Angewandte
Chemie
CeP nanotubes can be synthesized at 1058C. Although we have
observed for the as-synthesized CeP nanotubes due to the
absence of Ce3+. The pure trivalent CeP nanowires exhibit
strong UV luminescence; the two sharp peaks are centered at
about 348 nm and about 385 nm with a full-width at half
maximum (FWHM) of about 12 nm and about 30 nm,
respectively. The double-peak luminescence corresponds to
the direct emission from the 2D(5d1) state to the two split 4f1
not fully clarified the growth mechanism, we believe that the
appearance of nanotubes is related to the morphology of the initial
condensed linear polyphosphate at the different temperatures. The
as-synthesized CeP nanotubes were further heated in a flowing
mixture of argon and ammonia (volume ratio of 20:1). A heating rate
of 50 Khꢁ1 was used to allow a smooth structure modification.
The products were analyzed by using an X-ray diffractometer
with CuKa radiation, a differential thermal and thermogravimetric
apparatus, a UV/Vis spectrometer, a photoluminescence spectrom-
eter (He-Cd laser, lexc = 325 nm), a scanning electron microscope, and
a transmission electron microscope (TEM, JEOL 3000F). A Gatan
DigiPEELS 766 parallel detection spectrometer attached to the latter
microscope was used to collect electron energy loss spectra from an
individual nanotube.
2
2
ground states of F5/2 and F7/2 caused by spin-orbit coupling.
The small FWHM values also imply that the exited state of
Ce3+ is scarcely affected by the charge transfer transitions
from the host ligands. In contrast to pure Ce3+ nanowires and
Ce4+ nanotubes, the PL spectra of the Ce3+/Ce4+ hybrid CeP
nanotubes exhibit a strong blue luminescence. A broad and
prominent blue emission at about 490 nm is visible for the
Ce+3.34P nanotubes (heated at 6008C; Figure 4b). Such a
broad, blue emission for Ce3+ ions has been observed and
attributed to a charge transfer.[4,15] The charge transfer
between Ce4+ electron donation centers and Ce3+ lumines-
cence centers in the present nanotubes may occur due to the
electron–photon interaction. It has been reported that the 4f–
5d bands of Ce3+ and the charge-transfer transition bands of
Ce4+ ions appear in the same wavelength range and over-
lap.[16] Therefore, Ce4+ bands form the exited state and cause
the blue emission. We also noticed that the intensity of the
blue emission depends on the concentration of Ce3+ in a Ce4+
phosphate host. The hybrid CeP nanotubes heat-treated at
3008C exhibit a weak blue emission. The direct emission of
Ce3+ ions can be observed as an additional broad peak
between 330 and 380 nm (see arrow in Figure 4b).
In summary, the first rare-earth metal phosphate nano-
tubes made of CeP have been synthesized by careful control
of the composition of the reactants and the reaction temper-
ature. Under post-heat treatments in a reduced atmosphere,
the tubular morphology was maintained up to about 9008C.
Further increase in the temperature results in the formation
of nanowires, and leads to valence change from + 4 to + 3 for
the cerium ion. Strong blue and UV luminescence was
observed for the Ce3+/Ce4+ hybrid nanotubes and pure Ce3+
nanowires, respectively. Taking into account the short emis-
sion lifetime (a few ns) of Ce3+, CeP one-dimensional
nanostructures and, in particular, valence-hybrid nanotubes
developed in the present work are promising candidates for
light-emission-diode lamps, electroluminescence devices,
non-mercury-fluorescent lamps, and plasma display panels.
Received: July 3, 2004
Published online: December 21, 2004
Keywords: hybrid materials · luminescence · nanostructures ·
nanotubes · scanning probe microscopy
.
[1] M. Z. Yates, K. C. Ott, E. R. Birnbaum, T. M. McCleskey,
Angew. Chem. 2002, 114, 494 – 496; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.
2002, 41, 476 – 478.
[2] a) K. Riwotzki, H. Meyssamy, H. Schnablegger, A. Kornowski,
H. Markus, Angew. Chem. 2001, 113, 574 – 578; Angew. Chem.
Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 573 – 576; b) M. Nikl, E. Mihokova, Z.
Malkova, A. Vedda, M. Martini, K. Shimmamura, T. Sukuda,
Phys. Rev. B 2002, 66, 184101; c) P. Schlotter, R. Schmidt, J.
Schneider, Appl. Phys. A 1997, 64, 417 – 418.
[3] R. Francini, U. M. Grassano, L. Landi, A. Scacco, M. D. Elena,
M. Nikl, N. Cechova, N. Zema, Phys. Rev. B 1997, 56, 15109 –
15114.
[4] a) K. Annapurna, R. N. Dwivedi, P. Kundu, S. Buddhudu, Mater.
Lett. 2004, 58, 7 – 789; b) Y. X. Pan, M. M. Wu, Q. Su, Mater. Sci.
Eng. B 2004, 106, 251 – 256.
[5] T. Masui, M. Yamamoto, T. Sakata, H. Mori, G. Adachi, J. Mater.
Chem. 2000, 10, 353 – 357.
[6] a) S. Iijima, Nature 1991, 354, 56 – 58; b) N. G. Chopra, R. J.
Cherrey, V. H. Crespi, M. L. Cohen, S. G. Louie, A. Zettl,
Science 1995, 269, 966 – 967; c) R. Tenne, L. Margulis, M. Genut,
G. Hodes, Nature 1992, 360, 444 – 446; d) M. Niederberger, H. J.
Muhr, F. Krumeich, F. Bieri, D. Gunther, R. Nesper, Chem.
Mater. 2000, 12, 1995 – 2000; e) P. Hoyer, Langmuir 1996, 12,
1411 – 1413; P. Hoyer, Adv. Mater. 1996, 12, 857; f) C. C. Tang, Y.
Bando, Z. W. Liu, D. Golberg, Chem. Phys. Lett. 2003, 376, 676 –
682; g) C. N. R. Rao, M. Nath, Dalton Trans. 2003, 1 – 24.
[7] G. Alberti, U. Constantino, J. Mol. Catal. 1984, 27, 235 – 250.
[8] G. Alberti, U. Constantino, F. Di Gregorio, P. Galli, E. Torracca,
J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem. 1968, 30, 295 – 304.
[9] X. F. Zhang, X. B. Zhang, G. Van Tendeloo, S. Amelinckx, M.
Op de Beeck, J. Van Landuyt, J. Cryst. Growth 1993, 130, 368–382.
[10] J. A. Fortner, E. C. Buck, A. J. G. Ellison, J. K. Bates, Ultra-
microscopy 1997, 67, 77 – 81.
[11] F. F. Xu, Y. Bando, J. Appl. Phys. 2001, 89,5469 – 5472.
[12] A. Fujimori, Phys. Rev. B 1983, 28, 4489 – 4493.
[13] a) W. Vanschaik, S. Lizzo, W. Smit, G. Blasse, J. Electrochem.
Soc. 1993, 140, 216 – 222; b) N. Imanaka, T. Masui, H. Hirai, G.
Adachi, Chem. Mater. 2003, 15, 2289 – 2291.
[14] E. Nakazawa, F. Shiga, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. Part 1 2003, 42, 1642–1647.
[15] N. El Jouhari, C. Parent, G. L. Flem, J. Solid State Chem. 1996,
123, 398 – 407.
[16] H. Ebendorff-Heidepriem, D. Ehrt, Opt. Mater. 2000, 15, 7 – 25.
[17] A. F. Ali, P. Mustarelli, A. Magistris, Mater. Res. Bull. 1998, 33,
697 – 710.
Experimental Section
CeP nanotubes were prepared according to the procedure reported
by Alberti et al,[7,8] though a higher reaction temperature range and
reactant PO4/Ce concentration ratio were used in the present work.
The apparatus utilized was similar to that employed by Ali et al[17] to
prepare phosphate salts. In our experiments, a 6m aqueous phospho-
ric acid solution was first heated to a temperature ranging from 50 to
1108C, and stirred for 4 h to form a condensed linear polyphosphate
(PnO3n+1)
(n+2)ꢁ. A 0.02m aqueous solution of diammonium cerium(iv)
nitrate was added dropwise to the phosphoric acid solution (care was
taken during the addition to keep the temperature fluctuations to less
than 28C), and the mixture was allowed to react for 2 h. After washing
with water, a flexible, cellulose paperlike material was obtained,
suggesting a fibrous morphology.
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 576 –579
ꢀ 2005 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
579