153117-3
Fukata et al.
Appl. Phys. Lett. 90, 153117 ͑2007͒
carrier concentration by HAT cannot be estimated from the
change in intensity. Instead of using intensity, the passivation
efficiency can be estimated from the ESR linewidth, which
decreased for heavily P-doped Si, it would indicate the pas-
sivation of P by H. Figure 4͑b͒ clearly shows this, giving
evidence for the passivation of P by H. If the data reported
for bulk Si are assumed to correspond to those for SiNWs, it
can be estimated that 30% of active P dopants were passi-
vated by HAT at 120 °C.9,10
In conclusion, P doping in SiNWs during laser ablation
was confirmed by the ESR signal of conduction electrons
and the EDX peak of the P K␣ line. The concentration of P
donors was controlled by the content of P in the Si target.
The donor concentration of electrically active donors was
also controlled by hydrogen passivation. In addition to the
ESR signal of conduction electrons, the ESR results showed
the presence of defects in the surface oxide layer and at the
interface between the surface oxide and crystalline Si core.
The defects were also passivated by hydrogen and oxygen
atoms.
This work was partly supported by a Grant-in-Aid for
Scientific Research ͑2005͒ on Young Scientists ͑B͒
͑17760003͒ and the 21st Century COE ͑Center of Excel-
lence͒ Program “Promotion of Creative Interdisciplinary Ma-
terials Science for Novel Functions” under the Ministry of
Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology ͑MEXT͒
of Japan. TEM observations were also partly supported by
MEXT’s “Nanotechnology Support Project.” This work was
also performed under the interuniversity cooperative Re-
search Program of the Institute for Materials Research, To-
hoku University.
FIG. 4. ͑Color online͒ ͑a͒ Dependence of ESR signals on oxidation and
HAT temperature, and ͑b͒ change in the ESR signal of conduction electrons
by oxidation and HAT. The SiNWs were synthesized using a Si95͑Ni2P͒
5
target.
face oxide and Si core of SiNWs which are so-called Pb
centers. We also observed a similar signal for nanocrystalline
Si embedded in SiO2.21 Wang reported that amorphous Si
states exist around the interface between the surface oxide
and Si core of SiNWs, and defects in such amorphous Si
states can be the origin of the signal at 2.005.20 It is, how-
ever, not clear at the present time.
Next, the passivation of defects and P donors in SiNWs
was investigated, as shown in Fig. 4. Annealing in O2 gas at
900 °C reduced the ESR signal intensity of interfacial de-
fects ͑g=2.005͒, indicating that oxidation is effective against
their passivation. On the other hand, the ESR signal at 2.002
increases rather than decreases. For further passivation of the
interfacial defects and EX centers, H atoms were introduced
into P-doped SiNWs by HAT at 400 °C. The interfacial de-
fects were almost completely passivated by hydrogenation.
The intensity of the EX centers decreased by more than two-
thirds, showing that hydrogenation is effective against the
passivation of the EX centers.
The ESR signal of conduction electrons showed no
change after oxidation at 900 °C and subsequent HAT at
400 °C. In general, H passivation of P donors, i.e., the de-
crease in the concentration of conduction electrons, is
achieved by hydrogenation at less than 200 °C. The most
appropriate temperature is around 120 °C, which is due to
the thermal stability of the P–Si–H passivation center.12,15 To
investigate the H passivation of P donors, HAT was per-
formed at 120 °C after HAT at 400 °C. The results are also
shown in Fig. 4͑a͒. The interfacial defects and EX centers
were further passivated by HAT at 120 °C. The change in
the ESR signal of conduction electrons is shown in Fig. 4͑b͒.
It has been reported that the ESR signal intensity of conduc-
1Y. Cui, X. Duan, J. Hu, and C. M. Lieber, C. R. Math. 104, 5213 ͑2000͒.
2Y. Cui and C. M. Lieber, Science 291, 851 ͑2001͒.
3D. D. D. Ma, C. S. Lee, and S. T. Lee, Appl. Phys. Lett. 79, 2468 ͑2001͒.
4K. K. Lew, L. Pan, T. E. Bogart, S. M. Dilts, E. C. Dickey, J. M. Redwing,
Y. Wang, M. Cabassi, T. S. Mayer, and S. W. Novak, Appl. Phys. Lett. 85,
3101 ͑2004͒.
5L. Pan, K. K. Lew, J. M. Redwing, and E. C. Dickey, J. Cryst. Growth
277, 428 ͑2005͒.
6Y. Yang, K. K. Lew, T. T. Ho, L. Pan, S. W. Novak, E. C. Dickey, J. M.
Redwing, and T. S. Mayer, Nano Lett. 5, 2139 ͑2005͒.
7C. Yang, Z. Zhong, and C. M. Lieber, Science 310, 1304 ͑2005͒.
8N. Fukata, J. Chen, T. Sekiguchi, N. Okada, K. Murakami, T. Tsurui, and
S. Ito, Appl. Phys. Lett. 89, 203109 ͑2006͒.
9S. Maekawa and N. Kinoshita, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 20, 1447 ͑1965͒.
10J. D. Quirt and J. R. Marko, Phys. Rev. B 5, 1716 ͑1972͒.
11K. J. Chang and D. J. Chadi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 1422 ͑1988͒.
12K. Bergman, M. Stavola, S. J. Pearton, and T. Hayes, Phys. Rev. B 38,
9643 ͑1988͒.
13S. K. Estreicher, L. Throckmorton, and D. S. Marynick, Phys. Rev. B 39,
13241 ͑1989͒.
14C. Herring, N. M. Johnson, and C. G. van de Walle, Phys. Rev. B 64,
125209 ͑2001͒.
15N. Fukata, S. Sasaki, S. Fujimura, H. Haneda, and K. Murakami, Jpn. J.
Appl. Phys., Part 1 35, 3937 ͑1996͒.
16R. S. Wagner and W. C. Ellis, Appl. Phys. Lett. 4, 89 ͑1964͒.
17N. Fukata, T. Oshima, K. Murakami, T. Kizuka, T. Tsurui, and S. Ito,
Appl. Phys. Lett. 86, 213112 ͑2005͒.
18N. Fukata, T. Oshima, N. Okada, T. Kizuka, T. Tsurui, S. Ito, and K.
Murakami, J. Appl. Phys. 100, 024311 ͑2006͒.
19A. Baumer, M. Stutzmann, M. S. Brandt, F. C. K. Au, and S. T. Lee, Appl.
Phys. Lett. 85, 943 ͑2004͒.
20R. P. Wang, Appl. Phys. Lett. 88, 142104 ͑2006͒.
21N. Fukata, C. Li, H. Morihiro, K. Murakami, M. Mitome, and Y. Bando,
tion electrons shows no linearity with P concentration in
Appl. Phys. A: Mater. Sci. Process. 84, 395 ͑2006͒.
129.25.131.175 On: Mon, 06 Oct 2014 18:46:52