296
A.P. Amrute et al. / Journal of Catalysis 286 (2012) 287–297
Table 4
to highly expensive RuO2-based catalysts for industrial chlorine
Energy (DE) in eV and Gibbs free energy (D
G0) in kJ mol–1 M (M = Ce, Ru) atom for the
recycling. The activity is related to the presence of oxygen vacan-
cies in the material. The stability arises from the remarkable resis-
tance of cerium oxide against chlorination. Limited bulk
chlorination, that is detection of CeCl3 by XRD, takes place under
HCl-rich conditions (O2/HCl 6 0.25). The bulk chloride phase rap-
idly and completely disappears when the catalyst is exposed to
O2-rich conditions. Under O2/HCl P 0.75, only the outermost sur-
face layers of CeO2 contain chlorine. Density functional theory sim-
ulations reveal that Cl activation from vacancy positions to surface
Ce atoms is the most energy-demanding step, although chorine–
oxygen competition for the available active sites may render re-
oxidation as the rate-determining step. Current studies focus on
developing a proper strategy to support the active phase on a suit-
able carrier preserving the catalytic proprerties of bulk CeO2.
complete chlorination of CeO2 and RuO2 by Cl2 or HCl.a
Chlorination equation
D
E
DG°
573 K
703 K
CeO2 + 3/2Cl2 ? CeCl3 + O2
CeO2 + 4HCl ? CeCl3 + 2H2O + 1/2Cl2
RuO2 + 3/2Cl2 ? RuCl3 + O2
15.82
92.95
60.61
178.98
146.65
112.18
97.95
198.22
183.98
ꢀ115.99
101.86
RuO2 + 4HCl ? RuCl3 + 2H2O + 1/2Cl2
ꢀ29.95
a
Calculated using the PBE (RuO2) and PBE + U (CeO2) functionals.
coordinated Rucus positions, as nearly all available sites are occu-
pied by Cl [9]. For CeO2, under-coordinated cerium atoms only exist
when oxygen vacancies are present in the surface or near-surface
regions. These are the only active sites for the reaction, in agree-
ment with the linearity found between activity and OSC (Fig. 1b).
As a consequence, the reaction profile for CeO2 is much more abrupt
(involves higher energy requirements) than that of RuO2. This cor-
relates with the higher temperatures needed to run the Deacon
reaction on CeO2 (vide supra). The most energy-demanding step
of HCl oxidation on RuO2 is related to the formation and evolution
of Cl2. Due to the high energy required for Cl2 elimination on RuO2,
Cl self-poisoning is observed, and thus, re-oxidation turns out to be
the rate-determining step under relevant conditions, as shown by
the positive dependence of the activity on the partial pressure of
O2 [51]. For CeO2, the activation of Cl atoms from lattice vacancies
to surface positions is the most energy-demanding step.
The similar activity enhancement observed at higher partial O2
pressures (Fig. 2) can be rationalized on the basis of the chlorine
and oxygen competition for the same active sites, which tightly
couples chlorine elimination to oxygen re-adsorption. When Cl
atoms occupy most of the active positions, very few active sites ex-
ist for re-oxidation, thus producing less Cl2. In extreme cases, this
leads to catalyst deactivation.
Regarding the stability against the harsh reaction conditions
employed, while the experimental data indicate that RuO2 and
CeO2 are quite similar, the DFT analysis points out some differ-
ences. The RuO2 surface is known to be partially chlorinated, but
this chlorination is confined to the under-coordinated O and Ru
positions at the external surface. Comparing surface Cl contents,
the situation is such that the amount of Cl on the surface of RuO2
is very large, as the under-coordinated positions in the lattice are
very prone to adsorb reactants (Cl in particular). This effect is less
evident on CeO2, given the relative inertness of Ce atoms on the
surface. Indeed, most of the Cl is sitting at oxygen vacancies on
the surface and not directly on top of the active Ce sites. In addi-
tion, the penetration of Cl atoms to deeper layers is hindered in
both RuO2 and CeO2 systems by more than 2 eV. This energy is
somewhat larger for CeO2 (3 eV). Nevertheless, owing to vacancy
diffusion, and thus oxygen supply to the surface, ceria will be more
prone to subsurface and bulk chlorination in pure HCl or sub-stoi-
chiometric Deacon feeds. In line with this, we have compared the
energy required for the bulk chlorination and lattice disruption
in both Ru and Ce cases (Table 4). The energy requirement for
the chlorination of CeO2 is smaller than the corresponding value
for RuO2, in agreement with the greater chlorination detected in
the CeO2 experiments in HCl-rich feeds.
Acknowledgment
We thank Bayer MaterialScience for permission to publish these
results.
Appendix A. Supplementary material
Electronic Supplementary Information (ESI): Experimental
details of the applied characterization techniques, additional re-
sults from characterization, catalytic testing, and DFT simulations.
The above material can be found, in the online version, at
References
[1] J. Pérez-Ramírez, C. Mondelli, T. Schmidt, O.F.-K. Schlüter, A. Wolf, L. Mleczko,
T. Dreier, Energy Environ. Sci. 4 (2011) 4786.
[2] K. Seki, Catal. Surv. Asia 14 (2010) 168.
[3] H. Deacon, US Patent 85,370, Assigned to Gaskell, Deacon and Co., 1868.
[4] A.J. Johnson, A.J. Cherniavsky, US Patent 2542,961, Assigned to Shell
Development Company, 1951.
[5] T. Kiyoura, N. Fujimoto, M. Ajioka, T. Suzuki, Y. Kogure, K. Kanaya, T. Nagayama,
EP184413-A, Assigned to Mitsui Toatsu Chemicals, 1984.
[6] T. Hibi, H. Nishida, H. Abekawa, US Patent 5871,707, Assigned to Sumitomo
Chemical Company, 1999.
[7] C. Mondelli, A.P. Amrute, F. Krumeich, T. Schmidt, J. Pérez-Ramírez,
ChemCatChem 3 (2011) 657.
[8] A. Wolf, L. Mleczko, O.F. Schlüter, S. Schubert, EP2026905, Assigned to Bayer
MaterialScience, 2006.
[9] M.A.G. Hevia, A.P. Amrute, T. Schmidt, J. Pérez-Ramírez, J. Catal. 276 (2010)
141.
[10] D. Crihan, M. Knapp, S. Zweidinger, E. Lundgren, C.J. Weststrate, J.N. Andersen,
A.P. Seitsonen, H. Over, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 47 (2008) 2131.
[11] J.P. Hofmann, S. Zweidinger, A.P. Seitsonen, A. Farkas, M. Knapp, O. Balmes, E.
Lundgren, J.N. Andersen, H. Over, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 12 (2010) 15358.
[13] C. Mondelli, A.P. Amrute, T. Schmidt, J. Pérez-Ramírez, Chem. Commun. 47
(2011) 7173.
[14] R.W.G. Wyckoff, Crystal Structures, Interscience, New York, 1965.
[15] R.J. Gorte, AIChE J. 56 (2010) 1126.
[16] Q. Fu, H. Saltsburg, M. Flytzani-Stephanopoulos, Science 301 (2003) 935.
[17] A. Primo, T. Marino, A. Corma, R. Molinari, H. Garcia, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133
(2011) 6930.
[18] Y.S. Chaudhary, S. Panigrahi, S. Nayak, B. Sarpati, S. Bhattacharjee, N. Kulkarni,
J. Mater. Chem. 20 (2010) 2381.
[19] M. Mogensen, N.M. Sammes, G.A. Tompsett, Solid State Ion. 129 (2000) 63.
[20] B. Zhu, M.D. Mat, Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 1 (2006) 383.
[21] F. Zhou, X. Zhao, H. Xu, C. Yuan, J. Phys. Chem. C 111 (2007) 1651.
[22] A. Trovarelli, Catal. Rev.–Sci. Eng. 38 (1996) 439.
[23] A. Gómez-Cortés, Y. Márquez, J. Arenas-Alatorre, G. Díaz, Catal. Today 133–135
(2008) 743.
[24] A. Martínez-Arias, A.B. Hungría, G. Munuera, D. Gamarra, Appl. Catal. B 65
(2006) 207.
4. Conclusions
[25] W. Shin, C. Jung, J. Han, S. Nam, T. Lim, S. Hong, H. Lee, J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 10
(2004) 302.
[26] T.X.T. Sayle, S.C. Parker, C.R.A. Catlow, Surf. Sci. 316 (1994) 329.
[27] H.C. Yao, Y.F.Y. Yao, J. Catal. 86 (1984) 254.
[28] F. Esch, S. Fabris, L. Zhou, T. Montini, C. Africh, P. Fornasiero, G. Comelli, R.
Rosei, Science 309 (2005) 752.
In this study, we present a fundamental understanding of HCl
oxidation on bulk CeO2 combining catalyst testing, steady-state
kinetics, characterization, and DFT simulations. Due to its remark-
able activity and stability, CeO2 constitutes a promising alternative