3
090 J ournal of Medicinal Chemistry, 2000, Vol. 43, No. 16
Tsubery et al.
sociation of PMBN and PMB, with their LPS target.
Recently, the solution structure of LPS-bound PMB was
elucidated as an envelope-like fold of the peptide ring
and as a â-turn type II′ for the free peptide.
However, both structures could not be observed by the
CD measurements.
Spectra-Physics SP8800 liquid chromatography system equipped
with an Applied Biosystems 757 variable wavelength absor-
bance detector. The column effluents were monitored by UV
absorbance at 220 nm. Following HPLC purification the
lyophilized peptides (>97% pure) were analyzed, after exhaus-
tive acid hydrolysis and precolumn reaction with 6-amino-
quinolyl N-hydroxysuccinimidylcarbamate (AQC), to ascertain
amino acid composition (Waters 2690 separations module,
Milford, MA). Yields were 35-40%. Molecular weights of
compounds were determined by FAB mass spectrometry on a
VG-high-resolution magnetic sector (Fisons, U.K.) with PEG
or PEG-Me as internal standard or by ESI mass spectrometery
on a VG-platform-II electrospray single quadropole mass
spectrometer (Micro Mass, U.K.). Proton magnetic resonance
spectra were recorded at 25 °C on a Bruker AVANCE 400
spectrometer (400 MHz). J values are given in hertz (Hz).
1
2
6,27
Con clu sion s
The structure of PMBN appears to be highly specific
for efficient perturbation of the outer membrane and
consequent sensitization of the Gram-negative bacteria
toward hydrophobic antibiotics as well as for LPS
binding. Moreover, it is not a mere platform for a set of
positive charges but rather a molecule with precise and
unique topographic features which are essential for
complementarity in LPS binding and subsequent per-
turbation of the Gram-negative outer membrane. In
light of this study, the use of PMBN as a scaffold for
antibiotic targeting should be considered.
2 2
sP MBN (2): H NMR (400 MHz, H O:D O, 9:1; pH ) 2.3) δ
0
6
.69 (d, 3H, J ) 5.9), 0.75 (d, 3H, J ) 5.87), 1.19 (d, 3H, J )
.24), 1.30 (d, 3H, J ) 6.4), 2.07 (m, 10H), 3.10 (m, 10H), 3.95
(d, 1H, J ) 5.0), 4.23 (m, 9H), 7.26 (d, 2H, J ) 6.9) 7.36 (m,
4H), 7.76 (t, 1H, J ) 5.4), 7.88 (d, 1H, J ) 7.6), 8.24 (d, 1H,
J ) 6.4), 8.69 (d, 1H, J ) 4.7), 8.74 (d, 1H, J ) 5.8), 8.98 (d,
1
H, J ) 6).
[
Lys2
,3,4,7,8
1
2 2
]P MBN (3): H NMR (400 MHz, H O:D O, 9:1;
Exp er im en ta l Section
pH ) 3.1) δ 0.82 (d, 3H, J ) 6.5), 0.88 (d, 3H, J ) 6.6), 1.23 (d,
6H, J ) 6.4), 1.33 (d, 6H, J ) 6.43), 1.51 (m, 16H), 1.73 (m,
11H), 1.88 (m, 6H), 2.90 (m, 3H), 3.05 (m, 10H), 3.21 (m, 4H),
3.92 (d, 1H, J ) 3.2), 4.16 (m, 3H), 4.26 (m, 6H), 4.36 (m, 4H),
7.32 (d, 3H, J ) 6.9), 7.40 (m, 4H), 7.52 (d, 1H, J ) 4.81), 7.58
(t, 1H, J ) 5.8), 8.13 (d, 1H, J ) 6.3), 8.33 (d, 1H, J ) 7.54),
8.43 (d, 1H, J ) 6.4), 8.63 (d, 2H, J ) 6.6), 8.70 (d, 1H, J )
7.5), 8.8 (d, 1H, J ) 6.9).
Syn th esis of sP MBN a n d An a logu es 2-12. All protected
amino acids, coupling reagents and polymers were obtained
from Nova Biochemicals (Laufelfingen, Switzerland) or from
Bachem (Bubendorf, Switzerland). Synthesis grade solvents
were obtained from Labscan (Dublin, Ireland). Linear peptide
chains were assembled by conventional solid-phase synthesis,
using an ABIMED AMS-422 automated solid-phase multiple
peptide synthesizer (Langenfeld, Germany). The Fmoc strategy
was employed throughout the peptide chain assembly19 fol-
lowing the company’s commercial protocols. Synthesis was
initiated using Fmoc-Thr(tBu)-Wang resin (0.7 mmol/g) and
performed on a 25-µmol scale. Side chain amino protecting
groups for 2,4-diaminobutyric acid (Dab), lysine (Lys), orni-
thine (Orn), and 2,3-diaminopropionic acid (Dap) were tert-
butyloxycarbonyl (tBoc) and benzyloxycarbonyl (Cbz). Fmoc-
Thr(tBu)-OH was employed as the final building unit. Coupling
was achieved, as a rule, using two successive reactions with 4
equiv of PyBOP as a coupling reagent and 8 equiv of NMM,
all dissolved in DMF. The fully protected peptide-bound resin
was treated with piperidine (20% in DMF) for 20 min, then
washed (DMF), and the free N-terminus amino moiety was
reacted with 4 equiv of Cbz-OSu and 4 equiv of DIEA in DMF
for 3 h. The fully protected peptide-bound resin was then
treated with TFA/water/TES (95:2.5:2.5, v/v/v) for 1 h at room
temperature. The cleavage mixture was cooled to 4 °C, and
the partially protected linear peptides were precipitated with
ice-cold di-tert-butyl methyl ether/petroleum ether (30-40 °C)
2,3,4,7,8
1
[
Da p
2 2
]P MBN (5): H NMR (400 MHz, H O:D O, 9:1;
pH ) 2.38) δ 0.87 (d, 3H, J ) 6.5), 0.92 (d, 3H, J ) 6.6), 1.22
(
1
4
d, 1H, J ) 6.0), 1.38 (d, 3H, J ) 6.5), 1.56 (m, 2H), 2.26 (s,
H), 3.07 (m, 4H), 3.34 (m, 2H), 3.56 (m, 2H), 3.67 (m, 4H),
.09 (d, 1H, J ) 4.6), 4.16 (m, 4H), 4.37 (m, 3H), 4.49 (d, 1H,
J ) 6.8), 7.30 (d, 3H, J ) 7.2), 7.41 (m, 4H), 7.49 (d, 1H, J )
6
9
.1), 7.93 (t, 1H, J ) 6.4), 8.32 (d, 1H, J ) 6.5), 8.71 (m, 3H),
.35 (d, 1H, J ) 7.3).
[
cyclo-Da b ,Th r ]P MBN (9): 1H NMR (400 MHz, H
2
9
2
O:
D
2
O, 9:1; pH ) 2.35) δ 0.79 (d, 3H, J ) 6.4), 0.86 (d, 3H, J )
6
.6), 1.21 (d, 3H, J ) 6.5), 1.31 (t, 2H, J ) 7.3), 1.36 (d, 3H,
J ) 6.5), 1.54 (m, 2H), 2.03 (m, 4H), 3.18 (m, 10H), 3.44 (m,
1
7
7
H), 3.95 (d, 1H, J ) 6.1), 7.31 (d, 3H, J ) 6.9), 7.40 (m, 4H),
.95 (d, 1H, J ) 7.5), 8.11 (t, 1H, J ) 5.6), 8.45 (d, 1H, J )
.1), 8.54 (d, 1H, J ) 6.0) 8.57 (d, 1H, J ) 6.7), 8.65 (d, 1H,
J ) 6.9), 8.68 (d, 1H, J ) 6.4), 8.80 (d, 1H, J ) 7.2), 8.96 (d,
1
H, J ) 6.1).
p P MBN (1). pPMBN was prepared by proteolysis of PMB
with papain or ficin as described elsewhere11 (PMB, papain
and ficin were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis,
MO). Crude product was purified (>98%) by HPLC and
(1:3, v/v) and centrifuged. The pellet was washed with the
same mixture, dissolved in water/acetonitrile (2:3, v/v) and
lyophilized. Cyclization was then performed in DMF at peptide
concentration of 1 mM, using PyBOP/HOBT/NMM (4:4:8,
equiv) as reagents for 2 h at room temperature (yield, >90%
according to analytical HPLC). The reaction mixture was
concentrated in high vacuum and the peptidic cyclic product
was precipitated by treatment with water. Final deprotection,
i.e., removal of Cbz, was achieved by catalytic hydrogenation
1
characterized as described above (yield 60%): H NMR (400
MHz, H
2 2
O:D O, 9:1; pH ) 2.3) δ 0.70 (d, 3H, J ) 5.8), 0.77 (d,
3
H, J ) 5.8), 1.20 (d, 3H, J ) 6.3), 1.32 (d, 3H, J ) 6.4), 2.06
(m, 10H), 3.13 (m, 10H), 3.95 (d, 1H, J ) 5.5), 4.23 (m, 9H),
7.26 (d, 2H, J ) 6.7), 7.36 (m, 4H), 7.78 (t, 1H, J ) 5.6, 5.9),
8.24 (d, 1H, J ) 6.2), 8.49 (d, 1H, J ) 7.8), 8.69 (d, 1H, J )
4.7), 8.74 (d, 1H, J ) 5.8), 8.98 (d, 1H, J ) 6.1).
,4,7,8
[Agb2
]P MBN (13). pPMBN (40 mg, 41.5 µmol) was
(Pd/C) in acetic acid/methanol/water (5:4:1, v/v/v).
Rever sed -P h a se HP LC a n d An a lyses. The crude syn-
dissolved in water (40 mL) and 3,5-dimethylpyrazole-1-car-
boxamidine nitrate (125 mg, 0.62 mmol; Sigma) was added.
The pH of the solution was adjusted to 10 with sodium
carbonate solution (1 M) and the reaction mixture was stirred
overnight at room temperature. Progress of guanidation was
followed using analytical HPLC. The major product was
purified to homogeneity using semipreparative HPLC as
thetic peptides were purified by using a prepacked LichroCart
RP-18 column (250 × 10 mm; 7-µm bead size) employing a
binary gradient formed from 0.1% TFA in water (solution A)
and 0.1% TFA in 75% acetonitrile in water (solution B), eluted
at t ) 0 min, B ) 0%; t ) 48 min, B ) 60%; t ) 60 min, B )
1
00% at a flow rate of 5 mL/min. For purity evaluation,
analytical reversed-phase HPLC was performed using a pre-
packed Lichrospher-100 RP-18 column (250 × 4 mm, 5-µm
bead size) and the following binary gradient: t ) 0 min, B )
described above, characterized by amino acid analysis and
1
mass spectrometry: yield, 82%; H NMR (400 MHz, H
2
O:D
2
O,
9:1; pH ) 2.30) δ 0.71 (s, 3H), 0.79 (s, 4H), 1.24 (d, 3H, J )
6.4), 1.31 (t, 2H, J ) 7.3), 1.35 (d, 3H, J ) 6.4), 1.5 (m, 2H),
2.03 (m, 9H), 3.10 (m, 3H), 3.23 (m, 2H), 3.36 (m, 6H), 3.97 (d,
1
0%; t ) 40 min, B ) 60%; t ) 50 min, B ) 100% at a flow
rate of 0.8 mL/min. Separations were performed using a