X. Luo et al. / Reactive & Functional Polymers 70 (2010) 116–121
117
helical structures have not yet been reported. Such a class of no-
2.4. Polymerization and copolymerization
vel polymers undoubtedly integrates the intriguing helical struc-
tures and the desirable properties of urea and carbazole
functional groups and would be of great interest, especially for
practical applications.
(Co)Polymerizations were carried out in a glass tube equipped
with a three-way stopcock that contained a dry solvent under nitro-
gen atmosphere. A catalyst (nbd)Rh+BÀ(C6H5)4 (5 mM) was added to
a solution of monomers (0.5 M) in THF (2 ml) under nitrogen atmo-
sphere, and the resulting solution was kept at 30 °C for 2 h. After
(co)polymerization, the solution was poured into a large amount
of hexane to precipitate the polymer out. The solid product was fil-
tered and then dried under reduced pressure. Spectroscopic data of
poly(1) were as follows: IR (KBr): 3420 (HÀN), 2337 (HÀC@), 1697
2. Experimental section
2.1. Measurements
(C@O), 1600, 1447, 1326, 1238, 725, and 564 cmÀ1 1H NMR
.
Melting point (m.p.) was measured by an X-4 micro-melting
point apparatus. 1H nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectra
were recorded on a Bruker AV600 spectrometer (Bruker, Germany).
Fourier transform spectroscopy (FT-IR) spectra were recorded with
a Nicolet NEXUS 670 spectrophotometer (Nicolet, USA). Number-
average molecular weights (Mn) and molecular weight distribu-
tions (Mw/Mn) of the (co)polymers were determined by Gel perme-
ation chromatography (GPC) (Waters 515-2410 system) (Waters,
USA) calibrated by using polystyrenes as standards and THF as
the eluent (unless otherwise pointed out). Circular dichroism
(CD) and ultraviolet–visible (UV–vis) spectra were recorded on a
JASCO J-810 spectropolarimeter (Jasco, Japan). Fluorescence spec-
tra were measured on a Varian Cary Eclip sE spectrophotometer
(Varian, USA). The thickness of the film was determined with a
thickness gauge (Q/DBEF-2-91) (Shanghai Liuling Instrument Plant,
China).
(DMSO-d6, 600 MHz, 25 °C): d 3.31 (2H, C@CCH2), 6.45 (1H, HÀC@),
7.14–7.16 (4H, Ar), 7.36–7.39 (2H, Ar), 7.47–7.48 (2H, Ar), and 8.10–
8.11 (1H, NÀH).
The Spectroscopic data of copolymers were as follows (taking
Poly(10.2-co-20.8) as an example): IR (KBr): 3385 (HÀN), 2341
(HÀC@), 1645 (C@O), and 1523.
2.5. Preparation of composite films
The copolymers synthesized above were applied to prepare
composite films with PVB as supporting material. Copolymers
(0.05 g) were dissolved in 20 ml PVB (1 g) CHCl3 solution and cast
onto a glass dish. The CHCl3 was then evaporated under ambient
conditions and films with a uniform thickness of 55
obtained.
5 lm were
3. Results and discussion
2.2. Materials
3.1. Synthesis and polymerization of N-propargylurea monomers
Propargylamine, bis(trichloromethyl)-carbonate (BTC), poly(vi-
nyl butyral) (PVB) and carbazole were purchased from Aldrich
and used as received without further purification. (nbd)Rh+BÀ
(C6H5)4 was prepared as reported elsewhere [34]. Solvents were
distilled under reduced pressure [22–28].
Monomers 1 and 2 were synthesized according to the strategy
outlined in Scheme 1. The major synthetic procedure was as fol-
lows. A secondary amine was first reacted with bis(trichloro-
methyl)-carbonate (BTC) to form carbamoyl chloride, which was
then directly reacted with propargylamine to yield the target
monomer. The details for the synthesis and purification procedure
and the spectroscopic data of monomer 1 are described in the
experimental section. Monomers 1 and 2 were polymerized with
(nbd)Rh+BÀ(C6H5)4 as the catalyst in THF at 30 °C for 3 h. The rele-
vant details are also presented in the experimental section. Poly-
merization results for monomer 1 are summarized in Table 1.
The results of monomer 2 and poly(2) were introduced in our pre-
vious article [27]. Poly(1) was obtained as an 86% yield and its
number-average molecular weight (Mn) was 3700. It was assumed
that the low molecular weight resulted from the low coordination
ability of the ethynyl group of monomer 1 to Rh catalyst, due to the
low electron density [35], and thus the polymerizability of mono-
2.3. Monomer synthesis
The typical monomer synthesis procedure is as follows. To
synthesize monomer 1, carbazole (2 g, 12 mmol) was dissolved
in THF (50 ml), and the solution was added dropwise to a solution
of BTC (2 g, 6 mmol) in ethyl acetate (150 ml) while stirring at
0 °C for approximately 2 h. Afterwards, the mixture was further
stirred at room temperature for another 30 min and then refluxed
at 80 °C for about 3 h. Then, ethyl acetate and THF were removed
under reduced pressure, producing the corresponding carbamoyl
chloride, which was directly used for the next reaction. The car-
bamoyl chloride was dissolved in ethyl ether (150 ml), into which
triethyl amine (1.3 ml, 18 mmol) and propargylamine (0.5 ml,
12 mmol) were subsequently added at room temperature, and
the mixture was stirred at room temperature for about 2 h. The
solution was washed three times with 2 N HCl and then neutral-
ized by washing with saturated NaHCO3. The resulting solution
was dried over anhydrous MgSO4, filtered, and concentrated, pro-
ducing the target monomer. The crude monomer was further
purified by recrystallization with THF and hexane. The data for
monomer 1 were as follows: yield-40%, colorless crystal, m.p.
256–258 °C; IR (KBr): 3419 (H–N), 2163 (HC„), 1697 (C@O),
3048, 1598, 1495, 1447, 1330, 1240, 1138, 997, 925, 853, 725,
and 572 cmÀ1 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 600 MHz, 25 °C): d 2.25 (1H,
.
HC„), 3.33 (2H, C„CCH2), 7.14–7.16 (4H, Ar), 7.37–7.39 (2H,
Ar), 7.48–7.49 (2H, Ar), and 8.10–8.11 (1H, NÀH). Calculation
for (C16H12N2O): C, 77.42; H, 4.84; N, 11.29. The real values were:
C, 77.53; H, 4.79; N, 11.21. Monomer 2 was synthesized according
to our previous study [27].
Scheme 1. Monomer synthesis and polymerization. Reagents: (a) bis(trichloro-
methyl)carbonate (BTC), ethyl acetate and THF; (b) propargylamine, ethyl acetate;
(c) (nbd)Rh+BÀ(C6H5)4 (nbd, norbornadiene), THF.