Alkyl-Carbene Elimination from Pd-Carbene Complexes
J. Am. Chem. Soc., Vol. 123, No. 17, 2001 4039
4. Experimental Section
salts,97 providing an ideal opportunity for reaction between the
metal and imidazolium ion. Indeed, in one application of
imidazolium salts as solvents for the Heck reaction the possible
involvement of Pd-carbene species has been suggested,100 and
in a study on Suzuki coupling reactions with Pd2(dba)3 as the
precatalyst, the apparently successful in situ conversion of
imidazolium salt into free carbene has been reported.22 Very
recently, Xiao et al. isolated Pd-carbene complexes from an
ionic liquid solvent in which Pd(OAc)2 was used as a pre-
catalyst for the Heck reaction.102 The formation of carbene
complexes in the Heck reaction most likely resulted from
deprotonation of the imidazolium C2 proton under the basic
conditions of the reaction. However, the apparent formation of
Pd-carbene complexes from Pd2(dba)3 raises the question, can
carbene-metal complexes form via an alternative mechanism
in which prior deprotonation of the imidazolium cation is not
necessary? The present study suggests that they cansthrough
a process of oxidative addition to a low-valent metal. It is known
that chelating ligands on zerovalent Pd and Pt favor oxidative
addition.65-69,94 This is a consequence of a bent geometry for
the M0(L∧L) fragment, which has a high d-orbital energy
relative to linear ML2. Thus, the reverse reaction (in this case,
reductive elimination from a carbene complex containing a
chelating ligand) is expected to be disfavored. Consistent with
this expectation, our preliminary calculations on the model
system PdMe(dmiy)(P∧P) (P∧P ) 1,2-diphosphinoethane) show
that the reactant is lower in energy than the Pd0(P∧P) and
imidazolium products, that is, oxidative addition of imidazolium
ion to Pd(P∧P) should be spontaneous. Thus, in principle it is
possible to change the energetics of a system to favor oxidative
addition to give a carbene complex, especially in a huge excess
of imidazolium ion. It is important to note that not only would
oxidative addition of an imidazolium ion produce a carbene
complex, but it would also generate a reactive metal-hydride
that could initiate a catalytic cycle such as dimerization or C-C
coupling. Further computational and experimental studies on
the oxidative addition reaction103 and on nickel-carbene
catalyzed dimerization reactions will be reported shortly.
4.1. General Comments. All manipulations were carried out using
standard Schlenk techniques or in a nitrogen glovebox (Innovative
Technology Inc.). All solvents were purified by standard procedures
and distilled under nitrogen immediately prior to use. Nuclear magnetic
resonance (NMR) spectra were recorded at ambient temperature unless
otherwise stated, and peaks are labeled as singlet (s), doublet (d), triplet
(t), multiplet (m), and broad (br). Elemental analysis, MS and GC-
MS were carried out by the Central Science Laboratory, University of
Tasmania. [PdMeCl(tmiy)]2 was prepared as previously described.19,51
4.2. Synthesis. [PdMe(tmiy)(COD)]BF4, 8. A solution of [PdMeCl-
(tmiy)]2 (71 mg, 0.25 mmol) in 10 mL of DCM was treated with COD
(35 µL, 0.29 mmol) and syringed into a suspension of AgBF4 (73 mg,
0.37 mmol) in 3 mL of DCM at -20 °C. The solution was stirred at
this temperature for 1 h before being filtered through Celite and the
solvent removed in vacuo at -20 °C until ∼2 mL remained. Diethyl
ether (4 mL) was added, and the solvent was decanted off the precipitate
that formed. After being washing twice with 4 mL of ether the product
was dried in vacuo to yield a white powder. Yield: 0.100 g (90%).
Anal. Calcd for C16H27N2BF4Pd: C, 43.61; H, 6.18; N, 6.36. Found:
1
C, 43.62; H, 6.16; N, 6.08. MS (LSIMS) m/z: 353 [M]+ (100%). H
NMR (200 MHz, CDCl3, -20 °C): δ 5.79 (s, br, 2H, HCdC), 5.66
(s, br, 2H, CdCH), 3.75 (s, 6H, NCH3), 2.68 (m, br, 8H, CH2), 2.16
(s, 6H, CCH3), 0.60 (s, 3H, PdCH3). 13C NMR (50 MHz, CDCl3 CDCl3,
-20 °C): δ 165.3 (NCN), 126.8 (CdCcarbene), 118.4, 116.2 (CdCCOD),
35.5 (NCH3), 29.4, 28.9 (CH2), 9.2 (H3CCdCCH3), 1.7 (PdCH3).
[PdMe(tmiy)(PMePh2)2]BF4, 9. This complex was prepared in a
manner similar to that for 8 using 51.0 mg (0.0.181 mmol) of [PdMeCl-
(tmiy)]2, 37 mg (0.19 mmol) of AgBF4 and 70 µL (0.37 mmol) of
PMePh2. Yield: 0.113 g (85%). Anal. Calcd for C34H41N2P2PdBF4:
C, 55.72; H, 5.64; N, 3.82. Found: C, 55.07; H, 5.87; N, 3.60. MS
(LSIMS) m/z: 645 [M]+ (30%), 506 [Pd(PMePh2)2]+ (10%), 307 [Pd-
(PMePh2)]+ (10%), 201 [PMePh2]+ (100%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CD2-
Cl2): δ 7.6-7.1 (m, 20H, phenylH), 3.49 (s, 6H, NCH3), 1.88 (s, 6H,
CCH3), 1.86 (d, J ) 8 Hz, 3H, PCH3), 1.45 (d, J ) 7 Hz, 3H, PCH3),
0.17 (dd, J ) 7 Hz, 8 Hz, 3H, PdCH3). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CD2Cl2):
δ 132.6 (d, J ) 11 Hz, phenylC), 131.4 (d, J ) 12 Hz, phenylC),
130.8 (d, J ) 2 Hz, phenylC), 130.5 (d, J ) 2 Hz, phenylC), 129.0 (d,
J ) 10 Hz, phenylC), 128.8 (d, J ) 9 Hz, phenylC), 126.2 (d, J ) 3
Hz, CdC), 35.1 (NCH3), 13.2 (d, J ) 27 Hz, PCH3), 11.9 (d, J ) 21
Hz, PCH3), 8.9 (s, H3CCdCCH3), -0.27 (d, J ) 91 Hz, PdCH3). 31P
NMR (162 MHz, CD2Cl2): δ 12.3 (d, J ) 33 Hz), 0.8 (d, J ) 33 Hz).
3. Conclusions
[PdMe(tmiy){P(OPh)3}2]BF4, 10. This complex was prepared in a
manner similar to that for 8 using 65.2 mg (0.232 mmol) of [PdMeCl-
(tmiy)]2, 66 mg (0.34 mmol) of AgBF4, and 125 µL (0.477 mmol) of
P(OPh)3. Yield: 0.192 g (87%). Anal. Calcd for C44H45N2O6P2PdBF4:
C, 55.45; H, 4.76; N, 2.94. Found: C, 55.51; H, 4.88; N, 3.11. MS
(LSIMS) m/z: 865 [M]+ (3%), 726 [Pd{P(OPh)3}2]+ (1%), 139
[pentamethylimidazolium]+ (100%). 1H NMR (200 MHz, CDCl3, -20
°C): δ -0.23 (t, J ) 8.6 Hz, 3H, PdCH3), 1.88 (s, CCH3), 2.92 (s,
NCH3), 7.5-7.0 (m, 30H, phenylH). 13C NMR (50 MHz, CDCl3, -20
°C): δ 150.1 (d, J ) 5 Hz, ipso-phenylC), 149.8 (d, J ) 8 Hz, ipsoC),
130.1 (d, J ) 5 Hz, phenylC), 126.4 (d, J ) 5 Hz, phenylC), 125.8 (d,
J ) 15 Hz, phenylC), 120.3 (dd, J ) 6 Hz, 24 Hz, CdC), 34.4 (NCH3),
8.7 (H3CCdCCH3), 2.7 (d, J ) 130 Hz, PdCH3). 31P (162 MHz, CD2-
Cl2, -30 °C): δ 120.3 (d, J ) 72 Hz), 113.4 (d, J ) 72 Hz). After
some decomposition had occurred signals at 6.7-7.2 ppm appear in
A number of novel cationic methyl-PdII-carbene complexes
incorporating different phosphine ligands have been prepared
and fully characterized. The complexes decompose cleanly to
yield methylimidazolium salts as has been observed previously
for a variety of Pd and Ni complexes, and this shows that
carbene-based catalysts incorporating a hydrocarbyl group in
the active species have available a low-energy pathway to
decomposition. Combined kinetic and DFT studies show that
the mechanism is one of concerted reductive elimination, and
not one of carbene insertion into M-R bonds. This new type
of reductive elimination suggests there are similarities in the
reactivity of M-R bonds and M-heterocyclic carbene bonds,
and again highlights the differences between conventional
Fischer and Schrock carbenes and N-heterocyclic carbenes.
Finally, an understanding of the mechanism by which this
reaction occurs has allowed us to postulate methods by which
it can be impeded. These methods and the catalysts that result
from their application are currently under investigation in our
laboratories.
1
the H NMR spectrum corresponding to Pd{P(OPh)3}2, along with a
singlet at 141.0 ppm in the 31P NMR spectrum.
[PdMe(tmiy)(PPh3)2]BF4, 11. This complex was prepared in a
manner similar to that for 8 using 52.2 mg (0.186 mmol) of [PdMeCl-
(tmiy)]2, 44 mg (0.23 mmol) of AgBF4, and 100.4 mg (0.383 mmol)
of PPh3. Yield: 106 mg (67%). HRMS Calcd for C44H45N2P2104Pd:
767.209826. Found: 767.21313. MS (LSIMS) m/z: 769 [M]+ (7%),
631 [M and MH cluster for Pd(PPh3)2]+ (25%), 139 [pentamethylimi-
(100) Carmichael, A. J.; Earle, M. J.; Holbrey, J. D.; McCormac, P. B.;
Seddon, K. R. Org. Lett. 1999, 1, 997.
(101) Herrmann, W. A.; Bo¨hm, V. P. W. J. Organomet. Chem. 1999,
572, 141.
(102) Xu, L.; Chen, W.; Xiao, J. Organometallics 2000, 19, 1123.
(103) McGuinness, D. S.; Cavell, K. J.; Yates, B. F. J. Chem. Soc., Chem.
Commun. In press.
1
dazolium]+ (100%). H NMR (200 MHz, CD2Cl2, -50 °C): δ 7.0-
7.5 (m, 30H, phenylH), 3.52 (s, 6H, NCH3), 1.89 (s, 6H, CCH3), 0.23
(“t”, J ) 6 Hz, 3H, PdCH3). 31P NMR (162 MHz, CD2Cl2, -30 °C):
δ 34.2 (d, J ) 30 Hz), 21.4 (d, J ) 30 Hz). After some decomposition
has occurred signals at 7.6-7.85 ppm appear in the 1H NMR spectrum