(
)
K. Binnemans et al.rChemical Physics Letters 300 1999 509–514
511
Ž
.
50 mmol, 13.48 g , using a few drops of glacial
4. Mesomorphic properties: results and discussion
acetic acid as the catalyst. The Schiff base 4-oc-
tyloxy-N-octadecyl-2-hydroxybenzaldimine was pu-
rified by recrystallising three times from absolute
The ligand 4-octyloxy-N-octadecyl-2-hydroxyben-
zaldimine itself does not show mesomorphism, melt-
ing directly to an isotropic liquid at 508C. However,
all the rare-earth complexes exhibit a mesophase.
The mesophase was identified as a smectic A phase
by optical microscopy, using a hot stage and po-
larised light. The sample was placed between two
untreated cover glasses. By cooling from the isotropic
Ž
.
ethanol. The overall yield was 46% 11.60 g . The
ligand was characterised by NMR and IR spec-
troscopy. The rare earth complexes were prepared by
dissolving the Schiff base in absolute ethanol and
adding a solution of the hydrated rare-earth nitrate in
absolute ethanol. Although a complex is formed in a
1:3 metal:ligand ratio, we used an excess of the
hydrated rare-earth nitrate, in order to take the uncer-
tainty of the water content of these reagents into
account. For the calculations, it was assumed that the
melt batonnets form, which coalesce to form a fo-
ˆ
cal–conic fan structure. In the same sample extinct
regions were also observed, indicating homeotropic
alignment of the molecules. This supports the identi-
fication as the smectic A phase. The mesophases
show a high viscosity, which is evident if one tries to
shear the cover glasses at a temperature close above
the melting point. At higher temperatures the viscos-
ity gradually decreases, and a strong increase in
Ž
.
compounds were hexahydrates Y, La–Sm or pen-
Ž
.
tahydrates Eu–Lu . The dissolution of the Schiff
base can be assisted by heating the ethanolic solu-
tion, but reproducible results for the complexes could
only be obtained if the solution is cooled beneath
508C before the solution of the rare-earth salt is
added dropwise. About 15 min after mixing, the
solution turns cloudy and the complex starts to pre-
cipitate. Stirring was continued for at least 3 h. After
filtration, the complex was washed with ice-cold
ethanol and dried in vacuo. The yield of the com-
plexes varied between 70 and 80%. The complexes
were characterised by CHN elemental analysis. No
reproducible results could be obtained for the cerium
complex, probably because of a redox reaction due
fluidity is observed at the clearing point. When
y1
Ž
.
cooling the mesophase 58C min , no crystallisa-
tion is observed in the microscope and the texture of
the mesophase is frozen into the solid state. A glassy
mesophase is formed. The glass formation is noticed
from the fact that it is no longer possible to shear the
cover glasses between which the sample is sand-
wiched. Moreover, when cooling further, conchoidal
fractures are observed in the texture. These con-
choidal fractures also indicate the presence of a
glassy state. The glass state in the mesophase is
closer to the glassy state in polymers than the real
inorganic glasses. In contradistinction to inorganic
glasses which are optically isotropic, the vitreous
mesophase is an anisotropic glass. It should be noted
that by a glass, we mean a structural glass, and not a
spin glass. The DSC traces show crystallisation at a
cooling rate of 108C miny1, although a strong super-
cooling is observed. This difference in behaviour
between the microscopic and DSC observations do
not contradict each other, because we are studying a
thin film under the microscope, whereas a bulk
sample is used for the DSC measurements. The
glassy film is transparent at room temperature. When
the aluminium crucible is opened after the DSC
measurement, the sample is translucent, indicating its
polycrystalline state. No crystallisation of the thin
films was observed, not even after a day. Galyamet-
Ž
.
to Ce III,IV . Promethium was excluded from the
study, because this element is radioactive.
w
x
Although Galyametdinov et al. 10 proposed that
the empirical formula of this type of complexes is
w
Ž
.
xŽ
.
Ln LH L NO3 2 , we now have strong evidence
2
Ž
w
. Ž
.
xŽ
that the empirical formula is Ln LH NO3 3. It is
Ž 3
.
.
difficult to differentiate between Ln LH L NO3
P3H2O and Ln LH NO3 by CHN microanalysis
2
2
Ž
. Ž
.
3
3
1
only. However, the H NMR spectrum of the lan-
thanum complex shows that all the ligands are iden-
tical and that the OH-group of the ligand remains
protonated. Recently, a single crystal X-ray structure
Ž
of an analogous non-mesomorphic derivative LHs
Ž
.
.
w x
CH3OC6 H3 OH CHsNC4 H9 was obtained 14 .
The crystal structure shows that three coordinating
nitrate anions are present and that all three nitrates
are bound in a bidentate, chelating fashion. The
Schiff base ligands are bound through the phenol
oxygen.
w
x
dinov and coworkers 10 describe supercooling of