Table 1 Pt wt% loadings for each catalyst and total Pt mass on
electrodes for each HER measurement
should be performed on the ALD Pt/WC and Pt/C powder
catalysts to further understand the electrochemical stability of
these catalysts.
Electrode
Pt wt%
Mass of Pt on electrode/mg
In conclusion, Pt–WC core–shell particles were synthesized
using ALD to deposit thin Pt layers on WC powder substrates
in order to scale up the ML Pt–WC thin film system to a more
industrially relevant powder catalyst. In terms of reducing the
Pt loading while maintaining bulk-like performance, the
Pt–WC core–shell powder catalysts produced HER results
that are equivalent to the ML Pt–WC thin films reported
previously. To our knowledge, no other method has been
demonstrated to produce core–shell Pt–WC catalysts. While
improvements to the synthesis of these catalysts can be made
in making even thinner Pt films and using smaller WC
particles, the positive results observed here are a significant
step towards more efficiently utilizing precious metals in
powder catalysts in electrochemical devices.
5 ALD cycles Pt–WC
10 ALD cycles Pt–WC
30 ALD cycles Pt–WC
Pt/C
0.20
0.49
0.85
10
0.00055
0.0031
0.0055
0.025
The log of the exchange current densities were calculated
from the Tafel parameters and are plotted against Pt ALD
cycles shown in Fig. 3(a) and Pt surface area as determined by
Cu stripping measurements shown in Fig. 3(b). These figures
show that a limiting value for HER activity is reached, which
corresponds to the Pt/C value. The exchange current densities
of the 10 wt% Pt/C catalyst and the WC powders are indicated
by dashed lines. As shown in Fig. 3(a) and (b), increasing the
Pt deposition brings the Pt/WC exchange current density to
the Pt/C value, which is in agreement with the previous study
on planar thin film catalysts.7
We acknowledge financial support from the Department of
Energy (DE-FG02-00ER15104). We thank Ying Liu and
Dr William Mustain for synthesizing and providing the
WC particles.
Furthermore, similar to what was observed with ML
Pt–WC thin film catalysts, Pt/C HER activity is reached as
the Pt coverage on WC increases to an equivalent of 1 ML.
Although an ideal single ML of Pt is not produced on the
WC powder using ALD, the presence of a thin Pt layer on the
WC substrate is sufficient to bring about activities that are
comparable to conventional Pt catalysts. The Pt loadings are
also considerably less than what is typically used in electro-
chemical experiments. The Pt wt% for each of the above-
mentioned ALD Pt–WC catalysts were determined from
atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS) measurements after
digestion of the powder samples in aqua regia, and are
displayed in Table 1. By comparison, the literature typically
uses Pt loadings of 10–40 wt%. Table 1 also shows the total mass
of Pt loaded onto the electrode for each HER measurement. The
mass of Pt for each of the ALD Pt–WC electrodes is a fraction of
the mass of Pt used for the Pt/C electrode, clearly demonstrating
how the ALD Pt-coated WC catalysts utilize Pt more efficiently
than the bulk Pt catalyst.
Notes and references
1 H. Chhina, S. Campbell and O. Kesler, J. Power Sources, 2007,
164, 431–440.
2 D. V. Esposito and J. G. Chen, Energy Environ. Sci., 2011, 4,
3900–3912.
3 D. Ham and J. Lee, Energies (Basel, Switz.), 2009, 2, 873–899.
4 D. J. Ham, R. Ganesan and J. S. Lee, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy,
2008, 33, 6865–6872.
5 H. H. Hwu and J. G. Chen, Chem. Rev., 2005, 105, 185–212.
6 Y. Y. Shao, J. Liu, Y. Wang and Y. H. Lin, J. Mater. Chem., 2009,
19, 46–59.
7 D. V. Esposito, S. T. Hunt, A. L. Stottlemyer, K. D. Dobson,
B. E. McCandless, R. W. Birkmire and J. G. Chen, Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed., 2010, 49, 9859–9862.
8 A. L. Stottlemyer, E. C. Weigert and J. G. Chen, Ind. Eng. Chem.
Res., 2011, 50, 16–22.
9 E. C. Weigert, A. L. Stottlemyer, M. B. Zellner and J. G. Chen,
J. Phys. Chem. C, 2007, 111, 14617–14620.
10 E. C. Weigert, S. Arisetty, S. G. Advani, A. K. Prasad and
J. G. Chen, J. New Mater. Electrochem. Syst., 2008, 11, 243–251.
11 H. Yang, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2011, 50, 2674–2676.
12 J. Zhang, F. H. B. Lima, M. H. Shao, K. Sasaki, J. X. Wang,
J. Hanson and R. R. Adzic, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2005, 109,
22701–22704.
Previous work with ML Pt–WC thin films postulated that
the reasons for the similar HER activities are due to the
similarities in the electronic properties between bulk Pt and
ML Pt on WC. This can be observed when the hydrogen
binding energy (HBE) is used as a chemical descriptor for the
HER reaction. The HBE of WC is very strong, but when a ML
Pt is added on top of it, the HBE value decreases to be very
similar to that of Pt.7 Although more than the ideal one single
ML of Pt is deposited onto WC in this work (Fig. 1), ultra-low
loading Pt thin films are achieved. Additional work should be
devoted to determine ways to make the Pt nucleation more
efficient, which in turn will create smaller particles and thinner
Pt layers on the WC powder. WC was shown here to be a good
core material for Pt for this particular electrochemical reaction.
In a previous study, the stability of Pt/WC was investigated
using a well-characterized WC film with one monolayer Pt.7 The
Pt/WC thin film was characterized using X-ray photoelectron
spectroscopy (XPS) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM)
before and after HER measurements, which revealed that
Pt/WC remained stable under HER conditions. Similar studies
13 I. J. Hsu, D. V. Esposito, E. G. Mahoney, A. Black and J. G. Chen,
J. Power Sources, 2011, 196, 8307–8312.
14 M. D. Obradovic, B. M. Babic, A. Kowal, V. V. Panic and
S. L. J. Gojkovic, J. Serb. Chem. Soc., 2008, 73, 1197–1209.
15 Y. Liu and W. E. Mustain, ACS Catal., 2010, 1, 212–220.
16 E. J. Rees, C. D. A. Brady and G. T. Burstein, Mater. Lett., 2008,
62, 1–3.
17 J. W. Elam, M. D. Groner and S. M. George, Rev. Sci. Instrum.,
2002, 73, 2981–2987.
18 T. Aaltonen, M. Ritala, T. Sajavaara, J. Keinonen and M. Leskela,
Chem. Mater., 2003, 15, 1924–1928.
19 J. S. King, A. Wittstock, J. Biener, S. O. Kucheyev, Y. M. Wang,
T. F. Baumann, S. K. Giri, A. V. Hamza, M. Baeumer and
S. F. Bent, Nano Lett., 2008, 8, 2405–2409.
20 W. Setthapun, W. D. Williams, S. M. Kim, H. Feng, J. W. Elam,
F. A. Rabuffetti, K. R. Poeppelmeier, P. C. Stair, E. A. Stach,
F. H. Ribeiro, J. T. Miller and C. L. Marshall, J. Phys. Chem. C,
2010, 114, 9758–9771.
21 I. J. Hsu, D. A. Hansgen, B. E. McCandless, B. G. Willis and
J. G. Chen, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2011, 115, 3709–3715.
c
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2012
Chem. Commun., 2012, 48, 1063–1065 1065