View Article Online
Table 2 Influence of the concentration of quinuclidine (QN) on the
Table 3 Influence of the concentration of cinchonidine (CD) on the
enantioselective hydrogenation of ethyl pyruvate in the presence of the
enantioselective hydrogenation of ethyl pyruvate in the presence of the
cinchonidine–Pt/Al O
2 3
catalyst systema
a
cinchonidine–Pt/Al
O
2 3
catalyst system
/min2
1
k
/min21
eeb
Concentration
of [CD]/M
[QN]/M
k
1
2
k
1
/min2
1
k
2
/min21
eemaxb
0
1
6
1
6
1
.0
0.0254
0.0273
0.0601
0.0832
0.1267
0.1219
0.0065
0.0156
0.0932
0.1346
0.0371
n.m.c
0.775
0.782
0.910
0.926
0.936
0.946
2
6
6
5
5
4
.2 3 102
0.0
0.0050
0.0147
0.0273
0.0371
0.0823
0.1123
—
—
26
.0 3 10
1.4 3 10
0.0109
0.0271
0.0413
0.1270
0.216 (0.054)
0.560 (0.334)
0.646 (0.621)
0.868
2
26
.2 3 10
6.8 3 10
2
25
.0 3 10
1.2 3 10
.2 3 102
3.4 3 10
25
2
4
c
a
1.2 3 10
n.m.
0.870
Solvent: toluene; T = 10 °C; hydrogen pressure = 50 bar; amount of
catalyst = 0.125 g; [Etpy]
Measured at the end of reaction. c n.m. = not measurable.
2
5
a
0
= 1.0 M (batch No. 1); [CD]
0
= 1.2 3 10 M.
Solvent: toluene; T = 20 °C; hydrogen pressure = 50 bar; amount of
catalyst = 0.125 g; [Etpy]
of reaction. n.m. = not measurable.
b
= 1.0 M (batch No. 2). b Measured at the end
0
c
of enantioselectivity vs. conversion dependency was ob-
tained3
,8,11
when [CD]
> 5 3 10
25
M. There was no
0
1 2
similar changes in the reaction kinetics: (i) an increase of k , k
measurable difference between quinuclidine or DABCO, how-
ever, the phenomena was well reproducible (see Table 1 and
Fig. 1). In conclusion, results given in Table 1 and Fig. 1
precisely demonstrate that in the presence of ACTAs the final
enantioselectivity (eeend) increases from 0.71–0.72 to 0.91. This
increase in enantioselectivity is considered to be a very
pronounced selectivity improvement. Note that in toluene the
and eemax values and (ii) alteration of the form of the
enantioselectivity–conversion dependencies (see Fig. 1 in this
paper and Fig. 2 in ref. 11).
The absence of any effect of ACTAs both at high concentra-
tions of cinchonidine and in EtOH strongly resembles the
solute–solute (alkaloid–alkaloid) interactions observed in the
case of different dihydroquinines ((+)-DHQN and
highest ee value was 0.87 which was measured at [CD]
0
= 6 3
12
(
2)-DHQN). The (+)-alkaloid–(2)-alkaloid interaction was
2
4
10
M. Similar ee values were reported in ref. 2. As emerges
12
greatly reduced when an alcohol was used as solvent. We
propose that the alkaloid–alkaloid (cinchonidine–cinchonidine)
interaction is not favourable for the given catalytic reaction as it
reduces the amount of ‘free alkaloid’ required for asymmetric
induction. It should be mentioned that in crystallographic form
cinchonidine is stabilized by two hydrogen bonds between the
from data given in Fig. 1 the ability of ACTAs to increase the
enantioselectivity increased in the following order TEA <
DABCO = QN, i.e. the increase in ee is of a similar order as the
rate acceleration effect. However, no measurable effect was
induced by achiral tertiary amines when the concentration of
2
4
CD increased to 10 M.
13
OH group and the quinuclidine nitrogen, consequently
Analogous results were obtained in a series of experiments
carried out at 10 °C. In these experiments quinuclidine was used
as the ACTA and its concentration was varied. Related kinetic
data and enantioselectivities are summarized in Table 2, which
shows that the influence of ACTAs is strongly concentration
dependent. These experiments indicate that the addition of
quinuclidine (QN) in the given concentration range increases
cinchonidine exists in the form of a cyclic ‘dimer’. Based on the
above literature analogy we suggest that in the presence of
12
ACTAs a new type of solute–solute interaction (e.g., alkaloid–
ACTA interaction) appears provided the concentration of the
alkaloid is low and the solvent is not an alcohol. Due to the
above interaction the amount of ‘free alkaloid’ required for
asymmetric induction increases. Further studies are in progress
in our laboratory to elucidate the character of interactions
involved in the phenomena observed.
1 2
both the rate of the hydrogenation (rate constants k and k ) and
the enantioselectivity. In these experiments, due to the decrease
in the temperature, very high enantioselectivities were obtained.
Table 2 shows the influence of ACTAs is already very
pronounced at ACTA:CD = 0.5. The increase in the QN
The partial financial support of OTKA (grants T023317,
T025732) is greatly acknowledged.
concentration resulted in a further increase in the k
eemax values. The increase in the rate constant k and eemax is
gradual and levels off at ACTA:CD = 5–10, while the rate
constant k passes through a maximum. The enantioselectivities
obtained in this series of experiments (eemax = 0.93–0.94) are
the highest values that have ever been obtained in this reaction
in the absence of AcOH.
1 2
, k and
1
Notes and references
2
1
H. U. Blaser, H. P. Jalett, M. M u¨ ller and M. Studer, Catal. Today, 1997,
7, 441 and refs. cited therein.
3
2
3
4
H. U. Blaser, M. Garland and H. P. Jallett, J. Catal., 1993, 144, 569.
J. L. Margitfalvi and M. Heged uˆ s, J. Mol. Catal. A, 1996, 107, 281.
J. L. Margitfalvi and M. Heged uˆ s, J. Catal., 1995, 156, 175.
When EtOH was used as solvent no increase in ee was
2
5
24
observed in the 10 –10 M concentration range of CD and at
ACTA:CD = 1–5. No effect was observed in other alcohols,
such as methanol or propanol. All of these results strongly
indicate that the recognized effect induced by ACTAs depends
on (i) the type of solvent used, (ii) the concentration of achiral
tertiary amines, and (iii) the concentration of cinchonidine. Note
that the observed effect appears at a very low concentration of
5 H. U. Blaser, H. P. Jalett, D. M. Monti, J. F. Reber and J. T. Wehrli, Stud.
Surf. Sci Catal., 1988, 41, 153.
6 G. Bond, P. A. Meheux, A. Ibbotson and P. B. Wells, Catal. Today,
1
991, 10, 371.
7
J. L. Margitfalvi, B. Minder, E. T a´ las, L. Botz and A. Baiker, in New
Frontiers in Catalysis, ed. L. Guczi, F. Solymosi and P. T e´ t e´ nyi, Proc.
1
0th Int. Cong. Catal., Budapest, July 1992, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1993,
p. 2471.
2
5
cinchonidine (1.2 3 10 M), i.e. in the concentration range
8
J. L. Margitfalvi, M. Heged uˆ s and E. Tfirst, Stud. Surf. Sci. Catal. (11th
International Congress on Catalysis), 1996, 101, 241.
characteristic of enzyme catalytic reactions.
The observed increase of both the rate of hydrogenation and
the enantioselectivity upon addition of ACTAs strongly re-
9 R. A. Augustine and S. K. Tanielyan, J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem., 1996,
112, 93.
10 J. Wang, Y. Sun, C. LeBlond, R. N. Landau and D. G. Blackmond,
J. Catal., 1996, 161, 752.
sembles the influence of the initial concentration of cinchoni-
dine on the kinetics and enantioselectivity.2
,3,8,11
Results
1
1 J. L. Margitfalvi, E. Tfirst, M. Heged uˆ s and E. T a´ las, Catalysis of
Organic Reactions, ed. Frank E. Herkes, Marcel Dekker, New York,
obtained in this study indicated that addition of ACTAs would
increase the amount of cinchonidine involved in the enantio-
selective hydrogenation. The above suggestion is strongly
supported by results attained at difference concentrations of
CD, but in the absence of ACTA. These results are summarized
in Table 3. As emerges from the data in Tables 2 and 3, the
increase in the concentration of both CD and ACTA resulted in
1
998, vol. 75, p. 531.
1
2 T. Williams, R. G. Pitcher, P. Bommer, J. Gutzwiller and M. Uskovic,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1969, 91, 1870.
1
3 B. J. Oleksyn, Acta Crystallogr., Sect. B, 1982, 38, 1832.
Communication 9/00681H
646
Chem. Commun., 1999, 645–646