4
Tetrahedron
removed using sodium bis(2-methoxyethoxy)aluminum hydride
(Red-Al) to form 25 in 70% yield (5.3 g). A small amount of 25
was converted to N-methylmorpholine 1a to confirm the identity
by comparison to previously synthesized 1a (Scheme 2). Our
route is better suited for scale-up, avoiding the use of cryogenic
conditions or hazardous reagents. Moreover, from a medicinal
chemistry perspective, late stage incorporation of C2-aryl groups
and N-alkyl groups allow for efficient and rapid SAR studies.
With this route, only three steps were required to complete the
synthesis after introducing the C2-aryl group, and N-alkylation is
the last step. These are significantly less than those from the
previously reported synthetic route, which requires 9 (C2-aryl)
and 7 (N-alkyl) steps after those diversifications were introduced.
Scheme 7. Scale-up synthesis of 1a by TfOH-catalyzed hydroxyalkoxylation
Supplementary Date
1
Copies of H/13C/1D-NOE NMR spectra of the products and
the characterization conditions of LCMS, HRMS, and HPLC can
be found at https:// Single crystal X-ray structure of ent-1a,
obtained from the reproduction of Kozlowski and co-workers
route (Scheme 2) have been deposited with the Cambridge
Crystallographic Data Centre as supplementary publication
1583526 CCDC. Copies of the data can be obtained, free of
charge, on application to CCDC, 12 Union Road, Cambridge
CB2 1EZ, UK, (fax: +44-(0)1223-336033 or e-mail:
deposit@ccdc.cam.ac.Uk).
Conclusion
We have developed an improved, scalable synthesis of a
2,2,6-trisubstituted chiral morpholine scaffold, containing a
chiral quaternary stereogenic center using a diastereoselective
cyclization from readily available chiral starting materials.
Adaptation of a boron trifluoride mediated hydroalkoxylative
cyclization originally developed by Saikia and co-workers
provided the desired relative stereoselectivity needed to construct
the highly challenging quaternary stereogenic center. However,
stoichiometric amounts of BF3·OEt2 were required to promote
cyclization of the hindered tri-substituted internal olefinic
substrate. Reaction optimization demonstrated catalytic
trifluoromethanesulfonic acid can provide nearly identical
results. Our route negates the need for phenol protection,
eliminates toxic reagents, cryogenic conditions, and has clean
reaction profiles. Not only does our improved route allow for
safe scale up, it also allows for later stage incorporation of C2
aryl groups and N-substituents in support of driving efficient
SAR optimization studies.
References and notes
1.
(a) Al-Ghorbani M, Zabiulla BBA, V. MS, Khanum SA. J. Chem.
Pharm. Res. 2015;7:281-301;
(b) Naim MJ, Alam O, Alam MJ, Alam P, Shrivastava, N. Int. J. Pharm.
Pharm. Sci. 2015;3:40-51.
2.
Dugar S, Sharma A, Kuila B, Mahajan D, Dwivedi S, Tripathi V.
Synthesis 2015;47:712-720.
3.
4.
White AC. Morpholine derivatives. GB 2125793, 1984.
(a) Lupi V, Albanese D, Landini D, Scaletti D, Penso M. Tetrahedron
2004;60:11709-11718;
(b) Lanman BA, Myers AG. Org. Lett. 2004;6:1045-1047;
(c) Albanese D, Salsa M, Landini D, Lupi V, Penso, M. Eur. J. Org.
Chem. 2007:2107-2113;
(d) Breuning M, Winnacker M, Steiner M. Eur. J. Org. Chem.
2007:2100-2106;
(e) Penso M, Lupi V, Albanese D, Foschi F, Landini D, Tagliabue A.
Synlett 2008:2451-2454;
Acknowledgments
(f) Albanese D, Foschi F, Penso M. Catal. Today 2009;140:100-104;
(g) Ritzen B, Hoekman S, Verdasco ED, van Delft FL, Rutjes FPJT. J.
Org. Chem. 2010;75:3461-3464;
The authors thank Dr. Justin Stroh and Matthew S. Teague for
HRMS determination, Dr. Brian Samas and Ivan Samardjiev for
X-ray crystallography, and James N. Bradow for prep-scale
HPLC purifications. We also thank Dr. Christopher J. Helal, Dr.
Kyle Tarantino, and Dr. Jennifer E. Davoren for helpful
discussion.
(h) Albanese D, Landini D, Penso M, Tagliabue A, Carlini, E. Org.
Process Res. Dev. 2010;14:705-711;
(i) Sammons M, Jennings SM, Herr M, Hulford CA, Wei L, Hallissey
JF, Kiser EJ, Wright SW, Piotrowski DW. Org. Process Res. Dev.
2013;17:934-939.
5.
(a) Fennie MW, DiMauro EF, O'Brien EM, Annamalai V, Kozlowski
MC. Tetrahedron 2005;61:6249-6265;
B(OH)2
(b) Pedrosa R, Andrés C, Mendiguchía P, Nieto J. J. Org. Chem.
2006;71:8854-8863;
Et
OH
(c) Leathen ML, Rosen BR, Wolfe, JP. J. Org. Chem. 2009;74:5107-
5110;
Et
OH
OH
N
Ts
Me
OH
(d) Gharpure SJ, Prasad JVK. J. Org. Chem. 2011;76:10325-10331;
(e) Lu Z, Stahl SS. Org. Lett. 2012;14:1234-1237;
(f) McGhee A, Cochran BM, Stenmark TA, Michael FE. Chem. Comm.
2013;49:6800-6802;
N
Me
Pd(PPh3)4 (5 mol%)
Na2CO3
dioxane/water (9:1)
100 °C, 18 h, 59%
Ts
I
20
(g) Matlock JV, Svejstrup TD, Songara P, Overington S, McGarrigle
EM, Aggarwal VK. Org. Lett. 2015;17:5044-5047.
Deka MJ, Indukuri K, Sultana S, Borah M, Saikia AK. J. Org. Chem.
2015;80:4349-4359.
23
24.5 g
28.7 g
13.3 g
11.7 g
6.
7.
8.
9.
Ukaji Y, Yamamoto K, Fukui M, Fujisawa T. Tetrahedron Lett.
1991;32:2919-2922.
TfOH
(10 mol%)
Et
O
Chatani N, Amishiro N, Morii T, Yamashita T, Murai, S. J. Org. Chem.
1995;60:1834-1840.
Warren JD, Shi Y. J. Org. Chem. 1999;64:7675-7677.
HPLC
OH
Et
purification
DCE, 60 ºC
2 h, 84%
N
Ts
10. Albanese D, Landini D, Penso M, Petricci S. Tetrahedron
1999;55:6387-6394.
24
(2R,6S)- (54%)
11. (a) Yin W, Kabir MS, Wang Z, Rallapalli SK, Ma J, Cook JM. J. Org.
Chem. 2010;75:3339-3349;
21.0 g
14.3 g
7.1 g
(b) Ke Z, Tan CK, Chen F, Yeung Y-Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2014;136:5627-5630.
12. Yang C-G, He C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005;127:6966-6967.
Et
O
Red-Al
NaBH(OAc)3
OH
1a
(-)-
Et
·HCl
25
4.6 g
HCHO, 0 ºC to rt
overnight, 81%
toluene, reflux
3 h, 92%
N
H