7
066 Inorg. Chem. 2009, 48, 7066–7069
DOI: 10.1021/ic900087c
Reduction of Titanium Dioxide to Metallic Titanium Conducted under the Autogenic
Pressure of the Reactants
Michal Eshed, Alexander Irzh, and Aharon Gedanken*
Department of Chemistry, Kanbar Laboratory for Nanomaterials, Nanotechnology Research Center, Institute
of Nanotechnology and Advanced Materials, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan 52900, Israel
Received January 16, 2009
We report on a reaction to convert titanium dioxide to titanium. The reduction reaction was done under the autogenic
pressure of the reactants at 750 °C for 5 h. The MgO, a by- product, was removed by acids to obtain pure metallic
titanium.
1
. Introduction
synthesis to separate the electrodeposited titanium from the
ionic solutions have been hampered by difficulties. The
Metallic Titanium shows excellent physical and chemical
current paper presents a simple process to convert TiO to
2
properties, such as low density, high corrosion resistance at
high temperatures, good mechanical strength, ductility, and
fatigue resistance. It also exhibits a good biocompatibility
Ti, termed “RAPET” (Reaction under Autogenic Pressure at
ElevatedTemperature). The RAPET reaction takes place ina
closed cell (made of parts of the Swagelok company), and has
1
and bio integration with the human body.
9,10
been described elsewhere. The union (made by Swagelok)
is filled with the reactants, and the reaction is condu-
cted without a catalyst or a solvent at high temperature
and pressure. The pressure in the cell is generated from
the evaporation of the reactants or the products, and the
Swagelok union serves as a relief valve at 160 atm.
Several techniques are currently used to synthesize Tita-
nium. The first, is an electrochemical method for the direct
reduction of solid TiO in which the oxygen is ionized,
2
dissolved in a molten salt, and discharged at the anode,
2,3
leaving pure titanium at the cathode.
The most popular method is the Kroll process. At the first
step TiO is converted to TiCl , after which titanium is
2
4
2. Experimental Details
produced by the reduction of titanium tetrachloride with
an active metal such as magnesium at 800-900 °C according
All chemicals were obtained from Aldrich. A 3 mL closed
vessel cell was assembled from stainless steel parts
4-8
to the following reaction:
0
0
(
Swagelok). A 3/8 union part was plugged from both sides
by standard caps. For this synthesis, 0.5 g of titanium dioxide
anatase) and 0.3 g of magnesium powder were introduced
2
Mg þ TiCl4ðgÞ f 2MgCl þ TiðsÞ
ðlÞ 2ðlÞ
(
into the cell, and the cell was closed tightly at room tempera-
ture under nitrogen atmosphere (in a nitrogen- filled
glovebox). The cell (Swagelok) was placed inside an iron pipe
at the center of the tube furnace. The temperature was raised
at a rate of 10 °C per minute. The closed cell was heated at
750 °C for 5 h. The reaction proceeded under the autogenic
pressure of the precursor. The closed vessel cell (Swagelok)
was gradually cooled (5 h) to room temperature. Magnesium
oxide was removed by treatment with an aqueous solution of
acetic acid for 1 day. The sample was collected by centrifuga-
tion (9000 rpm for 20 min, Hettich Universal 32) and was
washed twice with water, once with ethanol, and then dried.
Since we observed that not all the MgO was dissolved we
continued the treatment by placing the products for an
additional 2 days in formic acid, after which the washing
and drying was repeated.
The byproduct, MgCl , is removed by vacuum distillation,
which complicates this process. The titanium is only partially
2
reduced in the process and lower chlorides such as TiCl and
2
TiCl3 are also obtained. Their removal makes the pro-
cess very costly. Moreover, attempts in the electrochemical
*
To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: gedanken@mail.
biu.ac.il.
(
1) Garbacz, H.; Kurzydlowski, K. J. Macromol. Symp. 2007, 253, 128–
1
33.
(
2) Suzuki, R. O. JOM 2007, 68–71.
3) Jiang, K.; Hu, X.; Ma, M.; Wang, D.; Xianbo Jin, G. Q.; Chen, G. Z.
(
Angew. Chem. 2006, 118, 442–446.
(
(
(
(
(
4) Alexander P. P. U.S. Patent 2,038,402, 1936.
5) Alexander P. P. U.S. Patent 2,043,363, 1936.
6) Alexander P. P. U.S. Patent 2,082,134, 1937.
7) Kroll, W. J. Trans. Am. Electrochem. Soc. 1940, 78, 35–47.
8) Ikeshima, T. In Titanium Science and Technology, Proc. 5th Int.
(9) Pol, S.; Pol, V.; Gedanken, A. Chem.;Eur. J. 2004, 10, 4467–4473.
(10) Pol, S. V.; Pol, V. G.; Kessler, V. G.; Seisenbaeva, G. A.; Sung, M.;
Asai, S.; Gedanken, A. J. Phys. Chem. B 2004, 108, 6322–6327.
Conf. Titanium, Mu ꢀe nchen 1984; Lutjering, G., Zwicker, U., Bunk, W., Eds.;
( 14 DGM-Deutsche Gesellschaft fu ꢀe r Materialurkunde. V., Oberursal, 1985.
3
pubs.acs.org/IC
Published on Web 07/08/2009
r 2009 American Chemical Society