LETTER
Synthesis of Nitronyl Nitroxide Radicals
949
Table 1 Synthesis of Aromatic and Aliphatic NNRs 2 with TPAP/
NMO System
In conclusion, a reliable preparation of aromatic, heteroar-
omatic and aliphatic NNRs bringing also redox-sensitive
groups has been developed by means of the TPAP/NMO
system. This new procedure is competitive in term of gen-
erality, simplicity cost and eco-compatibility with the ox-
idation procedures known so far.
Entry R
Time (h) Producta Yield (%)b
1
3
1
2a15
2b3
2cc
81
79
49
MeOOC
2
3
O2N
Acknowledgment
Work carried out in the framework of the National Projects: ‘Pro-
gettazione ed auto-organizzazione di architetture molecolari per
nanomagneti e sistemi optoelettronici’, ‘Stereoselezione in Sintesi
Organica. Metodologie ed Applicazioni’ and FIRB 2001-
RBNE01YLKN, supported by the Ministero dell’Istruzione della
Università e della Ricerca (MIUR), Italy; EC QuEMolNa MRTN-
CT-2003-404880. A special thanks to Prof. Andrea Goti of the De-
partment of Organic Chemistry in Florence who inspired this work.
12
H2O3P
O
4
2.5
2d
87
MeO
MeO
5
6
1.5
2
2e
90
80
References and Notes
(1) Jérome, D.; Schulz, H. J. Adv. Phys. 2002, 51, 293.
(2) (a) Osiecki, J. H.; Ullman, E. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1968, 90,
1078. (b) Ullman, E. F.; Call, L.; Osiecki, J. H. J. Org.
Chem. 1970, 35, 3623. (c) Ullman, E. F.; Osiecki, J. H.;
Boocock, D. G. B.; Darcy, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1972, 94,
7049.
(3) Tamura, M.; Nakazawa, Y.; Shiomi, D.; Nozawa, K.;
Hosokoshi, Y.; Ishikawa, M.; Takahashi, M.; Kinoshita, M.
Chem. Phys. Lett. 1991, 186, 401.
2f16
O
7
8
1.5
1.5
2g
2h
64
60
MeS
MeS
(4) (a) Messina, P.; Mannini, M.; Sorace, L.; Rovati, D.;
Caneschi, A.; Gatteschi, D. IEEE Nanotechnol. 2004, 645.
(b) Matsushita, M. M.; Ozaki, N.; Sugawara, T.; Nakamura,
F.; Hara, M. Chem. Lett. 2002, 6, 596. (c) Fraxedas, J.;
Caro, J.; Santiso, J.; Figueras, A.; Gorostiza, P.; Sanz, F.
Phys. Status Solidi B 1999, 215, 859. (d) Ruan, L.; Bai, C.;
Wang, H.; Hu, Z.; Wan, M. J. Vac. Sci. Technol., B 1991, 9,
1134.
(5) Palacio, F.; Antorrena, G.; Castro, M.; Burriel, R.; Rawson,
J. M.; Smith, J. N. B.; Bricklebank, N.; Novoa, J.; Ritter, C.
Phys. Rev. Lett. 1997, 79, 2336.
(6) Caneschi, A.; Gatteschi, D.; Lalioti, N.; Sangregorio, C.;
Sessoli, R.; Venturi, G.; Vindigni, A.; Rettori, A.; Pini, M.
G.; Novak, M. A. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 1760.
(7) (a) Tretyakov, E. V.; Eltsov, I. V.; Fokin, S. V.; Shvedenkov,
Y. G.; Romanenko, G. V.; Ovcharenko, V. I. Polyhedron
2003, 22, 2499. (b) Ziessel, R.; El-Ghayoury, A. Synthesis
2000, 2137.
(8) (a) Fursova, E.; Romanenko, G.; Ikorskii, V.; Ovcharenko,
V. Polyhedron 2003, 22, 1857. (b) Harada, G.; Jin, T.;
Izuoka, A.; Matsushita, M. M.; Sugawara, T. Tetrahedron
Lett. 2003, 44, 4415. (c) Ionita, P.; Whitwood, A. C.;
Gilbert, B. C. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 2001, 1453.
(d) Kalai, T.; Jeko, J.; Szabo, Z.; Parkanyi, L.; Hideg, K.
Synthesis 1987, 1048. (e) Ziessel, R.; El-Ghayoury, A.
Synthesis 2000, 2137. (f) Kreilick, R. W.; Becher, J.;
Ullman, E. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1968, 81, 5121.
(9) (a) Wautelet, P.; Le Moigne, J.; Videva, V.; Turek, P. J. Org.
Chem. 2003, 68, 8025. (b) Bobko, A. A.; Bagryanskaya, E.
G.; Reznikov, V. A.; Kolosova, N. G.; Clanton, T. L.;
Khramtsov, V. V. Free Radical Biol. Med. 2004, 36, 248.
(10) (a) Forrester, A. R.; Henderson, J.; Hepburn, S. P. J. Chem.
Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1981, 1165. (b)Hiraoka, S.;Okamoto,
T.; Kozaki, M.; Shiomi, D.; Sato, K.; Takui, T.; Okada, K. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 58.
9
1.5
3.5
2i
2j
72
44
10
CH3–(CH2)13
–
11
1
2k
72
N
a All compounds gave satisfactory elemental analysis (C, H, N
0.4%). EPR signals: giso = 2.006, aiso = 7.59 0.1 G.
b Yields of a single run without optimization.
c Reaction carried out in methanol.
Operatively, after mixing of the reagents in CH2Cl2 at
room temperature the reactions were monitored by TLC
until complete consumption of dihydroxyimidazolidine
(1–12 h), the organic phase washed with water and evap-
orated to give the crude NNRs which were purified by sil-
ica gel column chromatography.14 Reagents and solvents
were used without any previous purification and any other
work up manipulations are required before chromatogra-
phy. Dichloromethane revealed to be the solvent of choice
for this procedure, however, derivative 1c, due to its poor
solubility in such solvent, was successfully oxidized to
NNR 2c in MeOH. In addition, to confirm the versatility
of this novel method, TPAP/NMO oxidation was effec-
tively used also in the case of derivatives 1h and 1i
without affecting the oxidation sensitive sulfide sulfur
functionality (i.e. no evidence of the corresponding sulf-
oxides or sulfones was pointed out in the crude reaction
mixture).
Synlett 2006, No. 6, 948–950 © Thieme Stuttgart · New York