T.L. Henshaw et al.rChemical Physics Letters 325 (2000) 537–544
543
0
.999 R mirrors were labeled OC I and OC II,
and the subsequent role they play on laser perfor-
mance.
respectively. Accordingly, results from these mea-
surements give an average transmisson of 1.2"0.1
y3
=
10
ŽRs0.9988"0.0001. for both OC I and
OC II and thus, within experimental uncertainty,
there is no apparent difference in the reflectance
values between these two mirrors. Trial 2 in Table 1
shows the effect of substituting the high finesse
outcoupler with OC I, Rs0.9988. For near identical
flow conditions, the output power more than triples.
Indeed, using OC I under the enhaced NF , HN and
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to acknowledge Brian Ander-
son, Ralph Tate, Dr. John Herbelin, Vaughn Halford,
Richard Hagenloh and Dr. Shiv Dass for their techni-
cal assistance in these studies.
3
3
HI flow conditions shown in Trial 3 the power
increases considerably to 110 mW. Interestingly, in
Trial 4 the power extraction is repeated with OC II,
Rs0.9988, and a significant power enhancement to
References
w1x J.V.V. Kasper, G.C. Pimentel, Appl. Phys. Lett. 5 Ž1964.
1
80 mW is observed. Since the transmission mea-
2
31.
surements for OC I and II are somewhat limited in
accuracy, the power enhancement shown with OC II
may be attributed to slight variations in the magni-
tude of the mirror transmission that are not discern-
able by these measurements, or possibly by other
systematic effects such as better cavity alignment. It
should be noted that although attempts were made at
keeping the flow rates constant, the recorded HN3
and DCl flow rates in Trial 4 were slightly higher
and thus may also have contributed to the overall
increase in power.
2 T.A. Cool, R.R. Stevens, T.J. Falk, Int. J. Chem. Kinet. 1
w x
Ž1970. 295.
w3x W.E. McDermott, N.R. Pchelkin, D.J. Benard, R.R. Bousek,
Appl. Phys. Lett. 32 Ž1978. 469.
w4x D.J. Benard, W.E. McDermott, N.R. Pchelkin, R.R. Bousek,
Appl. Phys. Lett. 34 Ž1979. 40.
w x
5
J.M. Herbelin, N. Cohen, Chem. Phys. Lett. 20 1973 605.
w6x T.C. Clark, M.A.A. Clyne, Trans. Faraday Soc. 66 Ž1970.
77.
w7x C.T. Cheah, M.A.A. Clyne, J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans.
r76 Ž1980. 1543.
w8x A.T. Pritt Jr., R.D. Coombe, Int. J. Chem. Kinet. 12 Ž1980.
41.
Ž
.
8
2
7
w9x M.A.A. Clyne, A.J. MacRobert, J. Brunning, C.T. Cheah, J.
Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 2r79 Ž1983. 1515.
w10x J. Habdas, S. Watengaonkar, D.W. Setser, J. Phys. Chem. 91
Ž1987. 451.
4
. Summary and conclusion
w11x D.R. Yarkony, J. Chem. Phys. 86 Ž1987. 1642.
A new, chemically pumped, continuous wave laser
w
1
2
x
Ž
.
R.J. Malins, D.W. Setser, J. Phys. Chem. 95 1981 1342.
w13x T.L. Henshaw, S.D. Herrera, L.A. Schlie, J. Phys. Chem. A
02 Ž1998. 6239.
2
)
2
operating on the IŽ P .–I Ž P . transition of
3
r2
1r2
1
iodine at 1.315 mm has been demonstrated. The laser
w14x G.C. Manke II, D.W. Setser, J. Phys. Chem. A 102 Ž1998.
is based on the ET reaction between metastable NCl
1
2
7257.
Ža D. and ground state IŽ P . atoms. This repre-
3
r2
w
15x
x
Ž
.
R.D. Bower, T.T. Yang, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 8 1991 1583.
sents a significant step in the development of a
chemically pumped, all gas phase iodine laser. The
efficiency of the laser at this time is not fully charac-
terized since the current device features small gain,
pathlength and limitations in the amount of fluorine
atoms that can be generated in this device. Future
work will be directed at constructing a larger device
with longer pathlength and higher mass flow rates to
enhance the single-pass gain and mode volume of
this system. In addition, continued efforts will be
directed at obtaining a more detailed understanding
of the mixing and chemical kinetics of this system
w
Ž
.
1
6
A.J. Ray, R.D. Coombe, J. Phys. Chem. 97 1993 3475.
w17x T. Yang, V.T. Gylys, R.D. Bower, L.F. Rubin, Opts. Lett. 24
Ž1992. 1803.
w18x A.J. Ray, R.D. Coombe, J. Phys. Chem. 99 Ž1995. 7849.
w19x J.M. Herbelin, T.L. Henshaw, B.D. Rafferty, B.T. Anderson,
R.F. Tate, T.J. Madden, G.C. Manke II, G.D. Hager, Chem.
Phys. Lett. 299 1999 583.
Ž
.
w20x R.F. Tate, B.T. Anderson, P.B. Keating, G.D. Hager, Proc.
SPIE Gas Chem. Lasers Intense Beam Appl. 3268 Ž1998.
1
15.
w21x B.D. Rafferty, B.T. Anderson, T.L. Henshaw, J.M. Herbelin,
G.D. Hager, Lasers 97 Ž1997. 23.
w22x T.L. Henshaw, T.J. Madden, J.M. Herbelin, G.C. Manke II,
B.T. Anderson, R.F. Tate, G.D. Hager, Paper 3612-24, SPIE