F. Manna et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 10 (2000) 1883±1885
1885
Table 2. Inhibiting and vasorelaxing activity (4a±h)
11. Corelli, F.; Manetti, F.; Ta®, A.; Campiani, G.; Nacci, V.;
Botta, M. J. Med. Chem. 1997, 40, 125.
12. Campiani, G.; Nacci, V.; Garofalo, A.; Botta, M.; Fiorini,
I.; Ta®, A.; Bruni, G.; Romeo, M. R.; Peres, A.; Bertollini, L.
Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 1992, 12, 1193.
13. Campiani, G.; Garofalo, A.; Fiorini, I.; Botta, M.; Nacci,
V.; Ta®, A.; Chiarini, A.; Budriesi, R.; Bruni, G.; Romeo, M.
R. J. Med. Chem. 1995, 38, 4393.
14. Calculations and graphics manipulations were performed
on Iris 4D/35 and Indigo R4000 Silicon Graphics work-
stations, using the software packages InsightII and Discover
of MSI (Molecular Simulation Inc., 9685 Scranton Road, San
Diego, CA 92121, USA).
Compound
IC50 (M)
Maximum
relaxation concn (M)
Maximum
relaxation (%)
8
4
diltiazem
4.8Â10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
97.86
23.86
79.78
35.29
89.17
99.54
40.00
95.51
64.00
10
4
4a
4b
4c
4d
4e
4f
9.5Â10
3.0Â10
1.7Â10
1.0Â10
1.2Â10
3.8Â10
1.1Â10
5.0Â10
8
5
6
8
7
9
7
4
4
4
4
4
5
4g
4h
4
10
15. The two atoms were 0.70 A from each other.
16. The two atoms were 1.36 A from each other. (b) The two
atoms were 1.19 A from each other.
Acknowledgements
17. Manna, F.; Chimenti, F.; Bolasco, A.; Filippelli, W.;
Filippelli, A.; Palla, A.; Lampa, E.; Mercantini, R. Eur. J.
Med. Chem. 1992, 27, 627.
We thank Dr. Fabio Fusi and Dr. Simona Saponara for
electrophysiological evaluation. This work was sup-
ported by a grant from MURST, Roma.
18. Method: experiments were carried out according to God-
fraind and Polster.19 Albino Sprague±Dawley rats of both
sexes weighing 200±250 g were killed by a blow to the head
followed by exsanguination and the thoracic aortas removed
and placed in Krebs-bicarbonate buer. Excess fat and tissue
were removed and the aorta was cut into helicoidal strips.
Strips were mounted in organ baths in Krebs solution, at 37 ꢀC
and bubbled with 95% O2+5% CO2. Isometric contractions
were recorded by means of NARCO mod F60 coupled to
LINSEIS mod 2046 pen recorder. Tissues were allowed to
equilibrate for 1 h. Maximum responses were obtained under
an applied tension of 2 g. The aorta was washed every 10 min
to avoid interference of metabolites. Afterwards a depolarisa-
tion was induced by adding 80 mM KCl. Subsequent to the
contraction reaching a plateau, the compounds or diltiazem
References and Notes
1. Yamamoto, K.; Fujita, M.; Tabashi, K.; Kawashima, Y.;
Kato, E.; Oya, M.; Iso, T.; Iwao, J. J. Med. Chem. 1988, 31,
919.
2. (a) Striessing, J.; Goll, A.; Moosburger, K.; Glossmann, H.
FEBS Lett. 1986, 197, 204. (b) Kim, H. S.; Wey, X. Y.; Ruth,
P. J. Biol. Chem. 1990, 265, 1858.
3. Triggle, D. J.; Langs, D. A.; Janis, R. A. Med. Res. Rev.
1989, 9, 123.
4. Atwal, K. S.; O'Reilly, B. C.; Ruby, P. E.; Turk, C. F.;
Aberg, G.; Asaad, M. M.; Bergey, J. L.; Moreland, S.; Powell,
J. R. J. Med. Chem. 1987, 30, 627.
5. Garcia, M.; King, V. F.; Seigl, P. K. S.; Reuben, J. P.;
Kaczorowski, G. J. J. Biol. Chem. 1986, 261, 8146.
6. Galizzi, J. P.; Fosset, M.; Romey, G.; Laduron, P.; Laz-
dunski, M. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1986, 83, 7513.
7. King, V. F.; Garcia, M. L.; Shevell, J. L.; Slaughter, R. S.;
Kaczorowski, G. J. J. Biol. Chem. 1989, 264, 5633.
8. Rossier, J. R.; Cox, J. A.; Niesor, E. J.; Bentzen, C. L. J.
Biol. Chem. 1989, 264, 16589.
10
4
were added at concentrations of 10
to 10 M. The IC50
values were calculated from contractile force changes and
expressed with respect to the control, initial contractile values.
Stock solutions of compounds and diltiazem (10 2) were pre-
pared in DMSO and then diluted in Krebs±Henseleit buer.
The ®nal concentration of DMSO in the organ bath was
always 0.1%. Results of these experiments were expressed also
as percent- induced relaxation of the initial contraction, which
were used for calculation of IC50 values.
Â
19. Godfraind, T.; Polster, P. Therapie 1968, 23, 1209.
20. The ability of the compounds to block L-type calcium
channels was tested preliminarily only on 4e derivative using
electrophysiological techniques.21 This compound showed a
good inhibitory activity. The overall electrophysiological eva-
luations are in progress and will be presented elsewhere.
21. Hamill, O.; Marty, A.; Neher, E.; Sakmann, B.; Sigworth,
9. Striessnig, J. M.; Meusburger, E.; Grabner, M.; Knaus, H.
G.; Glossmann, H.; Kaiser, J.; Scholkens, B.; Becker, R.; Linz,
W.; Henning, R. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Arch. Pharmacol.
1988, 337, 331.
10. Qar, J.; Barhanin, J.; Romey, G.; Henning, R.; Lerch, U.;
Oekonomopulos, R.; Urbach, H.; Lazdunski, M. Mol. Phar-
macol. 1988, 33, 363.
F. P¯ug. Arch. 1981, 391, 85.
È