beam-induced diffusivity scales linearly with nuclear stop-
ping power in the athermal regime only, i.e., at irradiation
temperatures below the transition temperature Tc . Brong-
ersma et al.20 have shown that the temperature dependence
of in SiO2, very similarly, shows a temperature depen-
rad
dent and independent regime with TcϷ300 K.20 Tc is a ma-
terials parameter which scales with the cohesive energy.15,16
Using a cohesive energy of 8.7 eV,17 we find that for tung-
sten TcϷ830 K. Because this is well above room tempera-
ture, it is expected that our measurements of in W films
rad
were performed in the temperature-independent regime. To
experimentally study the temperature dependence would be
an interesting next step towards understanding radiation-
induced flow of W.
In conclusion, the intrinsic stress in PE-CVD W films
can be relaxed at room temperature by ion irradiation. The
stress relaxes via creep or flow in an exponential fashion
with ion fluence. The relaxation rate scales linearly with the
portion of the stopping that is deposited into atomic colli-
sions. This is consistent with the idea that the relaxation
phenomenon is a ballistic effect, that will occur during irra-
diation with any ion. Based on conceptual similarities with
beam-induced diffusion, we speculate that the product of
beam-induced viscosity and diffusivity is a constant that de-
pends on materials parameters such as the elastic constant
and others.
The authors thank J. Burke for assistance with the ion
irradiations. The TiW adhesion layers were grown by J. Mur-
phy. Thanks are also due to R. Egloff, M. L. Brongersma,
and A. Polman ͑FOM-Institute, Amsterdam, The Nether-
lands͒ for valuable discussions.
FIG. 3. Double log plot of rad /Y against nuclear stopping power for W
͑data from this work͒, Al ͑data from Ref. 7͒, SiO2 ͑Ref. 8͒, sodalime-
borosilicate glass ͑Ref. 8͒, and amorphous silicon ͑Ref. 7͒. The lines are best
fits, and both have identical slopes of Ϫ1.1.
aspect that has to be taken into account in the case of plastic
flow is how well a material can elastically accommodate an
imposed mechanical strain. To test this idea, we plotted
rad devided by the bielastic constant of the film for different
materials in Fig. 3 as a function of maximum nuclear stop-
ping power.19 The data points for W ͑dots͒ are based on the
present work, while the data points for annealed Al ͑black
triangle͒ and pure amorphous silicon ͑open triangle͒ are
based on measurements by Volkert and Polman,7 and the
data for SiO2 ͑circles͒ and sodalime-borosilicate glass ͑ϫ͒
are obtained from Ref. 8. Although may differ widely
rad
from material to material, scaling by the biaxial elastic con-
stant Y, results in a quantity that is a clear function of nuclear
stopping for the polycrystalline metal films ͑filled data
points͒ as well as the amorphous covalent films ͑open data
points͒. On the log–log plot, the slopes of the best linear fits
are Ϫ1.1 for both classes of materials, which approximately
1 E. K. Broadbent, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 5, 1661 ͑1987͒.
2 A. J. Learn and D. W. Foster, J. Appl. Phys. 58, 2001 ͑1985͒.
3 R. A. Roy, R. Petkie, and A. Boulding, J. Mater. Res. 6, 80 ͑1991͒.
4 R. A. Hoffman, J. C. Lin, and J. P. Chambers, Thin Solid Films 206, 230
͑1991͒.
corresponds to an inverse relationship between and the
rad
nuclear stopping. This striking similarity in the behavior of
different materials may indicate that the ion beam induced
relaxation mechanism can be understood in a general theo-
retical framework, as has been the case for beam-induced
diffusion.14–16
5 H. Windischmann, J. Appl. Phys. 62, 1800 ͑1987͒.
6 C. A. Davis, Thin Solid Films 226, 30 ͑1993͒.
7 C. A. Volkert and A. Polman, Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 235, 3 ͑1992͒.
8 E. Snoeks, T. Weber, A. Cacciato, and A. Polman, J. Appl. Phys. 78, 4723
͑1995͒.
However, more work is needed to understand which
other materials constants should be taken into account. For
instance, the relaxation rate in the amorphous covalent ma-
terials is faster than the metals for the same amount of
nuclear stopping. This might be a result of the recrystalliza-
tion process which happens during the cooling phase of the
collision cascade in the case of metals and not in the case of
amorphous materials. For metals this means that although the
stress may be fully relieved during the peak of the spike,
some stress is reintroduced by the crystallization. This effec-
tively results in a higher value for the radiation-induced vis-
cosity. In glasses this is not the case since the cooling down
does not cause a phase change inside the spike.20
9 G. G. Stoney, Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. A 82, 172 ͑1909͒.
10
TRIM-89: J. P. Biersack and L. J. Haggmark, Nucl. Instrum. Methods 174,
257 ͑1980͒.
11 S. W. H. Yih and C. T. Wang, Tungsten ͑Plenum, New York, 1979͒.
12 T. Diaz de la Rubia, R. S. Averback, Horngming Hsieh, and R. Benedek,
J. Mater. Res. 4, 579 ͑1989͒.
13 M. Ghaly and R. S. Averback, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 364 ͑1994͒.
14 W. Bolse, Mater. Sci. Eng. 12, 53 ͑1994͒.
15 Y.-T. Cheng, Mater. Sci. Rep. 5, 45 ͑1990͒.
16 M. Nastasi and J. W. Mayer, Mater. Sci. Eng. R. Rep. 12, 1 ͑1994͒.
17 P. A. Egelstaff, An Introduction to the Liquid State ͑Oxford University
Press, Oxford, 1992͒, Chap. 13.
18 P. A. Duine, J. Sietsma, and A. van den Beukel, Phys. Rev. B 48, 6957
͑1993͒.
It is outlined in, for example, Refs. 14–16 that beam-
induced diffusion is composed of a ͑beam-induced͒ athermal
contribution and a ͑beam-assisted͒ thermal migration. The
19 The average stopping power in the film is about 75% of the maximum
stopping power for all present irradiations.
20 M. L. Brongersma, E. Snoeks, and A. Polman ͑unpublished͒.
Appl. Phys. Lett., Vol. 71, No. 2, 14 July 1997 Snoeks, Boutros, and Barone 269
132.174.255.116 On: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 17:51:34