30
N.J. Niemuth et al. / Neurochemistry International 99 (2016) 24e32
PB1 and PB2 met the requirements of Lipinksi’s Rule of 5 for
druglikeness (Ghose et al., 1999; Lipinski et al., 2001): having fewer
than 5 hydrogen bond donors, fewer than 10 hydrogen bond ac-
ceptors, a log Pe between ꢂ0.4 and 5.6, and a molecular weight
between 160 and 480.
reduction of critical disulfides formed as a result of oxidation by
superoxide or other reactive oxygen species.
4.2. Upstream vs. downstream therapies
A critical issue with respect to cytoprotective therapies is the
timing between the onset of the injury, the commitment point for
dying (i.e. “point of no return”), and the point at which cell death
becomes manifest. If a drug only becomes bioavailable after the
commitment point, then it will not be cytoprotective, even if
administered long before cell death is manifest. This is analogous to
the fuse of a bomb, which will continue to burn even if the match
that ignited it is extinguished. In the case of cytoprotective thera-
pies, those that act on proximal or upstream pathways in cell death
need to be given early to be effective. Those that act on distal or
downstream pathways in cell death can be given later. The relation
between injury and the timing of cytoprotection is critical to clin-
ical trial design (Levin, 2004).
The neuroprotective action of phosphine-borane complexes is
associated with activation of ERK1/2 (Almasieh et al., 2011), a
downstream mechanism that also underlies the neuroprotection
mediated by brain-derived neurotrophic factor and the TrkB re-
ceptor (Cheng et al., 2002). Activation of this pathway with PB1
protects both the somal and axonal compartment after axonal
injury in two different animal models (Almasieh et al., 2011). The
intermediate steps between the reduction of a disulfide(s) and the
activation of the ERK1/2 pathway are not known, and presumably
reflect interruption of a cascade of redox signaling in one or more
critical death pathways, initiated by superoxide-dependent disul-
fide oxidation of key protein(s). Although c-Jun N-terminal kinase
(JNK) signaling is critical to RGC death after axonal injury
(Fernandes et al., 2012), the lack of effect of PB1 on phospho-JNK1/
2/3 levels indicates that its prosurvival effect bypasses JNK
(Almasieh et al., 2011).
The paradigm of upstream and downstream therapies can be
applied to the case of axonal injury in the CNS (Fig. 6). Our previous
work demonstrated that optic nerve transection activated an
intracellular pathway which caused elevated levels of superoxide
within the soma of the RGC (Kanamori et al., 2010a; Lieven et al.,
2006). This superoxide-dependent pathway is similar to that seen
in growth factor-deprived sympathetic neurons (Greenlund et al.,
1995) and renal proximal tubular cells (Lieberthal et al., 1998). It
likely represents an upstream pathway for cell death because it
precedes the appearance of cell death markers such as phosphati-
dylserine externalization (Kanamori et al., 2010a) and cytochrome c
release (Lieven et al., 2012). However, cell-permeant superoxide
scavengers such as pegylated superoxide dismutase (Kanamori
4. Discussion
4.1. Mechanism of action
These results provide a mechanism by which phosphine-borane
complexes are able to protect CNS cells from injury. Use of a fluo-
rescent dithiol reporter demonstrate that this class of drugs is able
to enter cells and reduce intracellular disulfides. CNS-specific
PAMPA-BBB assays showed that they penetrate brain lipids,
consistent with their observed neuroprotective potency in vivo
(Almasieh et al., 2011). Finally, although phosphine-borane com-
plexes inhibit a pathway for neuronal death that is superoxide-
dependent (Kanamori et al., 2010a; Lieven et al., 2006; Scott
et al., 2010), EPR and fluorescent reporter experiments indicate
that they are not superoxide scavengers but rather disulfide
reducing agents.
Previous studies demonstrated that axonal injury is associated
with a superoxide burst within the RGC soma (Kanamori et al.,
2010a; Lieven et al., 2006). Consistent with those findings, knock-
down of the endogenous mitochondrial superoxide scavenger su-
peroxide dismutase-2 increases neuronal cell death (Scott et al.,
2010). In the present study PB1 and PB2 had no superoxide scav-
enging activity, as manifested by absence of decrease in superoxide
produced in a xanthine/xanthine oxidase system and detected by
2-hydroxyethidium fluorescence or electron paramagnetic reso-
nance. The partial rescue of retinal ganglion cell death with PB1 and
PB2 seen in in vitro (Schlieve et al., 2006) and in vivo (Almasieh
et al., 2011) is therefore likely the result of restoration of redox
homeostasis by disulfide reduction and not superoxide scavenging.
Given that phosphine-borane complexes inhibit neuronal death
induced by elevations of superoxide in mitochondria external to the
matrix (Seidler et al., 2010), yet do not scavenge superoxide, this
implies that their disulfide-reducing activity is downstream of su-
peroxide generation.
Phosphines reduce protein disulfides through nucleophilic
attack by the reactive lone-pair electrons of the phosphorous.
Following hydrolysis this results first in a thiophosphonium salt
and then a free thiol and oxidized phosphine (Cline et al., 2004).
PB1 and PB2 were equally or more effective at reducing the disul-
fide bond of DTNB at pH 7 than equimolar concentrations of
commonly used reducing agents DTT and TCEP. PB1 and PB2 were
also able to reduce intracellular disulfides on a shorter time scale
than TCEP in tissue culture. P1 and P2, similar to PB1 and PB2 but
without borane protection, had strong reducing activity by EPR
spectroscopy, converting the superoxide adduct of the spin trap to a
hydroxyl adduct.
The increased effectiveness of PB1 and PB2 compared to the
parent compound TCEP results from specific structural modifica-
tions. Borane protection of the reactive phosphine protects the
compounds from extracellular oxidation. Intracellular phosphine
reactivity is restored when the borane protecting group is removed
by tertiary amines within tissues. Replacement of TCEP’s organic
acid groups by methyl esters results in intracellular sequestration
upon polarization of the molecule due to cleavage by esterases. In
addition, replacement of organic acid groups by phenyl rings re-
sults in increased cell membrane permeability and lower steric
hindrance of the lone-pair phosphorous electrons. Overall, these
modifications result in their concentration within cells where they
can interact with accessible protein thiols. This allows effective
et
al.,
2010a)
or
iron(III)
2,17-bis-sulfonato-5,10,15-
tris(pentafluorophenyl)corrole (Fe(tpfc)(SO(3)H)(2)) (Fe-corrole)
(Catrinescu et al., 2012) only incompletely protect RGCs against
axonal injury.
The present study provides a mechanism by which phosphine-
borane complex drugs would be more efficacious than superoxide
scavenging, based on the fact that they chemically reduce protein
disulfides which form under oxidative conditions (Fig. 6). This
redox chemistry is downstream of superoxide and other reactive
oxygen species, and therefore its reversal would be effective even if
late in the course of neuronal pathophysiology. Furthermore, if the
reactivity of reactive oxygen species with sulfhydryl groups on
critical signaling molecules is rapid, then this would help explain
why clinical trials based on scavenging superoxide and other
oxidative molecules fail to demonstrate efficacy (Louwerse et al.,
1995; Shuaib et al., 2007; Parkinson Study Group, 1993). It is un-
known whether therapies such as phosphine-borane complexes
are sufficiently downstream to be efficacious in randomized clinical