Paper
NJC
(
namely, 2-chloro-4,4,5,5-tetramethyl-1,3,2-dioxaphospholane) Notes and references
was charged into the NMR tube and mixed thoroughly prior
3
1
31
1 M. Ertas, Q. Han, H. Jameel and H.-m. Chang, Bioresour.
Technol., 2014, 152, 259–266.
to P NMR analysis. A P NMR spectrum was obtained by
using a Bruker 300 MHz spectrometer with a quad probe. The
contents of the hydroxyl groups were determined according to
ref. 29 and 30.
2
C. Huang, B. Jeuck, J. Du, Q. Yong, H. Chang, H. Jameel and
R. Phillips, Bioresour. Technol., 2016, 219, 600–607.
G. T. Beckham, C. W. Johnson, E. M. Karp, D. Salvach u´ a and
D. R. Vardon, Curr. Opin. Biotechnol., 2016, 42, 40–53.
3
2
D HSQC NMR
1
3
1
4 A. J. Ragauskas, G. T. Beckham, M. J. Biddy, R. Chandra,
F. Chen, M. F. Davis, B. H. Davison, R. A. Dixon, P. Gilna
and M. Keller, Science, 2014, 344, 1246843.
Two-dimensional (2D) C– H heteronuclear single quantum
coherence (HSQC) correlation NMR spectra were acquired
3
1
according to the procedures described by Capanema, et al.
The lignin samples were dissolved in DMSO-d with the concen-
tration ca. 20%. A special Shigemi NMR microtube was used to
reduce the amount of sample for the NMR experiments. The
D HSQC NMR spectra were acquired on a Bruker AVANCE
00 MHz spectrometer equipped with a 5 mm double reso-
nance broadband BBI inverse probe using a coupling con-
stant J C–H of 147 Hz. The HSQC experiment was performed
with a Bruker phase-sensitive gradient-edited HSQC pulse
sequence ‘hsqcetgpsi.2.’ The experimental parameters used
were 160 transients (scans per block) acquired using 1 K data
points in the F2 ( H) dimension for an acquisition time of
51 ms and 256 data points in F1 ( C) for an acquisition time
of 7.68 ms for a total of 16.5 h. The 2D data set was processed
with 1 K and 91 K data points using the Qsine function in both
dimensions.
5
6
7
8
9
S. J. Lee, H. J. Kim, E. J. Cho, Y. Song and H. J. Bae,
Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 2015, 72, 1056–1062.
W. Zhang, Y. Ma, C. Wang, S. Li, M. Zhang and F. Chu,
Ind. Crops Prod., 2013, 43, 326–333.
6
2
5
Y. Jin, X. Cheng and Z. Zheng, Bioresour. Technol., 2010, 101,
2046–2048.
W. Qiao, S. Li, G. Guo, S. Han, S. Ren and Y. Ma, J. Ind. Eng.
Chem., 2015, 21, 1417–1422.
A. Pizzi, Handbook of adhesive technology, 2003, vol. 2.
1
10 X. Jiang, J. Liu, X. Du, Z. Hu, H.-m. Chang and H. Jameel,
1
ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng., 2018, 6, 5504–5512.
1
3
11 J. Podschun, B. Saake and R. Lehnen, Eur. Polym. J., 2015,
7, 1–11.
1
6
12 G. J. Abarro, J. Podschun, L. J. Diaz, S. Ohashi,
B. Saake, R. Lehnen and H. Ishida, RSC Adv., 2016, 6,
107689–107698.
1
1
1
3 M. Funaoka, M. Matsubara, N. Seki and S. Fukatsu, Bio-
technol. Bioeng., 1995, 46, 545–552.
4 J. Podschun, A. St u¨ cker, B. Saake and R. Lehnen, ACS
Sustainable Chem. Eng., 2015, 3, 2526–2532.
5 M. V. Alonso, M. Oliet, F. Rodrıguez, J. Garcıa, M. A.
Gilarranz and J. J. Rodrıguez, Bioresour. Technol., 2005, 96,
Conclusions
Phenolation can be used to improve lignin’s reactivity by increas-
ing phenolic hydroxyl groups and reactive sites for adhesive
31
applications. P NMR revealed that phenolated lignin had
ꢀ
1
ꢀ1
aliphatic-OH of 1.49 mmol g and H-OH of 2.67 mmol g (more
than 8 times that in AER-S). The 2D HSQC indicated that all lignin
1013–1018.
1
6 H.-K. Ono and K. Sudo, in Lignin: Properties and
Materials, ed. W. G. Glasser and S. Sarkanen, American
Chemical Society, Washington, DC, 1989, ch. 25, vol. 397,
pp. 334–345.
7 R. H. Narron, Q. Han, S. Park, H. M. Chang and H. Jameel,
Bioresour. Technol., 2017, 241, 857–867.
0
0
0
0
substructures (b-O-4 , b-5 /a-O-4 , b-b , ferulate, p-coumarate and
p-benzoate) in AER were reacted during phenolation, along with
the hydrolysis of over 50% of the residual carbohydrates
determined by composition analysis. The b-elimination of the
g-hydroxymethyl group as formaldehyde was also detected. The
released formaldehyde further reacted with phenol and lignin
to form diphenylmethane structures.
1
1
1
2
2
8 D. J. Yelle, P. Kaparaju, C. G. Hunt, K. Hirth, H. Kim,
J. Ralph and C. Felby, BioEnergy Res., 2013, 6, 211–221.
9 C. Crestini and D. S. Argyropoulos, J. Agric. Food Chem.,
1997, 45, 1212–1219.
Conflicts of interest
0 J. Zeng, G. L. Helms, X. Gao and S. Chen, J. Agric. Food
Chem., 2013, 61, 10848–10857.
1 J. C. Del R ´ı o, J. Rencoret, P. Prinsen, A. n. T. Mart ´ı nez,
J. Ralph and A. Guti ´e rrez, J. Agric. Food Chem., 2012, 60,
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
Acknowledgements
5922–5935.
This research project was supported financially in part by a 22 H. Kim and J. Ralph, Org. Biomol. Chem., 2010, 8, 576–591.
USDA grant through Domtar and in part by the Biomass to 23 A. Jensen, Y. Cabrera, C.-W. Hsieh, J. Nielsen, J. Ralph and
Biochemicals and Biomaterials Research Consortium and the
Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities 24 C. Huang, J. He, L. Du, D. Min and Q. Yong, J. Wood Chem.
FRFCU, Project No. 2017PT11). The authors are grateful to
Technol., 2016, 36, 157–172.
USDA, Domtar and members of the research Consortium 25 C. Huang, J. He, R. Narron, Y. Wang and Q. Yong, ACS
C. Felby, Holzforschung, 2017, 71, 461–469.
(
and FRFCU.
Sustainable Chem. Eng., 2017, 5, 11770–11779.
New J. Chem.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry and the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique 2019