C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
(Figure 2, inset). This value is somewhat smaller than previously
determined values for pyrene13 but is in good agreement with the
values obtained from studies of the temperature dependence of kisc
for other polyaromatic hydrocarbons.13-15
The results of these experiments indicate that the long lifetimes
obtained for pyrene at temperatures above ∼110 °C are indeed due
to the removal of oxygen from the optical cell. The fact that the
lifetime of pyrene remains short in the absence of the Fe
nanoparticles indicates the importance of Fe in this process. The
intriguing aspect of these results is the ability of the core-shell
nanoparticles to inhibit the oxidation of the iron core at low
temperatures and then to apparently open or release over a very
narrow temperature range, giving oxygen access to the iron core.
Such capability suggests applications with a view toward the
development of temperature-activated catalysts and reactive media.
Future efforts will be focused on understanding the activation
processsspecifically, how molecules gain access to the core
particle, whether size restrictions apply, and whether the temperature
of activation can be tunedsand the nature of the reaction between
oxygen and the Fe nanoparticles.
Figure 2. Plot of pyrene lifetime vs temperature for Fe0 nanoparticles (O),
iron-oleic acid nanoparticles (measured as a function of increasing
temperature 0 and decreasing temperature [), iron-AOT nanoparticles
(4), and for no nanoparticles (solutions with and without oleic acid, +).
Inset: Arrhenius plot of ln(kisc) vs temperature.
Acknowledgment. We thank Drs. J. R. Gord, D. K. Phelps, E.
A. Guliants, and S. W. Buckner for helpful discussions, P. Pathak
and Prof. Y.-P. Sun for TEM assistance, N. L. Sanders for
experimental assistance, and Ms. M. M. Whitaker for editorial
support. We acknowledge the continuing support of Dr. Julian
Tishkoff and the Air Force Office of Scientific Research (AFOSR)
for high-temperature fluids research.
the presence of oxygen in solution. The oxygen concentration
determined from this lifetime using the Stern-Volmer equation
and a diffusion rate constant of 1.7 × 1010 M-1s-1 for hexane was
∼1 × 10-3 M, which was lower than the initial concentration
because of partitioning between the solution and the headspace
within the cell. The lifetime of pyrene remained short for temper-
atures up to ∼110 °C, above which it increased to match the
baseline-study values exactly (Figure 2). The change in lifetime is
abrupt, occurring over a 10 °C temperature range, and reproducible.
Pyrene decays were also recorded from high to low temperature
(Figure 2). The lifetimes determined while reducing the temperature
remained long, but slightly shorter than those obtained in the
absence of oxygen, indicating for the most part an irreversible
reaction.
For comparison, pyrene decays were also obtained in air-saturated
hexane (both with and without oleic acid) without the Fe nano-
particles. Under these conditions, the lifetime of pyrene is short
and remains short throughout the temperature range investigated
(Figure 2).
For pyrene it is known that the decay of the first excited singlet
state S1* occurs through two routes, fluorescence (kF) and inter-
system crossing (kisc), and that the sum of the quantum efficiencies
of these two processes (ΦF and Φisc) is unity.13,14 Under these
conditions, the temperature dependence of the fluorescence lifetime
is attributed to intersystem crossing, and the dependence of kisc on
temperature follows Arrhenius kinetics.15-18 A plot of ln(kisc) vs
1/T (K) using all of the oxygen-free data from Figure 2 is linear,
which suggests that no other processes are competing with
intersystem crossing, and yields an energy barrier of 2.7 kcal/mol
References
(1) Caruso, F. AdV. Mater. 2001, 13, 11-22.
(2) Zhong, C.-J.; Maye, M. M. AdV. Mater. 2001, 13, 1507-1511.
(3) Crooks, R. M.; Zhao, M.; Sun, L.; Chechik, V.; Yeung, L. K. Acc. Chem.
Res. 2001, 34, 181-190.
(4) Templeton, A. C.; Wuelfing, W. P.; Murray, R. W. Acc. Chem. Res. 2000,
33, 27-36.
(5) Suslick, K. S.; Fang, M.; Hyeon, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 11960-
11961.
(6) Suslick, K. S.; Hyeon, T.; Fang, M. Chem. Mater. 1996, 8, 2172-2179.
(7) (a) Shafi, K. V. P. M.; Ulman, A.; Yan, X.; Yang, N.-L.; Estourne`s, C.;
White, H.; Rafailovich M. Langmuir 2001, 17, 5093-5097. (b) Wu, N.;
Fu, L.; Su, M.; Aslam, M.; Wong, K. C.; Dravid, V. P. Nano Lett. 2004,
4, 383-386.
(8) Kataby, G.; Cojocaru, M.; Prozorov, R.; Gedanken, A. Langmuir 1999,
15, 1703-1708.
(9) Sun, S.; Murray, C. B. J. Appl. Phys. 1999, 85, 4325-4330.
(10) Puntes, V. F.; Krishnan, K. M.; Alivisatos, P. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2001, 78,
2187-2189.
(11) Sun, S.; Murray, C. B.; Weller, D.; Folks, L.; Moser, A. Science 2000,
287, 1989-1992.
(12) Mizukoshi, Y.; Fujimoto, T.; Nagata, Y.; Oshima, R.; Maeda, Y. J. Phys.
Chem. B 2000, 104, 6028-6032.
(13) Birks, J. B. Photophysics of Aromatic Molecules; Wiley-Interscience:
London, 1970.
(14) Klessinger, M.; Michl, J. Excited States and Photochemistry of Organic
Molecules; VCH: New York, 1995.
(15) Hirano, H.; Azumi, T. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1982, 90, 269-271.
(16) Lim, E. C.; Laposa, J. D.; Yu, J. M. H. J. Mol. Spectrosc. 1966, 19, 412-
420.
(17) Tanaka, F.; Okamoto, M.; Hirayama, S. J. Phys. Chem. 1995, 99, 525-
530.
(18) Dreeskamp, H.; Pabst, J. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1979, 61, 262-265.
JA0473891
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 126, NO. 35, 2004 10853