ChemComm
Communication
Table 2 Performance of the solar cells based on P3HT and two fullerene
New Materials. This work was fully supported by the Theme-
Based Research Scheme of the Research Grants Council of
Hong Kong, China (T23-713/11). T.S.W. thanks the China
Post-doctoral Science Foundation (201104153) and the Hong
Kong Scholars Program.
acceptors (Indan-PC61BM and PC61BM)
Acceptor
Voc (V)
Jsc (mA cmÀ2
)
FF (%)
PCE (%)
Indan-PC61BM
PC61BM
0.80
0.63
8.08
9.34
67.2
64.9
4.33
3.80
Notes and references
1 (a) N. Martin, L. Sanchez, B. Illescas and I. Perez, Chem. Rev., 1998,
98, 2527–2547; (b) E. Nakamura and H. Isobe, Acc. Chem. Res., 2003,
36, 807–815; (c) A. M. Lopez, A. Mateo-Alonso and M. Prato, J. Mater.
Chem., 2011, 21, 1305–1318; (d) D. M. Guldi and M. Prato, Acc. Chem.
Res., 2000, 33, 695–703; (e) M. Buhl and A. Hirsch, Chem. Rev., 2001,
101, 1153–1183.
2 (a) V. Georgakilas, F. Pellarini, M. Prato, D. M. Guldi, M. Melle-Franco
and F. Zerbetto, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 2002, 99, 5075–5080;
(b) L. Chen, W. Chen, H. Huang, H. L. Zhang, J. Yuhara and
A. T. S. Wee, Adv. Mater., 2008, 20, 484–488; (c) C. C. Chu, G. Raffy,
D. Ray, A. Del Guerzo, B. Kauffmann, G. Wantz, L. Hirsch and
D. M. Bassani, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2010, 132, 12717–12723;
(d) T. Nakanishi, T. Michinobu, K. Yoshida, N. Shirahata, K. Ariga,
H. Moehwald and D. G. Kurth, Adv. Mater., 2008, 20, 443–446;
(e) S. Campidelli, T. Brandmuller, A. Hirsch, I. M. Saez, J. W.
Goodby and R. Deschenaux, Chem. Commun., 2006, 4282–4284;
( f ) R. Charvet, K. Ariga, J. P. Hill, Q. M. Ji, A. H. Khan and
S. Acharya, Chem. Commun., 2011, 47, 6825–6827; (g) T. Nakanishi,
W. Schmitt, T. Michinobu, D. G. Kurth and K. Ariga, Chem. Commun.,
2005, 5982–5984.
Fig. 3 J–V curves for solar cells using Indan-PC61BM and PC61BM as acceptors.
optimized solar cells under AM 1.5G illumination (100 mW cmÀ2
are listed in Table 2, and the J–V curves are shown in Fig. 3.
Compared with the reference PC61BM solar cell, a highly
improved Voc value (0.80 V) and FF (67.2%) were obtained for the
)
Indan-PC61BM device. The increased Voc of the P3HT/Indan-PC61BM 3 (a) M. Feng, J. Lee, J. Zhao, J. T. Yates and H. Petek, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
2007, 129, 12394–12395; (b) M. Sathish and K. Miyazawa, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 2007, 129, 13816–13817; (c) H. S. Shin, S. M. Yoon, Q. Tang,
B. Chon, T. Joo and H. C. Choi, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2008, 47,
device can be ascribed to the enhanced LUMO level (0.12 eV higher
than that of PC61BM) as the Voc is proportional to the difference
between the HOMO of P3HT and the LUMO of the fullerene
acceptor.4–6 Moreover, the FF (67.2%) of the P3HT/Indan-PC61BM
device is also slightly improved in comparison with that of
the P3HT/PC61BM device (64.9%) and is comparable to that
of the reported P3HT/ICBA device (67%).6a FF is the ratio between
the maximum obtainable power (ImppVmpp) and the theoretical power
(IscVoc).4g The enhanced FF reveals a higher actual maximum power
output for the P3HT/Indan-PC61BM solar cell. As the FF is affected by
many factors, including charge carrier mobility and balance, film
morphology, and others, a clear understanding of the factors that led
to the higher FF for the P3HT/Indan-PC61BM device would require
further study. The lower Jsc may be caused by the regioisomers of the
693–696; (d) H. X. Ji, J. S. Hu, L. J. Wan, Q. X. Tang and W. P. Hu,
J. Mater. Chem., 2008, 18, 328–332; (e) L. Wang, B. B. Liu, D. Liu,
M. G. Yao, Y. Y. Hou, S. D. Yu, T. Cui, D. M. Li, G. T. Zou,
A. Iwasiewicz and B. Sundqvist, Adv. Mater., 2006, 18, 1883–1888;
( f ) Y. P. Ren, P. Paira, T. R. Nayak, W. H. Ang and G. Pastorin, Chem.
Commun., 2011, 47, 7710–7712.
4 (a) J. L. Segura, N. Martin and D. M. Guldi, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2005, 34,
31–47; (b) G. Dennler, M. C. Scharber and C. J. Brabec, Adv. Mater.,
2009, 21, 1323–1338; (c) C. J. Brabec, S. Gowrisanker, J. J. M. Halls,
D. Laird, S. J. Jia and S. P. Williams, Adv. Mater., 2010, 22, 3839–3856;
(d) C. P. Chen, C. Luo, C. Ting and S. C. Chuang, Chem. Commun.,
2011, 47, 1845–1847; (e) M. Murata, Y. Morinaka, Y. Murata,
O. Yoshikawa, T. Sagawa and S. Yoshikawa, Chem. Commun., 2011,
47, 7335–7337; ( f ) Y. Matsuo, A. Ozu, N. Obata, N. Fukuda, H. Tanaka
and E. Nakamura, Chem. Commun., 2012, 48, 3878–3880; (g) G. Li,
R. Zhu and Y. Yang, Nat. Photonics, 2012, 6, 153–161.
bis-adduct Indan-PC61BM, and this phenomenon has also been 5 (a) J. Y. Kim, K. Lee, N. E. Coates, D. Moses, T. Q. Nguyen, M. Dante
reported in the solar cells based on bis-adduct acceptors of ICBA,6a
and A. J. Heeger, Science, 2007, 317, 222–225; (b) Y. Zhang, T. P. Basel,
B. R. Gautam, X. M. Yang, D. J. Mascaro, F. Liu and Z. V. Vardeny, Nat.
Commun., 2012, 3, 1043; (c) M. Campoy-Quiles, T. Ferenczi,
OXCBA,6d and DMPCBA6c because isomers may interfere with full-
erene stacking and affect electron transport in the fullerene domain.
Although there is about 13% loss of Jsc for the Indan-PC61BM-based
device, the significant increase of Voc combined with the higher FF
T. Agostinelli, P. G. Etchegoin, Y. Kim, T. D. Anthopoulos,
P. N. Stavrinou, D. D. C. Bradley and J. Nelson, Nat. Mater., 2008, 7,
158–164; (d) J. M. Guo, H. Ohkita, H. Benten and S. Ito, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 2010, 132, 6154–6164.
leads to an improved PCE of 4.33% for the P3HT/Indan-PC61BM solar 6 (a) Y. J. He, H. Y. Chen, J. H. Hou and Y. F. Li, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2010,
132, 5532; (b) G. J. Zhao, Y. J. He and Y. F. Li, Adv. Mater., 2010, 22,
4355–4358; (c) Y. J. Cheng, M. H. Liao, C. Y. Chang, W. S. Kao,
C. E. Wu and C. S. Hsu, Chem. Mater., 2011, 23, 4056–4062;
cell compared to the standard P3HT/PC61BM device.
In conclusion, a new fullerene derivative of Indan-C60, which readily
crystallizes in organic solvents and can be used as a precursor for good
fullerene acceptors, was reported. The self-assembly of Indan-C60 was
investigated, and microsheets as well as the aloe-like micro-nano
structures of Indan-C60 were prepared. The Indan-PC61BM derivative
based on Indan-C60 was employed as an acceptor in OPV devices, and
the OPV device based on P3HT and Indan-PC61BM shows a higher Voc
(d) K. H. Kim, H. Kang, S. Y. Nam, J. Jung, P. S. Kim, C. H. Cho,
C. Lee, S. C. Yoon and B. J. Kim, Chem. Mater., 2011, 23, 5090–5095;
(e) C. Z. Li, S. C. Chien, H. L. Yip, C. C. Chueh, F. C. Chen, Y. Matsuo,
E. Nakamura and A. K. Y. Jen, Chem. Commun., 2011, 47,
10082–10084; ( f ) G. Ye, S. Chen, Z. Xiao, Q. Q. Zuo, Q. Wei and
L. M. Ding, J. Mater. Chem., 2012, 22, 22374–22377.
7 J. C. Hummelen, B. W. Knight, F. Lepeq, F. Wudl, J. Yao and
C. L. Wilkins, J. Org. Chem., 1995, 60, 532–538.
of 0.80 V and a higher PCE of 4.33%. Further work on its assembly and 8 Crystal data for 2C69H8Á5CS2: black plate, crystal size 0.04 Â 0.29 Â
%
0.41 mm, triclinic, space group P1, a = 9.857 Å, b = 14.021 Å, c = 14.292 Å
acceptor derivatives is underway.
and a = 89.901, b = 87.031, g = 84.221, V = 1966.1, Z = 2, T = 173 K;
R1 = 0.043 for 7170 reflections with I > 2s(I), wR2 = 0.1556 for all data.
V.W.-W.Y. acknowledges support from The University
of Hong Kong under the URC Strategic Research Theme on
CCDC number: 938648.
c
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2013
Chem. Commun., 2013, 49, 9923--9925 9925