March 2005
Synthesis and Characterization of Nonporous Zirconia Particles
713
olution Chromatographic and Electrokinetics Separations,’’ J. Chromatogr., 892
[
K. K. Unger, H. Gieche, and J. N. Kinkel, ‘‘Spherical SiO Particles.’’ US
2
Table I. Surface Area Comparison of Synthesized Zirconia
Particles Between Theoretical Data and Experimental Data
Measured by Nitrogen Adsorption
1–2] 47–55 (2000).
2
Patent, US 4,775,520, 1988.
T. J. Barder and P. D. DuBois, ‘‘Process for Forming Highly Uniform Silica
3
w
Experimental surface area
2
Spheres.’’ US Patent, US 4,983,369, 1989.
M. Hanson and K. K. Unger, ‘‘Evaluation of Advanced Silica Packings, Part I:
4
2
Theoretical surface area (m /g)
Particle size (mm)
(mmol/m )
Synthesis and Characterization of Nonporous Silica Particles for HPLC,’’ LCGC,
1
5, 170–8 (1997).
T. Adam, S. Ludtke, and K. K. Unger, ‘‘Packing and Stationary Phase Design
1
0
2
3
.24 (Fig. 1 (a))
.84 (Fig. 1 (b))
.72 (Fig. 6 (b))
.61 (Fig. 9)
0.83
1.23
0.38
0.29
1.03
1.38
0.55
0.44
5
for Capillary Electroendosmotic Chromatogrpahy (CEC),’’ Chromatographia, 49
[
Suppl. 1] S49–55 (1999).
S. P. Radko and A. Chrambach, ‘‘Capillary Electrophoresis of Subcellular-
6
wSurface area measured by BET nitrogen adsorption.
Sized Particles,’’ J. Chromatogr. B, 722, 1–10 (1999).
D. Strmer, K. Gottschall, and R. M. Kamp, ‘‘Fast Separation of Biomolecu-
7
lars,’’ BioTec, 4, 32–7 (1993).
D. L. Gooding, M. N. Schmuch, and K. M. Gooding, ‘‘Analysis of Proteins
8
As previously mentioned, a method to prevent secondary nu-
with New, Mildly Hydrophobic High-Performance Liquid Chromatography Pack-
ing Materials,’’ J. Chromatogr., 296, 107–14 (1984).
cleation is to continue rotation during the aging time, as previ-
ously mentioned. Figure 9 shows the effect of extended stirring
on particle shape and size under rotation during the aging time.
The mean diameter of the particles is 3.61 mm with a standard
deviation of 0.21 mm. These synthesized particles are monodis-
perse and spherical. Figure 9 shows that secondary nucleation is
no longer apparent.
9
J. P. Chang, ‘‘Effect of Surfactants on the Separation of Proteins by Reversed-
Phase High-Performance Liquid Chromatography. I. Non-ionic Surfactants
(Tween),’’ J. Chromatogr., 317, 157–63 (1985).
D. B. Wall, M. T. Kachman, S. Gong, R. Hinderer, S. Parus, D. E. Misek, S.
10
M. Hanash, and M. Lubman, ‘‘Isoelectric Focusing Nonporous RP HPLC: A
Two-Dimensional Liquid-Phase Separation Method for Mapping of Cellular Pro-
teins with Identification Using MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry,’’ Anal. Chem.,
7
2, 1099–111 (2000).
11
G. J. Opiteck, J. W. Jorgenson, and R. J. Anderegg, ‘‘Two-Dimensional SEC/
(
6) Demonstration that the Particles are Nonporous
RPLC Couple to Mass Spectrometry for the Analysis of Peptides,’’ Anal. Chem.,
69, 2283–91 (1997).
R. Oostervink, J. C. Kraak, and H. Poppe, ‘‘Hydrodynamic Chromatography
In order to verify that the synthesized particles were nonporous,
we examined them using accurate BET nitrogen adsorption
measurements of the surface area. Table I gives the surface ar-
eas of the synthesized particles. For example, the surface areas
of the 0.84 mm particles shown in Fig. 1(b), and the 2.7 mm par-
ticles shown in Fig. 6(b) are 1.23 and 0.38 m /g, respectively,
which are quite close to the theoretical surface areas of dense
zirconia spheres of 0.84 and 2.7 mm —1.38 and 0.55 m /g, re-
spectively. The experimental surface areas are likely greater than
the theoretical surface areas because the surface of the synthe-
sized particles is slightly rough because of the growth of the
particles being surface reaction (nucleation) limited. We con-
clude that all particles synthesized in this work are indeed
nonporous.
12
of Soluble Macromolecules of Columns Packed with Submicron Nonporous
Spheres,’’ Am. Lab., 30 [6] C 24 ff (1998).
13
K. J. Reynolds and L. A. Colon, ‘‘Submicron Sized Organo-Silica Spheres
for Capillary Electrochromatography,’’ J. Liq. Relat. Technol., 23 [1] 161–73
2
(
2000).
14
J. Th. G. Overbeek, ‘‘Monodisperse Colloidal System, Fascinating and Use-
ful,’’ Adv Colloid Interf. Sci., 15, 251–77 (1982).
2
15
K. K. Unger, J. N. Kinkel, B. Anspach, and H. Gieche, ‘‘Evaluation of Ad-
vanced Silica Packing for the Separation of Biopolymers by High-Performance
Liquid Chromatography,’’ J. Chromatogr., 296, 3–14 (1984).
A. K. van Helden, J. W. Jansen, and A. Vrij, ‘‘Preparation and Characteri-
16
zation of Spherical Monodisperse Silica Dispersions in Nonaqueous Solvents,’’
J. Colloid Interf. Sci., 81, 354–68 (1981).
3
3
17
W. Stober, A. Fink, and E. Bohn, ‘‘Controlled Growth of Monodisperse Silica
Spheres in the Micron Size Range,’’ J. Colloid Interf. Sci., 26, 62–9 (1968).
18
K. K. Unger, H. Giesche, and J. N. Kinkel, ‘‘Spherical Silica Particles.’’
German Patent, DE 3,534,143, 1985.
19
L. F. Colwell and R. Hartwick, ‘‘Synthesis of Nonporous Silica Supports for
HPLC from Porous Silica Gels,’’ J. High Resolut. Chromatogr., 9, 304–5 (1986).
M. J. Annen, R. Kizhappali, P. W. Carr, and A. V. McCormick, ‘‘Develop-
IV. Conclusions and Perspectives
20
Synthetic methods for making monodisperse, spherical nonpo-
rous zirconia have been developed to reproducibly make parti-
cles within a size range of 0.8–4 mm. Submicron particles (0.84
mm) can be produced by increasing the water concentration and
decreasing the aging time. A maximum particle size of 2.1 mm
was achieved by increasing the aging time. Larger particles (e.g.,
ment of Porous Zirconia Spheres by Polymerization-Induced Colloid Aggrega-
tion-Effect of Polymerization Rate,’’ J. Mater. Sci., 29, 6123–30 (1994).
P. W. Carr, E. F. Funkenbusch, M. P. Rigney, P. L. Coleman, D. A. Hanggi,
21
and W. A. Schafer, ‘‘High Stability Porous Zirconium Oxide Spherule.’’ US Pat-
ent, US 5,015,373, 1991.
M. P. Rigney, T. P. Weber, and P. W. Carr, ‘‘Preparation and Evaluation of
22
a Polymer-Coated Zirconia Reversed-Phase Chromatography,’’ J. Chromatogr.,
484, 273–91 (1989).
C. F. Lorenzano Porras, P. W., Carr, and A. V. McCormick, ‘‘Relationship
2
.7 mm) can be produced by increasing the organic acid chain
length and by rigorously controlling the total stirring time.
.9–2.6 mm particles were produced by varying the reaction
23
2
Between Pore Structure and Diffusion Tortuosity of ZrO Colloidal Aggregates,’’
0
J. Colloid Interf. Sci., 164, 1–8 (1994).
24
temperature from À51 to 501C during the aging period. Gentle
rotation of the reaction vessel was found to help prevent sec-
ondary nucleation and help reduce particle settling.
R. K. Iler, H. J. McQueston, and J. Herbert, ‘‘Preparation of Microparticles
Composed from Many Small Particles.’’ German Patent, DE 2,317,454, 1972.
L. Sun, M. J. Annen, F. Lorenzano-Porras, P. W. Carr, and A. V. McCor-
25
mick, ‘‘Synthesis of Porous Zirconia Spheres for HPLC by Polymeriza-
tion-Induced Colloid Aggregation (PICA),’’ J. Colloid Interf. Sci., 163, 464–73
(1994).
In future work, we will focus on controlling the surface
roughness of particles as well as imparting both a carbon and
polymer coating on these submicron- and micron-size nonpo-
rous zirconia particles. We believe that these coated nonporous
zirconia particles will have considerable utility for CE, and
capillary liquid chromatography. We also plan to extend this
methodology to make other monodisperse, spherical nonporous
metal oxides such as titania.
26
C. M. A. Stuart, ‘‘Absorbed Polymers in Colloidal System: From Statics to
Dynamics,’’ Polym. J., 23, 669–82 (1991).
G. J. Fleer and J. M. H. M. Scheutjens, ‘‘Effect of Adsorbing and Nonadsor-
27
bing Polymer on the Interaction Between Colloidal Particles,’’ Croat. Chem. Acta.,
60, 477–94 (1987).
28
K. Muhle, ‘‘Particle Adhesion in Coagulation and Bridging Flocculation,’’
Colloid Polym. Sci., 263, 660–72 (1985).
O. Van Canfort, B. Michaux, R. Pirard, J. Pirard, and A. J. Lecloux, ‘‘Syn-
29
thesis and Characterization of Monodisperse Spherical Zirconia Particles,’’ J. Sol–
Gel Sci. Tech., 8, 207–11 (1997).
30
Acknowledgments
L. Lerot, F. Legrand, and P. D. Bruycker, ‘‘Chemical Control in Precipitation
of Spherical Particles,’’ J. Mater. Sci., 26, 2353–8 (1991).
31
We are grateful to Dr. John Nelson from the surface characterization facility of
the Center of Interfacial Engineering at University of Minnesota for his help.
C. J. Brinker and G. W. Scherer, Sol–Gel Science, pp. 105–7. Academic Press,
Inc., San Diego, 1990.
32
J. Stejskal and P. Kratochvil, ‘‘Polyaniline Dispersion. 5. Poly(Vinyl Alcohol)
and Poly(N-Vinylpyrrolidone) as Steric Stabilizers,’’ Langmuir, 12, 3389–92
1996).
(
References
33
B. Yan, C. V. McNeff, C. Fang, P. W. Carr, and A. V. McCormick, ‘‘Syn-
thesis and Characterization of Monodisperse and Nonporous Zirconia Micro-
1
K. K. Unger, D. Kumar, M. Grun, G. Buchel, S. Ludtke, T. Adam, K. Schu-
macher, and S. Reker, ‘‘Synthesis of Spherical Porous Silicas in the Micron and
Submicron Size Range: Challenges and Opportunities for Miniaturized High-Res-
spheres Designed for Ultrafast Chromatography,’’ J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 84, 1721–7
(2001).
&