ESR spectrum in Fig. 2a allows us to determine the hyperfine
coupling constants (hfc) from the simulation spectrum as shown in
Fig. 2b. The computer simulation spectrum using these hfc values
5 K. Ishige, D. Schubert and Y. Sagara, Free Radical Biol. Med., 2001,
3
0, 433.
6
(a) D. A. Butterfield, Curr. Med. Chem., 2003, 10, 2651; (b) A. I. Bush,
Trends Neurosci., 2003, 26, 207.
(
Fig. 2b) agrees well with the observed ESR spectrum (Fig. 2a).
7 K. Murakami, K. Irie, H. Ohigashi, H. Hara, M. Nagao, T. Shimizu
The hfc assignment is also supported by the DFT calculation
using B3LYP/6-311+G(d,p) (see the calculated hfc values in
and T. Shirasawa, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2005, 127, 15168.
8
(a) P. Janicak, J. Davis, S. Preskorn and F. Ayd, Jr., Principles and
Practice of Psychopharmacotherapy, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins,
Maryland, USA, 2nd edn, 1997; (b) B. J. Sadock and V. A. Sadock,
Kaplan & Sacick’s Synopsis of Psychiatry, Lippincott Williams &
Wilkins, Maryland, USA, 9th edn, 2003.
14,17
parentheses in Fig. 2c).
The ESR spectrum of the hydrogen
bonded radical in Fig. 2a is quite different from that reported for
18
the free epinephrine semiquinone radical anion. The existence of
strong intramolecular hydrogen bonding in the phenoxyl radical is
clearly indicated by the a(H) value (0.220 mT) at the phenol proton
9
J. K. Kochi, P. J. Krusic and D. R. Eaton, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1969, 91,
1
877.
1
0 S. Fukuzumi and Y. Ono, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2, 1977, 622.
19
(
Fig. 2c). This is supported by the DFT calculation (Fig. 2d).
11 S. Fukuzumi, K. Shimoosako, T. Suenobu and Y. Watanabe, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 2003, 125, 9074.
The high hydrogen abstraction reactivity of epinephrine may be
ascribed to the strong intramolecular hydrogen bonding, which
1
2 I. Nakanishi, K. Miyazaki, T. Shimada, K. Ohkubo, S. Urano, N. Ikota,
T. Ozawa, S. Fukuzumi and K. Fukuhara, J. Phys. Chem. A, 2002, 106,
11123.
20
stabilizes the hydrogen abstracted radical.
In conclusion, neurotransmitters are susceptible to hydrogen
abstraction by an active oxygen species (the cumylperoxyl radical).
In particular, the hydrogen abstraction reactivity of catechol
amines is found to be comparable to that of a strong antioxidant
such as catechin due to the strong intramolecular hydrogen
bonding in the phenoxyl radical, which has been successfully
detected by ESR.
13 Protective effects of antioxidants against oxidative stress-induced
neurodegeneration have been reported, see: H. J. Heo and C. Y. Lee,
J. Agric. Food Chem., 2004, 52, 7514.
4 Density functional theory (DFT) calculations were performed on a
COMPAQ DS20E computer. Geometry optimizations were carried out
using the Becke3LYP and 6-31G* basis set for the phenoxyl radical with
the unrestricted Hartree–Fock (UHF) formalism as implemented in the
Gaussian 03 program. The DHT values were determined by the restricted
open shell Hartree–Fock (ROHF) formalism with the B3LYP/6-31G*
basis set.
1
1
1
1
5 The kobs value of tyrosine could not be determined accurately in the
present experimental conditions because of the low solubility in MeCN
at low temperature.
6 The kobs values of phenol derivatives have been reported, see: T. Osako,
K. Ohkubo, M. Taki, Y. Tachi, S. Fukuzumi and S. Itoh, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 2003, 125, 11027.
7 The geometry optimization of other isomers of hydrogen abstracted
radicals of epinephrine has also been carried out to compare the
energies of the isomers using DFT calculations. The structure drawn in
Fig. 2c is the most stable one among all the isomers.
Acknowledgements
This work was partially supported by a Grant-in-Aid (nos.
1
6205020 and 17750039) from the Ministry of Education, Culture,
Sports, Science and Technology, Japan.
References
1
8 Y. Shinagawa and Y. Shinagawa, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1978, 100, 67.
1
Foye’s Principles of Medicinal Chemistry, ed. D. A. Williams and
T. L. Lemke, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, MD, 5th edn,
19 For formation of intramolecular hydrogen bonding in catechol esti-
mated by DFT calculations, see: (a) A. T. Lithoxoidou and E. G.
Bakalbassis, J. Phys. Chem. A, 2005, 109, 366; (b) E. G. Bakalbassis,
A. T. Lithoxoidou and A. P. Vafiadis, J. Phys. Chem. A, 2003, 107, 8594;
(c) S. G. Est a´ cio, P. C. do Couto, B. J. C. Cabral, M. E. M. da Piedade
and J. A. M. Simk o˜ es, J. Phys. Chem. A, 2004, 108, 10834.
20 For the hydrogen bonding stabilization of the phenoxyl radical as
compared with the parent phenol compounds, see: (a) P. Pedrielli, G. F.
Pedulli and L. H. Skibsted, J. Agric. Food Chem., 2001, 49, 3034; (b) R.
Amorati, M. Lucarini, V. Mugnaini and G. F. Pedulli, J. Org. Chem.,
2003, 68, 5198; (c) M. Lucarini, V. Mugnaini and G. F. Pedulli, J. Org.
Chem., 2002, 67, 928.
2
002.
2
3
4
Neurotransmitters, Drugs, and Brain Function, ed. R. A. Webster, John-
Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Chichester, U.K., 2001.
G. Cohen, in Oxidative Stress, ed. H. Sies, Academic Press, London,
1
985, ch. 16.
(a) R. A. Floyd, Exp. Biol. Med., 1999, 222, 236; (b) G. Multhaup, T.
Ruppert, A. Schlicksupp, L. Hesse, D. Beher, C. L. Masters and K.
Beyreuther, Biochem. Pharmacol., 1997, 54, 533; (c) M. A. Pappolla,
Y. J. Chyan, R. A. Omar, K. Hsiao, G. Perry, M. A. Smith and P. Bozner,
Am. J. Pathol., 1998, 152, 871.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2006
Org. Biomol. Chem., 2006, 4, 999–1001 | 1001