In summary, we have synthesised 2,2,5-trisubstituted tetra-
hydropyran 1 as a multifunctional chiral synthon based on facial
and group selective acetal cleavage reactions, in which highly
diastereoselective 1,3- and 1,6-asymmetric induction was
observed. The utility of this chiral synthon was demonstrated by
its application to the total synthesis of (2)-malyngolide.
This work was supported by a Grant-in-Aid (No. 08772018)
for Encouragement of Young Scientists from the Ministry of
Education, Science, Sports and Culture, Japan.
7
O
4
2
6 O
Tol
O
1
O
TiCl4
S
TiCl4
S
O
O
Tol
Nu
A
B
Nu
δ+
+
O
O
–
O
O
δ–
Footnotes and References
TiCl4
S
TiCl4
S
O
Tol
* E-mail: iwata@phs.osaka-u.ac.jp
O
Tol
† Relative and absolute configurations at the C2 and the C5 positions in the
chiral synthon 1 can be controlled by the sulfinyl chirality. Furthermore,
inversion of the stereochemistry at the C2 position in 1 (RA = allyl) is also
possible, since both allyl and sulfinyl groups can be converted into variety
of functional groups.
‡ The absolute configurations of 3b–d were determined as (2S,5R), (2R,5S),
and (2R,5R), respectively. Structural determination of these compounds will
be reported elsewhere.
§ The X-ray crystal structure of compound 3a confirms the relative
configuration at C2 and C5 although the quality of the data is not adequate
for publication. These assignments are supported by the conversion of 3a
into (2)-malyngolide.
¶ The absolute configuration of the sulfoxide moiety in 3a was based on the
optical rotation of the known methyl p-tolyl sulfoxide (ref. 12), from which
3a was derived (ref. 2). Since all synthetic intermediates after introduction
of the sulfinyl group (including 2 and 3a) possess positve optical rotations,
their absolute configurations on sulfur are assumed to be retained during the
transformations [by the empirical rule (ref. 13)].
D (SN1-type)
C (SN2-type)
Fig. 1
Me
O
MsO
O
i, ii
iii–vi
S
S
2
Tol
O
Tol
O
OMOM
MOM = CH2OMe
4
5
Scheme 2 Reagents and conditions: i, TiCl4, allyltrimethylsilane, CH2Cl2,
2100 °C; ii, MsCl, DMAP, CH2Cl2, 0 °C (73% in 2 steps); iii, LiBEt3H,
THF, room temp. (97%); iv, PdCl2(PhCN)2, benzene, 80 °C (60%, 90%
based on recovery of material); v, O3, MeOH, 278 °C then NaBH4, room
temp. (93%); vi, MOMCl, Pri2NEt, CH2Cl2, room temp. (77%)
ses of malyngolide have been reported,9 most of synthetic
routes lack stereocontrol at the C2 methyl group. A few methods
overcome this problem by constructing the two chiralities one
by one.9a,c,e,f After the nucleophilic acetal cleavage reaction of
2, the major diastereomeric isomer 3a, which possesses three
appropriately installed side-chains for the synthesis of (2)-ma-
lyngolide, was isolated as a mesylate 4 (73% yield from 2).
After reduction of the mesylate moiety with Super Hydride®, a
catalytic amount of PdCl2(PhCN)2 was used to isomerise the
allyl group to a prop-1-enyl group.10 Ozonisation was followed
by a reductive work-up, and protection as a methoxymethyl
(MOM) ether was undertaken to yield 5 (Scheme 2).
The p-tolylsulfinyl group was converted into the alcohol 6 via
Pummerer rearrangement followed by reduction with LiBH4.
After Dess–Martin oxidation,11 eight carbon elongation at the
hindered position was successfully accomplished with a Wittig
reagent followed by hydrogenation of the olefin to produce
compound 7 in good yield. Finally, the tetrahydropyran ring
was oxidised to the d-lactone with RuO4, and the MOM ether
was removed with Me3SiBr to give (2)-malyngolide without
epimerisation at the methyl group (Scheme 3). The spectro-
scopic data and specific rotation [[a]D 212.5 (CHCl3)] were
consistent with the reported data [[a]D 213.0 (CHCl3)].6
1 For selected recent references to 1, n-asymmetric induction (n > 4), see
N. Magnus and P. Magnus, Tetrahedron Lett., 1997, 38, 3491 and
references cited therein; H. Fujioka, H. Kitagawa, N. Matsunaga, Y.
Nagatomi and Y. Kita, Tetrahedron Lett., 1996, 37, 2245; T. Sato, M.
Kido and J. Otera, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1995, 34, 2254; K.
Mikami and A. Yoshida, Tetrahedron Lett., 1994, 35, 7793; H.-C.
Zhang, M. J. Costanzo and B. E. Maryanoff, Tetrahedron Lett., 1994,
35, 4891; W. R. Roush and C. K. Wada, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1994, 116,
2151; G. A. Molander and K. L. Bobbitt, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1993, 115,
7517; R. J. Mears and A. Whiting, Tetrahedron Lett., 1993, 34, 8155.
2 N. Maezaki, M. Murakami, M. Soejima, T. Tanaka, T. Imanishi and C.
Iwata, Chem. Pharm. Bull., 1996, 44, 1146; C. Iwata, N. Maezaki, M.
Murakami, M. Soejima, T. Tanaka and T. Imanishi, J. Chem. Soc.,
Chem. Commun., 1992, 516. Related work: N. Maezaki, A. Sakamoto,
M. Soejima, I. Sakamoto, Y. X. Li, T. Tanaka, H. Ohishi, K. Sakaguchi
and C. Iwata, Tetrahedron: Asymmetry, 1996, 7, 2787 and references
cited therein.
3 T. Harada and A. Oku, Synlett, 1994, 95; A. Alexakis and P. Mangeney,
Tetrahedron: Asymmetry, 1990, 1, 477.
4 F. J. Schmitz, F. J. McDonald and D. J. Vanderah, J. Org. Chem., 1978,
43, 4220.
5 D. R. Williams, J. L. Moore and M. Yamada, J. Org. Chem., 1986, 51,
3916; J. P. Clayton, P. J. O’Hanlon, N. H. Rogers and T. J. King,
J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1, 1982, 2827; J. P. Clayton, P. J. O’Hanlon
and N. H. Rogers, Tetrahedron Lett., 1980, 21, 881.
6 J. H. Cardllina II and R. E. Moore, J. Org. Chem., 1979, 44, 4039.
7 E. Juaristi, in Introduction to Stereochemistry and Conformational
Analysis, Wiley, New York, 1991, ch. 16, p. 271.
Me
i, ii
8 K. Ishihara, A. Mori and H. Yamamoto, Tetrahedron, 1990, 46, 4595.
9 (a) D. Enders and M. Knopp, Tetrahedron, 1996, 52, 5805 and
references cited therein; (b) H. P. Zeng, J. Y. Su and L. M. Zeng, Yaoxue
Xuebao, 1994, 29, 680; (c) M. Asaoka, S. Hayashibe, S. Sonoda and H.
Takei, Tetrahedron, 1991, 47, 6967; (d) K. Machiya, I. Ichimoto, K.
Tonari, M. Kirihara and H. Ueda, Agric. Biol. Chem., 1985, 49, 1767; (e)
H. Hagiwara and H. Uda, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1, 1985, 1157; (f)
T. Kogure and E. L. Eliel, J. Org. Chem., 1984, 49, 576.
5
OH
O
OMOM
6
iii–v
Me
vi, vii
(–)-malyngolide
10 J. K. Cha and R. J. Cooke, Tetrahedron Lett., 1987, 28, 5473; P. Golborn
and F. Scheinmann, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1, 1973, 2870.
11 R. E. Ireland and L. Liu, J. Org. Chem., 1993, 58, 2899; D. B. Dess and
J. C. Martin, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1991, 113, 7277.
12 U. de la Camp and H. Hope, Acta Crystallogr., Sect. B, 1970, 26,
846.
C9H19
OMOM
O
7
Scheme 3 Reagents and conditions: i, Ac2O, AcONa, 130 °C (90%; 2:1
diastereomeric ratio); ii, LiBH4, THF, room temp. (97%); iii, Dess–Martin
periodinate, CH2Cl2, 0 °C (88%); iv, Ph3P+ (C8H17)Br2, KHMDS, THF, 0
°C (94%); v, H2, 10% Pd–C, MeOH, room temp. (86%); vi, RuCl3·3H2O,
NaIO4, CCl4–MeCN–H2O (57%, 80% based on recovery of material); vii,
Me3SiBr, CH2Cl2, 230 °C (85%)
13 K. Mislow, M. M. Green, P. Laur, J. T. Melillo, T. Simmons and A. L.
Ternay, Jr., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1965, 87, 1958.
Received in Cambridge, UK, 12th May 1997; 7/03242K
1756
Chem. Commun., 1997