6
2
C. Qiu et al. / Journal of Molecular Catalysis A: Chemical 350 (2011) 56–63
kobs. The apparent first-order rate constant k
for CT dechlori-
obs
−
2
−1
nation reaction are 8.15 × 10 min . The lager kobs (compared
to the previous reported values [34]) demonstrates that our as-
prepared Pd–Fe bimetallic film electrode is an effective catalyst for
CT dechlorination reaction.
4. Conclusions
Nanostructured Pd–Fe bimetallic thin films were directly fab-
ricated on glassy carbon substrates by means of double-potential
step electrodeposition and galvanic replacement methods. The
Pd/Fe weight ratio in the bimetallic films is an important parameter
that affects the dechlorination activity of the bimetallic catalysts
and can be adjusted by selecting nanostructured Fe film tem-
plates with different thickness and surface morphology, which
are dependent on the concentration of Fe2+ ions in electrolyte
solutions. When the weight ratio of Pd/Fe is 5.9, the bimetal-
lic thin film catalyst exhibits the highest dechlorination activity.
The activation energy Ea for dechlorination by different types of
hydrogen is in accord with the removal efficiency of CT, and a
minimum Ea and the highest removal efficiency were obtained at
Fig. 5. Relationship between ln(C0/C) and reaction time (t).
−
0.2 V. Besides, the removal efficiency of CT increased consider-
ably with increasing temperature. The reaction was found to be
pseudo-first-order.
where Á is overpotential, Ea is activation energy, R is the gas con-
stant, and T is the absolute temperature. Integrating Eq. (4) results
in:
Ea
Acknowledgements
ln I = −
+ ln A
(5)
RT
This work was supported by National Natural Science Foun-
dation of China (21073111), Beijing National Laboratory for
Molecular Science, and the National Basic Research Program of
China (2009CB930103).
where A is an integral constant. Thus, plotting lnI against 1/T creates
a set of Arrhenius plots for the CT dechlorination reaction. Based on
the relationship between lnI and 1/T, the Ea values under different
cathodic potentials were calculated and listed in Table 2. It is found
that the Ea value is the lowest at −0.2 V, and the highest at −0.15 V.
References
3
.3.4. Effect of electrolysis time
Due to the higher dechlorination activity, the bimetallic Pd–Fe
[
[
[
1] D. Wei, T. Kameya, K. Urano, Environ. Int. 33 (2007) 894–902.
2] W.K. Chu, M.H. Wong, J. Zhang, Environ. Geochem. Health 28 (2006) 169–181.
3] R.E. Doherty, J. Environ. Forensics 1 (2000) 69–81.
catalyst with Pd/Fe weight ratio of 5.9 was selected to investi-
gate the dependence of dechlorination efficiency on the reaction
time at a given potential (−0.2 V) and temperature (303 K). The
concentration of CT in the solutions decreased with the pro-
longed electrolysis time, which in turn increased the dechlorination
efficiency of CT. The dechlorination efficiency increased evi-
dently with electrolysis time and reached 99% after reaction for
[4] B.R. Helland, P.J.J. Alvarez, J.L. Schnoor, J. Hazard. Mater. 41 (1995) 205–216.
[5] V. Janda, P. Vasek, J. Bizova, Z. Belohlav, Chemosphere 54 (2004) 917–925.
[6] B.W. Zhu, T.T. Lim, J. Feng, Chemosphere 65 (2006) 1137–1145.
[7] H.L. Lien, W.X. Zhang, Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 77 (2007) 110–116.
[8] Z. Sun, B. Li, X. Hu, M. Shi, Q. Hou, Y. Peng, J. Environ. Sci. 20 (2008) 268–272.
[9] L.J. Matheson, P.G. Tratnyek, Environ. Sci. Technol. 28 (1994) 2045–2053.
10] W.X. Zhang, J. Nanopart. Res. 5 (2003) 323–332.
11] W.X. Zhang, C.B. Wang, H.L. Lien, Catal. Today 40 (1998) 387–395.
[12] X.Y. Wang, C. Chen, H.L. Liu, J. Ma, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 47 (2008) 8645–8651.
[13] C. Grittini, M. Malcomson, Q. Fernando, N. Korte, Environ. Sci. Technol. 29 (1995)
[
[
4
5 min. In particular, CH4 is the leading product [32]. Furthermore,
after 10 successive measurements, the steady state current for
electrochemical dechlorination was decreased by ∼27.3%, which
indicates a relatively high stability of the as-prepared Pd–Fe
bimetallic films during electrochemical reductive dechlorination
of CT.
Previous studies have shown that the degradation of CT is a
pseudo-first-order reaction [32–36]. The kinetics equation of the
reaction process can be expressed in Eq. (6).
2898–2900.
[
[
14] J. Xu, A. Dozier, D. Bhattacharyya, J. Nanopart. Res. 7 (2005) 449–467.
15] B. Schrick, A.D. Blough, J.L. Jones, T.E. Mallouk, Chem. Mater 14 (2002)
5140–5147.
16] L.H. Chen, C.C. Huang, H.L. Lien, Chemosphere 73 (2008) 692–697.
17] C.J. Lin, S.L. Lo, Y.H. Liou, J. Hazard. Mater. 116 (2004) 219–228.
18] G.V. Lowry, M. Reinhard, Environ. Sci. Technol. 35 (2001) 696–702.
[19] S. Gómez-Quero, F. Cárdenas-Lizana, M.A. Keane, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 47 (2008)
841–6853.
20] L.M. Gómez-Sainero, X.L. Seoane, A. Arcoya, Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 53 (2004)
101–110.
[
[
[
6
[
dc
=
−kobs
C
(6)
[21] Y.H. Kim, E.R. Carraway, Environ. Technol. 249 (2003) 69–75.
22] J. Choi, K. Choi, W. Lee, J. Hazard. Mater. 162 (2009) 1151–1158.
23] Y.X. Chen, S.P. Chen, Q.S. Chen, Z.Y. Zhou, S.G. Sun, Electrochim. Acta 53 (2008)
dt
[
[
where kobs is the apparent first-order rate constant, and C denotes
the transient concentration of CT during the reaction process.The
integration of Eq. (6) results in:
6938–6943.
[
24] D. Grujicic, B. Pesic, Electrochim. Acta 50 (2005) 4405–4418.
[25] Y.-X. Chen, S.-P. Chen, Z.-Y. Zhou, N. Tian, Y.-X. Jiang, S.-G. Sun, Y. Ding, Z.L.
Wang, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131 (2009) 10860–10862.
[26] R. Woods, Chemisorption at electrodes. Hydrogen and oxygen on noble met-
als and their alloys, in: A.J. Bard (Ed.), Electroanalytic Chemistry: A Series of
Advances, vol. 9, Marcel Dekker, New York, 1976, pp. 49–117.
[27] Y.L. Jiao, D.L. Wu, H.Y. Ma, C.C. Qiu, J.T. Zhang, L.M. Ma, Electrochem. Commun.
10 (2008) 1474–1477.
28] Y.-H. Shih, Y.-C. Chen, M.-Y. Chen, Y.-T. Tai, C.-P. Tso, Colloids Surf. A: Physic-
ochem. Eng. Aspects 332 (2009) 84–89.
29] H. Choi, S.R. Al-Abed, S. Agarwal, D.D. Dionysiou, Chem. Mater. 20 (2008)
3649–3655.
C0
ln
= kobs
t
(7)
C
where C is the initial CT concentration and t stands for electrolysis
time.
0
[
The natural logarithm of C /C as a function of time for CT degra-
0
dation is shown in Fig. 5 (with a regression coefficient of 0.997).
The logarithmic plot versus time is linear, whose slope is equal to
[