structures were confirmed by single-crystal X-ray diffraction
Diethyl thiomalonate 16 reacted at room temperature to
afford a 1:2 mixture of cycloadducts 19a and 20a. Both
compounds arise from an attack of the dienophile on the
less-hindered R-face of the diene. The observed regioselec-
tivity is not easily explained by FMO theory. In any case,
we believed that steric effects could reverse this selectivity.
We thus investigated bulkier thiones. As hoped, substitution
of both ethyl esters for tert-butyl esters on the thione (17)
led to the preferred formation of the desired regioisomer in
a 2:1 ratio. Ultimately, thione 18, derived from Meldrum’s
acid, led to a 14:1 ratio of the cycloadducts 19c and 20c.
Although the fixed (O)-E conformation of the esters in 18
probably affects the electronics of the thione, steric effects
are likely prominent in controlling the regiochemistry of this
cycloaddition. The rigid structure of 18 may increase its steric
demand, which would destabilize transition state TS II more
effectively (Scheme 4).
1
1
analysis. We believe the stereoselectivity of this unique
cycloaddition comes from conformational constraints. The
endo orientation of the internal carbonyl of the dienophile
imparts quite a bit of conformational strain to the system.
1
2
Unmasking of R,â-unsaturated aldehydes 15a,b was
followed by a second, endo-selective [4+2]-cycloaddition
involving ethylvinyl ether (EVE) and Yb(fod)
3
as the catalyst
13
(
Scheme 3). Cycloadducts 6a or 6b can be isolated as single
11
diastereomers if the reaction is run at 25 °C. However, and
gratifyingly, both compounds underwent the desired decar-
boxylation reaction when the reaction was run in refluxing
benzene to give directly 7a,b from 15a,b (cf. Scheme 1).
The result of the next Diels-Alder cycloaddition would
decide the fate of our strategy. We were looking for a
carbon-heteroatom dienophile because the resulting cy-
cloadduct would then contain two cleavable C-Z bonds (cf.
Scheme 2). It seemed to us that a thiocarbonyl compound
was a good choice because of the ease with which carbon-
sulfur bonds can be manipulated (e.g., desulfurization,
elimination, or Pummerer rearrangement).14 We also con-
sidered carbonyl compounds as dienophiles and tested several
without success (none would undergo the cycloaddition). In
general, thiocarbonyls are more reactive than the correspond-
ing carbonyls and react with 1,3-dienes at exceptionally low
Scheme 4. Transition States for the HDAC of 7a and 18
6g
temperatures. This increased reactivity originates from their
weaker π-bond and lower LUMO orbital.1
5,16
We prepared three thiones according to the methodology
16
developed by Albelman (Table 1). Treatment of bromo-
We repeated the cycloaddition of 18 with 7b with similar
results. In addition, using the method of Capozzi and co-
workers to generate 18, we were able to perform the
cycloaddition at -10 °C to yield 21 and 22 in a 30:1 ratio.17
The structure of 21 was confirmed by single-crystal X-ray
Table 1. Cycloadditions between 7a,b and 16-18
1
1
diffraction analysis.
Concomitant methanolysis and decarboxylation of 21 were
accomplished using a catalytic amount of Ni(acac) (Scheme
). Desulfurization to 23 and complete reduction of the
ester and ketone to the corresponding diol followed by a
2
1
8
5
1
9
double oxidation led to aldehyde 24. The dienophile
necessary for the final intramolecular cycloaddition was
(
11) Details of crystal structure analyses are provided as Supporting
Information. CCDC 600917 (14a), CCDC 600922 (14b), CCDC 600615
6a), CCDC 600923 (6b), CCDC 600918 (19a), CCDC 600926 (20a),
(
1
,3-diene
thione
T (°C)
yield (%)
ratio
CCDC 600919 (19c), CCDC 600925 (20c), and CCDC 600924 (21) contain
the supplementary crystallographic data for this paper. These data can be
obtained free of charge from the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre
via www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/data_request/cif.
6a
rt
60
82
81
92
80
63
1:2 (19a/20a)
b
c
1
17
1
a
7a
2:1 (19b/20b)
14:1 (19c/20c)
8a
b
(12) Langille, N. F.; Dakin, L. A.; Panek, J. S. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 575-
78.
5
d
b
7b
18
-10
30:1 (21 /22)
(
24.
13) Danishefsky, S. J.; Bednarski, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1984, 25, 721-
7
a
Generated by Albelman’s methodology.16 See ref 11. c Structure of
b
(
14) Bur, S. K.; Padwa, A. Chem. ReV. 2004, 104, 2401-2432 and
references therein.
15) (a) Vedejs, E.; Eberlein, T. H.; Mazur, D. J.; McClure, C. K.; Perry,
2
0b was confirmed by desulfurization to the vinylic gem-dimethyl
compound. Generated by Capozzi’s methodology.
d
17
(
D. A.; Ruggeri, R.; Schwartz, E.; Stults, J. S.; Varie, D. L.; Wilde, R. G.;
Wittenberger, S. J. Org. Chem. 1986, 51, 1556-1562. (b) Vedejs, E.; Perry,
D. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1983, 105, 6999-7001.
malonates with sulfur powder and triethylamine led, via a
simple addition-elimination sequence, to the corresponding
thiones 16-18 which reacted in situ with dienes. Table 1
summarizes the results of their cycloaddition with 1,3-diene
(
16) Albelman, M. M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1991, 32, 7389-7392.
(17) Capozzi, G.; Menichetti, S.; Nativi, C.; Rosi, A.; Valle, G.
Tetrahedron 1992, 48, 9023-9032.
(18) All acidic conditions tried gave decomposition products. Ni(acac)2
gave the best results.
7a.
(19) More, J. D.; Finney, N. S. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 3001-3003.
Org. Lett., Vol. 8, No. 20, 2006
4387