Catalysis Science & Technology
Paper
rhodium or platinum, is the formation of ethene. The formation of ability of the ethanol to remove amorphous carbon. In both cases
ethene over a metal function is well known35 and the mechanism we believe this to be the first example of carbon filaments formed
of ethanol dehydration has also been examined.36 It is likely that over rhodium and platinum during ESR.
the ethene formed is the main precursor to the carbonaceous
species and CNTs detected on the catalyst surface. Studies have
References
shown that ethanol31 and ethene37 will form CNTs over platinum
1 J. R. Rostrup-Nielsen and T. Rostrup-Nielsen, CATTECH, 2002, 6,
150–159.
and ethene will form CNTs over rhodium, whereas carbon deposi-
tion from carbon monoxide, over these catalysts, is inhibited in the
presence an equal amount of carbon dioxide.38 As there is always a
CO2 : CO ratio >1 (the rhodium catalyst at 873 K after 100 h TOS is
the only exception) it is unlikely that carbon monoxide is signifi-
cantly adding to the deposited carbon. Similarly the extent of
carbon deposition from methane, over these catalysts, even in the
absence of hydrogen and steam, is minimal.38
At low temperatures there is convincing evidence that the
dehydrogenation of ethanol to acetaldehyde and the dehydra-
tion to ethene are the two initial reactions over the available
sites in ESR, with methane and carbon monoxide being formed
from acetaldehyde decomposition and then subsequent water
2 A. J. Akande, R. O. Idem and A. K. Dalai, Appl. Catal., A, 2005, 287,
159–175.
3 I. A. Carbajal Ramos, T. Montini, B. Lorenzut, H. Troiani, F. C. Gennari,
M. Graziani and P. Fornasiero, Catal. Today, 2012, 180, 96–104.
4 T. Montini, L. De Rogatis, V. Gombac, P. Fornasiero and
M. Graziani, Appl. Catal., B, 2007, 71, 125–134.
5 S. M. de Lima, A. M. da Silva, L. O. O. da Costa, U. M. Graham,
G. Jacobs, B. H. Davis, L. V. Mattos and F. B. Noronha, J. Catal.,
2009, 268, 268–281.
6 S. D. Jones and H. E. Hagelin-Weaver, Appl. Catal., B, 2009, 90, 195–204.
7 X. Hu and G. Lu, Appl. Catal., B, 2010, 99, 289–297.
8 R. Trane, S. Dahl, M. S. Skjøth-Rasmussen and A. D. Jensen, Int. J.
Hydrogen Energy, 2012, 37, 6447–6472.
9 F. Bimbela, M. Oliva, J. Ruiz, L. Garcia and J. Arauzo, J. Anal. Appl.
Pyrolysis, 2009, 85, 204–213.
10 Y. Matsumura and H. Ishibe, J. Catal., 2009, 268, 282–289.
gas shift to form carbon dioxide.33,34 If the temperature is high 11 M. Bilal and S. D. Jackson, Catal. Sci. Technol., 2012, 2, 2043–2051.
enough methane can subsequently be steam reformed to give
12 X. Wu and S. Kawi, Energy Environ. Sci., 2010, 3, 334–342.
13 S. Cavallaro, Energy Fuels, 2000, 14, 1195–1199.
14 F. Aupretre, C. Descorme, D. Duprez, D. Casanave and D. Uzio,
carbon monoxide and hydrogen. At higher temperatures the
mechanism is less clear. It is often assumed that the same
mechanistic steps will be followed, only faster, however reac-
tions that are not readily observed at low temperatures due to
high activation energies can rapidly become dominant at high
temperatures. Carbon laydown and carbon–carbon bond break-
ing are two typical examples of this. From our study we cannot
delve too deeply into the mechanism, we can confirm produc-
tion of acetaldehyde, ethene and C-1 components. It is clear
that the mechanism is complex with multiple breakdown and
J. Catal., 2005, 233, 464–477.
15 D. K. Liguras, D. I. Kondarides and X. E. Verykios, Appl. Catal., B,
2003, 43, 345–354.
16 M. Domok, M. Toth, J. Rasko and A. Erdohelyi, Appl. Catal., B, 2007,
69, 262–272.
17 P. O. Graf, B. L. Mojet, J. G. van Ommen and L. Lefferts, Appl. Catal.,
A, 2007, 332, 310–317.
18 D. Duprez, P. Pereira, A. Miloudi and R. Maurel, J. Catal., 1982,
75, 151.
19 E. Kikuchi, K. Ito, T. Ino and Y. Morita, J. Catal., 1977, 46, 382.
20 F. Can, A. Le Valant, N. Bion, F. Epron and D. Duprez, J. Phys. Chem.
C, 2008, 112, 14145–14153.
synthesis routes, e.g. the formation of acetone is thought to be a 21 T. Nishiguchi, T. Matsumoto, H. Kanai, K. Utani, Y. Matsumura,
secondary product of acetaldehyde21 formed via aldol conden-
W. J. Shen and S. Imamura, Appl. Catal., A, 2005, 279, 273–277.
22 G. C. Bond, Metal-catalysed reactions of hydrocarbons (fundamental
sation, oxidation and decarboxylation. Further work involving
and applied catalysis), Springer, New York, 2005.
´
´
´
higher space velocities and, ideally, selectively labelled species 23 A. Csato, A. Szabo, A. Fonseca, D. Vuono, Z. Konya, A. Volodin,
would be useful to delineate the mechanism further.
C. Van Haesendonck, L. P. Biro, G. Giordano and J. B. Nagy, Catal.
Today, 2012, 181, 33.
24 J. H. Sinfelt and D. J. C. Yates, J. Catal., 1967, 8, 82–90.
25 D. E. Resasco and G. L. Haller, in Stud. Surf. Sci. Catal.,
Conclusions
ed. B. Naccache, C. Coudurier, G. Praliaud, H. Meriaudeau,
P. Gallezot, G. A. Martin and J. C. Vedrine, Elsevier, Amsterdam,
In this paper the steam reforming of ethanol over 0.2%
1982, vol. 11, pp. 105–112.
Rh/Al2O3 and 0.2% Pt/Al2O3 catalysts has been investigated at 26 S. D. Jackson, G. J. Kelly and G. Webb, J. Catal., 1998, 176, 225–234.
27 Z. Francisco, Appl. Catal., A, 2002, 229, 75–91.
28 D. W. Flaherty, W.-Y. Yu, Z. D. Pozun, G. Henkelman and
773 K, 823 K and 873 K at 20 barg over 100 h on-stream.
Hydrogen is the principle product at all temperatures with both
C. B. Mullins, J. Catal., 2011, 282, 278–288.
catalysts. At 773 K and 823 K Rh/Al2O3 is more active than 29 A. Shamsi, J. P. Baltrus and J. J. Spivey, Appl. Catal. A, 2005, 293, 145–152.
Pt/Al2O3, which is in keeping the literature33 however this is due
more to ethanol decomposition and ethanol dehydration rather
30 S. D. Jackson, S. J. Thomson and G. Webb, J. Catal., 1981, 70, 249.
31 N. Fukuoka, Y. Mizutani, S. Naritsuka, T. Maruyama and S. Iijima,
Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., 2012, 51, 06FD23.
than ESR. In contrast by 873 K Pt/Al2O3 is more active and stable 32 D. N. Futaba, J. Goto, S. Yasuda, T. Yamada, M. Yumura and K. Hata,
Adv. Mater., 2009, 21, 4811–4815.
33 N. Bion, F. Epron and D. Duprez, in Catalysis, ed. J. J. Spivey and
than Rh/Al2O3, which systematically deactivates, and reveals a
high activity for WGS. There is significant carbon laydown on
K. M. Dooley, RSC, London, 2010, vol. 22, p. 1–55.
both catalysts however it has little effect on catalyst activity at 34 G. Jacobs, R. A. Keogh and B. H. Davis, J. Catal., 2007, 245, 326–337.
35 M. Benitoa, J. L. Sanz, R. Isabel, R. Padilla, R. Arjona and L. Daza,
773 K and 823 K. At 773 K only the Rh/Al2O3 catalyst produces
J. Power Sources, 2005, 151, 11–17.
carbon filaments. At 873 K the Rh/Al2O3 catalyst shows a slow
36 S. D. Jackson, J. R. Jones, A. P. Sharratt, L. F. Gladden and R. J.
but steady deactivation. The Pt/Al2O3 catalyst also shows evidence
of CNT/whisker growth but does not significantly deactivate over
the reaction period. This may be due to a higher H : C ratio of the
Cross, G. Webb, in Catalysis of Organic Reactions, ed. D. Morrell,
Marcel Dekker, New York, 2002, pp. 453–460.
37 S. Takenaka, T. Iguchi, E. Tanabe, H. Matsune and M. Kishida,
Carbon, 2009, 47, 1251–1257.
deposit on the Pt/Al2O3 catalyst, as indicated by TGA, and/or the 38 E. Opara, S. D. Jackson, unpublished results.
c
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2012
Catal. Sci. Technol.