Communications
only the PL of TPI upon excitation at 320 nm (Figure S11a),
Propagation loss measurements were performed based on
the spatially resolved PL spectra of a single tube by collecting
the PL signal from one of its ends with respect to the distance
travelled (Figure 3a). According to the equation of the
because both the TPI and the APO molecules are separately
free-standing. In contrast, the PL of APO is dominant in the
PL spectrum of the stronger stock solution (1 mm) excited at
320 nm, thus suggesting the exclusive formation of TPI–APO
mixed clusters (Figure S11a), in which the spatial proximity
between TPI and APO molecules ensures the FET process.
Upon selective excitation of APO at 440 nm (Figure S11b),
observation of a severe concentration quenching effect (>
3.0 ꢁ 10ꢀ4 m) confirms that APO clusters are also formed in
the stock solution.[14] Most importantly, if the stock solution is
heated to 658C, the fluorescence signal of APO PL excited at
440 nm reappers with an intensity three times that recorded at
258C, probably because of the dissociation of APO clusters.
Meanwhile, the PL spectrum excited at 320 nm (Figure S11)
indicates that despite the dissociation, some of TPI–APO
mixed clusters remained intact at 658C.
By combining the above results, we propose a cooperative
assembly model for the formation of binary tubes in Fig-
ure 2g. Upon injection, the solvent exchange induces the
nucleation event. At room temperature (path 1), both TPI–
APO mixed clusters and APO clusters can serve as nuclei for
heterogeneous assembly driven by the p-stacking motif of
TPI or APO molecules. Therefore, orthogonal self-assembly
takes place, and leads to TPI and APO solid rods (path 1). At
658C (path 2), the APO clusters are dissociated; only TPI–
APO mixed clusters survive as high-energy nuclei for further
homogeneous cooperative assembly. In the presence of APO
monomers in the hot system, those APO molecules incorpo-
rated at the periphery of mixed clusters might dynamically
exchange on (formation) and off (dissociation) the mixed
clusters,[15] thus serving as a linker for aggregation of mixed
clusters by hydrogen-bonding during the nucleation process.
Although it is not yet fully understood, the aggregation of
nucleates might cause temporary concentration depletion,
which is responsible for the formation of primary hollow
structures (path 2).[16] Once initial hollow structures form, 1D
growth is energetically favorable because of the preferable
adsorption of the growth units of the mixed clusters on the
edge of primary tubular structures (path 2).[17] Note that the
system was maintained at 658C for 30 min after the injection,
and then the system was slowly cooled down at a rate of
108Chꢀ1. In the first 150 min (52 mm long tubes were obtained
as shown in Figure 2b), the temperature is higher than 458C.
Therefore, the TPI–APO mixed clusters play a major role in
both the nucleation and growth processes. The solution that
remains after the centrifugation shows only the absorption
characteristics of APO (nanoparticles according to SEM),
thus suggesting that all the TPI molecules are involved in tube
formation. We also monitored the growth process by measur-
ing the PL spectra excited at 320 nm. It is found that the ratio
Figure 3. a) Spatially resolved PL spectra of out-coupled light at a
distance of 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, and 60 mm (curves from top to bottom)
from the tip of a single tube, recorded by focused 325 nm laser
excitation (see the arrow in the inset). The scale bar is 10 mm.
b) Logarithmic plot of the relative PL intensities at 402 nm (square)
and 540 nm (circle) versus the propagation distance.
optical loss coefficient of guided light in the fundamental
modes of a waveguide [Eq. (1)]:[12c]
a ¼ ꢀ10 logðIout=IinÞ Lꢀ1
ð1Þ
where Iin and Iout are the intensities of incidence and out-
coupled light, respectively, and L is the propagation distance,
the values of a for TPI PL at 402 nm and for APO PL at
540 nm are determined to be 100 and 36 dBmmꢀ1, respec-
tively (Figure 3b). It has been established that the air medium
inside the tubes that have well-defined facets leads to spatial
confinement of guided photons in two dimensions in the thin
tubular wall, thereby forming an annular microcavity.[12b,c] The
travel distance of the guided light in the annular microcavity
is so long that a photon in the UV region from TPI can be
reabsorbed by APO, which then re-emits a photon in the
green region. This so-called remote energy relay (RER)
process results in re-distribution of the guided PL from short
to long wavelengths,[12c] and is the reason why the value of a at
540 nm is much lower than that at 402 nm.
The chalcone derivatives such as APO are photochemi-
cally active, and might undergo either photoisomerization or
photodimerization.[18] We found that the green fluorescence
of an ensemble of APO microrods placed on a quartz plate
can be quenched by exposure to light (UV400) from an Hg
lamp equipped with a band-pass filter (central wavelength:
400 nm, FWHM: 40 nm), probably because of the photo-
isomerization reaction.[18a] The reversible recovery of green
fluorescence can be easily achieved by keeping the irradiated
sample in the dark (Figure S13). Figure 4a shows a schematic
picture of a waveguide switch based on binary microtubes.
Snapshots during the waveguide switch measurement are
presented in Figure S14. Photoisomerization of APO compo-
nents is induced locally by focusing 400 nm light from the Hg
lamp down to the diffraction limit (2 mm) on a selected
position on the tube, as indicated by the circle in Figure 4a.
According to the spatially resolved spectra at the irradiation
between the PL intensities of APO and TPI, IAPO/ITPI
,
increases as the reaction time is extended (Figure S12). The
variation of IAPO/ITPI with time correlates well with that of the
tube length versus time (circles in Figure 2b), thus verifying
the incorporation of APO in the 1D tube growth.
As shown in Figure 1d, these binary microtubes present
typical features of an active waveguide, such as bright PL
spots at the tips and weaker emission from the bodies.[3]
ꢀ 2011 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 4942 –4946