Evaluation of the antidepressant activity, hepatotoxicity and blood brain barrier permeability of methyl genipin

Article abstract of DOI:10.3390/molecules21070923

Geniposide (GE) is the main bioactive component of Gardeniae Fructus. The hepatotoxicity of geniposide limited clinical application. In order to get a new geniposide derivative that has less hepatotoxicity and still possesses the antidepressant activity, a new C-1 hydroxyl methylation derivative named methyl genipin (MG) was synthesized from geniposide. In the present study, we demonstrated that MG did not increase the liver index, alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspirate aminotransferase (AST). Histopathological examination suggested that no toxic damages were observed in rats treated orally with MG (0.72 mmol/kg). More importantly, a 7-day treatment with MG at 0.13, 0.26, and 0.52 mmol/kg/day could reduce the duration of immobility. It showed that the antidepressant-like effects of MG were similar to GE in the tail suspension test and the forced swim test. Furthermore, we found MG could be detected in the brain homogenate of mice treated orally with MG 0.52 mmol/kg/day for 1 day by HPLC. The area under the curve (AUC) of MG in the brain homogenate was enhanced to 21.7 times that of GE. The brain amount and distribution speed of MG were improved significantly after oral administration. This study demonstrated that MG possessed the antidepressant effects and could cross the blood-brain barrier, but had less hepatotoxicity.

Full text of DOI:10.3390/molecules21070923

molecules
Article
Evaluation of the Antidepressant Activity,
Hepatotoxicity and Blood Brain Barrier Permeability
of Methyl Genipin
Xin Che 1,2,3, Meiyu Wang 1,2,3, Tian Wang 1,2,3,*, Huaying Fan 1,2,3, Mingyan Yang 1,2,3
Wenyan Wang 1,2,3 and Hui Xu 1,2,3
,
1
School of Pharmacy, Yantai University, Yantai 264005, China; 13792527062@163.com (X.C.);
wangmei123yu@163.com (M.W.); katiefhydong@sina.com (H.F.); mingyan-123456@163.com (M.Y.);
wangwenyan@luye.cn (W.W.); xuhui33@sina.com (H.X.)
Key Laboratory of Molecular Pharmacology and Drug Evaluation (Yantai University), Yantai 264005, China
Ministry of Education, Collaborative Innovation Center of Advanced Drug Delivery System and Biotech
Drugs in Universities of Shandong, Yantai 264005, China
2
3
*
Correspondence: bluewangtian@hotmail.com; Tel./Fax: +86-535-670-6066
Academic Editor: Diego Muñoz-Torrero
Received: 24 May 2016; Accepted: 12 July 2016; Published: 16 July 2016
Abstract: Geniposide (GE) is the main bioactive component of Gardeniae Fructus. The hepatotoxicity
of geniposide limited clinical application. In order to get a new geniposide derivative that has
less hepatotoxicity and still possesses the antidepressant activity, a new C-1 hydroxyl methylation
derivative named methyl genipin (MG) was synthesized from geniposide. In the present study,
we demonstrated that MG did not increase the liver index, alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and
aspirate aminotransferase (AST). Histopathological examination suggested that no toxic damages
were observed in rats treated orally with MG (0.72 mmol/kg). More importantly, a 7-day treatment
with MG at 0.13, 0.26, and 0.52 mmol/kg/day could reduce the duration of immobility. It showed that
the antidepressant-like effects of MG were similar to GE in the tail suspension test and the forced swim
test. Furthermore, we found MG could be detected in the brain homogenate of mice treated orally
with MG 0.52 mmol/kg/day for 1 day by HPLC. The area under the curve (AUC) of MG in the brain
homogenate was enhanced to 21.7 times that of GE. The brain amount and distribution speed of MG
were improved significantly after oral administration. This study demonstrated that MG possessed
the antidepressant effects and could cross the blood–brain barrier, but had less hepatotoxicity.
Keywords: geniposide derivative; antidepressant effect; hepatotoxicity; blood–brain barrier
1. Introduction
Gardeniae Fructus (Zhi-zi in Chinese) is the dried ripe fruit of the Gardenia jasminoides
Ellis plant which belongs to the Rubiaceae family. It is considered to be an important traditional
Chinese medicine used for the treatment of deficient dysphoria, conjunctival congestion,
hemorrhage, pathopyretic ulcer, swelling, sprain, pain, and coronary artery disease [
Geniposide (GE) is the main bioactive component of Gardeniae Fructus, and possesses
diverse beneficial biological activities, including hepatoprotective activity [ ], neuroprotective
activity [ ], antidepressant [7–9], anti-inflammatory [10 12], antitumor [13], hypoglycemic [14],
anti-thrombosis [15], and anti-osteoporosis properties [16].
However, hepatotoxicity has also been demonstrated in rats following oral administration of
Zhi-zi, its extracts or geniposide [17 19]. Hepatotoxicity was manifested in phenomena such as an
1].
2,3
4
–
6
–
–
increase in liver enzymes, liver weight, focal necrosis, and evident inflammatory infiltration of liver
cells. The possible reason was considered that geniposide was hydrolyzed into genipin by intestinal
Molecules 2016, 21, 923; doi:10.3390/molecules21070923
www.mdpi.com/journal/molecules

Molecules 2016, 21, 923
2 of 11
bacteria, and then genipin reacted with amino acids in vivo to gardenia blue pigment, which maybe
the direct material basis for the toxicity.
To find a new geniposide derivative which can reduce the liver toxicity—and meanwhile keep
the antidepressant activity of geniposide—we considered the structure feature by synthesizing a
new C-1 hydroxyl methylation derivate from geniposide (Sichuan Taikang Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.,
Sichuan, China), named methyl genipin (MG, Figure 1). The preparation method and structure
identification of MG have been detailed in our previous study [20]. The key step was the acid hydrolysis
˝
and methylation reaction of GE at 65 C for 4 h in 1 mol/L sulfuric acid-anhydrous methanol solution.
The product was purified by silica gel column chromatography and semi-preparative HPLC. MG was
obtained with a purity over 98%. In the present study, the hepatotoxicity, antidepressant effects,
and blood–brain barrier permeability of methyl genipin were investigated for the first time.
Figure 1. The Structure of (a) Geniposide (GE); and (b) Methyl genipin (MG).
2. Results
2.1. Effects of GE or MG on Body Weight and Liver Index in Rats
After per oral administration for 3 days at the dose of 0.72 mmol/kg (173 mg/kg), the animals
in the MG group did not show significant differences in body weight and liver index compared with
that of the control group (Table 1). However, the mice in the GE group showed a decrease of body
weight (p < 0.05) and an increase of liver index (p < 0.01) at 0.72 mmol/kg (280 mg/kg). Furthermore,
there were blue spots observed on the tails of animals, and one animal in the GE group died on the
3th day. Liver blackening and large-area necrosis were obvious after autopsies of the animals of the
GE group.
Table 1. Effects of GE or MG on body weight and liver index after oral administration in rats.
Dosage
(mmol/kg)
Body Weight before
Administration/g
Body Weight after
Administration/g
Group
N
Liver Index
Control
Geniposide
Methyl genipin
—
0.72
0.72
10
10 (1)
10
265.1 ˘ 18.9
251.4 ˘ 9.7
259.4 ˘ 13.8
245.1 ˘ 16.3
226.3 ˘ 8.1 *
243.0 ˘ 11.8
3.1 ˘ 0.5
4.4 ˘ 0.5 **
2.7 ˘ 0.2
* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; () Number of deaths.
2.2. Effects of GE or MG on Biochemical Parameters in Blood of Rats
Compared with the control group, serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspirate
aminotransferase (AST) and total bilirubin (TBIL) activities were increased significantly after oral
administration of GE in rats at 0.72 mmol/kg (280 mg/kg). On the contrary, the levels of AST and
ALT treated with MG at 0.72 mmol/kg (173 mg/kg) not only did not increase, but also reduced.
Additionally, the change in TBIL levels was not obvious (Table 2).

Molecules 2016, 21, 923
3 of 11
Table 2. Effects of GE or MG on biochemical parameters in blood of rats. ALT: alanine aminotransferase;
AST: aspirate aminotransferase; TBIL: total bilirubin.
Group
Dosage (mmol/kg)
N
ALT/U¨ L´1
65.8 ˘ 10.8
1304.6 ˘ 14.7 **
50.0 ˘ 8.6 *
AST/U¨ L´1
179.4 ˘ 37.3
646.4 ˘ 15.4 **
118.3 ˘ 19.7 **
TBIL/µmol¨ L´1
6.7 ˘ 4.2
33.1 ˘ 9.8 **
10.2 ˘ 4.0
Control
Geniposide
Methyl genipin
—
0.72
0.72
10
10 (1)
10
* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01; () Number of deaths.
2.3. Histopathological Examination
Histopathological examination showed there was severe toxic damage occurring in the GE group,
and no injuries were observed in the MG group at the same dose of 0.72 mmol/kg. In the MG group,
the livers were soft, ruddy, and shiny, with normal shape and size. There was no swelling degeneration
of liver cells, or expansion of the central vein and bile duct hyperplasia in the MG group. In contrast,
cell swelling degeneration, expansion of the central vein, bile duct hyperplasia, and inflammatory
infiltrate were observed in the GE group. A widening of the intercellular space became wider and
focal cell necrosis were also observed to occur in the GE group (Figures 2–4).
Figure 2. Hematoxylin and eosin (HE)-stained histological sections of rat liver in the control group
(Magnification: ˆ400).
Figure 3. HE-stained histological sections of rat liver in the GE group (Magnification: ˆ400).

Molecules 2016, 21, 923
4 of 11
Figure 4. HE-stained histological sections of rat liver in the MG group (Magnification: ˆ400).
2.4. Effects of GE or MG on Immobility Time in the Tail Suspension Test
As shown in Figure 5, the mice were treated with fluoxetine (20 mg/kg, Changzhou Siyao
Pharmaceuticals Co. Ltd., Changzhou, China), MG (0.13, 0.26, 0.52 mmol/kg) or GE (0.13, 0.26,
0.52 mmol/kg) for 7 days. Compared with the control group, all the MG, GE, and fluoxetine groups
significantly decreased the immobility time (p < 0.01).
Figure 5. Effects of GE or MG on immobility time in the tail suspension test. The mice were treated
orally with MG and GE at 0.13, 0.26, or 0.52 mmol/kg/day, and fluoxetine (FLX) at 20 mg/kg/day
for 7 days. The bars indicate the mean
group (CTL).
˘
SD (n = 10). * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 compared with the control
2.5. Effects of GE or MG on Immobility Time in the Forced Swim Test
Compared with the control group, the immobility time of mice in the MG group and the fluoxetine
group decreased (p < 0.05). Treatment with GE at the doses of 0.13 mmol/kg or 0.52 mmol/kg also
reduced the immobility time (p < 0.05), Figure 6.
2.6. Blood–Brain Barrier Permeability
2.6.1. Method of Brain Samples Qualification
The HPLC method for the assay of GE and MG in the brain was specific and efficient. There was
no interference from endogenous components observed in the retention times of all the analyses in the
chromatograms (Figure 7).

Molecules 2016, 21, 923
5 of 11
Figure 6. Effects of GE or MG on the immobility time in the forced swim test. The mice were treated
orally with MG and GE at 0.13, 0.26, or 0.52 mmol/kg/day, and fluoxetine (FLX) at 20 mg/kg/day
for 7 days. The bars indicate the mean
group (CTL).
˘
SD (n = 10). * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 compared with the control
Figure 7. Cont.

Molecules 2016, 21, 923
6 of 11
Figure 7. (A) Typical HPLC chromatograms of blank brain homogenate of mice, (B) blank brain
homogenate of mice spiked with GE and MG; and brain homogenate sample of mice after oral
administration with (C) MG or (D) GE.
Brain standards covering the expected sample concentration range were prepared by spiking
various quantities of GE and MG into blank brain homogenate. These calibration standards were used
to validate the linearity, recovery, and precision of the analytical method. The limits of detection of
GE and MG were 43 ng/g and 32 ng/g in brain (S/N
GE and MG in the brain were linear all in the range of 50–1500 ng/g. There was a good linearity
between concentration and peak area (r > 0.999). The mean relative recoveries of GE and MG in the
brain at low, middle, and high concentrations were 95.2% 0.30%, 95.7% 0.63%, 99.0% 1.71%,
ě
3), respectively. The calibration curves of
,
˘
˘
˘
and 96.9% ˘ 0.17%, 96.4% ˘ 0.23%, and 97.7% ˘ 1.80%, respectively. The relative standard deviation
(RSD) of intra-day precision of GE and MG were 1.6% and 0.6%, respectively, while inter-day precision
were 2.4% and 4.0%. The brain sample assay method was qualified and fit for our purposes.
2.6.2. Brain Pharmacokinetics
To further evaluate the differences in the blood–brain barrier permeability, the brain distributions
of GE and MG after oral administration were detected at fixed time intervals. The concentrations of
GE and MG in the brain versus time curves are displayed in Figure 8. Non-compartmental analysis of

Molecules 2016, 21, 923
7 of 11
pharmacokinetic data was performed by Kinetica 4.4 software. The pharmacokinetic parameters are
shown in Table 3.
Figure 8. Mean brain drug concentration–time curve of mice after oral administration with GE or MG.
Table 3. Main brain pharmacokinetic parameters of GE and MG in mice after oral administration.
AUC0–90: Area under the curve; MRTlast: mean residence time.
Parameters
Group
Tmax (min)
Cmax (ng/mL)
AUC0–90 (ng/mL¨ min)
MRTlast (min)
MG
GE
5 **
20
27592.7 ˘ 2536.7 **
332031.6 ˘ 28741.2 **
15.3 ˘ 0.6 **
29.8 ˘ 2.6
735.2 ˘ 64.9
23636.7 ˘ 2248.8
Data are expressed as mean ˘ SD (n = 5). ** p < 0.01 vs. the GE group.
The curves showed that methyl genipin, as the structure modification product, exhibited much
higher distribution in the brain. The pharmacokinetic parameters indicated that Cmax of MG in the
brain after oral administration was significantly improved; the area under the curve (AUC0–90) and
the mean residence time (MRTlast) of MG were obviously higher than that of GE. The AUC0–90 for
MG was enhanced to 21.7 times that of GE, and the MRTlast was increased to 3.29 times that of GE.
The result confirmed that MG could be promptly and thoroughly transported into the brain by oral
administration. The brain amount and distribution speed of MG by oral administration was improved
significantly, while GE was poor and low.
3. Discussion
The present study aimed to explore whether the structural modification of hemiacetal hydroxyl
can decrease the toxicity of geniposide, while keeping the antidepressant activity.
It has been reported that geniposide is metabolized to genipin (aglycone) through hydrolysis by
β-glucosidase (intestinal bacteria), which is in turn cleaved to a dialdehyde derivative, which reacts
with polymers such as proteins, resulting in the induction of hepatotoxicty [21]. It is also known that
genipin can be transformed to blue pigments by reacting with amino acids [22]. Our results indicated
that there were blue spots observed on the tails, and one animal in the GE group died on that day.
After autopsy, it was obvious that the liver turned black, and the kidney, stomach, and serum were
blue in the animals of the GE group. However, this phenomenon was not observed in the MG group.

Molecules 2016, 21, 923
8 of 11
The reason may be that MG is more stable in vivo than GE, and did not easily react with amino acids
to form gardenia blue pigment.
The forced swim test (FST) and tail suspension test (TST) were well-established animal models of
depression widely used to screen new potential antidepressant drugs in rats and mice [23]. The forced
swimming and the tail suspension-induced state of immobility in the animals claimed to represent
a condition similar to human depression, and amenable to reversal by antidepressant drugs [24].
These animal models were based on the despair or helpless behavior to some inescapable and confined
space in animals, and are sensitive to various antidepressant drugs. These animal models play a role in
the evaluation of antidepressant drugs. The effects of MG on the duration of immobility in the mouse
FST and TST have showed that treating animals with MG orally for 7 days reduced the duration of
immobility both in FST and TST significantly at the doses of 0.13, 0.26, and 0.52 mmol/kg (p < 0.05).
However, the decrease was not dose-dependent, both in FST and TST. As a result, MG produced an
antidepressant-like effect similar to the fluoxetine and GE.
MG can reduce the toxicity and play the same antidepressant activity as GE, which may provide
valuable information for the application of MG in the potential treatment of depression. However,
their action mode and associated mechanism(s) with anti-depression are still unclear and need to be
further investigated.
Increasing the concentration of drugs in the brain is an important problem in the treatment of
nervous system diseases. We hope to promote the drug crossing the blood–brain barrier by structural
modification. The data in our present study demonstrated that MG from the mouse orally treated
with MG can be detected by HPLC, indicating that MG can cross the blood–brain barrier of the rats.
The brain amount and distribution speed of MG were improved significantly after oral administration,
which may be more beneficial to the treatment of nervous system diseases.
4. Experimental Section
4.1. Animals
Male and female SD rats (200–250 g) were used in the hepatotoxicity evaluation, and male
Swiss mice (18–22 g) in the antidepressant evaluation, respectively, purchased from Luye Pharma
Group Co., Ltd. (Yantai, China). Mice and rats were habituated to animal facilities for 1 week before
behavioral testing, and kept on a 12 h dark–light cycle, with free access to water and food. For all
behavioral testing, the mice and rats were weight matched. Animal treatment and maintenance were
carried out in accordance with Principles of Laboratory Animal Care (NIH Publication No. 86-23,
revised in 1986) and according to the rules and ethics set forth by the Ethical Committee of Yantai
University. Approval for this study was granted with the registration number: 16/ECYU-13
(dated: 16 March 2013).
4.2. Hepatotoxicity Evaluation of Methyl Genipin
Thirty rats were randomly divided into three groups, intragastrically administered with vehicle
solution (12% alcohol solution), GE at 0.72 mmol/kg (280 mg/kg), and MG at 0.72 mmol/kg
(161 mg/kg) once a day for 3 days. Drugs were dissolved in 12% alcohol solution. Blood was collected
by abdominal aorta at 24 h after the last dose administration. For assessment of the hepatic damage and
function analysis, serum ALT, AST, and TBIL levels were determined. The assays were performed in
an AMS-18 automatic analyzer (Beijing Option Science & Technology Development Co., Ltd., Beijing,
China). The livers were removed, weighed, and fixed immediately in 10% formalin, and embedded
in paraffin. Tissue sections of 5 mm were made from representative regions of the organs by
the conventional tissue preparation methods, and viewed under a light microscope (Olympus,
Tokyo, Japan) after hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining. The liver sample was collected for
histopathological analysis.

Molecules 2016, 21, 923
9 of 11
4.3. Tail Suspension Test (TST)
The procedure for TST was reported as previously described [25]. Mice were assessed in the TST,
which was performed with a computerized device, allowing four animals to be tested at one time. In a
chamber that was both acoustically and visually isolated, an individual mouse was suspended 50 cm
above the floor by adhesive tape placed approximately 1 cm from the tip of the tail. The sessions of the
animals were videotaped. Data was calculated for the total duration of immobility in the final 4 min of
the 6 min test. Immobility was scored as a failure to make any struggling movements, and attempts to
catch the adhesive tape or body torsions or jerks.
4.4. Forced Swim Test (FST)
The FST was carried out in mice, individually forced to swim in an open cylindrical container
(diameter 10 cm, height 25 cm), containing 15 cm of water at 25
˘
1 ˝C. The sessions of the animals
were videotaped. Data was calculated for the total duration of immobility in the final 4 min of the
6 min test. Each mouse was considered to be immobile when it failed to struggle and remained
floating motionless in the water, making only those movements necessary to keep the nose above water.
A decrease in the duration of immobility during the FST was taken as a measure of antidepressant
activity [26].
4.5. Brain Pharmacokinetics
4.5.1. Instrumentation
Instruments used in this study were a centrifuge (Anke TGL-16G, Anting Scientific Instrument
Company, Shanghai, China); a vortex mixer (VDRTEX-5, Shanghai Medical University Instrument
Company, Shanghai, China); and an analytical balance (METTLER-AE240). A LC-2 T HPLC system
with UV detector (Shimadzu Company, Kyoto, Japan) was also used in the study.
4.5.2. Chromatographic Conditions
The separation was carried out using a Diamonsil C18 column (250
ˆ
4.6 mm, i.d., 5.0 µm)
maintained at 30 ˝C. The mobile phase consisted of water (A) and acetonitrile (B) with a flow rate
of 1.0 mL/min. GE and MG were detected at 238 nm and eluted according to the step gradient by
changing the percentage of solvent B at different times, T (min)/solvent B (%) = 0/15, 5/15, 10/25,
25/25, 28/15, 35/15. Sample injection volume was 20 µL.
4.5.3. In Vivo Experiments
Twenty mice were randomly divided into two groups, orally administered with GE 0.52 mmol/kg
(200 mg/kg), and MG 0.52 mmol/kg (124 mg/kg) for one time. At appropriate time intervals (2, 5, 10,
20, 30, 45, 60, and 90 min), the animals were sacrificed and the brain was removed, washed by normal
saline to remove excess surface blood, and were dried by filter paper. The bloodless brains were
homogenized after mixing with normal saline solution two times to the weight. After centrifugation
at 12,000 rpm for 10 min, 800 µL acetonitrile (the brain homogenate was 200 µL) was added in
the supernatant to precipitate proteins in the sample. After vortexing for 3 min, the solution was
centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 5 min. Then, the supernatant was removed and evaporated under air
stream in a water bath at 50 ˝C. The residue was dissolved in 100
µL of methanol, vortexed for 30 s,
and centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 5 min. A 20
system for analysis.
µL aliquot of supernatant was injected into the HPLC

Molecules 2016, 21, 923
10 of 11
4.6. Statistical Analysis
Data analyses were performed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by Tukey’s
post-hoc test, using Prism 5 (GraphPad Software, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) for multigroup comparisons.
All data are presented as the mean ˘ standard error (SEM). Significance was set at p < 0.05.
5. Conclusions
In the present study, we demonstrated that even if MG was orally administered at large dose,
there was no hepatotoxicity observed. Meanwhile, the antidepressant-like effects of MG was similar to
GE in the tail suspension test and the forced swim test of mice at 0.13, 0.26, and 0.52 mmol/kg/day
orally administered for seven days. Furthermore, the AUC of MG in the brain homogenate
was enhanced to 21.7 times that of GE, detected in the brain homogenate by HPLC of mice at
0.52 mmol/kg/day orally administered for 1 day. The brain amount and distribution speed of
MG by oral administration were improved, while GE was poor and low. For the first time, this paper
evaluated the hepatotoxcity, antidepressant effects, and blood–brain barrier permeability of MG.
However, more studies are needed to further investigate the pharmacological activity and associated
mechanism of MG as a novel antidepressant.
Acknowledgments: This work was supported by Research Awards Fund for Excellent Young Scientists of
Shandong Province No. BS2013YY004.
Author Contributions: Xin Che and Huaying Fan conceived and designed the experiments; Meiyu Wang and
Mingyan Yang performed the experiments; Wenyan Wang and Hui Xu analyzed the data; Xin Che and Tian Wang
wrote the paper.
Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
1.
Gao, L.; Zhu, B.Y. The Accumulation of Crocin and Geniposide and transcripts of Phytoene Synthase during
maturation of Gardenia jasminoides Fruit. Evid. Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2013, 3, e686351. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
2.
Chen, P.; Chen, Y.; Wang, Y.; Cai, S.; Deng, L.; Liu, J.; Zhang, H. Comparative evaluation of hepatoprotective
activities of Geniposide, Crocins and Crocetin by CCl4-Induced liver Injury in mice. Biomol. Ther. 2016, 24,
156–162. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
3.
4.
Ma, T.; Huang, C.; Zong, G.; Zha, D.; Meng, X.; Li, J.; Tang, W. Hepatoprotective effects of geniposide in a rat
model of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 2011, 63, 587–593. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Liu, J.; Zheng, X.; Yin, F.; Hu, Y.; Guo, L.; Deng, X.; Chen, G.; Jiajia, J.; Zhang, H. Neurotrophic property of
geniposide for inducing the neuronal differentiation of PC12 cells. Int. J. Dev. Neurosci. 2006, 24, 419–424.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
5.
6.
Liu, J.; Yin, F.; Zheng, X.; Jing, J.; Hu, Y. Geniposide, a novel agonist for GLP-1 receptor, prevents PC12 cells
from oxidative damage via MAP kinase pathway. Neurochem. Int. 2007, 51, 361–369. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Liu, J.H.; Yin, F.; Guo, L.X.; Deng, X.H.; Hu, Y.H. Neuroprotection of geniposide against hydrogen peroxide
induced PC12 cells injury: Involvement of PI3 kinase signal pathway. Acta Pharmacol. Sin. 2009, 30, 159–165.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
7.
8.
Wang, J.; Duan, P.; Cui, Y.; Li, Q.; Shi, Y. Geniposide alleviates depression-like behavior via enhancing BDNF
expression in hippocampus of streptozotocin-evoked mice. Metab. Brain Dis. 2016, 16. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Cai, L.; Li, R.; Tang, W.J.; Meng, G.; Hu, X.Y.; Wu, T.N. Antidepressant-like effect of geniposide on chronic
unpredictable mild stress-induced depressive rats by regulating the hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis.
Eur. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2015, 25, 1332–1341. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
9.
Kim, J.H.; Kim, G.H.; Hwang, K.H. Monoamine oxidase and dopamine.β-hydroxylase inhibitors from the
fruits of Gardenia jasminoides. Biomol. Ther. 2012, 20, 214–219. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
10. Ma, T.T.; Li, X.F.; Li, W.X.; Yang, Y.; Huang, C.; Meng, X.M.; Zhang, L.; Li, J. Geniposide alleviates
inflammation by suppressing MeCP2 in mice with carbon tetrachloride-induced acute liver injury and
LPS-treated THP-1 cells. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2015, 29, 739–747. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Molecules 2016, 21, 923
11 of 11
11. Deng, Y.; Guan, M.; Xie, X.; Yang, X.; Xiang, H.; Li, H.; Zou, L.; Wei, J.; Wang, D.; Deng, X. Geniposide inhibits
airway inflammation and hyperresponsiveness in a mouse model of asthma. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2013, 17,
561–567. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
12. Koo, H.J.; Lim, K.H.; Jung, H.J.; Park, E.H. Anti-inflammatory evaluation of gardenia extract, geniposide
and genipin. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2006, 103, 496–500. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
13. Wang, S.W.; Lai, C.Y.; Wang, C.J. Inhibitory effect of geniposide on aflatoxin B1-induced DNA repair synthesis
in primary cultured rat hepatocytes. Cancer Lett. 1992, 65, 133–137. [CrossRef]
14. Wu, S.Y.; Wang, G.F.; Liu, Z.Q.; Rao, J.J.; Lü, L.; Xu, W.; Wu, S.G.; Zhang, J.J. Effect of geniposide,
a hypoglycemic glucoside, on hepatic regulating enzymes in diabetic mice induced by a high-fat diet
and streptozotocin. Acta Pharmacol. Sin. 2009, 30, 202–208. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
15. Suzuki, Y.; Kondo, K.; Ikeda, Y.; Umemura, K. Antithrombotic effect of geniposide and genipin in the mouse
thrombosis model. Planta Med. 2001, 67, 807–810. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
16. Ha, H.; Ho, J.; Shin, S.; Kim, H.; Koo, S.; Kim, I.H.; Kim, C. Effects of eucommiae cortex on osteoblast-like
cell proliferation and osleoclast inhibition. Arch. Pharm. Res. 2003, 26, 929–936. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
17. Yamano, T.; Tsujimoto, Y.; Noda, T.; Shimizu, M.; Ohmori, M.; Morita, S.; Yamada, A. Hepatotoxicity of
gardenia yellow color in rat. Toxicol. Lett. 1988, 44, 177–182. [PubMed]
18. Yang, H.J.; Fu, M.H.; Wu, Z.L.; Liang, R.X.; Huang, L.Q.; Fang, J.; Li, G.; Cao, Y. Experimental studies on
hepatotoxicity of rats induced by Fructus Gardeniae. China J. Chin. Mater. Med. 2006, 31, 1091–1093.
19. Akao, T.; Kobashi, K.; Aburada, M. Enzymic studies on the animal and intestinal bacteria metabolism of
geniposide. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 1994, 17, 1573–1576. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
20. Wang, M.Y.; Zou, Q.Q.; Liu, K.; Xu, H.; Fan, H.Y.; Che, X. Isolation and structural identification of epimers of
methyl genipin. Nat. Prod. Res. Dev. 2014, 26, 305–308.
21. Yamano, T.; Tsujimoto, Y.; Noda, T.; Shimizu, M.; Ohmori, M.; Morita, S.; Yamada, A. Hepatotoxicity of
geniposide in rats. Food Chem. Toxicol. 1990, 28, 515–519. [CrossRef]
22. Paik, Y.; Lee, C.; Cho, M.; Hahn, T. Physical stability of the blue pigments formed from geniposide of gardenia
fruits: Effects of pH, temperature, and light. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2001, 49, 430–432. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
23. Porsolt, R.D.; Bertin, A.; Jalfre, M. Behavioral despair in mice: A primary screening test for antidepressants.
Arch. Int. Pharmacodyn. Ther. 1997, 229, 326–327.
24. Renard, C.E.; Dailly, E.; David, D.J. Monoamine metabolism changes following the mouse forced swimming
test but not the tail suspension test. Fundam. Clin. Pharmacol. 2003, 17, 449–455. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
25. Willner, P. Validity, reliability and utility of the chronic mild stress model of depression: A 10-year review
and evaluation. Psychopharmacology 1997, 134, 319–329. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
26. Pechnick, R.N.; Chesnokova, V.M.; Kariagina, A.; Price, S.; Bresee, C.J.; Poland, R.E. Reduced immobility
in the forced swim test in mice with a targeted deletion of the leukemia inhibitoryfactor (lif) gene.
Neuropsychopharmacology 2004, 29, 770–776. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Sample Availability: Not available.
©
2016 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access
article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution
(CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).