7
68
Journal of the American Ceramic Society—Suh and Han
Vol. 85, No. 5
vaporization is an irreversible reaction, it was possible to separate
the net amount of zinc weight loss by subtracting the weight
change due to oxidation–reduction from the total weight change.
Thus, the irreversible process results in permanent weight losses.
At 1100°C a negligibly small weight loss was observed with zinc
evaporation, whereas at 1200°C a significant weight change due to
zinc loss was detected. The weight loss stemming from zinc
vaporization increased exponentially with temperature. Below
1
300°C, the weight loss was a linear function of time, indicating
that the diffusion of elemental zinc to the surface of specimens is
fast enough to compensate the zinc loss at the interface region.
However, at 1400°C the weight change no longer followed the
linear dependence and showed a rather parabolic behavior with a
concave upward. It was confirmed that the rate of zinc vaporiza-
tion is strongly influenced by the core shape and the gas flow
around ferrite cores but is not affected by the grain size.
Fig. 7. Weight loss per hour (%) as a function of specific surface area for
toroidal and cylindrical ferrite cores.
References
1
S. Chikazumi, Physics of Ferromagnetism, 2nd Ed.; Ch. 9. Oxford University
Press, New York, 1997.
2
A. Goldman, Modern Ferrite Technology; Ch. 11. Van Norstand Reinhold, New
ZnO on the surface area the higher the rate of weight loss. It thus
leads to a parabolic behavior of zinc vaporization because the bulk
diffusion of ZnO to the surface area controls the evaporation
kinetics. However, weight loss due to zinc evaporation, obtained
from the total weight change less that due to the reduction reaction,
still has an important meaning from a practical point of view. A
processing condition as severe as heating at 1400°C is not common
in real sintering processes.
Figure 7 shows the weight change per hour as a function of
specific surface area of toroidal and cylindrical ferrite cores. As
summarized in Table I, the surface area of specimens per gram
depends on sample geometry. It is interesting that the cylindrical
specimen shows larger weight changes than those estimated from
the extrapolation of toroidal specimens. The vapor pressure de-
pends on the surface curvature. Toroidal specimens have a concave
surface (inner radius) as well as a convex surface (outer radius),
whereas cylindrical specimens have only a convex surface. In
addition, the gas flow would be stagnant at the inner side of the
toroid cores. The bare specimens showed five times greater
evaporation rate than cores put in an alumina crucible. These
results indicate that the core shape and gas flow around ferrite
cores are important factors affecting zinc vaporization.
York, 1992.
3
A. Beer and J. Schwarz, “Neue Ergenisse Uber den Einfluss der Sinterbedingun-
gen Auf,” IEEE. Trans. Mag., 2 [3] 470–74 (1966).
4
P. I. Slick and H. Basseches, “Thermogravimetric Study of the Solid–Gas
Interaction of a Mn-Zn Ferrite and the Effect on its Magnetic Properties,” IEEE.
Trans. Mag., 2 [3] 603–606 (1966).
5
G. Schnitt and P. Kleinert, “Studies on Material Transport during the Formation
of Zinc and Nickel Ferrite from the Oxides. II.,” Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem., 398, 41–53
(
1973).
6
D. W. Johnson, P. K. Gallerher, M. F. Yan, and H. Schreiber, “Vacancy Contents
and Phase Equilibria of Ti-Substituted Mn-Zn Ferrite,” J. Solid State Chem., 30,
2
99–310 (1979).
7
P. Sainamthip and V. R. W. Amarakoon, “Role of Zinc Volatilization on the
Microstructure Development of Manganese Zinc Ferrite,” J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 71 [8]
6
44–48 (1988).
8
H. J. Hellicar and A. Sicignano, “Dynamic Role of Zinc Oxide in the Sintering of
Manganese Zinc Ferrites,” Am. Ceram. Soc. Bull., 61 [4] 502–505 (1982).
9
S. H. Chen, S. C. Chang, I. N. Lin, M. J. Tung, and W. B. Shu, “Effect of Sintering
Parameters on Zn Loss for Preparation of High Permeability Mn-Zn Ferrites,” IEEE.
Trans. Mag., 28 [5] 2436–38 (1992).
10
Y. Okazaki, Y. Kitano, and T. Narutani, “Interaction between Mn-Zn Ferrites and
2 3
Al O Refractory during Sintering”; pp. 313–16 in Ferrites, Proceedings of the 6th
International Conference on Ferrites. Japan Society of Powder and Powder Metal-
lurgy, Tokyo, Japan, 1992.
1
1
S. H. Chen, S. C. Chang, and I. N. Lin, “Zinc Loss of Mn-Zn Ferrite Sintered
under Alumina Plate,” IEEE. Trans. Mag., 32 [5] 4857–59 (1996).
12
M. J. Tsay, M. J. Tung, C. J. Chen, and T. Y. Liu, “The Manufacture of
High-Permeability Mn-Zn Ferrites by Atmospherical Protect,” J. Phys. IV France, 7,
C1.71–C1.72 (1997).
1
3
R. Morineau, “Structual Defects and Oxidation–Reduction Equilibrium in Mn-Zn
Ferrites,” Phys. Staus. Soidi A, 38, 559–568 (1976).
IV. Conclusion
1
4
P. I. Slick, “A Thermogravimetric Study of the Equilibrium Relations between a
Mn-Zn Ferrite and an O -N Atmosphere”; pp. 81–83 in Ferrites, Proceedings of the
Zinc vaporization from Mn-Zn ferrites was quantitatively ana-
lyzed by a thermogravimetric technique. The amount of zinc loss
was determined by a periodic change of atmosphere. As the zinc
2
2
1
st International Conference on Ferrites. Edited by Y. Hoshino, S. Iida, and M.
Sugimoto. University of Tokyo Press, Tokyo, Japan, 1970.
Ⅺ