C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
Scheme 4
Scheme 6
reaction with benzaldehyde but also that the 1,3-anti diol 13 was
the major product with 8:1 diastereoselectivity (Scheme 4).
Although the fact that 12 is prepared as a 3:1 mixture of
diastereomers is a complicating feature of this silane design, this
experiment nevertheless demonstrates that the design of tandem
aldol-allylation reagents that give stereochemical flexibility is
possible.
to be competitive with an aldehyde for the attentions of reagent
14, it may reasonably be posited that such a sequestering mechanism
could become important in the design of a tandem aldol-aldol
reaction with aldehyde-derived dienolsilane reagents.
These successes with ketone-derived enolates within the strained
silacycle paradigm raised the possibility of a tandem aldol-aldol
reaction using a dienolsilane. While several groups have success-
fully and elegantly orchestrated one-pot sequential aldol reactions,7
and one group has reported tandem aldol-aldol reactions using
New tandem aldol-allylation reactions have been described,
employing enolsilanes derived from ketones, leading to the dia-
stereoselective synthesis of complex tertiary carbinols. In addition,
a new and highly efficient and diastereoselective tandem aldol-
aldol reaction has been described. These operationally simple
reactions provide remarkably efficient access to complex structures
with relevance to biologically important polyketide natural products.
Current efforts are focused on the development of enantioselective
and/or diastereoselective (using chiral aldehydes) variants of these
powerful reactions.
8
various metal dienolates, the scope of these reactions is quite
narrow and the development of a more general system remains an
elusive and enticing goal. Thus, to investigate the ability of our
silane system to participate in a smooth tandem aldol-aldol
reaction, we prepared dienolsilane 14 as outlined in Scheme 5. The
use of bicyclohexyl-1,1′-diol instead of pinacol was due to the
success of the former (and failure of the latter) in the reaction with
4
SiCl . With 14 in hand, the reactions with three aldehydes were
investigated. As shown, the reactions proceeded smoothly, deliver-
ing hemiketals 15a-c in high yields and with excellent diastereo-
selectivity. These efficient and selective reactions have potential
relevance to the synthesis of tetrahydropyrans, such as are found
in polyketide natural products.
Acknowledgment. This work was supported by a grant from
the National Institutes of Health (NIGMS GM58133). We gratefully
acknowledge research support from the Astellas USA Foundation,
Amgen, and Merck Research Laboratories.
Supporting Information Available: Experimental procedures,
characterization data, and stereochemical proofs. This material is
available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.
Scheme 5
References
(
1) Wang, X.; Meng, Q.; Nation, A. J.; Leighton, J. L J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2002, 124, 10672-10673.
(
(
(
2) Pettit, G. R. J. Nat. Prod. 1996, 59, 812-821.
3) Denmark, S. E.; Weber, E. J. HelV. Chim. Acta 1983, 66, 1655-1660.
4) (a) Sato, K.; Kira, M.; Sakurai, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 6429-
6
5
1
431. (b) Matsumoto, K.; Oshima, K.; Utimoto, K. J. Org. Chem. 1994,
9, 7152-7155. (c) Gewald, R.; Kira, M.; Sakurai, H. Synthesis 1996,
11-115. (d) Wang, Z.; Xu, G.; Wang, D.; Pierce, M. E.; Confalone, P.
N. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 4523-4526. (e) Aoyama, N.; Hamada,
T.; Manabe, K.; Kobayashi, S. Chem. Commun. 2003, 676-677.
(
5) Chemler, S. R.; Roush, W. R. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 1319-1333.
6) (a) Kabalka, G. W.; Narayana, C.; Reddy, N. K. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996,
(
3
7, 2181-2184. (b) Brzezinski, L. J.; Leahy, J. W. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998,
3
9, 2039-2042.
When the reaction of silane 14 with benzaldehyde was carried
out in benzene-d as solvent, the reaction could be monitored by
6
(7) (a) Gijsen, H. J. M.; Wong, C.-H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 7585-
7
9
591. (b) Yun, S.-S.; Suh, I.-H.; Choi, S.-S.; Lee, S. Chem. Lett. 1998,
85-986. (c) Casas, J.; Engqvist, M.; Ibrahem, I.; Kaynak, B.; C o´ rdova,
1
H NMR spectroscopy, and a set of signals grew in, consistent with
the expected structure 16 (Scheme 6). Over time, however, the
signals for 16 gave way to a new set of signals we have assigned
A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 1343-1345.
(
8) (a) Schmittel, M.; Ghorai, M. K.; Haeuseler, A.; Henn, W.; Koy, T.;
S o¨ llner, R. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 2007-2010. (b) Schmittel, M.;
Ghorai, M. K. Synlett 2001, 1992-1994. (c) Haeuseler, A.; Henn, W.;
Schmittel, M. Synthesis 2003, 2576-2589.
9
to structure 17. In principle, this rearrangement provides a built-
(
9) Rearrangement of the initially formed diol/diolate to the corresponding
hemiacetal/ketal appears to be a common feature in sequential/tandem
aldol-aldol reactions. See refs 7 and 8.
in sequestering mechanism for the carbonyl product of the tandem
aldol-aldol reaction (e.g., the ketone in 16), preventing it from
reacting with reagent 14. While ketone 16 would not be expected
JA053593S
J. AM. CHEM. SOC.
9
VOL. 127, NO. 37, 2005 12807