7
84
steroids 7 2 ( 2 0 0 7 ) 778–786
trum showed the absorption bands for hydroxyl (3442 cm 1),
−
ꢀꢀꢀ
from ıH 4.86 (H-1 of -d-cymaropyranosyl) to ıC 83.6
carbonyl (1709 cm 1) groups and benzene ring (1610 and
−
591 cm 1). The 1H NMR spectrum of 1 revealed the presence
of three singlet methyl groups [ıH 1.14, 1.63, 2.08 (each 3H, s,
Me-19, -18, -21)], one olefinic proton [ıH 5.38 (d, J = 4.7 Hz, H-6)]
and four aromatic protons on a para-substituted benzene
−
ꢀꢀ
ꢀꢀ
(C-4 of -d-digitoxopyranosyl); from ıH 4.98 (H-1 of -d-
digitoxopyranosyl) to ıC 79.3 (C-3). Therefore, compound 2 was
deduced to be qingyangshengenin-3-O--d-glucopyranosyl-
(1 → 4)--d-oleandropyranosyl-(1 → 4)--d-cymaropyranosyl-
(1 → 4)--d-digitoxopyranoside, and named otophylloside I.
1
ꢀ
ꢀ
ring [ıH 6.71 (2H, d, J = 8.8 Hz, H-4 ,6 ) and 7.73 (2H, d, J = 8.8 Hz,
ꢀ
ꢀ
H-3 ,7 )] in its aglycone moiety. Its negative FAB-MS exhibited
fragment ion peaks at m/z 1105 [M − 137]− which can be
ascribed to the loss of a hydroxybenzoyl ester group. The
above observation suggested qingyangshengenin to be the
aglycone of compound 1. Proton signals were also assigned
to three secondary methyl groups [ıH 1.20 (d, J = 5.9 Hz), 1.21
3.3.
Otophylloside J (3)
The molecular formula of 3 was determined as C61H92O25 by
−
its HRESI-MS (m/z 1223.5840 [M–H] , calcd. 1223.5849). The
acidic hydrolysis afforded 7 as the aglycone and the same
sugar compositions as compounds 1 and 2. The 1H NMR
spectrum of 3 showed four secondary methyl signals [ıH 1.23
(d, J = 6.3 Hz), 1.23 (d, J = 6.2 Hz), 1.30 (d, J = 6.2 Hz), and 1.34
(d, J = 6.2 Hz)] and three methoxyl methyl signals [ıH 3.45,
3.46, and 3.48] together with five anomeric proton signals
[ıH 4.36 (d, J = 7.7 Hz), 4.60 (dd, J = 9.6, 1.6 Hz), 4.86 (dd, J = 9.6,
1.6 Hz), 4.93 (dd, J = 9.8, 1.8 Hz), and 4.97 (dd, J = 9.7, 1.7 Hz)].
These observations suggested that four 2,6-dideoxysugar
were part of a pentahexose chain with -linkages in 3. The
13C NMR signals of each sugar unit were assigned exactly
by HMQC and HMBC analyses and indicated the existence
of one -d-digitoxopyranosyl, one -d-oleandropyranosyl,
one -d-glucopyranosyl and two -d-cymaropyranosyl units.
According to the distinct long-range correlations from ıH
(
[
d, J = 5.8 Hz), and 1.38 (d, J = 6.2 Hz)], two methoxyl groups
ıH 3.46 and 3.48] and five anomeric protons [ıH 4.38 (d,
J = 7.8 Hz), 4.48 (d, J = 7.9 Hz), 4.60 (dd, J = 9.6, 1.6 Hz), 4.82 (dd,
J = 9.6, 1.6 Hz), and 4.94 (dd, J = 9.7, 1.7 Hz)] whose multiplici-
ties suggested the presence of three 2,6-dideoxy-sugar in a
pentasaccharides chain and the -configuration of the five
hexose units. Acid hydrolysis of 1 gave qingyangshengenin
(
7) as the aglycone, and glucose, digitoxose, oleandrose, as
well as cymarose as sugar residues. The 13C NMR shifts of
each sugar unit were assigned unambiguously by HMQC,
HMBC and HMQC-TOCSY analyses (Table 2). The existence
of one d-digitoxopyranosyl, one d-oleandropyranosyl, one
d-cymaropyranosyl and two d-glucopyranosyl units were
confirmed by their comparison with the spectroscopic data
in the literatures [2,12–17]. The glycosylation shifts effects of
C-2 (−0.3 ppm), C-3 (+7.9 ppm), and C-4 (−1.7 ppm) showed
the linkage position of the sugar moiety was at the C-3
hydroxyl group of the aglycone. The sequence of these five
sugar units was demonstrated by HMBC spectrum, in which
ꢀ
ꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀ
ꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀ
4.36 (H-1
of -d-glucopyranosyl) to ıC 83.8 (C-4
of outer
of outer -d-
cymaropyranosyl) to ıC 84.0 (C-4 of -d-oleandropyranosyl);
ꢀ
ꢀꢀꢀꢀ
-d-cymaropyranosyl); from ıH 4.93 (H-1
ꢀ
ꢀꢀꢀ
ꢀ
ꢀꢀꢀ
ꢀꢀꢀ
from ıH 4.60 (H-1 of -d-oleandropyranosyl) to ıC 83.8 (C-4
of inner -d-cymaropyranosyl); from ıH 4.86 (H-1 of inner -
d-cymaropyranosyl) to ıC 83.6 (C-4 of -d-digitoxopyranosyl);
from ıH 4.97 (H-1 of -d-digitoxopyranosyl) to ıC 79.3 (C-3),
ꢀ
ꢀꢀ
ꢀ
ꢀ
ꢀ
ꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀ
ꢀꢀ
distinct correlations from ıH 4.38 (H-1
of terminal -d-
glucopyranosyl) to ıC 81.0 (C-4 of inner -d-glucopyranosyl);
of inner -d-glucopyranosyl) to ıC 83.6
C-4 of -d-cymaropyranosyl); from ıH 4.82 (H-1 of -d-
cymaropyranosyl) to ıC 83.6 (C-4 of -d-oleandropyranosyl);
from ıH 4.60 (H-1 of -d-oleandropyranosyl) to ıC 83.7
C-4 of -d-digitoxopyranosyl); from ıH 4.94 (H-1 of -d-
ꢀ
ꢀꢀꢀꢀ
the structure of otophylloside J (3) was confirmed to be
qingyangshengenin-3-O--d-glucopyranosyl-(1 → 4)--d-
cymaropyranosyl-(1 → 4)--d-oleandropyranosyl-(1 → 4)--d-
cymaropyranosyl-(1 → 4)--d-digitoxopyranoside.
ꢀ
ꢀꢀꢀꢀ
from ıH 4.48 (H-1
(
ꢀ
ꢀꢀꢀ
ꢀꢀꢀꢀ
ꢀ
ꢀꢀ
ꢀ
ꢀꢀ
ꢀ
ꢀ
ꢀꢀ
(
3.4.
Otophylloside K (4)
digitoxopyranosyl) to ıC 79.3 (C-3), were observed, respectively.
Thus, the structure of otophylloside H (1) was established
Compound 4 possessed the molecular formula C54H80O23
on the basis of HRFAB-MS (m/z 1095.5004 [M-H] , calcd.
−
as
qingyangshengenin-3-O--d-glucopyranosyl-(1 → 4)--
d-glucopyranosyl-(1 → 4)--d-cymaropyranosyl-(1 → 4)--d-
oleandropyranosyl-(1 → 4)--d-digitoxopyranoside.
1095.5012). The combination of acidic hydrolysis, GC analysis
and spectra studies indicated that 4 possessed qingyang-
shengenin (7) as aglycone, and d-digitoxose, d-cymarose,
d-glucose and another deoxysugar as sugar residue. The
undefined deoxysugar showed one secondary methyl [ıH
3
.2.
Otophylloside I (2)
1
.73 (d, J = 6.1 Hz)], one methoxyl (ıH 3.93), one methine [ıH
−
Based on the HRFAB-MS data (m/z 1079.5030 [M–H] , calcd.
079.5063) and 13C NMR (DEPT) spectrum, compound 2
3.70 (t, J = 9.0 Hz)], and an anomeric proton doublet [ıH 4.68
(d, J = 7.7 Hz)] as well as seven carbons ıC 106.0 (d), 74.7 (d),
85.9 (d), 83.0 (d), 72.0 (d), 18.7 (q), and 60.6 (q) in its NMR
spectra. These NMR features were identical to those of -
thevetopyranosyl unit [13,16–17], and its configuration was
supposed to be d-form because no l-thevetopyranose was
found from the Asclepiadaceae family so far. The sequence
of these four sugar units was determined by the important
correlations from ıH 5.13 (H-1
83.0 (C-4 of -d-thevetopyranosyl); from ıH 4.68 (H-1 of -
d-thevetopyranosyl) to ıC 83.4 (C-4 of -d-cymaropyranosyl);
from ıH 5.15 (H-1 of -d-cymaropyranosyl) to ıC 83.2
1
was shown to have a molecular formula C54H80O22. The
acidic hydrolysis afforded 7 as the aglycone and the same
sugar compositions as compound 1. The 1H and 13C NMR
spectra of 2 were very similar to those of 1 except that
the signals due to one set of d-glucopyranosyl unit van-
ished in 2. In the HMBC experiment, the sequence of the
four sugar units was elucidated by significant correlations
ꢀ
ꢀꢀꢀꢀ
of -d-glucopyranosyl) to ıC
ꢀ
ꢀꢀꢀꢀ
ꢀꢀꢀꢀ
ꢀꢀꢀꢀ
observed from ıH 4.48 (H-1 of -d-glucopyranosyl) to ıC 83.5
ꢀ
ꢀꢀꢀ
ꢀꢀꢀꢀ
ꢀꢀꢀ
(
C-4 of -d-oleandropyranosyl); from ıH 4.64 (H-1 of -d-
ꢀ
ꢀꢀ
ꢀꢀꢀ
oleandropyranosyl) to ıC 83.7 (C-4 of -d-cymaropyranosyl);