1646
H. Liu et al. / European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 46 (2011) 1638e1647
[42]. The DNA concentration was determined by measuring the UV
A0. The suppression ratio for Oꢀ2 : was calculated from the following
absorption at 260 nm, taking the molar absorption coefficient (e260
)
Eq. (10):
of CT DNA as 6600 Mꢀ1 cmꢀ1 [43]. The intrinsic binding constant Kb
for the interaction of the studied complex with CT DNA was
calculated by absorption spectral titration data using the following
equation [44]:
Suppression ratio ¼ ðA0 ꢀ AiÞ=A0
(10)
where Ai is the absorbance in the presence of the ligand or its
complexes and A0 is the absorbance in the absence of the ligand or
its complexes.
ꢄ
ꢅ
ꢄ
ꢅ
ꢄ
ꢅ
Hydroxyl radical (OH$) scavenging activity through the Fenton
reaction [48]. The solution of the compound to be tested was
prepared in DMF. The tested samples contained 1 mL of 0.15 M
½DNAꢅ= 3a
ꢀ
3f ¼ ½DNAꢅ= 3b
ꢀ
3f þ 1=Kb 3b
ꢀ
3f
(9)
where [DNA] is the concentration of DNA in base pairs, 3a corre-
sponds to the extinction coefficient observed (Aobsd/[complex]), 3f
corresponds to the extinction coefficient of the free compound
which was calculated from the LamberteBeer equation, 3b is the
extinction coefficient of the compound when fully bound to DNA,
and Kb is the intrinsic binding constant. The ratio of slope to
phosphate buffer (pH ¼ 7.4), 1 mL of 40
mg/mL safranin, 1 mL of
1.0 mM EDTA-Fe(II), 1 mL of 3% H2O2, and 0.5 mL of the solution of
the tested compound (prepared as a series dilutions of the tested
compound). The reaction mixtures were incubated at 37 ꢁC for
60 min in a water-bath. The absorbance of the samples and
a control were measured at 520 nm. The suppression ratio for OH$
was calculated from the following Eq. (11) [49].
intercept in the plot of [DNA]/(3a
of Kb. 3f can be obtained from the intercept 1/Kb(3b
ꢀ
3f) versus [DNA] gives the values
ꢀ
3f).
ꢆ
ꢇꢈ
4.5.2. Fluorescence spectra
Suppression ratio ¼ Asample ꢀ Ablank ðAcontrol ꢀ Ablank
Þ
The complexes at a fixed concentration (10 mM) were titrated
(11)
with increasing amounts of CT DNA. Excitation wavelength of the
samples were 437 nm, scan speed ¼ 240 nm/min, slit width 10/
10 nm. All experiments were conducted at 20 ꢁC in a buffer con-
taining 5 mM TriseHCl (pH 7.2) and 50 mM NaCl concentrations.
where Asample is the absorbance of the sample in the presence of the
tested compound, Ablank is the absorbance of the blank in the
absence of the tested compound and Acontrol is the absorbance in
the absence of the tested compound and EDTA-Fe(II). IC50 value was
introduced to denote the molar concentration of the tested
compound which caused good inhibitory or scavenging effect on
radicals.
4.5.3. Viscosity experiments
Viscosity experiments were conducted on an Ubbelohde
viscometer, immersed in a thermostated water-bath maintained at
25.0 ꢁC. Titrations were performed for the complexes (1e5
m
m
M),
M)
versus
is
and each compound was introduced into DNA solution (5
present in the viscometer. Data were presented as (h/h0)
the ratio of the concentration of the compound and DNA, where
the viscosity of DNA in the presence of compound and h0 is the
viscosity of DNA alone. Viscosity values were calculated from
the observed flow time of DNA containing solution corrected from
Acknowledgment
1/3
h
This study was supported by the Foundation of Key Laboratory
of Nonferrous Metals Chemistry and Resources Utilization of Gansu
Province and State Key Laboratory of Applied Organic Chemistry
and the NSFC (20171019).
the flow time of buffer alone (t0),
h
¼ t ꢀ t0 [45,46].
Appendix. Supplementary material
4.6. DNA cleavage
Supplementary material can be found, in the online version, at
The cleavage of supercoiled (SC) pUC19 DNA was studied by
agarose gel electrophoresis, carried out in a dark room at 37 ꢁC
using SC DNA (2
mL, 12 mM) in TriseHCl/NaCl buffer (pH 7.2) and the
References
complex (2 L) with varied concentrations. Each sample was
m
incubated for 5.0 h at 37 ꢁC and the cleavage reactions were
quenched by the addition of bromophenol blue, then analyzed for
the cleaved products using gel electrophoresis, in 0.8% agarose
solution, at 5 V/cm for 40 min using TBE buffer [0.045 M tris
(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane (tris), 0.045 M boric acid, and
1 mM EDTA, pH 7.2]. The gel was stained with 1 mg/ml ethidium
bromide and photographed on an Alpha Innotech IS-5500 fluo-
rescence chemiluminescence and visible imaging system.
[1] S. Zuehlke, U. Duennbier, T. Heberer, Chemosphere 69 (2007) 1673e1680.
[2] M.M. Girges, M.M. Abou EI-Zahab, M.A. Hanna, Arch. Pharm. Res. 11 (1988)
169e174.
[3] S.J. Franklin, Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 5 (2001) 201e208.
[4] J.A. Cowan, Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 5 (2001) 634e642.
[5] T.D. Maurer, B.J. Kraft, S.M. Lato, A.D. Ellington, J.M. Zaleski, Chem. Commun.
(2000) 69e70.
[6] E. Meggers, Chem. Commun. (2009) 1001e1010.
[7] Q. Saquib, A.A. Al-Khedhairy, S. Al-Arifi, A. Dhawan, J. Musarrat, Toxicol. In.
Vitro. 23 (2009) 848e854.
[8] S.M. Annigeri, M.P. Sathisha, V.K. Revankar, Transit. Met. Chem. 32 (2007)
81e87.
[9] Z. Ma, F.E. Jacobsen, D.P. Giedroc, Chem. Rev. 109 (2009) 4644e4681.
[10] A. Atkinson, D.R. Winge, Chem. Rev. 109 (2009) 4708e4721.
[11] A. Su1kowska, M. Maciaek-Jurczyk, B. Bojko, J. Mol. Struct. 881 (2008)
97e106.
[12] F. Zsila, Z. Bikádi, M. Simonyi, Biochem. Pharmacol. 65 (2003) 447e456.
[13] Y.T. Sun, S.Y. Bi, D.Q. Song, C.Y. Qiao, D. Mu, H.Q. Zhang, Sens. Actuators. B.
Chem. 129 (2008) 799e810.
[14] D.C. Carter, B. Chang, J.X. Ho, K. Keeling, Eur. J. Biochem. 226 (1994)
1049e1052.
[15] J.R. Brown, P. Shockley, LipideProtein Interactions, vol. 1, Wiley Interscience,
1982, pp. 25e68.
[16] F. Tan, M. Guo, Q.S. Yu, Spectrochim. Acta Part A. 61 (2005) 3006e3012.
[17] E.K. Efthimiadou, A. Karaliota, G. Psomas, J. Inorg. Biochem. 104 (2010)
455e466.
4.7. Anti-oxidative activity
The superoxide radicals (O2ꢀ:) were produced by the MET/VitB2/
NBT system [47]. The amount of Oꢀ2 : and suppression ratio for Oꢀ2 :
can be calculated by measuring the absorbance at 560 nm. The
solution of MET, VitB2, and NBT were prepared in a 0.067 M
phosphate buffer (pH ¼ 7.8) while avoiding light. The tested
compounds were dissolved in DMF. The 5 mL reaction mixture
contained MET (0.01 M), NBT (4.6 ꢃ 10ꢀ5 M), VitB2 (3.3 ꢃ10ꢀ6 M),
and the tested compound. After illuminating the solution with
a fluorescent lamp at 30 ꢁC for 30 min, the absorbance (Ai) of the
samples was measured at 560 nm. The sample without the tested
compound was used as the control and its absorbance was used as
[18] A. Sulkowska, J. Mol. Struct. 616 (2002) 227e232.
[19] X.W. Zhang, F.L. Zhao, K.A. Li, Chem. J. Chin. Univ. 20 (1999) 1063e1067.