RESEARCH
| REPORT
basis of our observation that increased light
intensities afford increased rates and higher
yields, we suspect that the decreased kcat is
due to the reaction being photon limited (fig.
S28). We observed a quantum yield of 7.8%.
We conducted a series of mechanistic experi-
ments to better understand the nuances of this
reaction, including the superior reactivity with
cyan light-emitting diodes (LEDs) [peak max-
imum (lmax) = 497 nm]. Reduction of GluER
to the FMNhq oxidation state with dithionite
revealed formation of the diagnostic FMNhq
signature with minimal absorption at 497 nm,
suggesting that direct excitation of the cofactor
is not responsible for the observed wavelength
preference (Fig. 3A, FMNhq). Addition of 100
equivalents of chloroamide 1 resulted in for-
Transient absorption spectroscopy with olefin
isomers of 29 provides additional support for
this mechanistic hypothesis. Initial excitation
at 370 nm followed by a broad-band probe pulse
reveals underlying dynamics of the flavin redox
states. We used a sequential kinetic scheme to
fit the data through global analysis. We found
three time constants that describe the tempo-
ral evolution of the various flavin species through
evolutionary associated difference spectra (EADS).
When (E)-29 is used as the substrate, a signal
corresponding to the charge transfer state de-
cays in 10 ps to the FMNsq. This time scale is
consistent with previously reported rates of de-
composition for the a-chloroacetophenone ketyl
radical anion (30). The neutral FMNsq decays on
the time scale of 250 ps to the flavin quinone
(FMNox) (figs. S42 and S43). This decay likely
corresponds to the rate of cyclization and termi-
nation of the radical through hydrogen atom
transfer from FMNsq. When the same experiment
is conducted on (Z)-29, the FMNsq lifetime in-
creases to 700 ps (figs. S39 and S40). These data
are consistent with post-cyclization rotation of
the exo-cyclic radical to a conformation in which
HAT from the FMNsq to the substrate-centered
radical is kinetically facile.
We anticipate that the light-promoted reac-
tivity demonstrated here will be replicable
widely in EREDs, KREDs, and other classes of
oxidoreductases known in biocatalysis for their
promiscuity and adaptability. These flavoen-
zymes may serve as stereoselective catalysts for
unexpected radical transformations beyond
those demonstrated here, depending on the
active site organization, provided starting mate-
rial, and properties of the excited state flavin.
By more widely investigating and exploiting
photoexcited states of cofactors, it should be
possible to photoinitiate radical-based reactions
within enzymes that are otherwise inaccessible
in the ground state.
16. E. Vitaku, D. T. Smith, J. T. Njardarson, J. Med. Chem. 57,
10257–10274 (2014).
17. S. P. France et al., ACS Catal. 6, 3753–3759 (2016).
18. D. P. Curran, J. Tamine, J. Org. Chem. 56, 2746–2750
(1991).
19. K. Hiroi, M. Ishii, Tetrahedron Lett. 41, 7071–7074 (2000).
20. N. G. Schmidt, E. Eger, W. Kroutil, ACS Catal. 6, 4286–4311
(2016).
21. N. J. Turner, E. O’Reilly, Nat. Chem. Biol. 9, 285–288
(2013).
22. H. S. Toogood, N. S. Scrutton, ACS Catal. 8, 3532–3549
(2018).
23. K. Heckenbichler et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 57, 7240–7244
(2018).
24. B. A. Sandoval, A. J. Meichan, T. K. Hyster, J. Am. Chem. Soc.
139, 11313–11316 (2017).
25. J. J. Warren, M. E. Ener, A. Vlček Jr., J. R. Winkler, H. B. Gray,
Coord. Chem. Rev. 256, 2478–2487 (2012).
26. S. Ghisla, V. Massey, J.-M. Lhoste, S. G. Mayhew, Biochemistry
13, 589–597 (1974).
mation of a broad absorption band at lmax
=
27. V. Massey, P. Hemmerich, W. R. Knappe, H. J. Duchstein,
H. Fenner, Biochemistry 17, 9–16 (1978).
28. Z. G. Brill, H. K. Grover, T. J. Maimone, Science 352,
1078–1082 (2016).
500 nm (Fig. 3A, FMNhq + 1). Because this
absorption feature is not lost upon addition of
sodium dithionite, we do not attribute it to
FMNsq. It is lost, however, upon addition of
150 equivalents of sodium benzoate (Fig. 3A,
FMNhq + 1 + NaOBz). These data are consist-
ent with the formation of an electron donor-
acceptor complex between the substrate and
FMNhq within the enzyme active site. We pro-
pose that excitation of this charge transfer band
promotes the initial electron transfer from
FMNhq to 1.
Next, we sought evidence for the existence
of radical intermediates by preparing a sub-
strate containing a cyclopropyl ring. GluER-T36A
produced only products of cyclopropane ring
opening, supporting the existence of a radical
intermediate (fig. S9). To determine the terminal
hydrogen atom source, we used labeled FMNDhq
generated in situ from D-glucose-1-d1 (Fig. 3A).
Deuterium was incorporated exclusively at the
benzylic carbon, with a high level of diaster-
eocontrol. These experiments support a reac-
tion mechanism in which substrate is initially
reduced by one electron after irradiation of
the electron donor-acceptor complex formed
between the substrate and FMNhq within the
enzyme active site. The a-acyl radical can react
with the pendent olefin to afford an exocyclic
radical that is terminated through hydrogen
atom transfer from neutral flavin semiquinone
(FMNsq) to afford the product and oxidized
flavin (fig. S47).
On the basis of this mechanistic hypothesis,
we reasoned that the configuration of the alkene
may be responsible for the observed levels of di-
astereoselectivity if HAT is faster than rotation
of the exocyclic C–C bond. We thus performed
the reaction on starting material 29 with (Z)-
alkene geometry rather than the (E)-isomer.
Both alkene geometries favor the same diaster-
eomer and produce no change in the enantio-
selectivity (Fig. 3C). The enzyme thus favors HAT
from one rotamer of the prochiral radical at rates
that are competitive with bond rotation. The di-
minished levels of diastereoselectivity observed
with the (Z)-alkene isomer are presumably due
to a small degree of hydrogen atom transfer be-
fore bond rotation.
29. L. Yet, Tetrahedron 55, 9349–9403 (1999).
30. D. D. Tanner, J. J. Chen, L. Chen, C. Luelo, J. Am. Chem. Soc.
113, 8074–8081 (1991).
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank M. Souza for preparing glassware for spectroscopy
studies, C. Kraml and L. Wilson at Lotus Separations for
compound purification, P. Jeffrey for assistance with x-ray
structure determination, K. Conover for assistance in photoNMR
data acquisition, and the staff of NSLS-II beamline FMX
(17-ID-2) for help with data collection. Funding: Research
reported in this publication was supported by the National
Institutes of Health (NIH) National Institute of General Medical
Sciences (NIGMS) (R01 GM127703), the Searle Scholars
Award (SSP-2017-1741), Sloan Research Fellowship, the
Princeton Catalysis Initiative, and Princeton University. D.G.O.
acknowledges support from the Postgraduate Scholarships
Doctoral Program of the Natural Sciences and Engineering
Research Council of Canada. D.G.O. and G.D.S. acknowledge
support from the Division of Chemical Sciences, Geosciences,
and Biosciences, Office of Basic Energy Sciences of the
U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) through grant DE-SC0019370.
The AMX (17-ID) beamline of The Life Science Biomedical
Technology Research (LSBR) resource is primarily supported
by NIH, NIGMS through a Biomedical Technology Research
Resource P41 grant (P41GM111244), and by the DOE Office
of Biological and Environmental Research (KP1605010).
As a National Synchrotron Light Source II facility resource
at Brookhaven National Laboratory, work performed at LSBR is
supported in part by the DOE Office of Science, Office of Basic
Energy Sciences Program under contract DE-SC0012704
(KC0401040). Author contributions: T.K.H. conceived and
directed the project. T.K.H., K.F.B., S.J.C., X.G., and J.H.K.
designed the experiments. K.F.B., S.J.C., X.G., and J.H.K.
performed and analyzed results. B.A.S. cloned the improved
variant, and S.E.G. obtained x-ray quality crystals and solved
the crystal structures. L.A.J. determined the absolute
configuration. D.G.O. designed and conducted the spectroscopic
studies, and D.G.O. and G.D.S. analyzed the data. Competing
interests: The authors declare no conflicts of interest. Data
and materials availability: All data are available in the
main text or the supplementary materials. Crystallographic
models and structure factors have been deposited in the Protein
Data Bank with accession nos. 6O08 and 6MYW for GluER
and GluER-T36A, respectively. X-ray crystallographic data
for lactam 2 have been deposited in the Cambridge
REFERENCES AND NOTES
1. C. M. Jäger, A. K. Croft, Chem. Bio. Eng. 5, 143–162
(2018).
2. A. Studer, D. P. Curran, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 55, 58–102
(2016).
3. U. T. Bornscheuer, R. J. Kazlauskas, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 43,
6032–6040 (2004).
4. N. A. Romero, D. A. Nicewicz, Chem. Rev. 116, 10075–10166
(2016).
5. S. Seifert, S. Brakmann, ACS Chem. Biol. 13, 1914–1920
(2018).
6. J. Gao, H. Wang, Q. Yuan, Y. Feng, Front. Plant Sci. 9, 357
(2018).
7. L. Schmermund et al., ACS Catal. 9, 4115–4144 (2019).
8. M. Gabruk, B. Mysliwa-Kurdziel, Biochemistry 54, 5255–5262
(2015).
9. D. Sorigué et al., Science 357, 903–907 (2017).
10. A. Sancar, Chem. Rev. 103, 2203–2237 (2003).
11. M. A. Emmanuel, N. R. Greenberg, D. G. Oblinsky, T. K. Hyster,
Nature 540, 414–417 (2016).
Crystallographic Data Centre (1878605).
SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIALS
12. K. F. Biegasiewicz, S. J. Cooper, M. A. Emmanuel, D. C. Miller,
T. K. Hyster, Nat. Chem. 10, 770–775 (2018).
13. K. Hung, X. Hu, T. J. Maimone, Nat. Prod. Rep. 35, 174–202
(2018).
14. M. P. Sibi, S. Manyem, J. Zimmerman, Chem. Rev. 103,
3263–3296 (2003).
Materials and Methods
Figs. S1 to S52
Tables S1 to S3
References (31–56)
15. Y. Cai, B. P. Roberts, D. A. Tocher, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans.
1 (11): 1376–1386 (2002).
7 December 2018; accepted 29 May 2019
10.1126/science.aaw1143
Biegasiewicz et al., Science 364, 1166–1169 (2019)
21 June 2019
4 of 4