6
S. R. LONG ET AL.
acetonitrile, there is no protonation of the ligands by the solvents that need to be accounted
for in the equilibrium constant determination.
Once the assembly using 4 was observed, we expanded the scope to determine whether
other heterocyclic aldehydes would also form the complex. Several different heterocyclic
aldehydes were screened with zinc and 4 in a 1 : 1 : 1 ratio at 60 mM. The equilibrium constant
for each heterocyclic aldehyde is shown in table 1 and as expected each heterocyclic alde-
hyde showed a different equilibrium for complex formation.
While all heterocyclic aldehydes formed complexes with 4 and zinc, 3,5-dibromopyridi-
necarboxaldehyde, isoquinoline-2-carboxyaldehyde, thiazole-4-carboxaldehyde and tri-
azole-2-carboxyaldehyde only formed a small amount of complex. Others, like 3,
5-bromopyridinecarboxaldehyde, imidazole-2-carboxaldehyde and thiazole-2-carboxalde-
hyde, almost exclusively formed the corresponding tripodal complexes (5). The formation
of complexes with the heterocyclic aldehydes is driven by a combination of the electrophilic-
ity of the aldehyde and the coordination ability of the heterocyclic nitrogen. The coordination
of the heterocyclic nitrogen of the aldehydes leads to a thermodynamically stable complex,
thereby forming an energy sink for the formation of the tripodal complexes. On the other
hand, the electrophilicity of the aldehyde influences the ability of the secondary amine to
add to the aldehyde.
In order to determine whether complex formation was dynamic and the heterocyclic
aldehydes could exchange, a second equivalent of a different aldehyde with a larger equi-
librium constant was added after the original solution had reached equilibrium. As could
be seen in the 1H NMR spectra, the original aldehyde peak grows in as the complex disas-
sembles and reassembles with the second aldehyde. For example, the weaker complex based
upon thiazole carbaldehyde disassembles in the presence of pyridine carbaldehyde to give
the more thermodynamically stable complex. Given this fact, in a mixture of aldehydes, the
complex that forms is dictated by the most stable metal complex (figure 2).
Additionally, the metal controls the extent of assembly. Metals that form stronger donor
coordinate bonds from the tetradentate assembly form more of the complex. Studies using
mass spectrometry were conducted with various metals to determine which metals would
lead to the most complex formation (5) under inert atmosphere and in degassed solvents.
The extent of complex formation was measured via mass spectrometry by a comparison of
the area of the peak corresponding to the tetradentate complex to the area of the peak
corresponding to metalated 5. Based on these studies, the largest amount of complex for-
mation occurred when using Zn(II). Co(II) led to approximately 80% of the complex formation
found for zinc. Mass spectroscopy studies with iron(II) and copper(II) showed little formation;
less than 10% of the amount formed with zinc.
Additionally, studies were carried out to evaluate the change in the thermodynamic driv-
ing force for the formation of the complex using each different metal ion to see whether the
thermodynamic driving forces could be correlated with the extent of complex formation.
Because the major driving force for assembly is the formation of the four-coordinate complex,
as such, the differences in energy between the metallation of tridentate 4 to the tetradentate
6 should directly correlate with the extent of complex formation for that metal. Isothermal
titration calorimetry was used to measure the thermodynamic parameters of the metal
binding to these two different ligands in acetonitrile. The goal was to generate relative trends
of binding constants to see how these correlate with the extent of assembly, and thus the