126
J. Qu et al. / Journal of Alloys and Compounds 686 (2016) 122e129
Fig. 4. CV curves of the obtained carbon, pristine and annealed SnO2/C composite ate
rate of 0.1 mV sꢀ1
.
change in particle size instead of a serious fusion can be attributed
to the spatial restriction of the amorphous carbon during the
annealing process.
To illustrate the electrochemical properties of the obtained
composite, cyclic voltammetry experiments are first conducted. As
presented in Fig. 4, the different CV curves can be observed. For the
blank carbon sample, there are no redox peaks can be observed. For
the pristine SnO2/C composite, there are two broad cathodic peaks
between 0.5 V and 1.1 V, which correspond to the reduction of SnO2
to the metallic Sn and the formation of the solid electrolyte inter-
phase [4]. The anodic peaks appearing at around 0.11 V can be
mainly attributed to the formation of LixSn [4]. For the annealed
SnO2/C composite, two less noticeable cathodic peaks can be
observed, which might result from the partial reduction of SnO2. It
is obvious that the obtained pristine and annealed SnO2/C com-
posite can show higher capacity than that of blank carbon sample.
Fig. 5 shows the initial discharge-charge curves of the obtained
samples. For the pristine SnO2/C composite, two obvious sloping
plateaus can be observed, while for the annealed composite, the
plateau becomes less noticeable, in consistent with the results of
CV. The initial discharge and charge capacities of the pristine
composite are 1474 and 748 mAh gꢀ1 with a coulombic efficiency of
50.7%, while the corresponding values for the annealed composite
increase to 1698 and 916 mAh gꢀ1 with a coulombic efficiency of
53.9%. The large initial irreversible capacity loss could be explained
by the irreversible reduction of SnO2 to Sn, the irreversible for-
mation of Li2O, the formation of a solid electrolyte interface (SEI)
layer, and electrolyte decomposition. The coulombic efficiency is
relatively constant (97%) from the 8th cycle and can keep almost
100% from the 20th cycle, indicating the high stability of the two
SnO2/C composites. To test the rate capability and cycling stability
of the composite, the discharge capacity at different current den-
sities is measured (Fig. 5b). The annealed composite shows the
highest discharge capacity, and both composites display superior
performance to the carbon sample. For the annealed SnO2/C com-
posite, the discharge capacity of 968 mAh gꢀ1 obtained after the
20th cycle at the current density of 200 mA gꢀ1 is about 2.6 times
higher than the theoretical capacity of graphite. When the current
density is increased to 5000 mA gꢀ1, the discharge capacity can be
retained at 435 mAh gꢀ1, still higher than the theoretical capacity of
graphite. More interestingly, after 60 cycles with varying current
densities, the discharge capacity of the annealed composite boun-
ces back to 1015 mAh gꢀ1, even higher than that at the 20th cycle.
The higher capacity is achieved by the better distribution of the
Fig. 5. (a) Initial discharge-charge curves (c) of the obtained composites; and (b) cycle
performance of the obtained composites at different current densities: 200 mA gꢀ1 for
20 cycles, 500 mA gꢀ1, 1000 mA gꢀ1, 2000 mA gꢀ1, 5000 mA gꢀ1 for 10 cycles each; and
the 200 mA gꢀ1 for 20 cycles.
SnO2 nanoparticles on the carbon matrix, which can react with the
SEI layer to release Liþ [44,45]. The good capacity retention may be
due to the unique structure with high surface area as well as the
small sizes of the SnO2 nanoparticles which can facilitate the
electrolyte penetration and shorten the transport distance of Liþ
ions, ensuring a high flux of Liþ through the interface [46]. And the
carbon matrix can enhance the structural stability, buffer the vol-
ume variation and prevent the agglomeration of SnO2 nano-
particles, leading to enhanced capacity retention [25e31]. For the
pristine composite, the discharge capacity is 769 mAh gꢀ1 at the
current density of 200 mA gꢀ1, and 315 mAh gꢀ1 at the current
density of 5000 mA gꢀ1 over 60 cycles.
As discussed above, SnO2/C structures show high capacity and
good cycle retention, however, the pristine composite does not
offer higher discharge capacity compared with the annealed one,
despite its smaller nanocrystal sizes. The reasons can be summa-
rized as follows: 1) annealing could strengthen the interaction
between SnO2 and carbon and result in good conductivity of the
carbon matrix, which are desirable for fast transport of electrons
and Li-ions. 2) SnO2 nanocrystals in the pristine composite would
aggregate to larger particles, while the size in the annealed com-
posite would be well retained [2,3]. To further understand the
improved discharge-charge capacity and cycle performance of
annealed nanocomposite, EIS tests in Fig. 6 were performed after
discharging to 1 V for two cycles. The semicircle in the high fre-
quency region represent the resistance of SEI film (Rsf) and charge