ACETYLENE HYDROGENATION TO ETHYLENE
451
Timofeev, K.A., Gorenie Vzryv, 2015, vol. 8, no. 1,
version, which exponentially decreases to 13%. At the
same time, an increase in selectivity to C2H4 is 3% and
is caused by a decrease in the selectivity to C2H6 at a
p. 71.
2. Belov, G.P., Catal. Ind., 2014, vol. 6, p. 266.
3. Tyurin, A.A., Eremenko, B.A., and Udalova, E.A.,
constant value of
A weak change in the distribu-
.
SΣC
4+
Bashkir. Khim. Zh., 2013, vol. 20, no. 1, p. 149.
tion of reaction products at CO : C2H2 = 0.1–1 shows
that, already at CO : C2H2 = 0.1 the sites of С2Н4 read-
sorption on which its subsequent hydrogenation to
ethane may occur are blocked. At the same time, judg-
ing from a change in conversion with an increase in the
CO : C2H2 ratio, one can assume a gradual decrease in
the number of sites available for hydrogen adsorption.
4. Mukhina, T.N., Barabanov, N.L., and Babash, S.E.,
Piroliz uglevodorodnogo syr’ya (Pyrolysis of Hydrocar-
bon Feedstock), Moscow: Khimiya, 1987.
5. Pogosyan, N.M., Pogosyan, M.D., Shapovalova, O.V.,
Strekova, L.N., and Tavanyan, L.A., Neftegazokhimiya,
2016, no. 2, p. 38.
6. Liu, X., Li, Y., Lee, J.W., Hong, C.-Y., Mou, C.-Y.,
and Jang, B.W.L., Appl. Catal., A, 2012, vol. 439, p. 8.
7. Yan, X., Wheeler, J., Jang, B., Lin, W.-Y., and Zhao, B.,
CONCLUSIONS
Appl. Catal., A, 2014, vol. 487, p. 36.
The gas-phase hydrogenation of acetylene on a
0.5% Pd/Sibunit catalyst was studied depending on
the composition of the reaction mixture, the reaction
temperature, and the presence of CO. It was shown
that, for the reaction mixture of the composition H2 :
C2H2 < 20, the reaction rate depends on the concen-
tration of hydrogen and does not depend on the con-
centration of acetylene, whereas for the ratio H2 : C2H2
> 20, the opposite relationship is characteristic. With a
high probability, the observed pattern is due to the
competitive adsorption of acetylene and hydrogen on
the active sites of the catalyst.
8. Borodziski, A. and Bond, G.C., Catal. Rev., 2006,
vol. 48, p. 91.
9. US Patent 20070191655, 2007.
10. US Patent 20070021638, 2007.
11. Lapidus, A.L., Golubeva, I.A., and Zhagfarov, F.G.,
Gazokhimiya (Natural Gas Chemistry), Moscow: Tsen-
trLitNefteGaz, 2008
12. Shitova, N.B., Shlyapin, D.A., Afonasenko, T.N., Ku-
drya, E.N., Tsyrul’nikov, P.G., and Likholobov, V.A.,
Kinet. Catal., 2011, vol. 52, no. 2, p. 251.
13. Smirnova, N.S., Shlyapin, D.A., Mironenko, O.O.,
Anoshkina, E.A., Temerev, V.L., Shitova, N.B., Ko-
chubey, D.I., and Tsyrul’nikov, P.G., J. Mol. Catal. A:
Chem., 2012, vol. 358, p. 152.
We found that with an increase in the reaction tem-
perature (from 30 to 85°C), the selectivity to ethylene
and oligomers gradually decreases, which is accompa- 14. Smirnova, N.S., Shlyapin, D.A., Shitova, N.B., Ko-
chubey, D.I., and Tsyrul’nikov, P.G., J. Mol. Catal. A:
Chem., 2015, vol. 403, p. 10.
15. Smirnova, N.S., Shlyapin, D.A., Trenikhin, M.V., Ko-
chubei, D.I., and Tsyrul’nikov, P.G., Izv. Vyssh.
Uchebn. Zaved., Khim. Khim. Tekhnol., 2015, vol. 58,
no. 7, p. 31.
16. Glyzdova, D.V., Smirnova, N.S., Leont’eva, N.N.,
Gerasimov, E.Yu., Prosvirin, I.P., Vershinin, V.I.,
Shlyapin, D.A., and Tsyrul’nikov, P.G., Kinet. Catal.,
2017, vol. 58, no. 2, p. 140.
17. Glyzdova, D.V., Vedyagin, A.A., Tsapina, A.M., Kaic-
hev, V.V., Trigub, A.L., Trenikhin, M.V., Shlyapin, D.A.,
Tsyrulnikov, P.G., and Lavrenov, A.V., Appl. Catal., A,
2018, vol. 563, p. 18.
nied by an increase in the fraction of ethane in the
reaction products. This is probably due to the appear-
ance of larger reaction sites for ethylene reabsorption
on the catalyst surface.
It is shown that, when CO is added to the reaction
mixture to have a molar ratio of CO : C2H2 = 0.1, the
sites for C2H4 readsorption are almost completely
blocked on which ethylene is further hydrogenated to
ethane, and the selectivity to ethylene increases
sharply from 4 to 73%. A further increase in the CO :
C2H2 = 0.1 ratio to 1 leads to a gradual decrease in the
number of sites available for hydrogen adsorption, and
to a regular suppression of catalytic activity.
18. Borodziski, A. and Bond, G.C., Catal. Rev., 2008,
vol. 50, p. 379.
FUNDING
19. Rassolov, A.V., Markov, P.V., Bragina, G.O., Baeva, G.N.,
Krivoruchenko, D.S., Mashkovskii, I.S., Yakushev, I.A.,
Vargaftik, M.N., and Stakheev, A.Yu., Kinet. Catal.,
2016, vol. 57, no. 6, p. 853.
This work was performed in the framework of the state
assignment of the Institute of Hydrocarbon Processing,
Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, in accor-
dance with the Program of Basic Scientific Research of the 20. Barbov, A.V., Filippov, D.V., Merkin, A.A., and Pro-
zorov, D.A., Zh. Fiz. Khim., 2014, vol. 88, no. 6,
p. 1026.
State Academies of Sciences for 2013–2020 according to
section V. 46 (project V.46.2.5, state registration in the
EGISU NIOKTR system AAAA-A17-117021450096-8).
21. Vattuone, L., Yeo, Y.Y., Kose, R., and King, D.A.,
Surf. Sci., 2000, vol. 447, p. 1.
22. Nikolaev, S.A., Zanaveskin, L.N., Smirnov, V.V.,
Aver’yanov, V.A., and Zanaveskin, K.L., Usp. Khim.,
2009, vol. 78, no. 3, p. 248.
REFERENCES
1. Arutyunov, V.S., Savchenko, V.I., Shmelev, V.M., Se-
dov, I.V., Shapovalova, O.V., Fokin, I.G., Nikitin, A.V., 23. Pradier, C.M., Mazina, M., Berthier, Y., and Oudar,
Strekova, L.N., Tarasov, A.I., Dmitruk, A.S., and
J., J. Mol. Catal., 1994, vol. 89, p. 211.
KINETICS AND CATALYSIS Vol. 60 No. 4 2019