Novel crizotinib–gnrh conjugates revealed the significance of lysosomal trapping in gnRH-based drug delivery systems

Article abstract of DOI:10.3390/ijms20225590

Several promising anti-cancer drug–GnRH (gonadotropin-releasing hormone) conjugates have been developed in the last two decades, although none of them have been approved for clinical use yet. Crizotinib is an effective multi-target kinase inhibitor, approved against anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-or ROS proto-oncogene 1 (ROS-1)-positive non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC); however, its application is accompanied by serious side effects. In order to deliver crizotinib selectively into the tumor cells, we synthesized novel crizotinib analogues and conjugated them to a [D-Lys⁶]–GnRH-I targeting peptide. Our most prominent crizotinib–GnRH conjugates, the amide-bond-containing [D-Lys⁶(crizotinib*)]–GnRH-I and the ester-bond-containing [D-Lys⁶(MJ55*)]–GnRH-I, were able to bind to GnRH-receptor (GnRHR) and exert a potent c-Met kinase inhibitory effect. The efficacy of compounds was tested on the MET-amplified and GnRHR-expressing EBC-1 NSCLC cells. In vitro pharmacological profiling led to the conclusion that that crizotinib–GnRH conjugates are transported directly into lysosomes, where the membrane permeability of crizotinib is diminished. As a consequence of GnRHR-mediated endocytosis, GnRH-conjugated crizotinib bypasses its molecular targets—the ATP-binding site of RTKs— and is sequestered in the lysosomes. These results explained the lower efficacy of crizotinib–GnRH conjugates in EBC-1 cells, and led to the conclusion that drug escape from the lysosomes is a major challenge in the development of clinically relevant anti-cancer drug–GnRH conjugates.

Full text of DOI:10.3390/ijms20225590

International Journal of
Molecular Sciences
Article
Novel Crizotinib–GnRH Conjugates Revealed the
Significance of Lysosomal Trapping in GnRH-Based
Drug Delivery Systems
József Murányi 1,2,
*
, Attila Varga 1, Pál Gyulavári 1, Kinga Pénzes 1, Csilla E. Németh 2,
3
Miklós Csala 2 , Lilla Petho˝
, Antal Csámpai 4, Gábor Halmos 5, István Peták 6 and
István Vályi-Nagy 7
1
MTA-SE Pathobiochemistry Research Group, Tu˝zoltó St. 37-47, H1094 Budapest, Hungary;
varga.attila@med.semmelweis-univ.hu (A.V.); gyulavari.pal@med.semmelweis-univ.hu (P.G.);
penzes.kinga@med.semmelweis-univ.hu (K.P.)
2
3
Department of Medical Chemistry, Molecular Biology and Pathobiochemistry, Semmelweis University,
H1094 Budapest, Hungary; nemeth.csilla@med.semmelweis-univ.hu (C.E.N.);
csala.miklos@med.semmelweis-univ.hu (M.C.)
MTA-ELTE Research Group of Peptide Chemistry, Eötvös Loránd University, H1117 Budapest, Hungary;
lilla.petho@gmail.com
Institute of Chemistry, Eötvös Loránd University, H1117 Budapest, Hungary; csampai@chem.elte.hu
Department of Biopharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Debrecen, H4032 Debrecen, Hungary;
halmos.gabor@pharm.unideb.hu
Oncompass Medicine Hungary Ltd., H1024 Budapest, Hungary; istvan.petak@oncompassmedicine.com
Central Hospital of Southern Pest National Institute of Hematology and Infectious Diseases,
H1097 Budapest, Hungary; drvnistvan@gmail.com
4
5
6
7
*
Correspondence: muranyi.jozsef@med.semmelweis-univ.hu
ꢀꢁꢂꢀꢃꢄꢅꢆꢇ
Received: 30 September 2019; Accepted: 6 November 2019; Published: 8 November 2019
ꢀꢁꢂꢃꢄꢅꢆ
Abstract: Several promising anti-cancer drug–GnRH (gonadotropin-releasing hormone) conjugates
have been developed in the last two decades, although none of them have been approved
for clinical use yet. Crizotinib is an effective multi-target kinase inhibitor, approved against
anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)- or ROS proto-oncogene 1 (ROS-1)-positive non-small cell
lung carcinoma (NSCLC); however, its application is accompanied by serious side effects. In order
to deliver crizotinib selectively into the tumor cells, we synthesized novel crizotinib analogues and
conjugated them to a [d-Lys6]–GnRH-I targeting peptide. Our most prominent crizotinib–GnRH
conjugates, the amide-bond-containing [d-Lys6(crizotinib*)]–GnRH-I and the ester-bond-containing
[d-Lys6(MJ55*)]–GnRH-I, were able to bind to GnRH-receptor (GnRHR) and exert a potent c-Met kinase
inhibitory effect. The efficacy of compounds was tested on the MET-amplified and GnRHR-expressing
EBC-1 NSCLC cells. In vitro pharmacological profiling led to the conclusion that that crizotinib–GnRH
conjugates are transported directly into lysosomes, where the membrane permeability of crizotinib
is diminished. As a consequence of GnRHR-mediated endocytosis, GnRH-conjugated crizotinib
bypasses its molecular targets—the ATP-binding site of RTKs— and is sequestered in the lysosomes.
These results explained the lower efficacy of crizotinib–GnRH conjugates in EBC-1 cells, and led
to the conclusion that drug escape from the lysosomes is a major challenge in the development of
clinically relevant anti-cancer drug–GnRH conjugates.
Keywords: targeted drug delivery 1; GnRH 2; GnRHR 3; lysosome 3; permeability 4; crizotinib 5;
conjugate 6; NSCLC 7; c-Met 8; endocytosis 9; galectin 10
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 5590; doi:10.3390/ijms20225590
www.mdpi.com/journal/ijms

Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 5590
2 of 23
1. Introduction
Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) is a tropic hormone which plays a crucial role in
the regulation of the pituitary–gonadal axis. The receptor of GnRH (GnRHR) is expressed mainly
in the pituitary gonadotroph cells, but its moderate expression has also been identified in certain
extrapituitary tissues, such as ovarium, endometrium, prostate, or lymphocytes [1].
It is well known that several types of cancer cells maintain an elevated GnRHR expression,
pointing to the role of GnRH/GnRHR system in the development of these tumors. Furthermore, this
phenomenon creates an opportunity for targeted drug delivery. Direct anti-tumor effects, which have
been reported using both GnRH agonists and antagonist analogues, represent a further advantage of
GnRH analogues as anti-cancer drug delivery peptides [2].
In the last two decades, several GnRH analogues have been developed for targeted drug delivery [3].
It is generally accepted that synthetic GnRH analogues are able to deliver the conjugated drug into
GnRHR-expressing cancer cells. Many promising in vitro and in vivo results have been reported that
support GnRH-targeted drug delivery [4–7]. Despite all these initial achievements, none of these
anti-cancer drug–GnRH conjugates have so far been approved for clinical use. Additionally, the
intracellular transport mechanism of GnRH-based drug delivery systems has not been well investigated.
Signal transduction therapy is one of the most intensively developing fields of cancer treatment.
Approved kinase inhibitors have several advantages compared to classical chemotherapeutic drugs.
However, their limited selectivity, the accompanying serious side effects, and the fast-developing
resistance against these small-molecule inhibitors still represent a set of general problems that must be
addressed [8].
c-Met (hepatocyte growth factor receptor) tyrosine kinase is a remarkable target in signal
transduction therapy of cancer, due to its relatively frequent overexpression and the associated poor
prognosis. Deregulated activity of c-Met has been reported in breast, colon, lung, pancreas, liver, and
ovarian cancers [9]. One of the most serious problems with the inhibition of c-Met is that it plays a vital
role in physiological processes such as embryogenesis, wound healing, and organ regeneration [10].
Crizotinib is a first-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor initially designed to target c-Met [11],
of which the (R)-enantiomer has been approved for the treatment of ALK (anaplastic lymphoma
kinase)- and ROS-1 (ROS proto-oncogene 1)-positive advanced NSCLC (non-small cell lung carcinoma)
as a multi-target inhibitor. In association with its potent c-Met inhibitory effect, crizotinib causes
several serious side effects that limit its therapeutic applications and significantly impair patients’
quality of life [12]. Nevertheless, application of crizotinib as a c-Met inhibitor is still being intensively
investigated, and it is under clinical trial in several types of advanced cancers (https://clinicaltrials.gov).
Interestingly, the (S)-enantiomer of crizotinib differs in pharmacological profile from the (R)-enantiomer,
but it also bears promising therapeutic potential for cancer therapy, [13,14].
According to the literature data on anti-cancer GnRH conjugates, we hypothesized that the
GnRHR-targeted delivery of crizotinib might reduce side effects, improve efficacy, and even delay the
development of resistance [6]. In addition, we supposed that the target-specific delivery could extend
the applicability of both the (R)- and (S)-enantiomers of crizotinib. Moreover, the enhanced selectivity
of crizotinib might allow a synergistic and tolerable combination with other kinase inhibitors (e.g.,
with inhibitors of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) [15]).
After consideration of the data outlined above, we designed racemic crizotinib analogues in
order to synthesize novel crizotinib–GnRH conjugates for further development. Contrary to our
initial goals, biological evaluation of crizotinib–GnRH conjugates revealed a serious impediment of
GnRH-based drug delivery, which had not previously been identified. Lysosomal trapping mechanisms
of small-molecule kinase inhibitors [16] and nanoparticle-based protein delivery systems [17] have
come into the spotlight recently. Here, we demonstrate clear evidence of the lysosomal sequestration
of GnRHR-targeted crizotinib–GnRH conjugates, a phenomenon which should be taken into account
in the development of anti-cancer GnRH conjugates with therapeutic value.

Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 5590
3 of 23
2. Results
2.1. Design of Crizotinib–GNRH Conjugates
The cocrystal structure of the c-Met-crizotinib complex revealed that the 2-aminopyridine core of
crizotinib plays a crucial role in binding to the ATP-binding pocket of ALK and c-Met kinases. On the
other hand, the piperidine ring of crizotinib is directed to the solvent, serving as a sterically accessible
site for conjugation to targeting agents (Figure 1).
Figure 1. The nitrogen atom of piperidine in crizotinib was selected for conjugation (marked by red
arrow). (A) Structure of (R)-crizotinib; (B) X-ray structure of crizotinib bound to the kinase domain
of c-Met (2WGJ). The hydrophobicity of the ATP-binding pocket is colored from red (hydrophilic) to
green (hydrophobic). Hydrogen bonds are marked with blue dashed lines.
2.2. Synthesis of Crizotinib Analogues and Crizotinib–GNRH Conjugates
The synthetic routes to racemic crizotinib (compound
(compound
, marked as MJ55*), [d-Lys6(crizotinib*)]–GnRH-I (compound 10), and [d-Lys6(MJ55*)]–
GnRH-I (compound 11) are shown in Figure 2.
4, marked as crizotinib*), racemic MJ55
8
We selected the nitrogen atom of piperidine in crizotinib for modification, in order to keep
the 2-aminopyridine core intact, which is responsible for the inhibition of receptor tyrosine kinases
(RTKs). Thus, the 2-aminopyridine core was protected by two tert-butyloxycarbonyl-protecting (BOC)
groups in the boronic acid pinacol ester
intermediates and , respectively. The acid-catalysed deprotection of
novel hydroxyethyl derivative MJ55*, respectively.
Regioselective acylation of with glutaric anhydride gave
between crizotinib* and the glutaric acid spacer. The carboxyl group of
-amino group of [d-Lys6]–GnRH-I on resin. Finally, the conjugate was cleaved from the resin, purified
by RP-HPLC, and lyophilized, resulting in the formation of [d-Lys6(crizotinib*)]–GnRH-I. Employing
1
. Suzuki coupling of
1
with iodopyrazoles
2 and 6 afforded
3
7
3
and led to crizotinib* and its
7
3
5, where an amide bond was formed
5
was then coupled to the
ε
the same reaction sequence, hydroxyethyl derivative
7 was also converted into the corresponding
conjugate [d-Lys6(MJ55*)]–GnRH-I, in which the glutaric acid spacer develops forms an ester bond
with the conjugated MJ55*.

Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 5590
4 of 23
Figure 2. Synthesis of crizotinib*, [d-Lys6(crizotinib*)]–GnRH-I, MJ55*, and [d-Lys6(MJ55*)]–GnRH-I. (
a)
2 M Cs2CO3 in H2O, Pd(dppf)Cl2*, dimethyl sulfoxide, 70 ◦C, 3 h; (
b
) trifluoroacetic acid/water (9:1 ratio)
) glutaric anhydride, triethylamine, CH2Cl2, 25 ◦C, 2 h; (
) COMU**, 4-methylmorpholine,
N,N-dimethylformamide, 25 ◦C, 2 h; (
) trifluoroacetic acid /phenol/water/ triisopropyl silane
) K2CO3, bromoethanol, tetrahydrofuran, reflux, 24 h. *Pd(dppf)Cl2—
[1,10-Bis(diphenylphosphino)ferrocene]dichloropalladium(II).
**COMU—(1-Cyano-2-ethoxy-2-
25 ◦C, 2 h; (
c
d
e
◦
(88:5:5:2 ratio) 25 C, 2 h; (
f
oxoethylidenaminooxy)dimethylamino-morpholino-carbenium hexafluorophosphate.
2.3. GnRHR Expression and GnRH Uptake of EBC-1 NSCLC Cells
The MET-amplified non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cell line EBC-1 was selected as an in vitro
model to investigate the efficacy of the novel crizotinib–GnRH conjugates. The GnRHR expression

Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 5590
5 of 23
of EBC-1 cells was confirmed by western blot, as shown in Figure 3A. GnRHR-expressing LNCaP
prostate cancer cells [18] were used as a positive control, and primary human skin fibroblast cells were
selected as a negative control.
Figure 3. GnRHR expression and cellular uptake of [d-Lys6(FITC)]–GnRH-I on EBC-1 cells.
(
A
) Expression of GnRHR in EBC-1 cells, confirmed by western blot; (
high level of GnRHR (total GnRHR) and a high proportion of these receptors are located in the plasma
membrane (membrane GnRHR). Nuclei: blue (DRAQ5), GnRHR: red (Alexa Fluor 594); ( ) Time- and
concentration-dependent dynamic uptake of [d-Lys6(FITC)]–GnRH-I was confirmed by flow cytometry.
B) EBC-1 cells contain a
C
Results are presented as mean relative fluorescent intensity
±
SD (N = 3); (
D) Intracellular localization
of [d-Lys6(FITC)]–GnRH-I (green; 10
µM, 24 h) in EBC-1 cells was confirmed by confocal microscopy
(nuclei: blue).

Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 5590
6 of 23
As shown in Figure 3B, confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) experiments underlined that
EBC-1 cells express high levels of GnRHR, and also exhibit a significant number of receptors on their
plasma membrane. CLSM images of GnRHR negative primary fibroblast cells are available in the
Supplementary Information (Section S3, Figure S5).
On EBC-1 cells, the cellular uptake of GnRH-I was measured by flow cytometry. For this method,
fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-labeled [d-Lys6]–GnRH-I was used. Synthesis and characterisation
of [d-Lys6(FITC)]–GnRH-I has been described previously [18]. As is shown in Figure 3C, EBC-1 cells
exhibited concentration-dependent dynamic uptake of [d-Lys6(FITC)]–GnRH-I. The CLSM images
shown in Figure 3D further confirmed the intracellular accumulation of [d-Lys6(FITC)]–GnRH-I (10
µM,
24 h).
2.4. Viability Inhibition Efficacy of Compounds on EBC-1 Cells and Primary Skin Fibroblast Cells
Viability inhibition potency of crizotinib*, [d-Lys6(crizotinib*)]–GnRH-I, MJ55*, [d-Lys6(MJ55*)]–
GnRH-I, and [d-Lys6]–GnRH-I was investigated in EBC-1 NSCLC cells and human primary skin
fibroblast cells by CellTiter-Glo assay (Figure 4A). While crizotinib* exerted a potent viability inhibition
effect on EBC-1 cells (IC50 = 28 nM), the [d-Lys6(crizotinib*)]–GnRH-I conjugate did not show any
significant effect at the submicromolar range, similarly to the vehicle [d-Lys6]–GnRH-I. In contrast,
the novel crizotinib analogue (MJ55*) resulted in a similar effect to crizotinib* (IC50 = 23 nM), and the
ester-bond-containing [d-Lys6(MJ55*)]–GnRH-I conjugate also proved to be effective on the EBC-1 cells
(IC50 = 90 nM).
The adverse cell-toxic effect of these novel compounds was measured on the GnRHR-negative
primary human skin fibroblast cells, using the same method as for the EBC-1 cells. As can be seen
in Figure 4B, crizotinib* (IC50 = 2.6 µM), MJ55* (IC50 = 2.6 µ
M), and [d-Lys6(MJ55*)]–GnRH-I (IC50
= 3.0 µM) were less effective on healthy fibroblast cells than on EBC-1 cancer cells. However, the
non-target-specific cytotoxic effect of [d-Lys6(MJ55*)]–GnRH-I was not reduced significantly compared
to the free MJ55*, despite the lack of GnRHR on the fibroblast cells.
2.5. In Vitro c-Met Inhibition Efficacy of Compounds
c-Met inhibitory effect was investigated using an in vitro recombinant kinase assay. As shown
in Figure 4C, MJ55* resulted in potent c-Met inhibition (IC50 = 39 nM) and was more effective
than crizotinib* (IC50 = 123 nM). As was expected (Figure 1), the GnRH-conjugated crizotinib* in
[d-Lys6(crizotinib*)]–GnRH-I strongly inhibited the c-Met kinase (IC50 = 163 nM) as well. Although
the [d-Lys6(MJ55*)]–GnRH-I conjugate resulted in potent c-Met inhibition (IC50 ~ 147 nM), its exact
IC50 value could not be determined due to the released free MJ55* (detailed in Section 2.6). The vehicle
[d-Lys6]–GnRH-I did not inhibit c-Met kinase, even at the highest concentration (10 µM).
2.6. Stability of Compounds in Cell Culture Medium
Stability of compounds was investigated in Eagle’s minimum essential medium (EMEM)
cell culture medium at 37 ◦C. As shown in Figure 4D, [d-Lys6]–GnRH-I, crizotinib*, MJ55*,
and the amide-bond-containing [d-Lys6(crizotinib*)]–GnRH-I conjugate were proven to be stable.
Their degradation was not significant even after 72 h. However, free MJ55* released from the
ester-bond-containing [d-Lys6(MJ55*)]–GnRH-I conjugate was clearly detectable after just 2 h of
incubation. The half-life of the ester bond is approximately 8 h. HPLC-UV chromatograms are available
in the Supplementary Information (Section S1, Figures S2 and S3).
2.7. GnRHR-Binding Affinity of Conjugates
The binding potency of crizotinib–GnRH conjugates to human pituitary GnRHR and prostate
cancer GnRHR was investigated by a ligand competition assay. Displacement of [125I]-[d-Trp6]–GnRH-I
as radioligand by the unlabeled crizotinib–GnRH conjugates as competitors was determined. As

Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 5590
7 of 23
shown in Table 1, crizotinib–GnRH conjugates could effectively bind to both types of GnRHR at
submicromolar concentrations.
Figure 4. Biological evaluation of compounds. (
) viability inhibition effect on human primary skin fibroblast cells; (
recombinant c-Met kinase; (
) stability in cell culture medium at 37 ◦C; All values are the mean
of at least three independent experiments.
A
) Viability inhibition effect on EBC-1 NSCLC cells;
in vitro inhibition effect on the
SD
(B
C)
D
±

Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 5590
8 of 23
Table 1. Inhibition of [125I]-[d-Trp6]–GnRH-I binding to the membranes of human pituitary and human
prostate cancer cells by GnRH derivatives.
IC50 Values (nM) 1
Compound
Human Pituitary
Human Prostate Cancer
[d-Lys6]GnRH-I (vehicle)
[d-Lys6(FITC)]–GnRH-I
6.44 ± 1.0
27.2 ± 2.8
34.6 ± 4.2
21.7 ± 1.4
4.31 ± 0.8
18.3 ± 2.9
39.5 ± 1.7
29.7 ± 3.1
[d-Lys6(crizotinib*)]–GnRH-I
[d-Lys6(MJ55*)]–GnRH-I
1
IC50 values were calculated via computerized curve-fitting program from displacement experiments, as described
previously [19]. IC50 is defined as the dose causing 50% inhibition of specific binding of [125I]-[d-Trp6]–GnRH-I to
the membranes. Values are mean ± standard deviation (SD) of two to three independent experiments.
2.8. c-Met Inhibition of Compounds in EBC-1 Cells
As shown in Figure 5, both crizotinib* and MJ55* completely inhibited the phosphorylation of
c-Met at 100 nM after 6 h. Similarly to these free drugs, the unstable [d-Lys6(MJ55*)]–GnRH-I conjugate
also blocked c-Met phosphorylation at 100 nM. However, the stable [d-Lys6(crizotinib*)]–GnRH-I had
no significant inhibitory effect at the same concentration. Its effect was moderate at 1
µ
M, and the
phosphorylation of c-Met was abolished only at 10
the c-Met kinase.
µ
M. The vehicle [d-Lys6]–GnRH-I did not inhibit
Figure 5. The c-Met inbibitory effect of the compounds in EBC-1 cells. Cells were treated with
[d-Lys6]–GnRH-I, crizotinib*, MJ55*, [d-Lys6(crizotinib*)]–GnRH-I, and [d-Lys6(MJ55*)]–GnRH-I
for 6 h, and c-Met phosphorylation was analyzed by western blot. Untreated cells and the
[d-Lys6]–GnRH-I-treated cells were used as negative controls.
control (N = 3).
α-tubulin was used as the loading
2.9. Colocalization of [d-Lys6(FITC)]–GnRH-I and Lysosomes
To investigate the intacellular localization of [d-Lys6]–GnRH-I, we treated the EBC-1 cells with
µ
M [d-Lys6(FITC)]–GnRH-I for 24 h, followed by staining with Lysoview 633 fluorescent dye. As
10

Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 5590
9 of 23
shown in Figure 6, the localization of FITC-labeled [d-Lys6]–GnRH-I highly correlated with the signal
of lysosome marker Lysoview 633. To validate the colocalization, we excluded the possibility of a
“cross-talk” effect between the two fluorescent dyes (Section S3, Figure S6).
Figure 6. Colocalization of [d-Lys6(FITC)]–GnRH-I and the lysosomes in EBC-1 cells. The green
fluorescent signal of [d-Lys6(FITC)]–GnRH-I (10
µM, 24 h) showed strong colocalization with the red
fluorescent signal of lysosome marker Lysoview 633.
2.10. The pH-Dependent Permeability of Crizotinib* and MJ55*
As shown in Figure 7, pH-dependent artificial membrane permeability assay (PAMPA) revealed
that the permeability of crizotinib* and MJ55* decreased at lower pH due to the ionization of their
2-aminopyridine core (pKa of the pyridinium cation is ~5.6 [20]). The permeability of crizotinib*
and MJ55* was near zero at the early endosome-/lysosome-like pH (pH = 6.0 and 4.8). On the
other hand, the permeability of the free drugs increased at mildly basic pH (due to the reduced
ionization of the piperidine), which is responsible for their enhanced uptake from the gastrointestinal
tract when they are orally administered. Caffeine was used as the positive control. Caffeine
remained neutral at the investigated pH range, and its permeability therefore remained constant. The
[d-Lys6(crizotinib*)]–GnRH-I conjugate turned out not to be membrane-permeable at pH 4.8, 6.0, and
7.4 (data not shown).

Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 5590
10 of 23
Figure 7. The pH-dependent artificial membrane permeability assay revealed the lysosomotropic
character of crizotinib* and MJ55*. ( ) Permeability of crizotinib* and MJ55*. Caffeine was used as
control; ( ) the pKa value of the pyridinium cation is ~5.6 in crizotinib [20] and MJ55*. The pKa value of
A
B
the piperidinium cation is 9.4 in crizotinib* [20] and 8.5 in MJ55* (predicted by ChemDraw Prime 15.1).
The pKa value of the caffeine cation is 0.7 (https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/caffeine).
2.11. [d-Lys6(crizotinib*)]–GnRH-I Resulted in Concentration-Dependent Lysosomal Membrane
Permeabilization
Lectin galactoside binding soluble (galectin) puncta assay was used to study lysosomal membrane
permeabilization (LMP) effect by crizotinib* and [d-Lys6(crizotinib*)]–GnRH-I in EBC-1 cells. Both
galectin-1 and galectin-3 were immunocytochemically labeled to investigate their cololaization and
puncta formation. CLSM imaging revealed a diffuse distribution of galectin-3 and galectin-1 in
untreated cells without puncta formation. Strong galectin-3 and galectin-1 puncta formation was
detected in 10
to the disruptive lysosomal membrane damage. In the case of [d-Lys6(crizotinib*)]–GnRH-I treated
cells, puncta formation was negligable at 0.1 M. However, puncta formation was clearly detectable at
1 µM, and it became more and more significant at 10 µM and at 100 µM (Figure 8).
µM crizotinib*-treated cells. The colocalization of galectin-1 and galectin-3 punctas refers
µ

Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 5590
11 of 23
Figure 8. Galectin puncta assay for crizotinib* and [d-Lys6(crizotinib*)]–GnRH-I in EBC-1 cells.
Galectin-3 and galectin-1 puncta formation indicate lysosomal membrane damage. Galectin-3: green
(Alexa Fluor 488); galectin-1: red (Alexa Fluor 594); nuclei: blue (DRAQ5).

Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 5590
12 of 23
3. Discussion
GnRH-based drug delivery systems are currently being intensively investigated and are a
promising field in cancer therapy. Despite the encouraging preclinical results on GnRH-targeted
anti-cancer drugs, none of the studied GnRH conjugates have been approved for clinical use yet. The
limited success of GnRH conjugates indicates an insufficient understanding of the GnRH/GnRHR
systems in cancers and the possible drawbacks of GnRHR targeting, which had not been highlighted
previously. For example, one of the most prominent conjugates, zoptarelin doxorubicin (AEZS-108,
AN-152), entered into a clinical trial based on its promising preclinical results [21,22]. However,
a phase III clinical trial on endometrial cancer concluded that zoptarelin doxorubicin could neither
extend overall survival, nor improve the safety profile compared to doxorubicin. Therefore, clinical
studies of zoptarelin doxorubicin were discontinued in May 2017 (https://clinicaltrials.gov). During
the biological evaluation of our novel crizotinib–GnRH conjugates, we kept the identification of
the possible limitations in focus, in order to identify new approaches in the field of GnRH-based
drug delivery.
According to the literature data on the structure of crizotinib–protein complexes (http://www.
rcsb.org/), we rationally designed and synthesized racemic crizotinib analogues that maintained their
RTK-binding affinity, but could also be coupled to targeting moieties, such as [d-Lys6]–GnRH-I peptide.
In order to keep the GnRHR-binding ability of [d-Lys6]–GnRH-I, we applied a glutaric acid spacer
between the peptide and the targeted drug. The assumed suitability of glutaric acid as a spacer was
supported by several publications on GnRH conjugates [4,23].
In order to perform a regioselective reaction of glutaric anhydride with the nitrogen atom of
piperidine in crizotinib, the 2-amino group of pyridine ring must be protected. Upon consideration,
we found that the selectively BOC-protected crizotinib racemate might be an appropriate compound to
synthesize our first conjugate, the amide-bond-containing [d-Lys6(crizotinib*)]–GnRH-I. Literature
data on GnRH conjugates represent several possible functional groups able to attach the drug with the
spacer. Among these solutions, ester linkages have been widely utilized, since the attached drug can be
liberated by hydrolysis of the ester bond [24]. In order to allow ester linkages between the drug and the
spacer, we designed and synthesized several hydroxyl-group-containing crizotinib analogues. Using
these analogues, we also synthesized several GnRH conjugates. From these compounds, based on their
IC50 values in EBC-1 cells, only the most potent one, MJ55* and its conjugate, [d-Lys6(MJ55*)]–GnRH-I,
are detailed in this article.
To investigate the efficacy of our compounds, we first focused on their c-Met inhibitory potential.
Accordingly, the MET-amplified EBC-1 NSCLC cell line was selected as an in vitro model. Since
lung cancers have been less investigated in the context of GnRH targeting, we proved the high
GnRHR expression of EBC-1 cells by western blot for the first time. CLSM images demonstrated
that a significant proportion of GnRHR is localized into the plasma membrane of EBC-1 cells. This is
essential information, because the restrained translocation and the relatively low amount of human
GnRHR on the plasma membrane of cancer cells are common phenomena which could limit effective
GnRHR targeting [25–27]. Finally, the time- and concentration-dependent uptake of FITC-labeled
[d-Lys6]–GnRH-I was demonstrated by flow cytometry. In brief, our findings on the EBC-1 lung cancer
cells correlate with those publications that have highlighted that lung cancer might be an effective
target for GnRH-based drug delivery [28,29].
After we proved that EBC-1 is a suitable in vitro model, we tested the viability inhibition
efficacy of our compounds on this cell line. The novel MJ55* crizotinib analogue and the ester-bond-
containing [d-Lys6(MJ55*)]–GnRH-I resulted in high effects similar to crizotinib*. However, the
amide-bond-containing [d-Lys6(crizotinib*)]–GnRH-I resulted in only a moderate effect at the highest
10
µM concentration. The molecular background of this unexpected result had been investigated further.
The non-target-specific cytotoxic effect of the compounds was measured in the GnRHR-negative
primary human skin fibroblast cells. The viability inhibition effect of free crizotinib* and MJ55* on
healthy primary fibroblast cells was much weaker than on EBC-1 cancer cells, proving their therapeutic

Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 5590
13 of 23
relevance. Surprisingly, the [d-Lys6(MJ55*)]–GnRH-I conjugate resulted in a similar cytotoxic effect
to the free MJ55*, despite the lack of GnRHR on fibroblast cells. To resolve this contradiction, we
determined the stability of the compounds in EMEM cell culture medium under the same conditions
that were used for the CellTiter-Glo viability assay. All of the tested compounds proved to be stable,
except the ester-bond-containing [d-Lys6(MJ55*)]–GnRH-I conjugate. The [d-Lys6(MJ55*)]–GnRH-I
had a half-life of 8 h in EMEM, due to the hydrolysis of the ester bond, which process releases the
free MJ55*.
The early-released free MJ55* (released before its conjugated form was taken up by GnRHR-
mediated endocytosis) ensured the high efficacy of [d-Lys6(MJ55*)]–GnRH-I on the EBC-1 cells, but it
was also responsible for the cytotoxic effect of this compound on the GnRHR-negative primary fibroblast
cells. In a similar way, the poor enzymatic stability of the ester bond can also be held responsible
for the sustained side effects of zoptarelin doxorubicin. The half-life of zoptarelin doxorubicin is
approximately 2 h in human serum [30]. These findings indicate that the application of ester bonds
should be considered in targeted drug delivery systems, and the positive preliminary results should be
handled with caution because of the possible selectivity problems.
Regarding the stable [d-Lys6(crizotinib*)]–GnRH-I conjugate, our main question was why
GnRHR-targeting abrogated the efficacy of crizotinib* on EBC-1 cells. To answer this question,
we investigated the binding affinity of our conjugates to the human pituitary GnRHR and prostate
cancer GnRHR. The displacement analyses of radiolabeled triptorelin ([125I]-[d-Trp6]–GnRH-I) by
unlabeled crizotinib–GnRH conjugates confirmed our hypothesis that the glutaric acid spacer on the
d-Lys6 of GnRH-I preserved the receptor-binding affinity of both conjugates to both types of GnRHR.
Thereafter, results obtained from the recombinant c-Met kinase assay underlined that the piperidine
ring is a suitable site for conjugation in crizotinib*, and that the attached targeting structure does not
impair the binding affinity to the c-Met kinase.
These results suggest that conjugated crizotinib* was unable reach its intracellular target, the
ATP-binding site of c-Met. To strengthen this hypothesis, we examined the activity of c-Met in
EBC-1 cells. In correlation with the results of the cell viability assay, crizotinib*, MJ55*, and the
unstable [d-Lys6(MJ55*)]–GnRH-I diminished the phosphorylation of c-Met at 100 nM. Nevertheless,
the stable [d-Lys6(crizotinib*)]–GnRH-I proved that GnRH-conjugated crizotinib could not inhibit the
phosphorylation of c-Met in EBC-1 cells at submicromolar concentration.
Next, we investigated the intracellular localization of GnRH-I, using [d-Lys6(FITC)]–GnRH-I
and a previously described method [18]. According to the literature data on GnRHR-mediated
endocytosis [31,32], we counterstained the lysosomes as the suspected destination for the ligands of
GnRHR. CLSM images strengthened that [d-Lys6(FITC)]–GnRH-I is concentrated in the lysosomes
(Figure 6), with similar implications for [d-Lys6(crizotinib*)]–GnRH-I. In addition, the artificial
membrane permeability experiment revealed the lysosomotropic properties of the 2-aminopyridine
core in crizotinib* and MJ55*, as well (Figure 7). Lysosomal accumulation of free crizotinib was also
reported by Da Silva et al. in 2015 [33].
The majority of drugs, which have been developed for oral use, have a weak basic character in
order to achieve suitable pharmacokinetic properties. Unfortunately, these drugs may accumulate in
the lysosomes with passive diffusion, a process which is enhanced further by transporter proteins [34].
While untargeted drugs (e.g., free crizotinib) have the chance to reach their site-specific molecular
targets before they are trapped in the lysosomes (Figure 9A), GnRH-delivered drugs are transported
directly into the endosomes/lysosomes via GnRHR-mediated endocytosis (Figure 9B). In the endosome,
GnRH conjugates dissociate from GnRHR due to the decreasing pH. Subsequently, the GnRH
peptide undergoes enzymatic degradation in the lysosome, which creates an opportunity to release
the conjugated drug in its free form. In context with the lysosomal accumulation of targeted
drugs, several enzymatically degradable spacers (self-immolative spacers) have been developed to
release the drug in the lysosomes [35]. However, the results of the PAMPA assay demonstrated
that GnRH-conjugated crizotinib analogues could barely escape from either endosomes (pH: ~6) or

Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 5590
14 of 23
lysosomes (pH: ~4.8) even in their free forms (Figure 7). This result highlights that reduced permeability
in the endosomes/lysosomes could be a general problem for targeted lysosomotropic drugs, which
cannot be solved by drug-releasing spacers.
Figure 9. Intracellular trafficking of crizotinib* and [d-Lys6(crizotinib*)]–GnRH-I. (
to reach the ATP-binding site of c-Met by passive diffusion and to effectively inhibit the c-Met-mediated
oncogenic signaling, while only a proportion of the drug accumulates in the lysosomes. ( ) The
GnRHR-mediated endocytosis leads to the lysosomal sequestration of GnRHR-targeted crizotinib* at the
nanomolar concentration range; meanwhile, crizotinib* bypasses c-Met. ( ) One possible explanation
A) Crizotinib is able
B
C
for the c-Met inhibition and the cell viability inhibition effect of [d-Lys6(crizotinib*)]–GnRH-I at
the micromolar concentration range is that during the GnRHR internalization, non–GnRHR-bound
conjugates might loaded into the vesicles as “passive passengers”. High lysosomal accumulation of
these passive passengers might destabilize the membrane of the lysosomes, leading to drug leakage
and cell death.
We previously reported that cellular GnRH uptake does not depend solely on the GnRHR-mediated
transport at micromolar concentrations or above [18]. Quantitative analysis of [d-Lys6(FITC)]–GnRH-I
in EBC-1 cells also demonstrated that the amount of the conjugate in the treated cells increased in
proportion to the applied concentration between 0.1 and 10
and dose–response studies on MCF-7 human breast cancer cells [27],
cells [36], and human GnRHR-transfected COS-7 cells [37 38] have suggested that the applied
µM. However, previous radioligand-binding
α
T3-1 human gonadotrope
,
concentration range of [d-Lys6(FITC)]–GnRH-I (10−7–10−5 M) on EBC-1 cells was several orders
of magnitude higher than the ypothetical GnRHR saturation concentration (<10−8 M). Furthermore,
the insatiable cellular uptake of [d-Lys6(FITC)]–GnRH-I was obvious even after 2 h of treatment,
which strongly suggested the presence of a GnRHR-independent uptake mechanism in EBC-1 cells
(Figure 3C).

Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 5590
15 of 23
One possible explanation of the enhanced GnRH uptake could be that during the internalization
of GnRHR and other endocytic events (e.g., micropinocytosis [39]), non-receptor-bound conjugates are
also able to get into the vesicles with the cell culture medium and/or with the plasma membrane as
“passive passengers” (Figure 9C). These passive passengers might become predominant in the treated
cells at higher concentrations.
There is evidence that lysosomotropic/amphiphilic drugs are able to destabilize the membranes
of lysosomes, leading to drug escape and even to apoptosis at higher doses [40–42]. In addition,
Zhitomirsky et al. also reported that lysosomal accumulation of anticancer drugs induces lysosomal
membrane permeabilization (LMP) and consequent activation of transcription factor EB (TFEB) [43].
Since TFEB is a master regulator of lysosomal biogenesis and promotes lysosomal exocytosis,
it could be that lysosomal exocytosis is the major intracellular mechanism of clearance for
GnRH-delivered crizotinib.
To strengthen our hypothesis on the lysosomal accumulation of [d-Lys6(crizotinib*)]–GnRH-I
and the consequent LMP in EBC-1 cells, a galectin puntca assay was applied. Intracellular puncta
formation of galectin-1 and galectin-3 has been reported to be a sensitive and robust marker of LMP [44].
Our galectin puntca assay provided evidence that both crizotinib* and [d-Lys6(crizotinib*)]–GnRH-I
accumulated in the lysosomes and caused LMP in a concentration-dependent manner, as it shown in
Figure 8.
Based on the above-mentioned results, we concluded that EBC-1 cells are able to get rid
of [d-Lys6(crizotinib*)]–GnRH-I at nanomolar concentrations by lysosomal exocytosis, and thus
could survive. However, at micromolar doses, highly accumulated [d-Lys6(crizotinib*)]–GnRH-I
causes LMP and drug leakage (Figure 8), which could explain the c-Met inhibitory effect and the
consequent viability reduction of EBC-1 cells (Figures 4A and 5). The slightly decreased efficacy of the
[d-Lys6(MJ55*)]–GnRH-I conjugate compared to free MJ55* can also be partially explained by lysosomal
sequestration: despite the fast release of MJ55* from the conjugate, the effect of the GnRHR-associated
conjugates is abrogated (Figure 4A).
In general, we hypothesize that the efficacy of other lysosomotropic/amphiphilic drug-bearing
GnRH conjugates (e.g., daunorubicin–GnRH [45,46]) is also mediated by LMP at micromolar
concentrations, but this presumption requires further investigation. On the other hand, we also
note that to achieve and maintain micromolar concentrations of GnRH conjugates in the tumor
microenvironment could be more than challenging in vivo. Interestingly, the importance of lysosomal
trapping and endosomal/lysosomal drug escape has not been previously highlighted in the context of
GnRHR targeting.
In summary, we demonstrated that MET-amplified EBC-1 NSCLC cells highly express GnRHR,
and are very sensitive for crizotinib*. Experiments with fluorescently labeled GnRH-I in EBC-1
cells corroborated that GnRH conjugates are delivered into the lysosomes via GnRHR-mediated
endocytosis. Our novel crizotinib analogue MJ55* had similar c-Met inhibition potential to crizotinib*;
furthermore, the introduced hydroxyl group represents new possibilities for drug targeting. The
[d-Lys6(MJ55*)]–GnRH-I conjugate resulted in a potent effect on EBC-1 NSCLC cells, but also revealed
the drawback of the ester bond, as the early-released MJ55* reduced the selectivity of the GnRHR
targeting. On the other hand, in vitro pharmacological profiling of the stable amide-bond-containing
[d-Lys6(crizotinib*)]–GnRH-I revealed that the membrane of the lysosome could be a significant
intracellular barrier for GnRHR-targeted drugs. In addition, the limited amount of GnRHR on the
plasma membranes of cancer cells might be another restrictive factor, which is a less investigated
part of GnRHR-targeted drug delivery and should be further investigated. Altogether, these findings
highlight that the individual pharmacokinetics of targeted molecules necessitate more specific drug
development than classical drug design, and there are still numerous unanswered questions.

Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 5590
16 of 23
4. Materials and Methods
4.1. Synthesis of Compounds
The syntheses of [d-Lys6]–GnRH-I peptide, and the synthetic routes for crizotinib* and MJ55*
drugs, and [d-Lys6(crizotinib*)]–GnRH-I and [d-Lys6(MJ55*)]–GnRH-I drug–peptide conjugates are
detailed in the Supplementary Information, Section S1. The relevant analytical methods and structural
determinations can be found in the Supplementary Information, Section S2 (HPLC purity: Figure S1,
HRMS: Table S1, 1H- and 13C-NMR: Figure S4).
4.2. Cell Cultures
EBC-1 cell line was obtained from the Japanese Collection of Research Bioresources Cell Bank
(JCRB, Solana Beach, CA 92075 USA) and cultured in Eagle’s minimum essential medium (EMEM)
(Lonza, Basel, Switzerland, cat. no.: BE12-611F,) supplemented with 1% MycoZap (Lonza, cat. no.:
VZA-2012) and 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA, cat.
no.: 10500-064).
LNCaP cell line was purchased from American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA, USA),
and maintained in Roswell Park Memorial Institute (RPMI-1640) Medium (Thermo Fisher Scientific,
cat. no.: 11875-093) supplemented with 1% MycoZap, 2 mM glutamine (Lonza, cat. no.: BE17-605E)
and 10% FBS.
Primary human skin fibroblast cells (fibroblast cells) were gifted by the Institute of Genomic
Medicine and Rare Disorders, Semmelweis University (Budapest, Hungary). Fibroblast cells were
cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) (Thermo Fisher Scientific, cat. no.:
41965039) supplemented with 10% FBS (Thermo Fisher Scientific), 1% penicillin–streptomycin (Thermo
Fisher Scientific, cat. no.: 15070063) and 1% MEM Non-Essential Amino Acids Solution (Thermo
◦
Fisher Scientific, cat. no.: 11140035). Cell cultures were grown in vitro at 37 C, 95% air and 5%
CO2 atmosphere.
4.3. Western Blot
To analyze the effect of the compounds on c-Met phosphorylation, EBC-1 cells were
seeded in six well plates and grown to 90% confluence. Cells were then treated with 0.1
µM
[d-Lys6]–GnRH-I, crizotinib*, MJ55*, and [d-Lys6(MJ55*)]–GnRH-I in complemented EMEM. In the case
of [d-Lys6(crizotinib*)]–GnRH-I-treated cells, 0.1
µM, 1 µM, and 10 µM concentrations were applied.
Cells were incubated with the compounds for 6 h at 37 ◦C in a CO2 incubator. After the incubation,
western blot analysis was performed. To investigate GnRH-R protein level, cells were seeded in six
well plates and grown to 90% confluence, then western blot analysis was applied.
Western blot analysis was performed as follows: cells were washed with ice-cold PBS (Lonza, cat.
no.: 17-516F) and lysed with radioimmunoprecipitation assay (RIPA) buffer (50 mM Tris (pH 7.4), 150
mM NaCl, 1% (v/v) NP-40, 0.5% (m/v) sodium deoxycholate, 0.1% (m/v) sodium dodecyl sulphate, 2
mM EDTA, and 2 mM EGTA (reagents were obtained from Merck Millipore, Burlington, MA, USA)
complemented with phosphatase and protease inhibitor cocktail (Merck Millipore, cat. no.: 524629
and 539134). Lysates were sonicated three times for 10 s and incubated on ice for 30 min. After
◦
centrifugation (13,000
Equal amounts of protein (20
×
g, 4 C, 15 min), protein concentration was determined by Bradford assay.
µ
g) were subjected to SDS-PAGE and electrotransferred to polyvinylidene
difluoride membranes (Bio-Rad, cat. no.: 162177, Budapest, Hungary). The membranes were probed
with primary antibodies GnRH-I R (Proteintech, Rosemont, IL, USA, cat. no.: 19950-1-AP, dilution:
1:4000), pTyr1234/1235-Met (Cell Signaling Technology, Leiden, The Netherlands, cat.no.: 3077, dilution:
1:6000), Met (Cell Signaling Technology, cat. no.: 3148, dilution: 1:8000), pThr202/Tyr204-Erk1/2 (Cell
Signaling Technology, cat. no.: 4370, dilution: 1:2000), Erk1/2 (Cell Signaling Technology, cat. no.: 9107,
dilution: 1:4000), and
and then with horse radish peroxidase conjugated secondary antibody (Cell Signaling Technology,
α
-tubulin (Merck Millipore, cat. no.: T9026, dilution: 1:40,000)) at 4 ◦C overnight,

Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 5590
17 of 23
anti-rabbit IgG—cat.no.: 7074, dilution: 1:2000, anti-mouse IgG—cat. no.: 7076, dilution: 1:10,000) for
1 h at room temperature. Bands were visualized via Enhanced Chemiluminescence detection system
(Western Lightning ECL Pro, PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA, cat. no.: NEL122001EA).
4.4. Immunofluorescence Staining of GnRHR
Cells were seeded in eight well Ibidi®
µ-Slide microscopic slides (2
×
104 cells/well) and allowed
to adhere for 48 h. Cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 10 min and washed twice with PBS
(Lonza). Cells were permeabilized with 0.1% (v/v) Triton X-100 PBS solution for 15 min to determine the
total GnRHR protein level. When only the membrane GnRHR was investigated, the permeabilization
step was skipped. For blocking, 5% BSA (Merck Millipore, cat. no.: A7906) in PBS was used for 30 min.
Cells were incubated with hGnRH-I-R primary antibody (Proteintech™, 19950-1-AP, dilution: 1:100)
for 1 h at 25 ◦C, followed by Alexa Fluor 594 conjugated secondary antibody (Jackson ImmunoResearch
Inc., West Grove, PA, USA, cat. no.: 111-585-003, dilution: 1:300) for 1 h at 25 ◦C. DRAQ5 (Thermo
Fisher Scientific, cat. no.: 62254) fluorescent probe solution (final concentration: 10 µM) was added
to the cells for 15 min. Cells were washed three times with PBS, and a few drops of mounting
medium (Merck Millipore, cat. no.: F4680-25ML) were added. Images of cells were acquired with a
confocal laser microscope (Zeiss Confocal LSM 710, Carl Zeiss AG, Oberkochen, Germany). [Objective:
Plan-Apochromat 63 /1.40 Oil DIC M27. Pinhole: 1.00 AU. Laser Wavelength: 543 nm and 633 nm.
×
Detection wavelength: 593–631 nm; 676–735 nm)].
4.5. Intracellular Localization of [d-Lys6(FITC)]–GnRH-I
EBC-1 cells were seeded in eight well Ibidi®
allowed to adhere for 48 h. Cells were then treated with 10
µ
-Slide microscopic slides (2
×
104 cells/well) and
µ
M [d-Lys6(FITC)]–GnRH-I in complemented
EMEM (Lonza) and incubated in a humidified, 5% CO2 atmosphere incubator for 24 h at 37 ◦C.
After [d-Lys6(FITC)]–GnRH-I treatment, cells were fixed using 4% paraformaldehyde for 10 min
and nuclei were counterstained with DRAQ5 for 15 min. Images (in Figure 3D) were acquired by Zeiss
Confocal LSM 710 microscope.
To investigate colocalization of [d-Lys6(FITC)]–GnRH-I with lysosomes (in Figure 6), after
[d-Lys6(FITC)]–GnRH-I treatment (24 h, 10
µM), Lysoview 633 dye was added to the treating medium
and the cells were incubated for a further 1 h. After incubation, cells were washed twice with
EMEM. Images of the living cells were acquired with a Zeiss Confocal LSM 710 microscope [Objective:
Plan-Apochromat 63 /1.40 Oil DIC M27. Pinhole: 1.95 AU. Laser wavelength: 488 nm and 633 nm.
×
Detection wavelength: 496–573 nm; 633–693 nm)].
4.6. Quantitative Analysis of [d-Lys6(FITC)]–GnRH-I in EBC-1 Cells
2
×
104 EBC-1 cells per well were seeded onto 24 well plates (VWR) and allowed to adhere for
48 h. Cells were treated with [d-Lys6(FITC)]–GnRH-I in complemented EMEM (Lonza) at 0.1, 1, and
10 µM, and incubated in a humidified, 5% CO2 atmosphere incubator for 2, 6, 24, and 72 h at 37 ◦C.
After incubation, supernatant was discarded and the cells were washed twice with PBS (Lonza).
Trypsin (Thermo Fisher Scientific, cat. no.: 25300062) was added for 10 min at 37 ◦C. Cells were pelleted
(250 µ
g, 4 min, 4 ◦C) in flow cytometry tubes, resuspended in 300 L PBS and kept at 4 ◦C for the rest
×
of the experiment. The fluorescence intensity of the conjugate-stained cells was analysed using a FACS
Calibur flow cytometer (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA) using channel FL1. Data were evaluated by
CellQuest Pro software (BD Biosciences). The relative median fluorescent intensity (MFI) values (based
on DMSO control) were calculated.
Calculation formula:
MFI (compound; [x(h); y(µM)])
relative MFI (compound; [x(h); y(µM)]) =
MFI (DMSO control; [x(h)])

Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 5590
18 of 23
x time (h)
y concentration (µM)
4.7. Cell Viability Assay
Effects of the synthesized compounds on EBC-1 and fibroblast cell viability was measured
via CellTiter-Glo® luminescent cell viability assay (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) according to the
manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, cells were plated at 1000 cells/well onto a flat-bottomed, white 96
well plate (BRANDplates, cat. no.: 781965). After 24 h, cells were treated for 72 h with either the desired
4-fold serial diluted compound concentrations or vehicle (0.2% DMSO) control. After the treatment,
the luminescence signal was recorded using a microplate reader (BioTek Synergy 2 Multi-Mode
Reader, BioTek, Winooski, VT, USA). Dose–response curves (using a non-linear regression model) were
generated and IC50 values were determined using Graph Pad Prism 5.02 software (GraphPad Software,
San Diego, CA, USA).
4.8. In Vitro Inhibition of Recombinant c-Met Kinase
Active, recombinant c-Met enzyme (3
µg/mL, ProQinase, cat. no.: 0171-0000-1, Lot: 012) was
incubated with ATP (3.1 M (KM[ATP]), Promega, cat. no.: V6930), peptide substrate (0,25 mg/mL,
µ
poly GT, Merck Millipore, cat. no.: PO275), and compounds at the indicated concentrations. Reaction
buffer was prepared according to ProQinase’s recommendation [60 mM HEPES, 3 mM MgCl2, 3 mM
MnCl2, 3 µM Na3VO4, 1.2 mM DTT (dithiothreitol), and 50 µg/mL PEG20,000, (reagents were obtained
from Merck Millipore)]. Enzyme activity was assayed in 384 well, low-volume white microtiter plates
(Corning®, Merck Millipore, cat. no.: CLS4513-50EA). Compounds were preincubated with c-Met
kinase for 30 min at room temperature and reactions were started by adding the substrate–ATP mixture.
Reaction time was 60 min at room temperature. Enzyme reaction was stopped using ADP-Glo
Assay (Promega, cat. no.: V6930) according to the manufacturer’s instructions (40 min incubation with
ADP-Glo
Reagent, 30 min incubation with Kinase detection reagent at 25 ◦C). All measurements were
™ Kinase
™
performed using a Synergy 2 Multi-Mode Reader (BioTek, Winooski, VT, USA). Raw enzyme activity
values were converted to relative activity data using positive and negative controls. Determination of
IC50 values was performed using GraphPad Prism 5.02 software.
4.9. Stability Experiment
Stock solutions of compounds in DMSO were diluted to 10 µM in complemented EMEM (Lonza).
Samples were incubated for 2, 6, 24, and 72 h at 37 ◦C. After the incubation, acetonitrile (VWR, cat. no.:
83639.320) was added to the solutions (1:1 ratio, to achieve 50% acetonitrile content). The samples
were vortexed and centrifuged (13,000 g, 10 min). Supernatants were measured by HPLC-UV. HPLC
×
method and chromatograms are available in the Supplementary Information. Stability was calculated
using the external standard method. Decay curves were generated and half-life was calculated by
GraphPad Prism 5.02 software.
4.10. PAMPA
An artificial-membrane-based system (BD Gentest
™ Pre-Coated PAMPA plate, Corning, cat. no.:
353015) was used to determine the pH-dependent membrane permeability of the compounds. In this
method, the protocol provided by the manufacturer was followed with minor modifications. Four
different pH values were applied per compound. The pH of the PBS solutions (Lonza) was adjusted
to 4.6, 6.0, 7.4, and 8.0 using 1 M HCl or 1 M NaOH. Stock solutions of compounds in DMSO were
diluted to 100 µM in each PBS. PBS solutions were loaded into the donor wells, but the acceptor wells
were filled with physiological PBS (pH = 7.4). The system was gently shaken (BioSan Thermo-Shaker
PST-60HL) for 5 h at 25 ◦C. Samples derived from the donor and the acceptor wells were measured

Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 5590
19 of 23
using a BioTek Synergy 2 Multi-Mode Reader at 280 nm. Calculation formula and the calculated data
are available in the Supplementary Information, Section S4.
4.11. Galectin Puncta Assay
EBC-1 cells were seeded on eight well Ibidi®
allowed to adhere for 48 h. Cells were treated with 10
100
M [d-Lys6(crizotinib*)]–GnRH-I in serum-free EMEM. Untreated (0.2% DMSO in EMEM) cells
µ
-Slide microscopic slides (2
×
104 cells/well) and
µ
M crizotinib*, 0.1 M, 1
µ
µ
M, 10 M, and
µ
µ
were used as a negative control. Cells were incubated with the compounds for 8 h at 37 ◦C in a CO2
incubator. Cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 10 min and washed twice with PBS (Lonza).
Cells were permeabilized with 0.1% (v/v) Triton X-100 PBS solution for 10 min. After blocking (5%
v/v BSA in PBS), cells were incubated with anti-galectin 3 (Merck, cat. no.: SAB4501746, dilution:
1:100) and anti-galectin-1 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, cat. no.: sc-166618, dilution: 1:100) primary
antibodies overnight at 25 ◦C, followed by Alexa-Fluor-488-conjugated (Jackson ImmunoResearch., cat.
no.: 111-545-003, dilution: 1:500) and Alexa-Fluor-594-conjugated (Jackson ImmunoResearch, cat. no.:
115-585-003, dilution: 1:250) secondary antibodies for 1 h at 25 ◦C. DRAQ5 (10 µM) was added to the
cells for 15 min. Cells were washed three times with PBS and a few drops of mounting media (Merck
Millipore) were added. Images of cells were acquired with a confocal laser microscope (Zeiss Confocal
LSM 710). [Objective: Plan-Apochromat 63x/1.40 Oil DIC M27. Pinhole: 1.01 AU. Laser wavelength:
488 nm, 543 nm and 633 nm. Detection wavelength: 504–539 nm; 602–651 nm; 694–758 nm)].
4.12. Radioligand-Binding Assay
The receptor binding affinities of crizotinib–GnRH conjugates were determined by displacement
analyses using radioiodinated GnRH-I agonist triptorelin ([125I]-[d-Trp6]–GnRH-I) on human pituitary
and human prostate cancer cells. The collection and use of the tissue samples for our studies were
approved by the local Institutional Ethics Committee. Normal human pituitary (anterior lobe) tissue
was collected at autopsy and the human prostate cancer specimen was obtained from a patient at
the time of initial surgical treatment. The ligand competition assay was performed as described
previously [19].
5. Conclusions
Based on the literature data, we designed and synthesized novel crizotinib analogues and
successfully conjugated them with [d-Lys6]–GnRH-I peptide. Although these crizotinib–GnRH
conjugates had potent inhibitory potential on recombinant c-Met kinase and they were able to bind
to GnRH-R, the benefit of GnRHR targeting was not clearly proven on the MET-amplified and
GnRHR-overexpressing EBC-1 NSCLC cells in vitro. We concluded that the decreased efficacy of
crizotinib–GnRH conjugates could be explained by the mechanism of receptor-mediated endocytosis.
Intracellular trafficking of GnRH/GnRHR directs conjugated crizotinib into the lysosomes, and hence
crizotinib bypasses the ATP-binding site of c-Met. At nanomolar doses, GnRH-delivered crizotinib is
trapped in the lysosome due to acidic pH and triggers lysosomal exocytosis. At micromolar doses, the
observed c-Met inhibition and cell viability reduction effects of [d-Lys6(crizotinib*)]–GnRH-I could be
explained by crizotinib-induced LMP.
In general, we found that lysosomal sequestration of GnRH-delivered drugs partially explained
the limited success of anti-cancer GnRH conjugates retrospectively. In order to design more effective
GnRH-based drug delivery systems, the importance of drug escape from the lysosomes should be taken
into account. Therefore, we suppose that drugs with enhanced membrane permeability at mildly acidic
pH could be more appropriate for GnRHR-targeted drug delivery. In the case of compounds with poor
permeability, incorporation of a membrane-penetrative spacer [47] might be an effective solution to
enhance the drug’s escape from the lysosomes. Nevertheless, it has been reported that targeting the
lysosomes could be a promising strategy for cancer therapy [48
,49]. Thereby, the lysosome-directed
transport of GnRHR might even be advantageous, for example in the case of GnRH-conjugated

Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 5590
20 of 23
lysosome inhibitors, and also for drugs with no site-specific molecular target (e.g., protoporphyrin
derivatives [50,51]).
Supplementary Materials: Supplementary materials can be found at http://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/20/22/
5590/s1.
Author Contributions: Conceptualization, project administration and visualization were done by J.M.; Cell
cultures were maintained and the viability assay was performed by K.P. and C.E.N.; Western blot was performed
by A.V.; c-Met kinase assay was performed by P.G.; Radioligand-binding assay was performed by G.H.; HRMS
analysis was performed by L.P.; Structure determination by 1H- and 13C-NMR performed by A.C.; The rest of the
experiments was performed by J.M.; Writing of the original draft was done by J.M. The manuscript was supervised
by M.C.; Funding acquisition was granted by G.H., I.P. and I.V.-N.
Funding: This research was supported by the “NVKP_16-1-2016-0005”, the “K-124813”, the “K-128785” and the
“GINOP-2.3.2-15-2016-00043” grants (NKFI Fund of National Research, Development and Innovation Office,
Hungary), and also by the “20428-3/2018/FEKUTSTRAT” (Higher Education Institutional Excellence Programme
of the Ministry of Human Capacities in Hungary, within the framework of the Biotechnology Thematic Programme
of the University of Debrecen).
Acknowledgments: We thank Mária Judit Molnár (Institute of Genomic Medicine and Rare Disorders, Semmelweis
University, Budapest, Hungary) for providing the human primary human skin fibroblast cells, which were isolated
from living tissues of control subjects.
Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Abbreviations
ALK
anaplastic lymphoma kinase
BOC
CLSM
c-Met
tert-butyloxycarbonyl-protecting group
confocal laser scanning microscopy
hepatocyte growth factor receptor
(1-Cyano-2-ethoxy-2-oxoethylidenaminooxy)dimethylamino-morpholino-carbenium
hexafluorophosphate
COMU
crizotinib
crizotinib*
EMEM
FBS
(R)-crizotinib, (Xalkori®, Pfizer)
racemic mixture of (R)-crizotinib and (S)-crizotinib
Eagle’s minimum essential medium
Fetal bovine serum
fibroblast cells human primary human skin fibroblast cells
galectin-1
galectin-3
HRMS
LMP
MJ55*
NSCLC
Pd(dppf)Cl2
ROS-1
RTK
lectin galactoside binding soluble 1
lectin galactoside binding soluble 3
high resolution mass spectrometry
lysosomal membrane permeabilization
racemic mixture of (R)-MJ55 and (S)-MJ55
non-small cell lung cancer
[1,10-Bis(diphenylphosphino)ferrocene]dichloropalladium(II)
ROS proto-oncogene 1, receptor tyrosine kinase
receptor tyrosine kinase
SD
standard deviation
TEA
triethylamine
TFEB
transcription factor EB
THF
tetrahydrofuran
References
1.
Maggi, R.; Cariboni, A.M.; Marelli, M.M.; Moretti, R.M.; Andre, V.; Marzagalli, M.; Limonta, P. GnRH and
GnRH receptors in the pathophysiology of the human female reproductive system. Hum. Reprod. Update
2016, 22, 358–381. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
2.
Limonta, P.; Montagnani, M.M.; Mai, S.; Motta, M.; Martini, L.; Moretti, R.M. GnRH receptors in cancer: From
cell biology to novel targeted therapeutic strategies. Endocr. Rev. 2012, 33, 784–811. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 5590
21 of 23
3.
4.
Mezo, G.; Manea, M. Receptor-mediated tumor targeting based on peptide hormones. Expert Opin. Drug
Deliv. 2010, 7, 79–96. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Aggarwal, S.; Ndinguri, M.W.; Solipuram, R.; Wakamatsu, N.; Hammer, R.P.; Ingram, D.; Hansel, W.
[DLys(6)]-luteinizing hormone releasing hormone-curcumin conjugate inhibits pancreatic cancer cell growth
in vitro and in vivo. Int. J. Cancer 2011, 129, 1611–1623. [CrossRef]
5.
6.
Argyros, O.; Karampelas, T.; Asvos, X.; Varela, A.; Sayyad, N.; Papakyriakou, A.; Davos, C.H.; Tzakos, A.G.;
Fokas, D.; Tamvakopoulos, C. Peptide-Drug Conjugate GnRH-Sunitinib Targets Angiogenesis Selectively at
the Site of Action to Inhibit Tumor Growth. Cancer Res. 2016, 76, 1181–1192. [CrossRef]
Karampelas, T.; Argyros, O.; Sayyad, N.; Spyridaki, K.; Pappas, C.; Morgan, K.; Kolios, G.; Millar, R.P.;
Liapakis, G.; Tzakos, A.G.; et al. GnRH-Gemcitabine conjugates for the treatment of androgen-independent
prostate cancer: Pharmacokinetic enhancements combined with targeted drug delivery. Bioconjug Chem.
2014, 25, 813–823. [CrossRef]
7.
8.
9.
Nagy, A.; Schally, A.V. Targeting of cytotoxic luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogs to breast,
ovarian, endometrial, and prostate cancers. Biol. Reprod. 2005, 73, 851–859. [CrossRef]
Fabbro, D. 25 years of small molecular weight kinase inhibitors: Potentials and limitations. Mol. Pharmacol.
2015, 87, 766–775. [CrossRef]
Peters, S.; Adjei, A.A. MET: A promising anticancer therapeutic target. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 2012, 9, 314–326.
[CrossRef]
10. Gherardi, E.; Birchmeier, W.; Birchmeier, C.; Vande Woude, G. Targeting MET in cancer: Rationale and
progress. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2012, 12, 89–103. [CrossRef]
11. Cui, J.J.; Tran-Dube, M.; Shen, H.; Nambu, M.; Kung, P.P.; Pairish, M.; Jia, L.; Meng, J.; Funk, L.; Botrous, I.;
et al. Structure based drug design of crizotinib (PF-02341066), a potent and selective dual inhibitor of
mesenchymal-epithelial transition factor (c-MET) kinase and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK). J. Med.
Chem. 2011, 54, 6342–6363. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
12. Puccini, A.; Marin-Ramos, N.I.; Bergamo, F.; Schirripa, M.; Lonardi, S.; Lenz, H.J.; Loupakis, F.; Battaglin, F.
Safety and Tolerability of c-MET Inhibitors in Cancer. Drug Saf. 2019, 42, 211–233. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
13. Dai, X.; Guo, G.; Zou, P.; Cui, R.; Chen, W.; Chen, X.; Yin, C.; He, W.; Vinothkumar, R.; Yang, F.; et al.
(S)-crizotinib induces apoptosis in human non-small cell lung cancer cells by activating ROS independent of
MTH1. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2017, 36, 120. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
14. Ji, J.; Chen, W.; Lian, W.; Chen, R.; Yang, J.; Zhang, Q.; Weng, Q.; Khan, Z.; Hu, J.; Chen, X.; et al. (S)-crizotinib
reduces gastric cancer growth through oxidative DNA damage and triggers pro-survival akt signal. Cell
Death Dis. 2018, 9, 660. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
15. Kauffmann-Guerrero, D.; Kahnert, K.; Kumbrink, J.; Syunyaeva, Z.; Tufman, A.; Huber, R.M. Successful
Treatment of a Patient with NSCLC Harboring an EGFR Mutation and a Concomitant Met Exon 14 Skipping
Mutation Combining Afatinib and Crizotinib. Clin. Lung Cancer 2019, 20, 59–62. [CrossRef]
16. Llanos, S.; Megias, D.; Blanco-Aparicio, C.; Hernandez-Encinas, E.; Rovira, M.; Pietrocola, F.; Serrano, M.
Lysosomal trapping of palbociclib and its functional implications. Oncogene 2019, 38, 3886–3902. [CrossRef]
17. Li, W.Q.; Sun, L.P.; Xia, Y.; Hao, S.; Cheng, G.; Wang, Z.; Wan, Y.; Zhu, C.; He, H.; Zheng, S.Y. Preoccupation
of Empty Carriers Decreases Endo-/Lysosome Escape and Reduces the Protein Delivery Efficiency of
Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 5340–5347. [CrossRef]
18. Muranyi, J.; Gyulavari, P.; Varga, A.; Bokonyi, G.; Tanai, H.; Vantus, T.; Pap, D.; Ludanyi, K.; Mezo, G.; Keri, G.
Synthesis, characterization and systematic comparison of FITC-labelled GnRH-I, -II and -III analogues on
various tumour cells. J. Pept. Sci. 2016, 22, 552–560. [CrossRef]
19. Halmos, G.; Arencibia, J.M.; Schally, A.V.; Davis, R.; Bostwick, D.G. High incidence of receptors for luteinizing
hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) and LHRH receptor gene expression in human prostate cancers. J. Urol.
2000, 163, 623–629. [CrossRef]
20. Sahu, A.; Prabhash, K.; Noronha, V.; Joshi, A.; Desai, S. Crizotinib: A comprehensive review. South Asian J.
Cancer 2013, 2, 91–97.
21. Engel, J.; Emons, G.; Pinski, J.; Schally, A.V. AEZS-108: A targeted cytotoxic analog of LHRH for the treatment
of cancers positive for LHRH receptors. Expert Opin. Investig. Drugs 2012, 21, 891–899. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 5590
22 of 23
22. Popovics, P.; Schally, A.V.; Szalontay, L.; Block, N.L.; Rick, F.G. Targeted cytotoxic analog of luteinizing
hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH), AEZS-108 (AN-152), inhibits the growth of DU-145 human
castration-resistant prostate cancer in vivo and in vitro through elevating p21 and ROS levels. Oncotarget
2014, 5, 4567–4578. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
23. Nagy, A.; Schally, A.V.; Armatis, P.; Szepeshazi, K.; Halmos, G.; Kovacs, M.; Zarandi, M.; Groot, K.;
Miyazaki, M.; Jungwirth, A.; et al. Cytotoxic analogs of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone containing
doxorubicin or 2-pyrrolinodoxorubicin, a derivative 500–1000 times more potent. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
1996, 93, 7269–7273. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
24. Majumdar, S.; Siahaan, T.J. Peptide-mediated targeted drug delivery. Med. Res. Rev. 2012, 32, 637–658.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
25. Schottelius, M.; Berger, S.; Poethko, T.; Schwaiger, M.; Wester, H.J. Development of novel 68Ga- and
18F-labeled GnRH-I analogues with high GnRHR-targeting efficiency. Bioconjug. Chem. 2008, 19, 1256–1268.
[CrossRef]
26. Finch, A.R.; Caunt, C.J.; Armstrong, S.P.; McArdle, C.A. Plasma membrane expression of
gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptors: Regulation by peptide and nonpeptide antagonists. Mol.
Endocrinol. 2010, 24, 423–435. [CrossRef]
27. denFinch, A.R.; Sedgley, K.R.; Armstrong, S.P.; Caunt, C.J.; McArdle, C.A. Trafficking and signalling of
gonadotrophin-releasing hormone receptors: An automated imaging approach. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2010, 159,
751–760.
28. Hao, D.; Sun, L.; Hu, X.; Hao, X. (99m)Tc-LHRH in tumor receptor imaging. Oncol. Lett. 2017, 14, 569–578.
[CrossRef]
29. Lu, C.; Huang, T.; Chen, W.; Lu, H. GnRH participates in the self-renewal of A549-derived lung cancer
stem-like cells through upregulation of the JNK signaling pathway. Oncol. Rep. 2015, 34, 244–250. [CrossRef]
30. Nagy, A.; Plonowski, A.; Schally, A.V. Stability of cytotoxic luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone conjugate
(AN-152) containing doxorubicin 14-O-hemiglutarate in mouse and human serum in vitro: Implications for
the design of preclinical studies. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2000, 97, 829–834. [CrossRef]
31. Hazum, E.; Koch, Y.; Liscovitch, M.; Amsterdam, A. Intracellular pathways of receptor-bound GnRH agonist
in pituitary gonadotropes. Cell Tissue Res. 1985, 239, 3–8. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
32. Schvartz, I.; Hazum, E. Internalization and recycling of receptor-bound gonadotropin-releasing hormone
agonist in pituitary gonadotropes. J. Biol. Chem. 1987, 262, 17046–17050. [PubMed]
33. Da Silva, C.G.; Honeywell, R.J.; Dekker, H.; Peters, G.J. Physicochemical properties of novel protein kinase
inhibitors in relation to their substrate specificity for drug transporters. Expert Opin. Drug Metab. Toxicol.
2015, 11, 703–717. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
34. De Klerk, D.J.; Honeywell, R.J.; Jansen, G.; Peters, G.J. Transporter and Lysosomal Mediated (Multi)drug
Resistance to Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors and Potential Strategies to Overcome Resistance. Cancers 2018
10, 503. [CrossRef]
,
35. Zhong, Y.J.; Shao, L.H.; Li, Y. Cathepsin B-cleavable doxorubicin prodrugs for targeted cancer therapy
(Review). Int. J. Oncol. 2013, 42, 373–383. [CrossRef]
36. Avet, C.; Garrel, G.; Denoyelle, C.; Laverriere, J.N.; Counis, R.; Cohen-Tannoudji, J.; Simon, V. SET protein
interacts with intracellular domains of the gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor and differentially
regulates receptor signaling to cAMP and calcium in gonadotrope cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2013, 288, 2641–2654.
[CrossRef]
37. Brothers, S.P.; Janovick, J.A.; Conn, P.M. Calnexin regulated gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor
plasma membrane expression. J. Mol. Endocrinol 2006, 37, 479–488. [CrossRef]
38. Jardón-Valadez, E.; Aguilar-Rojas, A.; Maya-Núñez, G.; Leaños-Miranda, A.; Piñeiro, A.; Conn, P.M.;
Ulloa-Aguirre, A. Conformational effects of Lys191 in the human GnRH receptor: Mutagenesis and molecular
dynamics simulations studies. J. Endocrinol. 2009, 201, 297–307. [CrossRef]
39. Kelsey, R. Macropinocytosis for proliferation. Nat. Rev. Urol. 2018, 15, 336–337. [CrossRef]
40. Zhitomirsky, B.; Yunaev, A.; Kreiserman, R.; Kaplan, A.; Stark, M.; Assaraf, Y.G. Lysosomotropic drugs
activate TFEB via lysosomal membrane fluidization and consequent inhibition of mTORC1 activity. Cell
Death Dis. 2018, 90, 1191. [CrossRef]
41. Villamil Giraldo, A.M.; Appelqvist, H.; Ederth, T.; Ollinger, K. Lysosomotropic agents: Impact on lysosomal
membrane permeabilization and cell death. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2014, 42, 1460–1464. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 5590
23 of 23
42. Chen, H.-E.; Lin, J.-F.; Tsai, T.-F.; Lin, Y.-C.; Chou, K.-Y.; Hwang, T.I.S. Chloroquine induces lysosomal
membrane permeability mediated apoptotic cell death in bladder cancer cells. Collect. Urol. Sci. 2016, 27, S5.
[CrossRef]
43. Zhitomirsky, B.; Assaraf, Y.G. Lysosomal accumulation of anticancer drugs triggers lysosomal exocytosis.
Oncotarget 2017, 8, 45117–45132. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
44. Aits, S.; Kricker, J.; Liu, B.; Ellegaard, A.M.; Hamalisto, S.; Tvingsholm, S.; Corcelle-Termeau, E.; Hogh, S.;
Farkas, T.; Holm Jonassen, A.; et al. Sensitive detection of lysosomal membrane permeabilization by
lysosomal galectin puncta assay. Autophagy 2015, 11, 1408–1424. [CrossRef]
45. Schuster, S.; Biri-Kovacs, B.; Szeder, B.; Buday, L.; Gardi, J.; Szabo, Z.; Halmos, G.; Mezo, G. Enhanced In
Vitro Antitumor Activity of GnRH-III-Daunorubicin Bioconjugates Influenced by Sequence Modification.
Pharmaceutics 2018, 10, 223. [CrossRef]
46. Szabo, I.; Bosze, S.; Orban, E.; Sipos, E.; Halmos, G.; Kovacs, M.; Mezo, G. Comparative in vitro biological
evaluation of daunorubicin containing GnRH-I and GnRH-II conjugates developed for tumor targeting. J.
Pept. Sci. 2015, 21, 426–435. [CrossRef]
47. Zhou, L.; Lv, F.; Liu, L.; Wang, S. Polarity Conversion of Conjugated Polymer for Lysosome Escaping. ACS
Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 27427–27432. [CrossRef]
48. Towers, C.G.; Thorburn, A. Targeting the Lysosome for Cancer Therapy. Cancer Discov. 2017, 7, 1218–1220.
[CrossRef]
49. Domagala, A.; Fidyt, K.; Bobrowicz, M.; Stachura, J.; Szczygiel, K.; Firczuk, M. Typical and Atypical Inducers
of Lysosomal Cell Death: A Promising Anticancer Strategy. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 2256. [CrossRef]
50. Rahimipour, S.; Ben-Aroya, N.; Ziv, K.; Chen, A.; Fridkin, M.; Koch, Y. Receptor-mediated targeting of a
photosensitizer by its conjugation to gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogues. J. Med. Chem. 2003, 46,
3965–3974. [CrossRef]
51. Petho, L.; Muranyi, J.; Penzes, K.; Gurbi, B.; Brauswetter, D.; Halmos, G.; Csik, G.; Mezo, G. Suitability of
GnRH Receptors for Targeted Photodynamic Therapy in Head and Neck Cancers. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019
20, 5027. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
,
©
2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access
article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution
(CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).