Wang and Andrews
Table 3. Calculated Fundamental Frequencies for the Bridged
Ge(H)dMoH3 and Ge(H)dWH3 Germylidene Complexesa
We have also calculated (B3LYP) a triplet state butterfly-
structured product Ge(H)2WH2, which has the same energy
as singlet HGetWH3, but the calculated W-H stretching
frequencies 1800 cm-1 (287 km/mol) and 1968 cm-1 (102
km/mol) do not correlate with our observed germylidyne
frequencies. In addition, the analogous triplet state butterfly-
structured Si(H)2WH2 product is 1 kcal/mol higher in energy
than singlet HSitWH3. The calculated W-H stretching
frequencies 1806 cm-1 (284 km/mol) and 1964 cm-1 (101
km/mol) for this butterfly structure do not match our observed
silylidyne frequencies.15
Frequencies calculated with the BPW91 functional are
slightly lower (Table S2, Supporting Information), and they
correlate well with the B3LYP values, which substantiates
the application of DFT to support vibrational assignments
for these molecules.27,28
A close correlation between argon and neon matrix
frequencies is expected as the less polarizable neon matrix
host interacts less with the guest molecule than the more
polarizable argon matrix,29 and the 21-24 cm-1 differences
(1.2%) observed here are appropriate for the vibration of
metal hydrides with polar bonds.14
Reaction Mechanisms. The reaction of chromium, mo-
lybdenum, or tungsten atoms with GeH4 gives the straight-
forward inserted metal hydride GeH3-MH, which is trapped
in the cold argon matrix for M ) Cr, and some for M )
Mo, but most continues further to HGetMoH3 and with
tungsten all goes to the lower energy HGetWH3 final
product. This is consistent with the product energy profile
(Figure 4), which shows that the metal hydride is the only
plausible product for chromium, one possibility for molyb-
denum, and most unlikely for tungsten. Remember that
annealing increases the HGetMoH3 and HGetWH3 prod-
ucts,
Ge(H)dMoH3
Ge(H)dWH3
approximate description
calc
int
calc
int
M-H str, a′
M-H str, a′′
M-H str, a′
M-(H) str, a′
(H)-Ge str, a′
MH2 bend, a′
MH2 rock, a′′
MH2 twist, a′′
M-H def, a′′
Ge-M str, a′
M-H def, a′
MH2 tors, a′′
1906
1904
1811
1754
1015
904
833
719
598
452
249
131
16
101
5
1966
1960
1902
1717
1219
874
860
674
594
436
124
213
150
10
11
8
34
31
32
53
7
2
90
19
72
45
9
345
337
297
264
21
8
a Ground states 1A′. Frequencies and intensities are in cm-1 and km/
mol computed with B3LYP/6-311++G(3df,3pd) in the harmonic ap-
proximation using the SDD core potential and basis set for Mo and W.
Symmetry notations are based on the Cs structure. Calculations with the
BPW91 density functional gave similar frequencies.
The assignments to HGetWH3 and HGetMoH3 follow
those for HSitWH3 and HSitMoH3 and are based on
B3LYP harmonic frequency calculations.15 For HGetMoH3
we find a strong degenerate Mo-H antisymmetric mode at
1895 cm-1 and a half as strong Mo-H symmetric mode at
1891 cm-1 (Table 2), and we observe only two bands at
1804.8 and 1801.0 cm-1 with 2:1 relative intensity (frequen-
cies overestimated by 5.0%). In addition the strong band is
25 cm-1 lower than the strong band for HCtMoH3 and the
calculated value for HGetMoH3 is 16 cm-1 lower than the
calculated value for the methylidyne. However, the calculated
value for the bridged species is only 5 cm-1 lower (Table
3), which is not as good agreement by 11 cm-1, and the
bridged species has an observable bridge bond stretching
mode predicted 150 cm-1 lower, but this band is not
observed. Hence, our 1804.8 and 1801.0 cm-1 bands are best
assigned to the HGetMoH3 germylidyne, which is separated
from the lower energy bridged species by a 14 kcal/mol
higher energy transition state.
M + GeH4 f GeH3-MH f GeH2dMH2 f HGetMH3
(1)
which shows that reaction 1 is spontaneous for Mo and W
atoms to give the final germylidyne product. Here, however,
we are able to trap very little GeH3-MoH in solid argon
and no GeH3-WH, GeH2dMoH2, and GeH2dWH2 inter-
mediates as the reaction goes on to the more stable final
products.30 We were not able to trap any GeH3-MoH in
the more slowly condensing solid neon matrix at 4 K. In the
silicon case, both SiH3-MoH and HSitMoH3 are preserved
as major products.15 Finally, on the basis of reaction energies,
HGetWH3 is more stable than HGetMoH3 as reaction 1
is 64 kcal/mol exothermic for W and 13 kcal/mol exothermic
for Mo, computed at the B3LYP level of theory.
For the HGetWH3 molecule our calculation predicted a
strong degenerate W-H antisymmetric mode at 1961 cm-1
and a half as-strong W-H symmetric mode at 1951 cm-1,
and the two predictions are in very good agreement with
the 1894.0 and 1887.5 cm-1 experimental values (overesti-
mated by 3.5% and 3.3%). The two bands are observed 13
and 8 cm-1 lower than the corresponding bands for
HCtWH3, and our calculation predicts them 10 and 9 cm-1
lower. For the bridged species, the two higher modes are
predicted to fall 5 and 0 cm-1 lower than for the methylidyne,
and a comparable bridge bond stretching mode at 58 cm-1
lower. Hence, the two higher bands for the bridged species
are not predicted as accurately as those for the germylidyne,
but the clincher is the absence of the observable bridged
stretching mode. The unobserved lower energy bridged
species is separated from HGetWH3 by an 11 kcal/mol
higher energy transition state. The new peaks observed with
the GeHxDx-4 reagent are in agreement with our calculations
for the HGetMHD2 and DGetMH2D species, but these
band positions are not sufficiently unique to rule out the
bridged species in their own right.
Structure and Bonding. The structures calculated for the
three products of each group 6 metal atom reaction are
collected in Figure 5. The three germyl metal hydrides have
Cs structures comparable to those found for the methyl metal
(27) Scott, A. P.; Radom, L. J. Phys. Chem. 1996, 100, 16502.
(28) Andersson, M. P.; Uvdal, P. L. J. Phys. Chem. A 2005, 109, 3937.
(29) Jacox, M. E. Chem. Phys. 1994, 189, 149.
(30) We would not be able to detect GeH3-WH, even if it were trapped, as
the two strongest infrared absorptions (Table S1) are likely to be
masked by germane precursor and product bands.
8164 Inorganic Chemistry, Vol. 47, No. 18, 2008