Chemistry Letters 2001
71
conversion ratio at the photostationary states of 1a and bleached
1b films under irradiation with 313 nm light were 35% and
48%, respectively. The bleached amorphous film prepared
from 1b exhibited higher conversion ratio in the photostation-
ary state than that of the film prepared from 1a. The open-ring
isomers of diarylethenes have two conformations, parallel and
anti-parallel conformations, and the photochemical cyclization
reaction takes place only from the anti-parallel conformation.
Although interconversion between the two conformers is
allowed in solution, the interconversion is strongly suppressed
in the amorphous film. When 1a is produced by visible light
irradiation from 1b in the amorphous film, the photogenerated
1a is considered to be in the photoactive anti-parallel conforma-
tion and hardly interconverts to the photo-inactive parallel con-
formation. This is the reason why the conversion in the photo-
stationary state of the film prepared from 1b is higher than that
of the film from 1a. The low conversion in the film prepared
from 1a is that a part of molecules are in the photo-inactive par-
allel conformation.
indices of 1a and 1b was 0.040, which is similar to the value of
our previous result on amorphous film.13 It should also be
noted that the refractive index of the bleached 1b film was
slightly higher than that of 1a film. This difference suggests
that the structure of 1a molecule in the 1a film is different from
that in the bleached 1b film and, therefore, density is slightly
different. The refractive index in the photostationary state of
the 1b film was found to be about 0.015 larger than the
bleached 1b film, which is 43 % of the refraction index change
of 1b film. This ratio is roughly in accordance with the conver-
sion ratio at the photostationary state, 48%, suggesting a linear
relationship between composition and refractive index.
Thermal property was studied by DSC as shown in Figure
1. Upon heating, 1a showed a clear endothermal peak at 113.7
°C , and clear shift in the base line was observed at around this
peak, which is typical for the glass-to-liquid transition. The
endothermal peak can be assigned to the intermolecular interac-
tion in the glass state. Based on the threshold temperature, the
glass transition temperature, Tg, was determined to be 103 °C.
Thermal behavior of 1b was also investigated and clear glass
transition behavior was observed above 120 °C and Tg was
determined to be 124 °C, as shown in Figure 1(b). Formation
References and Notes
1
M. Fukudome, K. Kamiya, T. Kawai, and M. Irie, Abstract of Papers,
78th Spring Meeting of The Chemical Society of Japan, Tokyo, March
2000, 3A4 29.
o
of 1a indicates that the exothermal peak at about 178 C corre-
sponds to the thermal cycloreversion reaction. The higher Tg of
1b is attributed to the planer molecular structure of 1b.
2
3
4
5
6
M. Irie and M. Mohri, J. Org. Chem., 53, 803 (1988).
M.Irie, Chem. Rev., 100, 1685 (2000).
N. Tanio and M. Irie, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., 33, 1550 (1994).
N. Tanio and M. Irie, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., 33, 3942 (1994).
T. Kawai, T. Koshido, and K. Yoshino, Appl. Phys. Lett. 67 795
(1995).
7
8
9
J. Biteau, G. M. Tsivgoulis, F. Chaput, J. P. Boilot, S. Gilat, S.
Kawai, J. M. Lahn, B. Darracq, F. Martin, and Y. Levy, Mol. Cryst.
Liq. Cryst., 297, 65 (1997)
J. Biteau, F. Chaput, K. Labli, J. P. Boilot, G. M. Tsivgoulis, J. M.
Lahn, B. Darracq, C. Marios, and Y. Levy, Chem. Mater., 10,
1945(1998).
E. Kim, Y. K. Choi, and M. H. Lee, Macromolecules, 32, 4855 (1999).
10 Y.Atassi, J. Chauvin, J. A. Delaire, J.-F. Delouis, I. Fanton-Maltey,
and K. Nakatani, Pure Appl. Chem., 70, 2157 (1998).
11 Y. Shirota, K. Moriwaki, S. Yoshikawa, T. Ujike, and H. Nakano, J.
Mater. Chem., 8, 2579 (1998).
12 T. Koshido, T. Kawai, and K. Yoshino, Synth.Met., 73, 257 (1995).
13 Y. Kaneuchi, T. Kawai, M. Hamaguchi, K. Yoshino, and M. Irie,
Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., 36, 3736 (1997).
14 T. Kawai, N. Fukuda, D. Groschl, S. Kobatake, and M. Irie Jpn. J.
Appl. Phys., 38, L1194 (1999).
15 M. -S. Kim, T. Kawai, and M. Irie, Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst., 345, 251
(2000).
The change in the refractive index of 1 was also studied by
a prism coupling method.14 At the monitoring wavelength of
817 nm both 1a and 1b have no optical absorption. The refrac-
tive index changes upon UV (λ = 313 nm) and visible (λ > 480
nm) light irradiations are shown in Figure 2. The refractive
index of 1a film was 1.619 and increased to 1.635 upon irradia-
tion with UV light. The refractive index of film of 1b
decreased from 1.659 to 1.624 upon irradiation with visible
light. These changes in the refractive index clearly indicate that
the closed-ring isomer 1b has higher polarizability than that of
the open-ring isomer 1a. The difference between the refractive
16 M. -S. Kim, T. Kawai, and M. Irie, Chem. Lett., 1188 (2000).
1
17 1a: H NMR(CDCl3): δ = 2.07(s, 3H), 2.10(s, 3H), 2.32(m, 18H),
6.9–7.3(m, 24H). MS m/z = 938(M+). 1b: 1HNMR (CDCl3); δ =
2.21(s, 6H), 2.32(m, 18H), 6.9–7.3(m, 24H). Anal. Found: C,73.30;H,
5.53; N, 2.89%. Calcd. for C57H48F6N2S2: C, 72.90; H, 5.15; F, 12.14;
N, 2.98; S, 6.83%. MS m/z (M+) = 938.
18 M. Irie, K. Sakemura, M.Okinaka, and K. Uchida, J. Org. Chem.,
60, 8305 (1995).
19 During the review process a paper dealing with a similar compound
appeared; H. Utsumi, D. Nagahama, H. Nakano, and Y. Shirota, J.
Mater. Chem., 10, 2436 (2000).