Z.-G. Niu et al. / Inorganic Chemistry Communications 43 (2014) 146–150
147
Scheme 1. Synthetic routes of C^N ligands 3a–3d and Ir(III) complexes 5a–5d.
group can cause larger molecular deformation. However, the torsion
angle [C8–C9–C11–C12] of complex 5c with \CN group is only 0.63°,
indicating that the 4-(isoquinolin-1-yl)benzonitrile ligand is
almost coplanar.
spectra of 5a–5d display the vibronically structured emission bands
3
3
3
3
⁎
arose from a mixture of LC ( π–π ) and CT ( MLCT) excited states.
Phosphorescence relative quantum yields (Φ) of 5a–5d in dichloro-
methane solution were measured to be 0.046–0.16 (Table 1) at
room temperature by using typical phosphorescent fac-Ir(ppy)3 as a
standard (Φ = 0.40) [4,23]. Compared with the parent complex
[Ir(piq)2(bpy)](PF6) (Φ = 0.089) [24], the introduction of the C\F
bond or \CF3 group in complexes 5b and 5d results in the increase of
the luminescence quantum yield dramatically. This is probably due to
the presence of the C\F bonds that could reduce the radiationless deac-
tivation rate in comparison with C\H bonds [6,25]. Additionally, the
electron-withdrawing substituents (\CHO and \CN) in the same site
of the ligand lead to a decrease in the phosphorescence quantum yield
for complexes 5a and 5c.
The electrochemical properties of the complexes 5a–5d were
studied by cyclic voltammetry (Fig. 5). All complexes show a pair of
reversible redox peaks, with potentials of 1.27–1.65 V. The positive
oxidation potential is attributed to the metal-centered Ir3+/Ir4+ oxida-
tion couple [26,27], because the higher oxidation potentials are ascribed
to the stronger electron-withdrawing ability of the substituent on
phenylisoquinoline ligands. Based on the electrochemical data, the
complexes can be arranged in the increasing order as follows:
5c N 5a N 5b N 5d, which is consistent with the actual electron-with-
drawing ability of \CN N \CF3 N \CHO N \F. The HOMO energy
deduced by the equation EHOMO = −(Eox + 4.8 eV) [28] is listed in
Table 1, as well as compared with the theoretical calculation results.
From the results, it can be seen that the HOMO orbital energy also
reveals the order as 5c N 5a N 5b N 5d.
The absorption spectra of complexes 5a–5d in CH2Cl2 solution are
presented in Fig. 2 and the spectral data are summarized in Table 1. In
common with most Ir(III) complexes [15–17], the absorption spectra
of 5a–5d are dominated by multiple bands originating from ligand-
⁎
centered π–π transitions and MLCT transitions. The strong absorption
bands of the higher energies (below 350 nm) are mainly assigned to
the spin-allowed intraligand 1(π–π ) transitions [18]. The moderate
⁎
absorption peaks of lower-energies (350–550 nm) are likely due to
charge-transfer (CT) transitions, with their nature being both spin-
allowed (singlet-to-singlet metal-to-ligand charge transfer, 1MLCT)
[19] and spin-forbidden (singlet-to-triplet metal-to-ligand charge
3
3
⁎
transfer, MLCT and ligand-centered π–π transition) [20].
Density functional theory (DFT) and time-dependent DFT (TDDFT)
calculations have been performed for complexes 5a–5d to gain insights
into the lowest-energy electronic transition (435 nm for 5a, 456 nm for
5b, 442 nm for 5c, 434 nm for 5d). The representative molecular frontier
orbital diagrams have been presented in Fig. 3 and the calculated spin-
allowed electronic transitions and electron density distributions are
listed in Tables S1 and S2. The electron density in the HOMO/HOMO-1
of all the complexes 5a–5d resides significantly on the cyclometalating
ligands and the core Ir(III) atom. The electron density in LUMO + 1
(5a) and LUMO + 2 (5c) locates mainly on the cyclometalating ligand
and ancillary ligand, while the electron density in LUMO (5b) and
LUMO + 2 (5d) locates primarily on the cyclometalating ligand.
⁎
All these electronic transitions are ascribed as LLCT and MLCT π → π
In conclusion, four new cyclometalated phenylisoquinoline-based
iridium(III) complexes [Ir(C∧N)2(N∧N)]PF6 (5a–5d) with the N∧N li-
gand 2,2′-bipyridine and four different C∧N cyclometalating ligands
have been synthesized. The photophysical properties, electrochemical
behaviors and theoretical calculations have been investigated. X-ray dif-
fraction studies of complexes 5a and 5c indicate that the coordinations
of the iridium atoms are both distorted octahedral. Analyses of DFT and
TDDFT calculations for 5a–5d indicate that the lowest-energy electronic
transition, which are consistent with the actual absorptions.
All complexes are luminescent at room temperature in CH2Cl2 solu-
tion (Fig. 4). Upon photoexcitation at ca. 360 nm, the complexes 5a–5d
show intense orange luminescence with the emission peak appeared at
593–618 nm, and display the wavelength order as 5b N 5c N 5a N 5d
(Table 1). The results are in good agreement with those of the lowest-
energy electronic transition in UV–Vis spectra and DFT calculations
(Table S1). As compared with 5b and 5c, 5a and 5d exhibit the blue-
shifted emission spectra, which can be explained by steric hindrance
of 4-CF3, 4-Me and 3-F group. According to analogous iridium(III)
cyclometalates reported in references [21,22], the photoluminescence
⁎
transitions are attributed to MLCT and LLCT π → π transition. Each
Ir(III) complex shows orange emission with a maximum main peak
and a shoulder peak, which is suggested to be a mixture of 3LC
3
( π–π ) and 3CT (3MLCT) excited states. The results will facilitate the
⁎