26
J. Peng et al. / Journal of Alloys and Compounds 694 (2017) 24e29
addition of Mg laid out of bulks) with the product of MgB2 during
the 1 h preservation period at 650 ꢀC.
decompose to Mg and MgB4, meanwhile Mg vapor can migrate
easily to the areas with the low vapor pressure (for example necks
and small pores). At the second step (650 ꢀC for 1 h) of this stage,
composition between Mg and MgB4 occurs and new boundary
forms. Moreover, Fig. 3 c shows better connectivity and the smaller
pore than Fig. 3 b because of extra 10-min preservation at 900 ꢀC
and more MgB2 particles being taken part in the reversible reaction.
Given this, it's not difficult to explain Fig. 3 d (sample ‘900 ꢀC,
20 min - 650 ꢀC, 1 h’) which is depicted by stage III hold the best
connectivity which with 20 min preservation at 900 ꢀC. At this
stage III, more MgB2 is decomposed and reformed, the original
surface become closer and closer, pores are eliminated progres-
sively and the new boundary formed at last. However, some
unreacted MgB4 and new-formed MgO are wrapped around the
new-born boundary which can damage the connectivity. Isolated
and closed pores and large grains can be seen in Fig. 3 d.
Fig. 3 presents typical microstructural features of MgB2 poly-
crystalline bulks prepared by ex-situ with different heating pro-
grams. Here, gray, black, and white contrasts in the secondary
electron images correspond to MgB2 grains, pores, and impurity
phases such as MgO, respectively. Fig. 3 a, sample ‘650 ꢀC, 1 h’,
clearly shows microstructure with many pores between the parti-
cles. Obviously, it is owing to deficient self-sintering of ex-situ
MgB2. One can also see that the intergrain coupling of sample
‘650 ꢀC, 1 h’ (Fig. 3 a) between MgB2 grains/particles is poor in
contrast with that of sample ‘900 ꢀC,0 min - 650 ꢀC, 1 h’, ‘900 ꢀC,
10 min - 650 ꢀC, 1 h’, and ‘900 ꢀC, 20 min - 650 ꢀC, 1 h’ (Fig. 3 b, c, d),
in which more strongly linked MgB2 grains are observed. We can
also learn that as the preservation time prolonged at 900 ꢀC, the
intergrain coupling enhanced and the boundaries become vaguer
(Fig. 3 b, c, d). All of these suggested that solid-state self-sintering
occurred during the heat treatment.
Fig. 4 shows schematic diagrams of self-sintering of three grains
[21], which can describe the results obtained from the different
sintering programs properly in present work. Stage I (correspond-
ing to sample ‘650 ꢀC,1 h’) is the early stage of sintering and contact
angle of grains becomes shallower (formation of necks) at this
stage. The obvious characteristic of this stage is the reserve of many
open pores. We can confirm this phenomenon from Fig. 3 a. At this
stage, MgB2 grains can hardly been decomposed because of low
temperature, but the surface of grains has changed to form necks
which are result from slow migration of MgB2 at 650 ꢀC. In the next
stage (stage II, corresponding to sample ‘900 ꢀC,0 min ꢁ650 ꢀC, 1 h’
and sample ‘900 ꢀC, 10 min - 650 ꢀC, 1 h’), pores are gradually
eliminated by the formation of new grain boundaries (The detailed
information of new boundary will be shown in Fig. 5 and discussed
later). At this stage, the surface contact area increased and the bulk
became denser. Fig. 3 b (sample ‘900 ꢀC,0 min ꢁ650 ꢀC, 1 h’) and
Fig. 3 c (sample ‘900 ꢀC, 10 min - 650 ꢀC, 1 h’) show this situation
appropriately. At the first step of this stage, MgB2 grains begin to
The HRTEM images of the sample ‘900 ꢀC, 20 min - 650 ꢀC, 1 h’
are shown in Fig. 5. The new-born boundary was found between
MgB2 grains (as marked by a white line in Fig. 5b), and MgB4 and
MgO were recognized within the new-born boundary in Fig. 5 a.
The corresponding lattice was confirmed by FFT (Fast Fourier
Transformation). The decomposition of MgB2 is easier to occur
close to gaps and pores than in the particle center because gaps and
pores can provide a highway for new formed Mg diffusing from
original matrix, then some Mg may react with O2 which exists in
pores and gaps forming MgO. From Fig. 5 a, the scale of MgB4
crystalline grains was measured varying 5e10 nm and those grains
can act as flux pinning centers. When heating at 650 ꢀC, pores and
gaps are gradually eliminated and substituted by the new-born
boundary. This also agrees with the stage IV in Fig. 4. The new-
born boundary was built up by the unreacted MgB4, impurity
MgO, and new formed MgB2. The width of this boundary was
measured varying 10e15 nm.
According to the Rowell connectivity analysis, the active cross-
sectional area fraction (AF) represents the connectivity factor be-
tween adjacent grains [26,27]. Here the AF is estimated as:
Fig. 3. SEM images of the sintered MgB2 bulks of (a) 1 h preservation at 650 ꢀC, (b) preservation 0 min at 900 ꢀC and then with 1 h preservation at 650 ꢀC, (c) preservation 10 min at
900 ꢀC and then with 1 h preservation at 650 ꢀC, (d) preservation 20 min at 900 ꢀC and then with 1 h preservation at 650 ꢀC.