Anal. Chem. 2006, 78, 901-904
High-Throughput Screening for the Asymmetric
Transformation Reaction of L-Histidine to
D-Histidine by Capillary Array Electrophoresis
Jun Wang, Kaiying Liu, Guangming Sun, Jiling Bai, and Li Wang*
State Key Laboratory of Molecular Reaction Dynamics, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences,
Dalian, 116023, P. R. China
Scheme 1
Asymmetric transformation reaction of L-histidine to D-
histidine was studied by homemade capillary array elec-
trophoresis for the first time. The enantiomeric excess
value of asymmetric histidine products can be directly
determined from the electrophoretogram of capillary array
electrophoresis. The experiment results showed that the
optimized asymmetric transformation reaction condition
was in the presence of salicylaldehyde as catalyst and
acetic acid as solvent.
mass spectrometric analysis,8 the use of capillary array electro-
phoresis (CAE)9 and HPLC/circular dichroism (CD) spectros-
copy.10
There are also some disadvantages for the application of HTS;
for example, the bottleneck in such an application was the data
analysis and processing.11 In the case of slow analytical methods
such as GC and HPLC, it became crucial to perform measure-
ments at the correct sampling time.12 The possible way to solve
such a problem would be the application of time-resolved HTS.12
To broaden this scope and avoid the problem of such incorrect
sampling time, we developed a multichannel CAE system, which
could serve as a real-time measurement, to optimize the reaction
conditions of crystallization-induced asymmetric transformations
Combinatorial asymmetric catalysis involves time-saving paral-
lel synthesis and the testing of large numbers of chiral catalysts.1
The challenges in this interesting new area of asymmetric catalysis
are twofold, which center around strategies for the modular
synthesis of chiral ligands and on developing high-throughput
assays for determining the enantiomeric excess (ee).2 Several
catalysts have already been identified by parallel synthesis and
high-throughput screening (HTS) techniques.3 However, the factor
limiting an efficient extension of this research to asymmetric
catalysis remains the lack of efficient methods for rapid screening
of the enantioselective reaction.4 To overcome this major obstacle,
the first approach consists of screening the catalyst library for
activity using an HTS procedure and then testing each lead for
enantioselectivity by conventional methods,5 but this is only
amenable if few catalysts from the broad library are active. The
first high-throughput ee assay was a rather crude UV/visible-based
screening system for the lipase-catalyzed kinetic resolution of
chiral p-nitrophenol esters.6 Nevertheless, it forms the basis of
other tests as well, for example, the recent development using
coupled enzymatic transformations.7 Several more general screen-
ing systems have been devised, such as methods based on the
of
L
-histidine to
D-histidine.
CAE, which was initially designed for DNA analysis and
sequencing, had been applied in screening of enantioselective
catalysts of chiral amines first by Reetz et al.9 Their initial elegant
investigation indicated that CAE could be used for high-
throughput determination of enantiomeric purity. Evidently, a
high-throughput technique allowing quantification of both activity
and enantioselectivity would accelerate the rate at which asym-
metric catalysts are discovered. Continued efforts in this fascinat-
ing area are necessary, since no single assay is universal.
D-Histidine (His) can be prepared from inexpensive L-His by
asymmetric transformation,13 described by Scheme 1. Despite
great advances in biocatalysis and asymmetric synthesis, the
resolution of racemates is an important approach in the industrial
synthesis of enantiomeric pure compounds. It is often the most
economical and convenient way to prepare enantiomeric pure
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Telephone: +0086-411-
(1) Burgess, K.; Lim, H. J.; Porte, A. M.; Sulikowski, G. A. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. Engl. 1996, 35, 220-222.
(8) Reetz, M. T.; Becker, M. H.; Klein, H. W.; Sto¨ckigt, D. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. Engl. 1999, 38, 1758-1761.
(2) Edkins, T. J.; Bobbitt, D. R. Anal. Chem., 2001, 73, 488A - 496A.
(3) Lavastre, O.; Morken, J. P. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1999, 38, 3163-
3165.
(4) Janes, L. E.; Lowendahl, A. C.; Kazlauskas, R. J. Chem. Eur. J. 1998, 4,
2324-2331.
(9) Reetz, M. T.; Kuhling, K. M.; Deege, A.; Hinrichs, H.; Belder, D. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 3891-3893.
(10) Ding, K.; Ishii, A.; Mikami, K. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1999, 38, 497-
501.
(11) Tibiletti, D.; de Graaf, E. A. B.; Teh, S. P.; Rothenberg, G.; Farrusseng, D.;
(5) Copeland, G. T.; Miller, S. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 4306-4307.
(6) Reetz, M. T.; Zonta, A.; Schimossek, K.; Liebeton, K.; Jaeger, K. E. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1997, 36, 2830-2832.
Mirodatos, C. J. Catal. 2004, 225, 489-497.
(12) Boelens, H. F. M.; Iron, D.; Westerhuis, J. A.; Rothenberg, G. Chem. Eur.
J. 2003, 9, 3876-3881.
(7) Baumann, M.; Sturmer, R.; Bornscheuer, U. T. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001,
40, 4201-4204.
(13) Shiraiwa, T.; Shinjo, K.; Masui, Y.; Ohta, A.; Natuyama, H.; Miyazaki, H.;
Kurokawa, H. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1991, 64, 3741-3742.
10.1021/ac051377w CCC: $33.50 © 2006 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 12/15/2005
Analytical Chemistry, Vol. 78, No. 3, February 1, 2006 901