particles. Furthermore, the rate of decomposition is not con-
trolled by diffusion of H
2
to the surface. Amorphous
AlH ꢁnEt O loses the solvent to produce a-AlH , which then
3
2
3
proceeds rapidly to lose H , leaving behind crystalline Al with
2
a particle size of ca. 50 nm. In spite of the sensitivity of the
material to the electron beam valuable information has been
obtained about each of the decomposition steps involved in
the dehydrogenation and the structural evolution of a-AlH
at the nanoscopic level – in real-time. Although we have been
successful in studying AlH by this technique, the sensitivity of
3
–
3
the sample to the high energy TEM electron beam may prove
to be a more serious problem with other metal hydrides.
We thank NSERC, CFI, NBIF and HSM Systems for
financial support of this research.
Notes and references
Fig. 5 TEM image and SADP (inset) of the same area as Fig. 4 after
z A time-resolved movie of the decomposition of a-AlH
3
to Al is
prolonged exposure to the TEM beam.
studies have shown the decomposition of a-AlH to Al to be
3
1
4
60
accelerated by exposure to UV light, and to 1 MeV Co
1
W. Grochala and P. P. Edwards, Chem. Rev., 2004, 104, 1283.
2 S. Orimo, Y. Nakamori, J. R. Eliseo, A. Zuttel and C. M. Jensen,
Chem. Rev., 2007, 107, 4111.
S. Satyapal, J. Petrovic, C. Read, G. Thomas and G. Ordaz, Catal.
Today, 2007, 120, 246.
J. Graetz and J. J. Reilly, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2005, 109, 22181.
F. M. Brower, N. E. Matzek, P. F. Reigler, H. W. Rinn, C. B.
Roberts, D. L. Schmidt, J. A. Snover and K. Terada, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 1976, 98, 2450.
2
0
¨
g-irradiation. Although the sample decomposes within sec-
onds on exposure to the electron beam, ultimately, a SADP
3
that clearly corresponds to a-AlH
The SADP in Fig. 4 contains contributions from both a-
AlH and metallic Al (refer to ESIw for ring measurements). It
3
was obtained (Fig. 4).
4
5
3
is difficult to identify unambiguously certain features, as both
materials have similar d-spacings. However, a-AlH has a
6 J. Graetz and J. J. Reilly, J. Alloys Compd., 2006, 424, 262.
3
7
8
9
M. Resana, M. D. Hamptona, J. K. Lomnessa and D. K. Slattery,
Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2005, 30, 1417.
J. Wang, A. D. Ebner, T. Prozorov, R. Zidan and J. A. Ritter,
J. Alloys Compd., 2005, 395, 252.
B. Bogdanovic, R. A. Brand, A. Marjanovic, M. Schwickardi and
˚
unique reflection at 3.28 A, which is clearly observed in the
˚
SADP of Fig. 4. The 3.28 A reflection was observed previously
(
refer to ESI,w Fig. S1) during the initial stages of AlH ꢁnEt O
3
2
decomposition, however, the SADP was diffuse and it was
difficult to definitively identify the a-AlH phase.
¨
J. Tolle, J. Alloys Compd., 2003, 350, 246–255.
0 E. H. Majzoub and K. J. Gross, J. Alloys Compd., 2003, 356–357,
3
1
Fig. 5 shows the same area as Fig. 4 and corresponding
SADP following further exposure to the electron beam. Of
particular note in Fig. 5 are the larger grains, the absence of
363.
11 S. Singh, S. W. H. Eijt, J. Huot, W. A. Kockelmann, M. Wage-
maker and F. M. Mulder, Acta Mater., 2007, 55, 5549.
2 V. P. Tarasov, Yu. B. Muravlev, S. I. Bakum and A. V. Novikov,
1
˚
the earlier spots at 3.28 A, and the strong Al doublet rings at
Dokl. Phys. Chem., 2003, 393, 353.
13 O. J. Zogait, M. Punkkinen, E. E Ylinent and B. Stalinski,
˚
2
These features unambiguously point to the disappearance of
.338 and 2.024 A (refer to ESIw for ring measurements).
J. Phys.: Condens. Matter, 1990, 2, 1941.
4 P. J. Hereley, S. O. Christofferson and J. A. Todd, J. Solid State
Chem., 1980, 35, 391.
5 B. Bogdanovic, R. A. Brand, A. Marjanovic, M. Schwickardi and
J. Tolle, J. Alloys Compd., 2000, 302, 36–58.
¨
6 A. Leon, O. Kircher, H. Rosner, B. Decamps, E. Leroy, M.
Fichtner and A. P. Guegan, J. Alloys Compd., 2006, 414, 190.
7 M. Felderhoff, K. Klementiev, W. Grunert, B. Spliethoff, B.
1
1
1
1
a-AlH and the emergence of metallic Al in its place.
3
To the best of our knowledge, this is the first real-time, in
situ study by TEM of hydrogen desorption from a metal
hydride.z The high resolution of the technique, in combination
with the ability to obtain localised diffraction patterns, has
allowed an in situ temperature and time resolved study of the
structural and morphological changes that occur during des-
Tesche, J. M. Bellosta von Colbe, B. Bogdanovic
Pommerin, F. Schuth and C. Weidenthalera, Phys. Chem. Chem.
Phys., 2004, 6, 4369.
´
, M. Hartel, A.
¨
olvation and hydrogen desorption. Decomposition of a-AlH
occurs spontaneously at localized sites throughout the bulk
3
1
1
8 JCPDS-ICCD PDF-2 Database #4-787, 1996.
9 JCPDS-ICCD PDF-2 Database #14-1436, 1996.
material, and is not initiated by nucleation at the surface of the
20 P. J. Herley and R. H. Irwin, J. Phys. Chem. Solids, 1978, 39, 1013.
4
450 | Chem. Commun., 2008, 4448–4450
This journal is ꢂc The Royal Society of Chemistry 2008