Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
ARTICLE
agar was added per liter. Medium was sterilized at 121 °C for 30 min.
The stock solutions of the above herbicides or insecticides (1%, w/v)
were prepared in methanol and sterilized by membrane filtration (pore
size = 0.22 μm).
were used for the nucleotide sequence and deduced amino acid identity
Gene Expression and Purification of the Recombinant
ChbH. The open reading frame (ORF) of chbH without its translation
Isolation and Identification of CyB-Degrading Bacteria. The
soil sample used as initial inoculants was collected from the surface layer
(0ꢀ10 cm) of a rice field, which had been exposed to CyB for many years,
in Jiangsu province, China. About 1.0 g of the soil sample was added to a
150 mL Erlenmeyer flask containing 50 mL of MSM supplemented with
100 mg Lꢀ1 CyB as carbon sources; CyB was first dissolved in methanol
and then transferred into the medium. The culture was incubated at 30 °C
on a rotary shaker at 150 rpm for about 5 days. Five milliliters of the
enrichment culture was transferred into another 50 mL of fresh enrich-
ment medium for another 5 days. Then the enrichment culture was spread
on MSM agar plates supplemented with 100 mg Lꢀ1 CyB. Bacterial
colonies producing a visible transparent halo duetoCyB degradationwere
picked out, purified by repeated streaking, and tested for their degrading
capabilities.
The isolates were characterized and identified by morphological,
physiological, and biochemical characteristics and 16S rRNA gene
analysis. The morphological and physiological and biochemical charac-
terizations were carried out according to the diagnostic tables of bacteria
proposed by Cowan and Steel.4 Genomic DNA was extracted by a high-
salt precipitation method.14 The 16S rRNA gene sequence was amplified
by PCR as described by Wang et al.19 using a set of universal primers, 50-
AGAGTTTGATCCTGGCTCAG-30 (Escherichia coli bases 8ꢀ27) and
50-TACCTTGTTACGACTT-30 (E. coli bases 1507ꢀ1492), originally
presented by Lane.6 The PCR product was purified by PCR purification
kit (Axygen) and ligated into the vector pMD18-T (TaKaRa Biotechnol-
ogy, Dalian, China) and then transformed into E. coli DH5R. An
automatic sequencer (Applied Biosystem, model 3730) was used to
determine the16SrRNA gene sequence. Pairwise sequence similarity was
calculated by using a global alignment algorithm, implemented at the
EzTaxon server.3 Phylogenetic analysis was performed by using the
software package MEGA version 4.116 after multiple alignment of the
sequence data with CLUSTAL_X.17 The GþC content of the genomic
DNA was determined by thermal denaturation11 using E. coli K-12 DNA
as reference. DNAꢀDNA hybridizations were performed according to
the method of Ezaki et al.5
stop codon was amplified by PCR with one primer pair [chbF1,
ATGCGGTACCATGGCTGTCGAATGGGTTGTCG (KpnI, corre-
sponding to sites 1ꢀ22 of the chbH gene), and chbR1, ATGCCTC-
GAGCTGGCTCGCCAGGGCGACAGG (XhoI, corresponding to
sites 976ꢀ996 of the chbH gene)] and inserted into the KpnIꢀXhoI
site of pET29a(þ) to generate the recombinant plasmid pet-chbH. The
recombinant plasmid pet-chbH then transformed into E. coli BL21-
(DE3). The induction and purification of the recombinant ChbH were
carried out according to the methods described by Wang et al.18 The
protein concentration was quantified by the Bradford method using
bovine serum albumin as the standard.1
Enzyme Assay. Enzymatic activities toward CyB and other AOPP
herbercides were performed in 50 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH
7.5) at 37 °C. One microliter of chemical solution was added to 3 mL of
the preincubated enzyme solution. The enzyme mixture was incubated
for 10 min. No more than 10% of the substrate was hydrolyzed during
the assay. The esterase activities against p-nitrophenyl acetate, perme-
thrin, bifenthrin, and malathion were performed as described by Liang
et al.8 One activity unit was defined as the amount of enzyme required to
catalyze the formation or hydrolysis of 1 μmol of product or substrate
per minute. For kinetic studies, a stock solution of substrate was
appropriately diluted in methanol into at least five different concentra-
tions around the Km values. Kinetic values were obtained from Line-
weaverꢀBurk plots against various substrate concentrations.
Construction of chbH-Disrupted Mutant. A 524 bp fragment
(corresponding to sites 198ꢀ721 of the chbH gene) used for the
homologous recombination directing sequence was amplified from the
genomic DNA of strain QDZ-1 with one primer pair [chbF2, AC-
CTGGATCCGGGCAGTAGTCGCAACCTGACCTATGC (BamHI,
corresponding to sites 198ꢀ224 of the chbH gene), and chbR2,
GCTTCTGCAGGGTCGTTGACCCGGTTGATCTCG (PstI, corre-
sponding to sites 699ꢀ721 of the chbH gene)] and inserted into the
BamHIꢀPstI site of the suicide plasmid pJQ200SK (Gm resistant,
Quandt and Hynes13) to yield pJQdchbH. Then plasmid pJQdchbH
was introduced into strain QDZ-1 (Ap resistant) by triparental con-
jugation using pRK2013 as the helper plasmid. A mutant with single
recombination events was selected on the basis of resistance to Ap and
Gm on LB plates. One of the selected mutant strains was designated
dchbH. The chbH gene of the mutant was divided into two separate parts
by the integrated plasmid pJQ200SK.13 The single recombination event
was checked by PCR using two primer pairs: chbF1 and chbR1; and
chbF1 and R3 (GCGAGTCAGTGAGCGAGGAA, corresponding to
sites 497ꢀ477 downstream of PstI in the plasmid pJQ200SK). Theore-
tically, when chbF1 and chbR1 were used as primers, a fragment of 1016
bp would be yielded for wild type and no fragment would be yielded for
mutant dchbH; when chbF1 and R3 were used as primers, a fragment of
1228 bp would be yielded for mutant dchbH, and no fragment would be
yielded for wild type.
Growth and Degradation Experiments. The isolate growing
in LB medium for about 12 h was harvested by centrifugation (5000 rpm,
10 min) and washed twice with fresh MSM. After the cell density had
been adjusted to about 1.0 ꢁ 108 cfu mLꢀ1, an aliquot (1%, v/v) was
inoculated into 20 mL of MSM supplemented with 100 mg Lꢀ1 CyB as
carbon source in a 50 mL Erlenmeyer flask. The cultures were incubated
at 30 °C and 150 rpm on a rotary shaker. At an interval of 24 h, three
culture flasks were removed from incubation. Bacterial growth was
monitored by measuring the colony forming units (CFU mLꢀ1), and
concentrations of CyB were determined by HPLC analysis as described
below. Each treatment was performed in three replicates, and the control
experiments without inoculation and without substrate were carried out
under the same conditions.
Degradation of other AOPP herbercides (diclofop-methyl, haloxy-
fop-P-methyl, quizalofop-P-ethyl, fenoxaprop-P-ethyl, and fluazifop-P-
butyl) by the strain was also studied at the same conditions.
Two methods were used to determine the CyB-degrading activities of
wild-type strain QDZ-1 and mutant dchbH. In method I, the wild-type
strain QDZ-1 and mutant dchbH were inoculated on MSM plate
supplemented with 200 mg Lꢀ1 CyB and incubated at 30 °C for 3 days
and then investigated as to whether the growth and transparent halo
occurred. In method II, the wild-type strain QDZ-1 and mutant dchbH
were cultivated in 20 mL of LB medium for about 12 h, harvested by
centrifugation, and inoculated into 20 mL of MSM supplemented with
100 mg Lꢀ1 CyB. After incubation at 30 °C on a rotary shaker for 2 days,
the CyB concentrations of the cultures were determined by HPLC
analysis as described below. The control experiments without inocula-
tion were carried out under the same conditions.
Cloning of the chbH Gene Encoding CyB-Hydrolyzing
Esterase. DNA manipulation was carried out as described by Sam-
brook et al.14 The genomic DNA library of strain QDZ-1 was con-
structed according to the method of Wang et al.18 with some
modification. The insertion fragments in the transforms were about
4ꢀ6 kb. Colonies that produced clear transparent halos on LB plates
supplemented with 100 mg Lꢀ1 CyB were screened and further tested
for degrading capabilities. Nucleotide and deduced amino acid sequence
analyses were performed using Omiga software 2.0. BlastN and BlastP
6041
dx.doi.org/10.1021/jf200397t |J. Agric. Food Chem. 2011, 59, 6040–6046