071911-3
Wang, Kang, and Cheng
Appl. Phys. Lett. 87, 071911 ͑2005͒
In conclusion, for the first time, direct formation of
-Na3AlH6 from NaH/Al was achieved by mechanical mill-
ing with TiF3 under H2 atmosphere. The as-formed Na3AlH6
exhibits a series of unexpected phase transformation and de-
composition behaviors. In particular, it was found that vary-
ing the milling time led to a modified thermodynamics of the
dehydriding reaction of Na3AlH6. Additionally, possibly re-
lated to the in situ hydrogenation, the mechanically prepared
Ti-doped materials were observed to undergo a serious deg-
radation on the hydrogen storage performance upon increas-
ing the milling time. A comprehensive understanding of
these phenomena may lead to the elucidation of the nature of
active Ti-species and the means of improving the hydrogen
storage property of Ti-doped NaAlH4.
FIG. 4. 150 °C dehydriding profiles ͑second cycle͒ of NaH+Al+4 mol %
TiF3 mechanically milled under H2 atmosphere for different periods.
The authors are grateful to Ms. S.H. Yang and Mr. Y.
Chen for their assistance in XRD and thermal analysis mea-
surements. The financial support for this research from the
Hundred Talents Project of Chinese Academy of Sciences is
gratefully acknowledged.
detected by TG, the enthalpy change for the solid-state de-
hydriding of Na3AlH6 to NaH/Al was found to decrease
from 35 for the 10 h sample to 28.5 kJ/mol for the 20 h
sample. And both of them are considerably lower than the
literature values.7,10,25 These findings clearly suggest that the
variation of the preparation condition may lead to a change
of the microstructure of Na3AlH6, possibly including local
atomic arrangement, coordination environment and structural
defects. And as a result, the phase transformation, decompo-
sition behavior, and even thermodynamics of Na3AlH6 may
be modified. A better understanding of the involved mecha-
nism, including the possible role of Tix+ and F− played in
such property change, is clearly of importance for achieving
favorable modification of thermodynamics of Na3AlH6.
Of particular interest, we found that the materials pre-
pared by mechanical milling NaH/Al with TiF3 under H2
atmosphere underwent a serious degradation on the hydrogen
storage performance upon increasing the milling time. More-
over, the marked difference on hydrogen storage perfor-
mance arising from the variation of milling time was found
to persist in the following de-/hydrogenation cycles. Figure 4
gives the typical dehydriding profiles ͑second cycle͒ at
150 °C of the materials milled for different periods. A care-
ful examination of the dehydriding profiles found that almost
all the capacity degradation came from the first decomposi-
tion step ͑NaAlH4→Na3AlH6/Al͒, while the second step
͑Na3AlH6→NaH/Al͒ was left almost intact. These results
clearly indicate that the active Ti-species that are involved in
the reversible dehydrogenation of Na3AlH6 may not neces-
sarily contribute to the kinetic enhancement of
NaAlH4/Na3AlH6+Al reactions. The possible reasons for
the aggravated “ “selective” deactivation” of Ti-species upon
increasing the milling time include the modification of
structural/chemical environment of the doped hydride, the
distribution state and even the nature of the active Ti-species.
Here, a key clue is available from the direct formation of
-Na3AlH6 because the in situ hydrogenation during the
milling process may produce a critical influence on the dis-
tribution of the active Ti-species. Further investigation in this
respect is currently under way.
1L. Schlapbach and A. Züttel, Nature ͑London͒ 414, 353 ͑2001͒.
2G. Sandrock, J. Alloys Compd. 293–295, 877 ͑1999͒.
3M. Hirscher and M. Becher, J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 3, 3 ͑2003͒.
4B. Bogdanović and M. Schwickardi, J. Alloys Compd. 253–254, 1 ͑1997͒.
5C. M. Jensen, R. Zidan, N. Mariels, A. Hee, and C. Hagen, Int. J. Hydro-
gen Energy 24, 461 ͑1999͒.
6R. A. Zidan, S. Takara, A. G. Hee, and C. M. Jensen, J. Alloys Compd.
285, 119 ͑1999͒.
7B. Bogdanović, R. A. Brand, A. Marjanovic, M. Schwickardi, and J. Tölle,
J. Alloys Compd. 302, 36 ͑2000͒.
8A. Zaluska, L. Zaluski, and J. O. Ström-Olsen, J. Alloys Compd. 298, 125
͑2000͒.
9K. J. Gross, S. Guthrie, S. Takara, and G. J. Thomas, J. Alloys Compd.
297, 270 ͑2000͒.
10C. M. Jensen and K. J. Gross, Appl. Phys. A: Mater. Sci. Process. 72, 213
͑2001͒.
11B. Bogdanović and M. Schwickardi, Appl. Phys. A: Mater. Sci. Process.
72, 221 ͑2001͒.
12K. J. Gross, G. J. Thomas, and C. M. Jensen, J. Alloys Compd. 330–332,
683 ͑2002͒.
13G. Sandrock, K. Gross, G. Thomas, C. Jensen, D. Meeker, and S. Takara,
J. Alloys Compd. 330–332, 696 ͑2002͒.
14G. Sandrock, K. Gross, and G. Thomas, J. Alloys Compd. 339, 299
͑2002͒.
15M. Fichtner, O. Fuhr, O. Kircher, and J. Rothe, Nanotechnology 14, 778
͑2003͒.
16B. Bogdanović, M. Felderhoff, S. Kaskel, A. Pommerin, K. Schlichte, and
F. Schüth, Adv. Mater. ͑Weinheim, Ger.͒ 15, 1012 ͑2003͒.
17P. Wang and C. M. Jensen, J. Alloys Compd. 379, 99 ͑2004͒.
18P. Wang and C. M. Jensen, J. Phys. Chem. B 108, 15827 ͑2004͒.
19T. Kiyobayashi, S. S. Srinivasan, D. Sun, and C. M. Jensen, J. Phys.
Chem. A 107, 7671 ͑2003͒.
20L. I. Zakharkin and V. V. Gavrilenko, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 145, 79
͑1962͒.
21L. I. Zakharkin and V. V. Gavrilenko, Proc. Acad. Sci. SSSR, Div. Chem.
Sci. 147, 656 ͑1962͒.
22E. C. Ashby and P. Kobetz, Inorg. Chem. 5, 1615 ͑1966͒.
23J. Huot, S. Boily, V. Güther, and R. Schulz, J. Alloys Compd. 383, 304
͑1999͒.
24J.-P. Bastide, B. Bonnetot, J.-M. Letoffe, and P. Claudy, Mater. Res. Bull.
16, 91 ͑1982͒.
25P. Claudy, B. Bonnetot, G. Chahine, and J.-M. Letoffe, Thermochim. Acta
38, 75 ͑1980͒.
129.100.58.76 On: Mon, 01 Dec 2014 19:07:11