STRUCTURAL–MORPHOLOGICAL AND BIOLOGICAL PROPERTIES
1171
determined from the ratio between the MMs of BSA
In the general case, at dn/dc ≠ 0 (dn/dc is the refrac-
and the nanostructure formed. To measure the reduced tive index increment of the solution, 0.146 for the
0
scattering intensity of the solutions R , we used a Fica BSA–Se –ç é system), the experimental value of [n]
θ
2
photogoniodiffusometer. The wavelength of vertically is the sum of three contributions: [n] = [n]
+ [n]fs + [n]
is the intrinsic anisotropy, [n]fs is the micro-
is the macroform effect [6]. The
depends on the particle shape asymme-
,
e
f
polarized incident light was 546.1 nm. Measurements where [n]
e
were performed for angles of scattering within θ = 30°– form effect, and [n]
f
1
50°. The refractive index increment dn/dcBSA (cBSA is quantity [n]
f
try p as
the BSA concentration) was determined from refrac-
tometric measurements performed on an IRF-23
instrument.
2
s
2
2
[
n] = ((n + 2)/3) (M (dn/dc) f(p))/30πRTn
*
f
w
s
The experimental data on light scattering for the
nanocomposite solutions were processed in accordance
with the Zimm procedure, by double extrapolation (to
(2)
2
=
const × M*(dn/dc) f (p),
w
2
where n is the refractive index of the solvent, T is the
cBSA = 0, θ = 0) of the KÒ /R versus sin (θ/2) + kÒ
s
BSA
θ
BSA
absolute temperature, R is the universal gas constant,
and f(p) is the tabulated function of the ratio between
the lengths of the axes of the solid ellipsoid that mod-
eled the particle [6].
dependence (K and k are the calibration and numerical
constants, respectively).
The method of dynamic light scattering [7] was used
to determine the average hydrodynamic size R* of the
h
The biological tests were performed with cells of
promyelocytic leukemia HL-60 from the bank of cell
cultures at the Institute of Cytology of the Russian
Academy of Sciences. The cells were cultured in an
incubator (5% ëé , 37°ë) on plastic Petri dishes in an
RPMI medium (Biolot, St. Petersburg) containing 15%
nanostructure at ÒBSA
0. The ratio between the
experimental values R* and R* was used to determine
g
h
the parameter ρ* = R* /R* , which characterizes the
g
h
2
conformation of the nanostructure [8].
The optical equipment of the setup used for measur- of cattle embryo blood serum (Gibco). To exclude
ing the dynamic light scattering consisted of an ALV-SP microbial contamination of the cultivation medium, we
goniometer (Germany) and a helium–neon (He–Ne) introduced antibiotic gentamycin in a concentration of
laser (Spectra-Physics), as a light source (λ = 632.8 nm, 80 µg/ml. The cells were preliminary planted in plastic
W ~ 20 mW). The correlation function of the scattered cups 35 mm in diameter or in 24-socket plates.
light intensity was measured on a Photo Cor-FS
Anteks, Russia) correlator with 288 channels. The cor-
relation function was analyzed using the Dynals soft-
ware package (Gelios, Russia).
HL-60 cells were treated 24 h after transplantation
by adding the corresponding agents to the cultivation
medium at certain time intervals (24 h to 3 days).
The cell distribution over the DNA content was
determined using flow cytofluorometry. To enhance the
(
The mean density of the spherical nanostructure was
calculated from M* and the root-mean-square radius membrane permeability, we treated the cells with
w
X-100 triton at a final concentration of 0.01% for 0.5 h
at room temperature (~20°C), added propidium iodide
of inertia by the formula
3
sph
Φ* = 3M* /4πN R
,
(1) (10 µg/ml, Sigma, USA), incubated the cells for 15 min
at 37°ë, and analyzed them on a ATC 300 flow cytoflu-
orometer (Bruker) at a flow rate of 20 µl/min for 3 min.
w
a
where Rsph = 1.29R* [9].
g
To determine the content of active oxygen species
AOS) in the cells, the cultivation medium was treated
with dihydroethidium bromide (30 min before the anal-
ysis) so as to attain a final concentration of 5 µmol/l.
The cells were washed twice with a PBS solution
The molecular dispersity of the test solutions of
nanostructures was determined by the flow birefrin-
gence method [6] from the dependences of the birefrin-
gence ∆n on the velocity gradient g and the BSA con-
centration Ò. We used a titanium dynamooptimeter with
a h = 4.0 cm and a rotor–stator gap of ∆r = 0.03. The
flow birefringence measurements were performed with
thermostatted solution (at 21°C) to avoid viscosity vari-
ations and optical distortion caused by temperature gra-
(
(
20 mmol/l phosphate buffer, pH 7.4, 0.1 mol/l NaCl).
The fluorescence of ethidium bromide was analyzed on
an ATC 300 flow cytofluorometer (Bruker).
The AOS yield in the cells was stimulated by adria-
dients. The setup was calibrated with phenylethyl alco- mycin at a concentration of 10 ng/ml.
hol which has a significant birefringence increment
1
1
(
∆n/g = 1.7 × 10 ), and with polystyrene–bromoform
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
solution. The error in determination of the characteris-
The reduction of ionic selenium was found to be a
first-order reaction in the selenious acid concentration,
tic birefringence, [n] = lim (∆n /gÒBSAη0] (where
g → 0, c → 0
–3
–1
η0 is the solvent viscosity) did not exceed 10%. The
with rate constants k* of 2.5 × 10 s (Table 1) and
–3
–1
measurements were performed at g < g , where g is the 1.7 × 10
s
in the presence and absence of BSA,
k
k
velocity gradient of onset of flow turbulence.
respectively. Thus, the protein accelerates the reaction.
RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY A Vol. 81 No. 7 2007