organic compounds
For compound (II), atom C4 on ring A of the steroid nucleus is
disordered over two sites. The four ring C atoms of the ethoxy-
pyrrolidine moiety are also disordered over two conformations and
two sets of positions were de®ned for pyrrolidine ring atoms C31±
C34. Constrained re®nement of the site-occupation factors for the
two disordered regions led to values of 0.788 (7) and 0.510 (13),
respectively, for the major conformations. Chemically equivalent
bonds involving the disordered C atoms were constrained to have
similar lengths and the 1,3-distances within each conformation of the
pyrrolidine ring were also restrained to be similar. Neighbouring
disordered atoms within and between each conformation of the
disordered region were also restrained to have similar atomic
displacement parameters. The position of the hydroxy H atom in (I)
was determined from a difference Fourier map and re®ned freely
along with its isotropic displacement parameters. The positions of the
water H atoms in (II) were also determined from a difference Fourier
map and were re®ned along with their isotropic displacement para-
1994); program(s) used to re®ne structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick,
1997); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 (Farrugia, 1999); software used
to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97 and PLATON
(Spek, 2003).
RG and SG wish to acknowledge Cipla Ltd, Mumbai, India,
for the generous supply of steroid, and SG thanks the CSIR,
India, for ®nancial assistance.
Supplementary data for this paper are available from the IUCr electronic
archives (Reference: SK1678). Services for accessing these data are
described at the back of the journal.
References
Altomare, A., Cascarano, G., Giacovazzo, C., Guagliardi, A., Burla, M. C.,
Polidori, G. & Camalli, M. (1994). J. Appl. Cryst. 27, 435.
Bernstein, J., Davis, R. E., Shimoni, L. & Chang, N.-L. (1995). Angew. Chem.
Int. Ed. Engl. 34, 1555±1573.
Blessing, R. H. (1995). Acta Cryst. A51, 33±38.
Caira, M. R., Guillory, K. J. & Chang, L. (1995). J. Chem. Crystallogr. 25, 393±
400.
Ê
meters, while restraining the OÐH bond length to 0.82 A. The methyl
H atoms in both compounds were constrained to an ideal geometry
Ê
(CÐH = 0.98 A), with Uiso(H) = 1.5Ueq(C), but were allowed to
rotate freely about the CÐC bonds. All remaining H atoms were
Ê
placed in geometrically idealized positions (CÐH = 0.95±1.00 A) and
Cremer, D. & Pople, J. A. (1975). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 97, 1354±1358.
Duax, W. L. & Norton, D. A. (1975). In Atlas of Steroid Structures, Vol. 1. New
York: Plenum.
Farrugia, L. J. (1999). J. Appl. Cryst. 32, 837±838.
Flack, H. D. (1983). Acta Cryst. A39, 876±881.
were constrained to ride on their parent atoms. The presence of Cl in
compound (I) permitted the determination of the absolute con®g-
uration of the molecule by re®ning the Flack parameter [� 0.21 (7),
2
982 Friedel pairs; Flack, 1983; Flack & Bernardinelli, 2000]. Due to
Flack, H. D. & Bernardinelli, G. (2000). J. Appl. Cryst. 33, 1143±1148.
Hema, R., Parthasarathi, V., Thamotharan, S., Dubey, S. & Jindal, D. P. (2002).
Acta Cryst. C58, o421±o422.
Hema, R., Parthasarathi, V., Thamotharan, S., Dubey, S. & Jindal, D. P. (2003).
Acta Cryst. C59, o213±o215.
Nonius (2000). COLLECT. Nonius BV, Delft, The Netherlands.
Otwinowski, Z. & Minor, W. (1997). Methods in Enzymology, Vol. 276,
Macromolecular Crystallography, Part A, edited by C. W. Carter Jr & R. M.
Sweet, pp. 307±326. New York: Academic Press.
Rao, S. T., Westhof, E. & Sundaralingam, M. (1981). Acta Cryst. A37, 421±425.
Sheldrick, G. M. (1997). SHELXL97. University of G oÈ ttingen, Germany.
Spek, A. L. (2003). J. Appl. Cryst. 36, 7±13.
the absence of any signi®cant anomalous scatterers in (II), attempts
to con®rm the absolute structure by re®nement of the Flack para-
meter in the presence of 3177 sets of Friedel equivalents led to an
inconclusive value of 0.0 (8). Therefore, the Friedel pairs were
merged before the ®nal re®nement and the absolute con®guration
was assigned to correspond with the known chiral centres in a
precursor molecule, which remained unchanged during the synthesis
of (II). Re¯ections 112, 012 and 111 in (I), and 021, 011 and 040 in (II)
were partially obscured by the beam stop and were omitted.
For both compounds, data collection: COLLECT (Nonius, 2000);
cell re®nement: DENZO±SMN (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997); data
reduction: DENZO±SMN and SCALEPACK (Otwinowski & Minor,
Thamotharan, S., Parthasarathi, V., Gupta, R., Guleria, S., Jindal, D. P. &
Linden, A. (2002). Acta Cryst. C58, o727±o729.
Vasuki, G., Thamotharan, S., Parthasarathi, V., Ramamurthi, K., Dubey, S. &
Jindal, D. P. (2002). Acta Cryst. C58, o598±o599.
1997); program(s) used to solve structure: SIR92 (Altomare et al.,
ꢁ
o78 S. Thamotharan et al.
C
30
H39ClO
4
and C37
H
54
N
2
O
3
ÁH
2
O
Acta Cryst. (2004). C60, o75±o78