C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
Supporting Information Available: Synthetic details, descriptions
of reactions, and product analyses. This material is available free of
References
(1) Itoh, S. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2006, 10, 115.
(2) Gherman, B.; Heppner, D.; Tolman, W.; Cramer, C. J Biol. Inorg. Chem.
2006, 11, 197.
position of 1 occurs over ∼30 min, as observed by UV-vis
spectroscopy. A sharp strong peak is observed at ∼405 nm in the
absorption spectrum along with g ∼ 2 signal in EPR spectroscopy,
indicating the formation of the stabilized phenoxyl radical (B, 40%
yield, diagram).18 Other products identified in this 1/p-MeO-2,6-
DTBP reaction are the 1,4-benzoquinone A (∼24% yield) and the
arylhydroperoxide C, as identified by GC and GC-MS.38 With an
18O2 source, GC-MS reveals 18O-incorporation (∼80% insertion
into A and ∼90% into C).18
(3) Chen, P.; Solomon, E. I. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2004, 101, 13105-
13110.
(4) Klinman, J. P. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281, 3013-3016.
(5) Chen, P.; Solomon, E. I. J. Am Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 4991-5000.
(6) Kodera, M.; Kita, T.; Miura, I.; Nakayama, N.; Kawata, T.; Kano, K.;
Hirota, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 7715-7716.
(7) Crespo, A.; Marti, M. A.; Roitberg, A. E.; Amzel, L. M.; Estrin, D. A. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 12817-12828.
(8) Yoshizawa, K.; Kihara, N.; Kamachi, T.; Shiota, Y. Inorg. Chem. 2006,
45, 3034-3041.
(9) Decker, A.; Solomon, E. I. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2005, 9, 152-163.
(10) Prigge, S. T.; Eipper, B.; Mains, R.; Amzel, L. M. Science 2004, 304,
864-867.
(11) Karlin, K. D.; Wei, N.; Jung, B.; Kaderli, S.; Niklaus, P.; Zuberbu¨hler,
A. D. J. Am Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 9506-9514.
(12) Lee, D.-H.; Wei, N.; Murthy, N. N.; Tyekla´r, Z.; Karlin, K. D.; Kaderli,
S.; Jung, B.; Zuberbu¨hler, A. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 12498-
12513.
Unlike p-MeO-2,6-DTBP, the reaction of [CuII(NMe2-TMPA)-
(O2-)]+ (1) with 2,6-DTBP and 2,4,6-TTBP37 produces only 2,6-
di-tert-butyl-1,4-benzoquinonone (diagram), confirmed by GC and
GC-MS after low-temperature reaction,38 warming, and workup.
With 18O2 labeled 1, ∼70% 18O-atom incorporation occurs.18
(13) Chaudhuri, P.; Hess, H.; Weyhermu¨ller, T.; Wieghardt, K. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 1999, 38, 1095-1098.
(14) Komiyama, K.; Furutachi, H.; Nagatomo, S.; Hashimoto, A.; Hayashi,
H.; Fujinami, S.; Suzuki, M.; Kitagawa, T. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 2004,
77, 59-72.
(15) Schatz, M.; Raab, V.; Foxon, S. P.; Brehm, G.; Schneider, S.; Reiher,
M.; Holthausen, M. C.; Sundermeyer, J.; Schindler, S. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 4360-4363.
(16) Wu¨rtele, C.; Gaoutchenova, E.; Harms, K.; Holthausen, M. C.; Sunder-
meyer, J.; Schindler, S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 3867-3869.
(17) Zhang, C. X.; Kaderli, S.; Costas, M.; Kim, E.-i.; Neuhold, Y.-M.; Karlin,
K. D.; Zuberbu¨hler, A. D. Inorg. Chem. 2003, 42, 1807-1824.
(18) See Supporting Information.
Thus, the reactivity of [CuII(NMe2-TMPA)(O2-)]+ (1) appears
to parallel that known for other M-superoxo species.28-33,36 The
superoxo complex 1 is able to effect hydroxylation and hydroper-
oxylation of phenols, with incorporated oxygen atoms derived from
(19) Tyekla´r, Z.; Jacobson, R. R.; Wei, N.; Murthy, N. N.; Zubieta, J.; Karlin,
K. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 2677-2689.
-
(20) Baldwin, M. J.; Ross, P. K.; Pate, J. E.; Tyekla´r, Z.; Karlin, K. D.;
Solomon, E. I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 8671-8679.
(21) Mirica, L. M.; Ottenwaelder, X.; Stack, T. D. P. Chem. ReV. 2004, 104,
1013-1045.
the CuII-O2 moiety. In M ) CoIII, CrIII, and RhIII or other
M-superoxo complex mediated phenol reactions, initial H-atom
-
abstraction (i.e., M-O2 + ArOH f M-OOH + ArO•) is
(22) Quant Hatcher, L.; Karlin, K. D. J. Biol. Inorg. Chem. 2004, 9, 669-
implicated (however, it may not be rate-limiting28). The quinone
and hydroperoxide products observed can be explained from
reactions of initially formed ArO• and its further interactions with
683.
(23) Lewis, E. A.; Tolman, W. B. Chem. ReV. 2004, 104, 1047-1076.
(24) The noise in the 1058 cm-1 peak is higher due to overlap and subsequent
subtraction with a large solvent peak.
a M-O2- complex. However, a number of mechanisms have been
(25) Cramer, C. J.; Tolman, W. B.; Theopold, K. H.; Rheingold, A. L. Proc.
-
Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2003, 100, 3635-3640.
suggested, including those that do not derive from initial M-O2
/
(26) Pate, J. E.; Cruse, R. W.; Karlin, K. D.; Solomon, E. I. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1987, 109, 2624-2630.
ArOH H-atom abstraction chemistry.31,33,39-41 Thus, detailed mecha-
nistic work on the chemistry described here is needed and planned.
In addition, we will survey the reactivity of [CuII(NMe2-TMPA)-
(O2-)]+ (1) with other kinds of C-H, O-H, and N-H containing
substrates.
(27) Guieu, S. J. A.; Lanfredi, A. M. M.; Massera, C.; Pachon, L. D.; Gamez,
P.; Reedijk, J. Catal. Today 2004, 96, 259-264.
(28) Zombeck, A.; Drago, R. S.; Corden, B. B.; Gaul, J. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1981, 103, 7580-7585.
(29) Nishinaga, A.; Shimizu, T.; Matsuura, T. Tetrahedron Lett. 1981, 22,
5293-5296.
In summary, the present work provides evidence for our early
supposition12 that a tripodal tetradentate TMPA-type ligand copper-
(I) complex O2 reaction may lead to a terminally bound end-on
superoxide-copper(II) species that was further hypothesized by
Suzuki for tripodal tetradentate ligands,14 demonstrated recently in
the coordination complex (with an X-ray structure) of Schindler
and Sundermeyer,16 and has been seen in an X-ray structure of
PHM.10 The further significant advance is the demonstration of
substrate oxidations starting from a superoxo-copper(II) complex;
the observed phenol oxygenation reactions likely involve initial
H-atom abstraction chemistry directly parallel to that known for
other metal-superoxides, especially cobalt. Further investigations
of the reactivity and complementary studies aiming toward O-O
cleavage reactions (leading to CuII-O•?) will provide a firmer basis
for understanding chemical and biological copper-promoted oxida-
tive processes with 1:1 CuI/O2-derived species.
(30) Nishinaga, A.; Tomita, H.; Nishizawa, K.; Matsuura, T.; Ooi, S.; Hirotsu,
K. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 1981, 1504-1514.
(31) Deng, Y. P.; Busch, D. H. Inorg. Chem. 1995, 34, 6380-6386.
(32) Musie, G. T.; Wei, M.; Subramaniam, B.; Busch, D. H. Inorg. Chem.
2001, 40, 3336-3341.
(33) Knaudt, J.; Forster, S.; Bartsch, U.; Rieker, A.; Jager, E. G. Z. Naturforsch.
B 2000, 55, 86-93.
(34) Simandi, T. M.; May, Z.; Szigyarto, I. C.; Simandi, L. I. Dalton Trans.
2005, 365-368.
(35) Shan, X. P.; Que, L. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2005, 102, 5340-
5345.
(36) Bakac, A. Coord. Chem. ReV. 2006, 250, 2046-2058.
(37) Abbreviations: 2,4,6-TTBP ) 2,4,6-tri-tert-butylphenol; 2,6-DTBP )
2,6-di-tert-butylphenol; p-MeO-2,6-DTBP ) 2,6-di-tert-butyl-4-methoxy-
phenol.
(38) For product A, we detected formaldehyde18 as a product derived from
the -OMe substituent, but we have not yet elucidated products derived
from the t-Bu substituent loss in formation of C or reaction of 2,4,6-
TTBP.
(39) Gupta, M.; Upadhyay, S. K.; Sridhar, M. A.; Mathur, P. Inorg. Chim.
Acta 2006, 359, 4360-4366.
(40) Fecenko, C. J.; Meyer, T. J.; Thorp, H. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128,
11020-11021.
Acknowledgment. This work was supported by grants from
the National Institutes of Health (K.D.K., GM28962; E.I.S,
DK31450).
(41) Sun, H. J.; Harms, K.; Sundermeyer, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126,
9550-9551.
JA067411L
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 129, NO. 2, 2007 265