Journal of the American Chemical Society
Article
argues against it. Specifically, cyclopropane containing
substrate 1q reacted with diazoester 2a to yield the [1,2]-
rearrangement product 3q with the radical probe intact (Figure
2B).21,22
Scheme 2. Synthetic Derivatization of [2,3]-Rearrangement
Product
To gain insight into the key carbon−carbon bond formation
event in the copper-catalyzed reaction, we considered ion-pair
complexes (12a, 12b, 12c, 12d, and 12e) that could lead to
the [1,2]-rearrangement product 3a or the [2,3]-rearrange-
ment product diastereomers syn-4a and anti-4a with minimal
reorganization (Figure 2A).23 In principle, these ion-pairs
would be in equilibrium with each other and could recombine
to form copper-bound recombination products (e.g., 13a,
Figure 2A).24 However, recombination in a solvent cage is
expected to be faster than equilibration between ion-pairs.20g,25
Although a solvent cage was not explicitly modeled in our
calculations, the formation of ion-pairs in a solvent cage is
consistent with experimentally determined results. When
substrates 1i and 1r were simultaneously subjected to the
[1,2]-rearrangement conditions, we did not detect crossover
products 3s and 3a (Figure 2C).
We were able to find a transition state structure (TS12a
)
converting the ion-pair 12a to 13a, the Cu(hfacac)2-bound
experimentally observed product, with a 3.1 kcal/mol barrier.
Subsequent dissociation of Cu catalyst yields 3a. If 12a was
formed preferentially on the dissociation of the copper-
coordinated oxonium ylide 11, we propose that this ion-pair
could rapidly recombine to the experimentally observed
product (12a → 3a) before equilibration with other ion-
pairs. Comparisons of the various ion-pairs and metal-ylide
intermediate 11 do indeed reveal greater conformational
similarity between 11 and 12a than either 12b, 12c, 12d, or
12e (Figure 2A; see SI for details). We also investigated the
proposed stepwise ion-pair mechanism with other copper
catalysts (Cu(acac)2, CuCl2, Cu(hfacac)+, and Cu(acac)+), and
all qualitatively lead to similar results (see SI for details).
In summary, on the basis of our combined experimental and
computational data, we favor a mechanism for the rhodium-
promoted reaction where early catalyst dissociation occurs at
the ylide stage, and products are formed via a metal-free [2,3]-
sigmatropic rearrangement. For the copper-promoted reaction,
we favor a mechanism where a copper-coordinated ion-pair is
formed and rapidly recombines in a solvent cage to form the
observed [1,2]-rearrangement product.
Synthetic Applications of Regiodivergent Rearrange-
ments. The products generated through the [2,3]-rearrange-
ment proved to be versatile substrates to access building blocks
that are potentially useful for the synthesis of complex
molecules (Scheme 2). For example, rearrangement product
4a can undergo ozonolysis to yield indoxyl product 14. In the
presence of acid, the rearrangement product 4a is rearomatized
to furnish 2,3-disubstituted indole 15. In the presence of an
electrophilic source of bromine, it is selectively converted to 3-
bromomethyl indole 16.
procedure converted benzylester 3a to the Weinreb amide 17.
Subsequent removal of the N-tosyl group provided N−H
indole 18 in 93% yield. To access the relative configuration for
the proposed structure of sorazolon B (21), we treated the
Weinreb amide 18 first with ethynylmagnesium bromide
followed by methylmagnesium bromide, which generated
tertiary alcohol 19 in 19:1 dr and 57% yield over the two
steps. The relative configuration of the major diastereomer,
which was confirmed by X-ray crystallography, was consistent
with a Cram chelation controlled addition of methylmagne-
sium bromide.27 Alcohol 19 was then converted to diol 20,
which was subjected to gold catalyzed 6-endo cyclization.28
Although the resulting tricyclic skeleton of 21 was consistent
with the proposed structure of sorazolon B, the NMR data of
our synthetic sample did not match the corresponding data for
the natural product.
We hypothesized that the relative configuration of the two
stereogenic centers in sorazolon B may have been misassigned.
To test this hypothesis, we switched the order of addition of
Grignard reagents to the Weinreb amide 18. An initial addition
of methylmagnesium bromide followed by a Cram chelation
controlled addition of ethynylmagnesium bromide yielded the
tertiary alcohol 22 in 9:1 dr. The relative configuration of the
major diastereomer was confirmed by X-ray crystallography.
The treatment of methyl ether 22 with bromodimethylborane
and 2-methyl-2-butene resulted in the formation of diol 23. In
the presence of Au(MeCN)SbF6 and JohnPhos, diol 23 was
converted to tricycle 24, which had spectroscopic data that
were identical with the data reported for sorazolon B in the
original isolation paper.26
To demonstrate the synthetic utility of the [1,2]-rearrange-
ment products, we incorporated this transformation into the
first total synthesis of the indole alkaloid sorazolon B, which
enabled a stereochemical reassignment of the natural product’s
structure that was reported in the original isolation paper
(Scheme 3).26 To commence the total synthesis, 3-
(methoxymethyl)-1-tosyl-1H-indole (1a) was coupled with
diazoester 2a under the [1,2]-rearrangement conditions to
furnish benzylester 3a in 82% yield and >95:5 rr. The efficiency
of the reaction was maintained on a gram scale. A two-step
CONCLUSION
■
We developed catalyst-controlled regiodivergent rearrange-
ments of onium-ylides derived from indole methyl ethers and
diazoesters. While a copper catalyst promotes a regioselective
[1,2]-rearrangement, a rhodium catalyst facilitates a regiose-
lective and diastereoselective [2,3]-rearrangement. We present
experimental and computational studies that support divergent
mechanistic pathways for the two rearrangement processes. We
also describe the synthetic utility of the two rearrangements by
9021
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021, 143, 9016−9025