Effect of Orn-Tau‚HCl on Saltiness of Food
J. Agric. Food Chem., Vol. 44, No. 9, 1996 2483
Ta ble 3. Sa ltin ess of Or n -Ta u ‚1.2HCl w ith Ad d ed Na Cl
combination
Orn-Tau‚1.2 HCl
NaCl
pH
saltiness
100 mM (2.40%)
60 mM (1.44%)
30 mM (0.72%)
15 mM (0.36%)
0 mM (0%)
0.0% (0 mM)
5.2
5.2
5.3
5.3
6.7
+5, contains weak sourness
0.063% (10.7 mM)
0.125% (21.4 mM)
0.375% (64.2 mM)
0.5% (85.6 mM)
+5, contains very weak sourness
+5
+5
+5
Ta ble 4. Weigh t P er cen ta ge of Sod iu m Ion s in Sa m p le
Solu tion s Con ta in in g Or n -Ta u ‚1.2HCl a n d Sod iu m
Ch lor id e
Ta ble 5. Sa ltin ess a n d Ta ste Qu a lity of Or n -Ta u ‚1.2HCl
a d d in g Low -Sod iu m -Ch lor id e-Con ta in in g Soy Sa u ce
saltinessb/taste qualityc
concna
Na+ contentsa
(% w/w)
ratio of Na+b
(%)
(mM)
A
B
C
D
Orn-Tau‚1.2 HCl
NaCl (%)
192.6
171.2
149.8
128.4
107.0
85.6
64.2
42.8
21.4
10.7
8/++
9/+++
9.5/+++
9/+++
8/+++
7/+++
6/+++
5/+++
4/+++
3/+++
2/+++
1/+++
10/+++
9/+++
8/+++
7/+++
6/+++
5/+++
4/+++
3/+++
2/+++
1/+++
100 mM (2.40%)
60 mM (1.44%)
30 mM (0.72%)
15 mM (0.36%)
0 mM (0%)
0.0
0
1.7
5.8
20.1
39.4
0
4.3
15
51
100
7.5/++
7/++
8.5/+++
7.5/+++
6.5/+++
5.5/+++
5/+++
0.063
0.125
0.375
0.5
6.5/++
5.5/++
5/++
4.5/++
3.5/++
2.5/++
1.5/++
a
Na+ contents ) Na+/(NaCl + Orn-Tau) × 100. The weight
4/+++
of Na+ in each sample solution was divided by the total weight of
3/+++
additives. Ratio of Na+ ) Na+ contents/39.4 × 100. Ratio of the
b
2/+++
weight percentage of Na+ in the sample solution compared with a
solution containing only 0.5% of NaCl.
1/+++
a
b
Total concentration of NaCl and Orn-Tau. A, the ratio of
Orn-Tau to the total concentration is 60%; B, 50%; C, 33% (mol/
c
(b) Preparation of Mixed Solutions of Orn-Tau‚1.2HCl and
NaCl. Mixed solutions listed in Table 3 were prepared by
adding NaCl to Orn-Tau‚1.2HCl solutions.
mol); D, commercial soy sauce. Taste quality of the samples was
evaluated on
a scale of +++ and ++: +++, equivalent to
reference commercial soy sauce in quality; ++, slightly inferior
to commercial one.
(c) Preparation of Contents-Modified Soy Sauce Samples
Containing Orn-Tau‚1.2HCl. We requested a soy sauce mate-
rial containing only 6.4% NaCl for Takeda Syokuryo Co., Ltd.
(Muramatu et al., 1990). We called this soy sauce “pre-soy
sauce”. Though the glutamate and ethanol contents of pre-
soy sauce were a little higher than those of the commercial
soy sauce, pre-soy sauce amended to 16% NaCl had the same
taste and flavor as the commercial one (Muramatu et al.,
1993). NaCl and Orn-Tau‚1.2HCl were added to pre-soy sauce
to prepare contents-modified soy sauce with three additive
ratios (60%, 50%, and 33% mol/mol). The sample containing
Orn-Tau‚1.2HCl with additive ratio 60% was prepared as
follows: Orn-Tau‚1.2HCl was added to pre-soy sauce (NaCl
concentration is 1.12 M), and the Orn-Tau‚1.2HCl concentra-
tion of the sample was adjusted to 1.65 M. In this sample,
the total concentration of Orn-Tau‚1.2HCl and NaCl was 2.77
M, which was the same as the NaCl concentration of com-
mercially available soy sauce. The sample with additive ratio
50% was prepared as follows: NaCl was added to pre-soy sauce
so that the NaCl concentration became 1.38 M. Orn-
Tau‚1.2HCl was then added, and the Orn-Tau‚1.2HCl concen-
tration of the sample was adjusted to 1.39 M. Total concen-
tration of the two was 2.77 M. The sample with additive ratio
33% was also prepared in a similar way and contained 1.85
M NaCl and 0.92 M Orn-Tau‚1.2HCl. To apply these contents-
modified soy sauces to the sensory test, total concentrations
of NaCl and Orn-Tau‚1.2HCl were adjusted to the concentra-
tions shown Table 5.
Sen sor y An a lysis. All samples were evaluated by a panel
of four or five people in terms of their characteristics and taste
strength. After rinsing the mouth, each person kept the
solution in his/her mouth for about 10 s to evaluate the
character and taste intensity of the sample. All panel mem-
bers gave the same evaluation for the taste characteristics,
while there were some personal variations in the taste strength
evaluation owing to personal and experimental conditions.
However, these personal deviations in the taste strength were
eliminated by tasting a standard NaCl solution and comparing
these results at the same time. The saltiness strength was
evaluated on a score of 0-10. Score 10 was judged to be
equivalent in salty taste to a reference 192.6 mM (1.125%)
NaCl. Score of from 9 to 1 indicated a descending degree of
saltiness, compared with the reference solution: score 9, 8, 7,
6, 5, 4, 3, and 2 meant that the saltiness of the sample solution
was the same as that of 171.2 mM (1.0%), 149.8 (0.875%), 128.4
mM (0.75%), 107.0 (0.625), 85.6 mM (0.50%), 64.2 mM (0.375),
42.8 mM (0.25%), and 21.4 mM (0.125%) NaCl, respectively;
score 1 was the saltiness of the threshold value of NaCl
(0.063%); score 0 indicated tastelessness or other tastes.
The quality of contents-modified soy sauce sample solutions
was evaluated. A sample solution was given a scale of +++
if the taste quality was judged equal to that of commercially
available soy sauce. Scale ++ indicates that the quality is a
little inferior to that of traditional soy sauce. The procedure
for the sensory analysis was described in our previous paper
(Ishibashi et al., 1987) in detail.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
New Con ven ien t Syn th esis of Or n -Ta u . A con-
ventional synthesis of Orn-Tau‚HCl is shown in Scheme
2. Even in 3 mmol scale, very careful techniques and
great cost were required to obtain such high yields.
Therefore, this method was not suitable for large scale
synthesis.
In the new method (Scheme 1), we could directly
couple Z-Orn(Z)-OH with H-Tau-OH by the WSC-HOBt
method (Konig et al., 1970). This coupling proceeded
readily in water without blocking the sulfonyl group and
side reactions did not occur. Subsequently, an aqueous
solution of Ba(OH)2‚8H2O was added to the reaction
mixture and Z-Orn(Z)-Tau-OH was selectively precipi-
tated as a barium salt [Z-Orn(Z)-Tau‚1/2Ba]. The pre-
cipitate washed several times with deionized water was
added to 1 N H2SO4(aq) (0.7 equiv of the starting
material) and then deblocked by hydrogenation. After
BaSO4 and the catalyst were removed, Ba2+ was com-
pletely precipitated as BaSO4 by adding 0.1 N H2SO4-
(aq). BaSO4 was filtrated off, and solid Orn-Tau was
obtained by lyophilization. Ba2+ was not detected in the
final product.
In this method, two problems in conventional syn-
thesis were solved and the following advantages for
large scale synthesis were found: All operations could
be performed in a water solvent system. Water is
superior to the other solvents from the point of safety,
cost, and easy control of the reaction condition by pH.