We disclose in the present paper a convenient solution to
this problem that allows the ethylation of diversely substi-
tuted R,â-acetylenic aldehydes with virtually complete enan-
tioselectivity.
Over the last few years, we have been involved in a
research program devoted to the synthesis of modular ligands
for a variety of catalytic enantioselective processes from
purely synthetic yet enantiopure epoxides. As a result of lead
identification and structural refining processes, we have
developed the new ligands 3-6 that, besides a great structural
simplicity, depict very high catalytic activity and enantio-
control in the addition of diethylzinc to aldehydes of many
different structural types.6
the amino alcohol ligands encountered difficulties in ef-
ficiently differentiating between the rather similar substituents
of the aldehyde in the space near the reaction center.
In view of these results, we decided to submit the substrate
aldehyde to a reversible modification that could increase the
difference in steric bulk between the carbonyl branches and,
hence, favor stereodifferentiation in the attack. The formation
of the dicobalt hexacarbonyl complex of 1a was designed
for this purpose: this robust class of alkyne complexes,
7
widely used for protection of the triple bond, has also found
application for enhanced stereodifferentiation in the ox-
azaborolidine-mediated borane reduction of ketones.8
Complex 7a was prepared in essentially quantitative yield,
As a first step in our research and with the purpose of
determining the optimal ligand for these reactions, we studied
the use of 3-6 in the addition of diethylzinc to 3-phenyl-
propynal (1a). The reactions were performed at 0 °C for 3
h with 6 mol % ligand, and the results are summarized in
Table 1. As it can be seen, all four studied ligands exhibited
2
and the addition of Et Zn in the presence of ligands 3-6
was next studied. While the increase in enantioselectivity
was spectacular from the first moment, the reaction condi-
tions required optimization. At room temperature, reaction
yields were not satisfactory. Carbonyl groups within the
dicobalt complex may compete with the aldehyde for
coordination with the active catalyst, thus diminishing total
conversion.
A thorough examination of reaction conditions led to the
following set of optimal parameters: 20% mol ligand, 2.0
2
Table 1. Ligand Evaluation for the Enantioselective Et Zn
Addition to Phenylpropynal (1a) and Its Dicobalt Hexacarbonyl
Complex (7a)
equiv Et Zn, toluene as the solvent, 4 h reaction at -10 °C.
2
Use of 3-6 under these conditions led to the results shown
in Table 1. Simultaneous consideration of yields and enan-
tioselectivities led us to select ligand 4 for the continuation
9
of our study. Thus, 4 was used for the ethylation of an array
of dicobalt hexacarbonyl complexes of alkynals that covers
a range of substitutions (primary, secondary, or tertiary) and
natures (alkyl, vinyl, or aryl) at the carbon directly bonded
to the triple bond, as shown in Table 2. Starting complexes
ligand
2a from 1a ee [%]a
8a from 7a ee [%]b
Table 2. Enantioselective Ethylation of Dicobalt Hexacarbonyl
Complexes of R,â-Acetylenic Aldehydes Mediated by
(R)-2-Piperidino-1,1,2-triphenylethanol (4)
3
4
5
6
38
43
31
51
88
99
79
98
a
Enantiomeric excesses were determined by GC analysis. b Enantiomeric
excesses were determined by HPLC analysis.
alcohol 8
poor behavior in the reaction. This result was particularly
surprising, since 3-6 have been previously shown to induce
the addition of diethylzinc to R-unsubstituted saturated and
R,â-unsaturated aldehydes with enantioselectivities in the
entry
R
yield [%]
ee [%]
a
b
c
d
Ph
n-C5H11
t-C4H9
63
82
51
83
99
99
96
98
85-95% range. We interpreted these results to indicate that
1-cyclohexen-1-yl
(
4) (a) Niwa, S.; Soai, K. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1990, 937-
9
1
1
43. (b) Kitajima, H.; Ito, K.; Aoki, Y.; Katsuki, T. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn.
997, 70, 207-217. (c) Huang, W.-S.; Hu, Q.-S.; Pu, L. J. Org. Chem.
998, 63, 1364-1365.
(7a,b) were readily available from complexation of com-
mercial aldehydes or by formylation and complexation of
(5) Seebach, D.; Beck, A. K.; Schmidt, B.; Wang, Y. M. Tetrahedron
1
0
the corresponding alkynes (7c,d).
1
994, 50, 4363-4384.
(
6) (a) Vidal-Ferran, A.; Moyano, A.; Peric a` s, M. A.; Riera, A.
Under the optimized conditions, the ethylation reactions
took place, as a general trend, at elevated conversions
Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 8773-8776. (b) Sol a` , L.; Reddy, K. S.; Vidal-
Ferran, A.; Moyano, A.; Peric a` s, M. A.; Riera, A.; Alvarez-Larena, A.;
Piniella, J. F. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 7078-7082. (c) Vidal-Ferran, A.;
Moyano, A.; Peric a` s, M. A.; Riera, A. J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 4970-
(7) Nicholas, K. M.; Pettit, R. Tetrahedron Lett. 1971, 37, 3475-3478.
(8) (a) Corey, E. J.; Helal, C. J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 36, 9153-9156.
(b) Bach, J.; Berenguer, R.; Garcia, J.; Loscertales, T.; Vilarrasa, J. J. Org.
Chem. 1996, 61, 9021-9025.
4
982. (d) Reddy, K. S.; Sola, L.; Moyano, A.; Peric a` s, M. A.; Riera, A.
Synthesis 2000, 165-176. (e) Reddy, K. S.; Sola, L.; Moyano, A.; Peric a` s,
M. A.; Riera, A. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 3969-3974.
2382
Org. Lett., Vol. 4, No. 14, 2002